DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   DVD Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/dvd-talk-3/)
-   -   About anamorphic... (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/dvd-talk/381650-about-anamorphic.html)

natevines 08-23-04 11:46 PM

About anamorphic...
 
Would ANY difference be discernable on a standard TV?
Is picture quality at all better if it's anamorphic? Thanks.

Randy Miller III 08-23-04 11:55 PM

On a standard TV without a 16:9 enhancement feature, I don't think there's any discernable difference in quality (at least from my experience). If, however, your standard TV has 16:9 enhancement (Sony WEGA, etc), you'll definitely see an improvement. Still, it's a good idea to "plan ahead" by making sure your collection is anamorphic, as widescreen and enhanced standard TVs will be the norm before you know it.

DonnachaOne 08-24-04 04:03 AM

The Anamorphic feature doesn't add much, but since a lot of films undergo a remaster or cleanup before anamorphic encoding, it's often the better choice. A lot of the non-anamorphic transfers are bad transfers or LD ports, both of which are outclassed by modern technology's anamorphic capabilities.

eedoon 08-24-04 06:57 AM

What they said. Also it looks a lot better if you watch your movie on a PC like me.

Brian McHale 08-24-04 01:36 PM

I thought I read somewhere that you actually lose a little resolution watching an anamorphic DVD on a 4x3 set (unless the set does the 16x9 squeeze). There certainly will be no inherent advantage on a 4x3 set that does not do the 16x9 squeeze. The advantage is that you'll probably get a 16x9 set someday and want anamorphic discs.

otmetrud 08-24-04 03:04 PM


Originally posted by Brian McHale
The advantage is that you'll probably get a 16x9 set someday and want anamorphic discs.
What he said. I have about a half-dozen widescreen movies that are not anamorphic (including "Once More With Feeling" on Buffy S6). Never mattered to me on my 32" set. But I can't make myself watch them now on my 57" Sony HD set. I tried zooming them to fill the screen, but that doesn't look very good at all.

DigIt 08-24-04 03:30 PM


Originally posted by Brian McHale
I thought I read somewhere that you actually lose a little resolution watching an anamorphic DVD on a 4x3 set (unless the set does the 16x9 squeeze).
Your DVD player has to convert the 16:9 content to fit your 4:3 screen, and this conversion can introduce slight defects in the picture, but it's not even worth worrying about.

Mike Lowrey 08-24-04 04:10 PM


Originally posted by Brian McHale
I thought I read somewhere that you actually lose a little resolution watching an anamorphic DVD on a 4x3 set (unless the set does the 16x9 squeeze).
Well now there may be some truth to that. We have a 32" and 36" Sony WEGA, both with of course, 16:9 Enhanced Modes. Now before I realized what that was for, (VERY quite early on in the ownership of the TVs), I think I may have watched a few DVDs in 4:3 Widescreen mode. But since discovering 16:9 Enhanced Mode, I have kept my player on 16:9 mode ever since.

But what does that have to do with the question at hand? Well, since then, I have reverted back to 4:3 WS mode just to check the difference with anamorphic discs and non-anamorphic discs. It seems that non-anamorphic discs look just as good if not better than anamorphic discs in any mode, while anamorphic discs don't look as good in 4:3 mode as they do in 16:9 mode. It's almost as if you can actually see the missing resolution when viewing an anamorphic disc in 4:3 mode.



But anyway, as a rule of thumb, ALWAYS buy anamorphic discs when possible. In fact, my collection would be quite a bit bigger, but I refuse to buy non-anamorphic discs of movies that I'd really like to have.

In the near future, and even now as we speak, most new TVs, whether 16:9 TVs or standard 4:3 TVs, have either 16:9 mode or what they call "cinematic" mode.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.