First Indiana Jones Trilogy review?
#1
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First Indiana Jones Trilogy review?
I was just wondering who is going to have the first full review of the trilogy.
I really must be close. Usually some DVD website get their hands on them, several weeks before us consumer are able to buy them in the store.
Does anyone have a guess who will be the first one out with a review?
I really must be close. Usually some DVD website get their hands on them, several weeks before us consumer are able to buy them in the store.
Does anyone have a guess who will be the first one out with a review?
#2
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Paramount has a rule that you can't post a review until a certain number of days before release date. I think I read that reviews would start popping up Oct 10th at the earliest.
DVDFile seems pretty good with getting their reviews done quick, though they usually come with a slew of errors.
The BBC already has up a "review" but it's not very in-depth.
DVDFile seems pretty good with getting their reviews done quick, though they usually come with a slew of errors.
The BBC already has up a "review" but it's not very in-depth.
#3
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: on a river in a kayak..where else?
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
if I really need a write-up about it....I'll wait until about 5 or more talk members start rappin' about it. then you can ask questions. I would say the Digital Bits/Home Theater Forum will have it as soon as anybody.
#4
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Thoradin
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The BBC did a review but this might be the R2:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2003/09/1...d_review.shtml
http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2003/09/1...d_review.shtml
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by gutwrencher
if I really need a write-up about it....I'll wait until about 5 or more talk members start rappin' about it...
if I really need a write-up about it....I'll wait until about 5 or more talk members start rappin' about it...
Did you say RAP?!!!! My god I wish all rappers would die and anot-wait, what's that you say? It's not another repetitive thread about how much everyone hates hip hop? Sorry, carry on.
DO NOT
#7
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Rizor
DVDFile seems pretty good with getting their reviews done quick, though they usually come with a slew of errors.
DVDFile seems pretty good with getting their reviews done quick, though they usually come with a slew of errors.
Just curious.
#8
DVD Talk Reviewer
I don't tend to read DVD reviews that much, not that I'm worried it will 'spoil' anything. I like to see the initial 'this is what will be officially on the dvd' when that's announced, and that's it. I just figure, I'm going to have the set, it's something I've wanted for a long time, and anything on any review would make me reconsider buying it I'll have a great preview of the set when I buy it the morning it comes out and start going on adventures with Indy
#9
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i asked at the recent IGN DVD/Digital Bits chat just the other day and they said there'd be some big promo thing on the 11th, and that they'd most likely have reviews up on monday the 13th.
#10
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Thoradin
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by DavidH
Re: BBC Review: Anyone who didn't see the Indy DVDs could have writen a review like that. It couldn't have been more vague.
Re: BBC Review: Anyone who didn't see the Indy DVDs could have writen a review like that. It couldn't have been more vague.
#12
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RussG
What kind of errors are in their reviews? Either I've never noticed or am too ignorant (gasp!) to recognize any.
Just curious.
What kind of errors are in their reviews? Either I've never noticed or am too ignorant (gasp!) to recognize any.
Just curious.
#13
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by Rizor
Maybe not a slew as I stated, but they're pretty common. Generally things like wrong disc info. I remember they had a decent sized paragraph on SW Episode II not having English subtitles on the movie only to remove that statement later. Sometimes the running times of extras are wrong like saying there's 25 minutes of deleted scenes on Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone when there's under ten. And they'll occasionally get some movie facts wrong like they said James Horner scored LOTR and Howard Shore scored X2. But most of the biggies get edited later in the day/week.
Maybe not a slew as I stated, but they're pretty common. Generally things like wrong disc info. I remember they had a decent sized paragraph on SW Episode II not having English subtitles on the movie only to remove that statement later. Sometimes the running times of extras are wrong like saying there's 25 minutes of deleted scenes on Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone when there's under ten. And they'll occasionally get some movie facts wrong like they said James Horner scored LOTR and Howard Shore scored X2. But most of the biggies get edited later in the day/week.
