Why do opening credits often look unrestored?
#1
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why do opening credits often look unrestored?
i'm sure this question has been asked a million times.. but often when i'm watching an older film (most recently it was Little Big Man) the image during the opening credits look completely untouched by any restoration.. like shimmering, grain, etc. but once they are over the picture looks so much better.. why is this? they can't restore the picture when there are credits present or what's the reason? you'd think with all the modern digital tools they have today that they could restore around the text or whatever the problem is..
#2
I'm not sure of the exact answer. But on films, any shot with a title superimposed on it would be an optical effect. Which means that shot was already a second generation dupe of the original negative.
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've noticed problems with the frames not being locked in the credits, so the text tends to jump around a lot.
I've noticed this mostly with just about every Criterion release. I don't know what it is. I meant to log in to the HTF chat with them on Monday and ask about it, but I forgot about the chat.
I've noticed this mostly with just about every Criterion release. I don't know what it is. I meant to log in to the HTF chat with them on Monday and ask about it, but I forgot about the chat.
#5
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA, DVD Region 1
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been noticing artifacts (not DVD type but film type) of dust and such on a few restored DVD's I've rented. Maybe the opening and closing titles are difficult to do because the restorers don't have the 'clean' plate to work with before the titles were on? Maybe, maybe not. Any views and opinions on this? I hope I could be of some help.
Last edited by RaynMan2019; 02-20-04 at 01:29 AM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Normally the credits are at the ends of the actual film, so when the reels are handles these parts recieve the most wear. If a film has been professonally restored, the restoration should include the credits as well.
#7
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
As Crocker Jarmen mentions, credits are often done via opticals. I believe optically-processed film degrades at a faster rate. Also, due to the later-generational nature of optical effects, any defects in the process become a permanent part of the film. That is, if the film elements used to create the optical effect were dirty and grainy, the resultant effect will be permanently dirty and grainy. This dirt and grain actually becomes a part of the negative, so even a pristine negative will show it. You can see this all the time in optical effects in all parts of many films (e.g., dissolves), not just in their credits. Short of somehow finding the various elements and recompositing the optical effect, however, it isn't possible to find anything that would look "better." If the original look of the optical was dirty and grainy, there is little that can be done to rectify this. Nothing can really be done to make it look like the rest of the film.
DJ
DJ
#8
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA, DVD Region 1
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by djtoell
As Crocker Jarmen mentions, credits are often done via opticals. I believe optically-processed film degrades at a faster rate. Also, due to the later-generational nature of optical effects, any defects in the process become a permanent part of the film. That is, if the film elements used to create the optical effect were dirty and grainy, the resultant effect will be permanently dirty and grainy. This dirt and grain actually becomes a part of the negative, so even a pristine negative will show it. You can see this all the time in optical effects in all parts of many films (e.g., dissolves), not just in their credits. Short of somehow finding the various elements and recompositing the optical effect, however, it isn't possible to find anything that would look "better." If the original look of the optical was dirty and grainy, there is little that can be done to rectify this. Nothing can really be done to make it look like the rest of the film.
DJ
As Crocker Jarmen mentions, credits are often done via opticals. I believe optically-processed film degrades at a faster rate. Also, due to the later-generational nature of optical effects, any defects in the process become a permanent part of the film. That is, if the film elements used to create the optical effect were dirty and grainy, the resultant effect will be permanently dirty and grainy. This dirt and grain actually becomes a part of the negative, so even a pristine negative will show it. You can see this all the time in optical effects in all parts of many films (e.g., dissolves), not just in their credits. Short of somehow finding the various elements and recompositing the optical effect, however, it isn't possible to find anything that would look "better." If the original look of the optical was dirty and grainy, there is little that can be done to rectify this. Nothing can really be done to make it look like the rest of the film.
DJ
BUT, my process would probably involve some form of digital restoration method. Any positive or negative side-affects this 'method' could have for the restoration process?
#9
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Originally posted by RaynMan2019
Wouldn't it also be possible to take the original background plate which the titles were to be opticed over to get a clean print?
Wouldn't it also be possible to take the original background plate which the titles were to be opticed over to get a clean print?
I mentioned this option in my post: recompositing the optical.
Any positive or negative side-affects this 'method' could have for the restoration process?
DJ
#10
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA, DVD Region 1
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DJ,
I get what you're saying. Let me see if I could put it the way I understand it. It'll be more feasible for the restorers if the film they were working on was a more 'current' film? That way, the more 'current' film has probably more resources to contribute towards this process. This would more likely happen if the director wants to re-optic the titles and fund his own money for this extra restoration time.
It'd also have to do with matchups and everything. I've even noticed some slight dust particles and the such during the titles for the entire Indiana Jones WIDESCREEN trilogy, but the rest of the film is ok.
I guess if the restorers would want to take the time fiddling around with the opening and closing credits, (I would assume this process also has to do with the occasional location and such titles which pop up every now and then for the movie), would be some really time consuming work.
In the long run, I guess the restorers would fairly much have to deal with the rest of the film.
Ray
I get what you're saying. Let me see if I could put it the way I understand it. It'll be more feasible for the restorers if the film they were working on was a more 'current' film? That way, the more 'current' film has probably more resources to contribute towards this process. This would more likely happen if the director wants to re-optic the titles and fund his own money for this extra restoration time.
It'd also have to do with matchups and everything. I've even noticed some slight dust particles and the such during the titles for the entire Indiana Jones WIDESCREEN trilogy, but the rest of the film is ok.
I guess if the restorers would want to take the time fiddling around with the opening and closing credits, (I would assume this process also has to do with the occasional location and such titles which pop up every now and then for the movie), would be some really time consuming work.
In the long run, I guess the restorers would fairly much have to deal with the rest of the film.
Ray
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by gfoots
Normally the credits are at the ends of the actual film, so when the reels are handles these parts recieve the most wear. If a film has been professonally restored, the restoration should include the credits as well.
Normally the credits are at the ends of the actual film, so when the reels are handles these parts recieve the most wear. If a film has been professonally restored, the restoration should include the credits as well.
Anyway, the thread subject is specifically asking about opening credits.
#13
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by djtoell
You can see this all the time in optical effects in all parts of many films (e.g., dissolves), not just in their credits.
You can see this all the time in optical effects in all parts of many films (e.g., dissolves), not just in their credits.
thanks everyone who replied!
#14
DVD Talk Gold Edition
I saw the restored "The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly" in a theater recently ... it has scenes with very obvious optical work where "the good" is printed over a short scene of Clint Eastwood, and other shots with "the bad" and "the ugly" over the other main characters ... not the beginning credits, but well within the film. These shots looked much more "dupey" with different color levels, less sharpness, lots of scratches, dirt, etc. Since this was not at the beginning I guess it was because of the optical work that had to be done, but it certainly looked pretty bad.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Grizzly
oh yeah, that too. i forgot about that.. i've seen some DVDs that had some really terrible dissolves.. the picture is really awesome and then it just very different (and worse) a few seconds before the dissolve.
oh yeah, that too. i forgot about that.. i've seen some DVDs that had some really terrible dissolves.. the picture is really awesome and then it just very different (and worse) a few seconds before the dissolve.
#16
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hail to the Redskins!
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes
on
38 Posts
Something interesting to note is that on the My Fair Lady SE, they actually showed them fixing a frame in the opening credits. The compression level may be higher in the credits to allow for lower during the main feature.