![]() |
Re: Worst DVD covers
What I really want to know is what's holding companies up from using the original poster art for DVD/Blu Ray covers?
|
Re: Worst DVD covers
Originally Posted by calhoun07
(Post 10539418)
What I really want to know is what's holding companies up from using the original poster art for DVD/Blu Ray covers?
|
Re: Worst DVD covers
I really doubt that any artist was or is keeping any royalties or copyright over movie posters. Criterion and a couple other studios use them on occasion but I think the thinking these days tends to be that consumers want 'contemporary' even for old movies. What gets me is why they don't put cover/poster galleries on the disc - surely that must be the easiest/cheapest and smallest-disc size special feature they could make.
Anyways, here's my nomination for worst cover http://img.amazon.ca/images/I/515dwNzQgkL.jpg |
Re: Worst DVD covers
One reason may be that studios seem very worried about the "visibility" of their movies. What works on a 24-inch poster may not work as well on a 7-inch DVD case. They want you to be able to grasp 1) the title and 2) who's in it from a few feet away. Only when the image itself has become iconic do I see studios retaining poster artwork.
The other reason studios change poster artwork is that new artwork constitutes enough of a reason to consider an old DVD a new "edition" and thus get stores to re-order stock. With catalog titles, stores will often order one batch of stock and then never order another, but if they change the cover every few months it will look like new product and might get re-ordered. |
Re: Worst DVD covers
|
Re: Worst DVD covers
|
Re: Worst DVD covers
|
Re: Worst DVD covers
Originally Posted by calhoun07
(Post 10538051)
While not as iconic as the aforementioned movie...I hated this cover because it revealed a pretty big spoiler to anybody who never saw the movie. (Hancock.)
Spoiler:
|
Re: Worst DVD covers
Originally Posted by Xiroteus
(Post 10539608)
I saw it in the theater, I could not believe they did that, really? good going there, I hate when covers give away too many plot points or the menus, it is possible we have NOT seen this yet.
|
Re: Worst DVD covers
Originally Posted by MrSmearkase
(Post 10539614)
Good point :up: I hate the animated menus that you cannot skip through that proceed to show you beats from the movie you are about to watch.
/offtopic |
Re: Worst DVD covers
Originally Posted by dogmatica
(Post 10539517)
I think the worst offender of this (and there may be others...this is just the first one I think of) is Wet Hot American Summer. When the movie came out the biggest names in it were that brother from Frasier and Janine Garoffolo? Yeah, not exactly big name stars. But the other people in it are a who's who of comedy movies today. So the inevitable re-release with the new floating head cover came out to focus on these bigger name stars. http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/617HSfIBCTL.jpg The original cover is MUCH better...in line with classic artwork for movies like American Graffiti and Animal House. WHAS isn't as iconic as those movies, of course, so they can screw around with the cover art and get away with it, I suppose. http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA300_.jpg |
Re: Worst DVD covers
|
Re: Worst DVD covers
love the movie and the anchor bay cover is good but this is just awful
http://content7.flixster.com/photo/1...965677_gal.jpg |
Re: Worst DVD covers
Originally Posted by Chicken Warrior
(Post 10539453)
http://www.coverbrowser.com/image/be...006/1629-1.jpg |
Re: Worst DVD covers
Originally Posted by calhoun07
(Post 10539724)
I think the worst offender of this (and there may be others...this is just the first one I think of) is Wet Hot American Summer. When the movie came out the biggest names in it were that brother from Frasier and Janine Garoffolo? Yeah, not exactly big name stars. But the other people in it are a who's who of comedy movies today. So the inevitable re-release with the new floating head cover came out to focus on these bigger name stars.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/617HSfIBCTL.jpg The original cover is MUCH better...in line with classic artwork for movies like American Graffiti and Animal House. WHAS isn't as iconic as those movies, of course, so they can screw around with the cover art and get away with it, I suppose. http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA300_.jpg |
Re: Worst DVD covers
Originally Posted by majorjoe23
(Post 10539909)
I do not agree with this selection.
|
Re: Worst DVD covers
I agree, except that the title is hard to read.
|
Re: Worst DVD covers
Here's a previous thread on this topic:
What DVD has the worse cover art? http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA300_.jpg |
Re: Worst DVD covers
Originally Posted by TomOpus
(Post 10537254)
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA300_.jpg
I think we've done this type of thread before... but Merry Christmas :) |
Re: Worst DVD covers
Originally Posted by Perkinsun Dzees
(Post 10540503)
|
Re: Worst DVD covers
Originally Posted by Perkinsun Dzees
(Post 10540492)
Here's a previous thread on this topic:
What DVD has the worse cover art? http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA300_.jpg |
Re: Worst DVD covers
http://cdn3a.dvdempire.org/products/74/623974h.jpg
Sure, the girl is hot, but... 1. she's not in the movie 2. what's with the glowing, possessed eyes? 3. what's with the castle? |
Re: Worst DVD covers
Originally Posted by TimeandTide
(Post 10539286)
Not "terrible" I guess because the cover does feature a smokin' hot Yunjin Kim (of Lost fame), but it's incredibly misleading as there isn't an ounce of skin or sexiness in this straight-up action film. (I enjoyed regardless.)
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a3.../shiri-dvd.jpg http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wnP6VzbSyP...%2B%2B2002.jpg assuming thats the psychologist, she never holds a gun and never wears that outfit in that movie at all |
Re: Worst DVD covers
one I always disliked...why did they chose the dog?!!
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA300_.jpg |
Re: Worst DVD covers
Originally Posted by droidguy1119
(Post 10541074)
This is absolutely one of my least-favorite cover artworks of all time. The color of Murray's skin in the background photo mixed with the hand (certainly not his) holding the clock makes him look like a bizarro wax zombie. The fact that he's also on the clock is stupid (how being the hands of a clock conveys being trapped in a day better than being literally trapped inside the clock face is beyond me). And, just as icing on the cake, the cover art commits one of my major pet peeves, which is positioning the actors under the wrong names. When they released this edition on Blu-Ray I was really hoping they'd revert to the classic art, where Bill's trapped in the clock, but no dice.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.