DVD Talk review of 'NBA Dynasty Series: Chicago Bulls (The 1990s)'
#1
DVD Talk Hero
Thread Starter
DVD Talk review of 'NBA Dynasty Series: Chicago Bulls (The 1990s)'
I read Randy Miller III's DVD review of NBA Dynasty Series: Chicago Bulls (The 1990s) at http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=11014 and...
would you say that the game footage is at least tv circa 1990's quality? mainly because, i watched the 93 phoenox game on espn classic, and the video was very blurry and the audio was shitty. maybe a reason was beacause it was a tape from a local pheonox station.
also i read on reviews that warner decided to use the "greatest games" from espn classic as their games since they dedided to edit a portion of the games as well.
would you say that the game footage is at least tv circa 1990's quality? mainly because, i watched the 93 phoenox game on espn classic, and the video was very blurry and the audio was shitty. maybe a reason was beacause it was a tape from a local pheonox station.
also i read on reviews that warner decided to use the "greatest games" from espn classic as their games since they dedided to edit a portion of the games as well.
Last edited by Rypro 525; 06-06-04 at 06:14 PM.
#2
DVD Talk Reviewer
Yes, the footage is equal or better than mid-1990s broadcast quality, at least from what I remember. As I said in the review, Warner's excellent track record for video quality was really the only basis I made my opinion on. Anyway, I'll check that particular game in more detail later tonight and report back here.
#3
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: ...wait a minute, where the hell am I?
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Randy Miller III
Yes, the footage is equal or better than mid-1990s broadcast quality, at least from what I remember. As I said in the review, Warner's excellent track record for video quality was really the only basis I made my opinion on. Anyway, I'll check that particular game in more detail later tonight and report back here.
Yes, the footage is equal or better than mid-1990s broadcast quality, at least from what I remember. As I said in the review, Warner's excellent track record for video quality was really the only basis I made my opinion on. Anyway, I'll check that particular game in more detail later tonight and report back here.
#4
DVD Talk Reviewer
Rypro: I checked out the 1993 game, and it looks very good...not as sharp and well-defined as newer broadcasts, but easily at or above the level of its time. Also, this game is taken from the "Greatest Games" series (I'm pretty sure most or all of them are, actually), but I'm not sure what you meant when you said Warner Bros. chose to edit a portion of the games. Could you shed some light on this?
Purplechoe: Thanks for the heads-up...it was a simple typo that I'm surprised I hadn't caught by now.
Purplechoe: Thanks for the heads-up...it was a simple typo that I'm surprised I hadn't caught by now.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After watching the set this week, I have to say I am not overwhelingly impressed. While it is nice to get DVD versions of the championship season videos, the games were somewhat lacking. The games were NOT complete; the game clock jumps at some points, indicating the loss of portions. Some observations:
1) In the Title-clinching games of 1991 (Lakers), 1996 (Sonics) and 1998 (Jazz), the celebrations are edited down (I didn't watch the 1993 clincher (Suns) yet). I think this is the best part of each of the title-clinching games and was hoping that they would show the entire national NBC feeds showing all the celebration and post-game interviews.
2) In the Bulls-Jazz 1997 game 5, just over five minutes of the 4th quarter are edited out. The score is tied 77-77 at the 9:00 mark when the game went to commercial on a UTAH timeout. When the game resumed, it was 81-81 with just under 4:00 left and the BULLS inbound the ball. Is it really that difficult to keep the game intact?? I saw time losses in some of the other games, but I didn't keep track of them.
3) A nice addition I noticed are the trivia/sports facts added to the game screen (I assume from the ESPN Classic edited versions) at various points of the games.
1) In the Title-clinching games of 1991 (Lakers), 1996 (Sonics) and 1998 (Jazz), the celebrations are edited down (I didn't watch the 1993 clincher (Suns) yet). I think this is the best part of each of the title-clinching games and was hoping that they would show the entire national NBC feeds showing all the celebration and post-game interviews.
2) In the Bulls-Jazz 1997 game 5, just over five minutes of the 4th quarter are edited out. The score is tied 77-77 at the 9:00 mark when the game went to commercial on a UTAH timeout. When the game resumed, it was 81-81 with just under 4:00 left and the BULLS inbound the ball. Is it really that difficult to keep the game intact?? I saw time losses in some of the other games, but I didn't keep track of them.
3) A nice addition I noticed are the trivia/sports facts added to the game screen (I assume from the ESPN Classic edited versions) at various points of the games.
#6
DVD Talk Reviewer
I agree with the disappointment of not having more post-game celebration footage...at the very least, maybe it could have been added separately as a bonus features on each disc. Although I'm not really aware of how many different tape of the games exist (or the exact amount of footage cut), do you think these games were edited for time to fit in with their broadcast on ESPN Classic?
Overall though, I'm very much in agreement: the lackluster way in which these games were presented was what held this release back from earning higher marks.
Overall though, I'm very much in agreement: the lackluster way in which these games were presented was what held this release back from earning higher marks.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Randy Miller III
Although I'm not really aware of how many different tape of the games exist (or the exact amount of footage cut), do you think these games were edited for time to fit in with their broadcast on ESPN Classic?
Although I'm not really aware of how many different tape of the games exist (or the exact amount of footage cut), do you think these games were edited for time to fit in with their broadcast on ESPN Classic?
As a side note, I have all of the Bulls ' Finals games taped on VHS. I taped directly from the NBC Chicago feed which contains the local post-game coverage as well. Unfortunately my 1991-1993 versions were taped with poor cable reception and with a cheap VCR (a double-whammy), so I have less-than-desirable video to watch. I was hoping this set was a first step to reclaim some good video.