Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Archives > Archives > DVD Talk Archive
Reload this Page >

Bad Boys II Package Mis-Print or Contractual Obligation?

Community
Search

Bad Boys II Package Mis-Print or Contractual Obligation?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-03, 01:05 AM
  #1  
Suspended
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Back Of The Book
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bad Boys II Package Mis-Print or Contractual Obligation?

I picked up Bad Boys II today and noticed on the front of the cover it says A Don Simpson/Jerry Bruckheimer Production. Ths struck me as odd because isn't Don Simpson Dead? I thought he died under mysterious cricumstances about 5+ years ago.
So is this just a mis-print at Columbia or was it a contract that if a sequel was made that Don Simpson got Co-Producer credit?
Vic Venom is offline  
Old 12-28-03, 01:08 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is not a mistake. Don Simpson and Jerry Bruckheimer made Bad Boys (the first one) together, so the only fitting thing was to have the sequel, as well, from them. It's a fitting tribute in my mind, especially considering I never thought I'd see the Don Simpson/ Jerry Brucheimer logo again in the theater. So no, it is not a misprint but it looks like something that was done in very good taste.
dcprules is offline  
Old 12-28-03, 03:32 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup, I think this was more like in honor of Don Simpson. You'll notice they also kept the billing order the same, with Martin Lawrence getting top billing and Will Smith second. Granted, in any other flick that would never happen...Will Smith is the bigger star.
jaeufraser is offline  
Old 12-28-03, 03:46 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Astoria, NY, USA
Posts: 3,333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I believe Don Simpson/Jerry Bruckheimer Films is a business entity that still exists. Since that company produced the first film, it probably owned sequel production rights, as well. That Bruckheimer chose to use that production company name instead of transferring the sequel rights to another company (such as Jerry Bruckheimer Films) was probably as a tribute, as the previous posters suggest.

DJ
djtoell is offline  
Old 12-28-03, 06:28 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Sweden
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they wanted to keep everything consistent, why did they change the aspect ratio?
Yocke is offline  
Old 12-28-03, 09:52 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, it really annoys me when one movie is matted and the other scope. Also, huge differences in length are kinda annoying too. But not as bad as aspect ratios. Grrr.

K
Cornelius1047 is offline  
Old 12-28-03, 02:31 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,208
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Off hand I can't think of them, but I know I've seen the Don Simpson/Jerry Bruckheimer Films name on a few movies in recent time...
mikewendt is offline  
Old 12-28-03, 03:19 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Sunny Hawaii
Posts: 8,124
Received 450 Likes on 308 Posts
Originally posted by mikewendt
Off hand I can't think of them, but I know I've seen the Don Simpson/Jerry Bruckheimer Films name on a few movies in recent time...
Nope, nothing since he died, except Bad Boys II, which, as others have mentioned, is probably due to contractrual/ownership issues.

http://us.imdb.com/List?production-c...lms%20%5Bus%5D
TheBang is offline  
Old 12-28-03, 04:15 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Troy Stiffler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Under an I-10 Overpass
Posts: 25,819
Received 366 Likes on 266 Posts
Originally posted by Yocke
If they wanted to keep everything consistent, why did they change the aspect ratio?
Probably because Michael Bay's style has become a little different over the years.

Also, is it possible that it has something to do with the budget? If I remember correctly, Bad Boys was made for approximately 20 million. Bad Boys II was made for approximately 120 million.
Troy Stiffler is offline  
Old 12-28-03, 04:49 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its not a mistake..
jayson1017 is offline  
Old 12-29-03, 01:43 AM
  #11  
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Rogue588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WAS looking for My Own Private Stuckeyville, but stuck in Liberty City (while missing Vice City)
Posts: 15,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I caught this when I saw the flick in the theatres..

glad to see I wasn't the only movie geek that did
Rogue588 is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.