I know there was a website that showed the difference between the altered and unaltered scenes. Anyone have a link to that site/article?

Check out the comparisons on DVD Beaver (which for those who don't know is a great DVD comparison site, and absolutely NOT a porn site, despite the name, and the fact that in this lonely instance, there's some adult content):
http://www.celtoslavica.de/chiaroscu...iche/eyes.html

There are other sites that have some still shots, but the DVD-B comparison makes clear how much the digital characters have affected the image quality. Warners should be absolutely ashamed of itself.

Kwaheri.

Weren't the digital characters added to the FILM, so it shouldn't have affected the DVD?

thanks for the link - that's an impressive site.

The R1 is the R-rated digitally altered version, where EVERY OTHER REGION is the unaltered version.

I have the R3 which is the most complete "vision" Kubrick had for the film

Could this poster possibly be less enticing?

From DVDBeaver

Bizarre. What country is that poster from?
Also is that R3 edition available anymore?

Are those ass cheeks or what?

ewww, that looks like a really bad fanboy poster (who has yet to learn Photoshop properly).

More proof that many of the people who design posters and dvd packaging should maybe look for employment in another field.