Back to the original topic, Paramount has a moratorium on DVD reviews appearing more than 10 days before street date.
Last edited by Josh Z; 10-04-03 at 10:00 AM.
#14
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Originally posted by Josh Z
There are currently 7 writers doing reviews for DVDFile. If you take a look at all of the reviews you've just mentioned, you'll notice that they are all by the same person.
There are currently 7 writers doing reviews for DVDFile. If you take a look at all of the reviews you've just mentioned, you'll notice that they are all by the same person.
#15
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Josh Z
There are currently 7 writers doing reviews for DVDFile. If you take a look at all of the reviews you've just mentioned, you'll notice that they are all by the same person.
There are currently 7 writers doing reviews for DVDFile. If you take a look at all of the reviews you've just mentioned, you'll notice that they are all by the same person.
#16
DVD Talk Legend
I'm currently working on a review now...not for DVD Talk though, but for DVD Empire.
Not sure when the review will be posted, but for those interested, here are some specs about the DVD set:
Each movie comes on it's own disc in Anamorphic Widescreen and 5.1 sound. Other than a language and subtitle option, a chapter selection and a link to the Indiana Jones website, no other extras appear on these 3 DVDs.
The picture looks fantastic...and I don't think I've ever seen Raiders look so sharp and full of color before. Those lamenting the absence of DTS will hardly notice...the 5.1 soundtrack is VERY aggressive and sounds great.
On the fourth bonus DVD you get the following:
"Making The Trilogy", which covers all three movies and can be viewed in three seperate parts or all at once. Total running time on this is 127 minutes, and it's the best behind the scenes you'll find on any DVD out there...combining both footage from the shoots and brand new interview material with Speilberg, Lucas, Ford, and most of the cast members of each film. You'll also get to see bits of Tom Selleck's and Tim Matheson's screen tests with Karen Black in this featurette, as well as some great stories from each shoot (including how Harrison seriously hurt his back on "Temple of Doom").
There's a "Featurettes" section with the following four featurettes:
"The Stunts of Indiana Jones" - 11 Minutes
"The Sound of Indiana Jones" - 13 Minutes
"The Music of Indiana Jones" - 12 Minutes
"The Light and Magic of Indiana Jones" - 12 Minutes
The titles of these are pretty self-explanatory, and are presented in the same style as the "Making of the Trilogy", with both old footage and brand-new interview material.
The sound on all of the above is only 2.0 Dolby.
Then, there's a Trailers section, with some of the trailers being in 2.0 and others in 5.1. The theatrical trailers for Raiders and Temple are in 5.1, but Crusade is only in 2.0 for some reason. I believe all the other trailers are 2.0.
Here's a list of the trailers:
Raiders of the Lost Ark: Teaser, Theatrical and Re-Issue Trailers
Temple of Doom: Theatrical Trailer
Last Crusade: Teaser (note: this is the classic "Another Day at the Office" trailer where Ford staples his hat to his head!) and Theatrical Trailers
Emperor's Tomb: A preview of the Videogame
DVD-ROM content: provides access to a special DVD section of the Indiana Jones website with special content...however, when I tried this, I couldn't find anything other than what's available on the regular website, so perhaps Paramount hasn't added the content yet (since the movie doesn't come out until the 21st).
This may sound light the bonus material is kind of on the light side, but trust me - the 127-minute "Making The Trilogy" is as entertaining as the movies are - and the best bonus material I've seen since Lucas' "The Beginning" on The Phantom Menace DVD (in fact, it's actually much better!).
Hope this info helps answer some of your questions concerning the set!
Not sure when the review will be posted, but for those interested, here are some specs about the DVD set:
Each movie comes on it's own disc in Anamorphic Widescreen and 5.1 sound. Other than a language and subtitle option, a chapter selection and a link to the Indiana Jones website, no other extras appear on these 3 DVDs.
