![]() |
8MM 2 straight to video release
Obviously it must not have Cage in it, but I thought I'd at least post this:
http://search.atomz.com/search/?sp-a...h.tpl&sp-q=8mm Columbia Tristar Home Entertainment has revealed early details on a straight to video sequel to 8MM, starring Nicolas Cage. The new film, cleverly titled 8MM 2, will be available to own from the the 22nd November this year, in seperate rated and unrated editions. Each should set you back around $24.96. I'm afraid we have no further details on this one at the moment, but we'll bring you the full spec rundown shortly. A repackaged Eight Millimeter will also be available to own from the 22nd November, priced at around $14.94, or thereabouts. We'll bring you further details on that one shortly too. Stay tuned. |
Awesome title. They should have gone with 16 mm. 8mm 2 sounds like a model number.
|
wow...... After this long.
|
I highly doubt I'll buy 8mm 2 but am I the only one who liked the first one? It seems like 8mm has a bad reputation.
|
In the press release it states "starring Nicolas Cage" but there is no listing for it on IMDB (not that they're never wrong). My first thought was they should have called it 16mm, as well.
|
why why why why
|
Originally Posted by T.Bickle
I highly doubt I'll buy 8mm 2 but am I the only one who liked the first one? It seems like 8mm has a bad reputation.
|
They should have called it 70mm, and released it in IMAX.
|
Originally Posted by critterdvd
why why why why
7 years after it's release, poor reviews and mediocre box-office, none of the original stars or crew...was there really any point, at all? |
Originally Posted by Bobbin
Honestly.
7 years after it's release, poor reviews and mediocre box-office, none of the original stars or crew...was there really any point, at all? |
Originally Posted by T.Bickle
I highly doubt I'll buy 8mm 2 but am I the only one who liked the first one? It seems like 8mm has a bad reputation.
Andrew Kevin Walker walked away from the film (no pun intended), and I'd love to know if his original ideas were any better. As it stands, I'd much rather watch Schader's Hardcore, which rings much more true and doesn't insult the audience (although perhaps it loses some points for the ending). DJ |
i saw an ad for single white female 2 the other day
|
The sequel stars Johnathon Schaech and Bruce Davison.
|
Originally Posted by whotony
i saw an ad for single white female 2 the other day
Single White Female 2 Road House 2 Like Mike 2 The Last Seduction 2 Cruel Intentions 3 The Skulls 3 Species 3 Mimic 3 Iron Eagle 4 The Prophecy 4 and 5 Police Academy 7 Hellraiser 8 If there's a market for A LOT of straight-to-video sequels of Van Damme movies, I guess there's a market for this too. When are Dolph Lundgren and Brian Bosworth gonna team up for Se7en 2? |
Originally Posted by Legolas
If there's a market for A LOT of straight-to-video sequels of Van Damme movies, I guess there's a market for this too. When are Dolph Lundgren and Brian Bosworth gonna team up for Se7en 2?
|
Sony continues the trend of making sequels no one wanted to movies that weren't popular in the first place: Baby Geniuses 2, 8mm 2, Anacondas, Hollow Man 2, Cruel Intentions 2 and 3, Urban Legend: Bloody Mary, and the list goes on and on...
It seems like they are the worst studio for useless sequels, and now they have the MGM library to toy around with. |
Originally Posted by djtoell
It has a bad reputation with me, at least, because I found it to be a very childish film. The depiction of a snuff film industry that is just a step away from your local porn shop or of S&M as a giant leap down the road to murder are silly anti-masculine fantasies. It's hard to redeem a film when it starts from such a trite, patronizing, and insulting hypothesis.
Andrew Kevin Walker walked away from the film (no pun intended), and I'd love to know if his original ideas were any better. As it stands, I'd much rather watch Schader's Hardcore, which rings much more true and doesn't insult the audience (although perhaps it loses some points for the ending). DJ |
Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
I agree that the film wasn't that great. But I disagree that the film made it easy to obtain snuff film. That was pretty much the entire plot of the film.
DJ |
Well, great. Now I just need The Babysitter 2, Coyote Ugly 2 and Cruising 2 and I can actually live in hell full time.
|
Originally Posted by phraseturner
Se7en 2? Would that be 9, 14 or 49?
Trois 2: Pandora's Box What kind of idiot named a movie that? I guarantee you that it never even occurred to the bozo that "trois" means "3". |
Originally Posted by djtoell
That's all 8mm says it takes.
Also, love 8mm, wouldn't touch 8mm2. |
This movie can only be good if it's an actual snuff film.
|
Originally Posted by j_sutton
I dunno about that one...because something happens in a movie, they're telling you that life is really like that? If so, the producers of Pretty Woman owe me a lot of money that I blew on hookers trying to find the clean hot one with a heart of gold.
DJ |
Originally Posted by Rockmjd23
This movie can only be good if it's an actual snuff film.
WTF? I guess Nic Cage REALLY needed the money then! |
Originally Posted by NitroJMS
Sony continues the trend of making sequels no one wanted to movies that weren't popular in the first place: Baby Geniuses 2, 8mm 2, Anacondas, Hollow Man 2, Cruel Intentions 2 and 3, Urban Legend: Bloody Mary, and the list goes on and on...
It seems like they are the worst studio for useless sequels, and now they have the MGM library to toy around with. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.