The picture looks fantastic...and I don't think I've ever seen Raiders look so sharp and full of color before. Those lamenting the absence of DTS will hardly notice...the 5.1 soundtrack is VERY aggressive and sounds great.
On the fourth bonus DVD you get the following:
"Making The Trilogy", which covers all three movies and can be viewed in three seperate parts or all at once. Total running time on this is 127 minutes, and it's the best behind the scenes you'll find on any DVD out there...combining both footage from the shoots and brand new interview material with Speilberg, Lucas, Ford, and most of the cast members of each film. You'll also get to see bits of Tom Selleck's and Tim Matheson's screen tests with Karen Black in this featurette, as well as some great stories from each shoot (including how Harrison seriously hurt his back on "Temple of Doom").
There's a "Featurettes" section with the following four featurettes:
"The Stunts of Indiana Jones" - 11 Minutes
"The Sound of Indiana Jones" - 13 Minutes
"The Music of Indiana Jones" - 12 Minutes
"The Light and Magic of Indiana Jones" - 12 Minutes
The titles of these are pretty self-explanatory, and are presented in the same style as the "Making of the Trilogy", with both old footage and brand-new interview material.
The sound on all of the above is only 2.0 Dolby.
Then, there's a Trailers section, with some of the trailers being in 2.0 and others in 5.1. The theatrical trailers for Raiders and Temple are in 5.1, but Crusade is only in 2.0 for some reason. I believe all the other trailers are 2.0.
Here's a list of the trailers:
Raiders of the Lost Ark: Teaser, Theatrical and Re-Issue Trailers
Temple of Doom: Theatrical Trailer
Last Crusade: Teaser (note: this is the classic "Another Day at the Office" trailer where Ford staples his hat to his head!) and Theatrical Trailers
Emperor's Tomb: A preview of the Videogame
DVD-ROM content: provides access to a special DVD section of the Indiana Jones website with special content...however, when I tried this, I couldn't find anything other than what's available on the regular website, so perhaps Paramount hasn't added the content yet (since the movie doesn't come out until the 21st).
This may sound light the bonus material is kind of on the light side, but trust me - the 127-minute "Making The Trilogy" is as entertaining as the movies are - and the best bonus material I've seen since Lucas' "The Beginning" on The Phantom Menace DVD (in fact, it's actually much better!).
Hope this info helps answer some of your questions concerning the set!
Last edited by Shannon Nutt; 10-04-03 at 03:58 PM.
#20
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by DavidH
Shannon,
So, is Raiders referrence quality - videowise?
Shannon,
So, is Raiders referrence quality - videowise?
I should also point out the great job they've done with "Temple of Doom". As you know, this movie has a lot...and I mean a lot...of reds in it, and I was worried about oversatruation, since red seems to be a nightmare color for a lot of DVDs. But everything looks properly balanced.
#21
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good news on the set. I wasn't even aware DVD Empire had reviews. Just checked the site and am somewhat disappointed to see they added a big ugly gray WIDESCREEN banner to the cover. But it's only a minor thing. Still, it looked much better without it.
Last edited by Rizor; 10-04-03 at 09:21 PM.
#22
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Originally posted by Shannon Nutt
I didn't notice any dirt on the print or hint of grain
I didn't notice any dirt on the print or hint of grain
#23
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by ctyankee
Sure hope you're wrong, without film grain it is no longer "film-like"
Sure hope you're wrong, without film grain it is no longer "film-like"
#24
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by Rizor
Good news on the set. I wasn't even aware DVD Empire had reviews. Just checked the site and am somewhat disappointed to see they added a big ugly gray WIDESCREEN banner to the cover. But it's only a minor thing. Still, it looked much better without it.
Good news on the set. I wasn't even aware DVD Empire had reviews. Just checked the site and am somewhat disappointed to see they added a big ugly gray WIDESCREEN banner to the cover. But it's only a minor thing. Still, it looked much better without it.