Community
Search
DVD & Home Theater Gear Discuss DVD and Home Theater Equipment.

120 Hz vs 240 hz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-12, 11:10 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: It's always Hot!
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
120 Hz vs 240 hz

I am about ready to get a new LCD for the front room. Thinking 47/55/60/65 (no room for 70 ) it will be a 3D TV. I have others for the rest of the house but never really gave much into the Hz being they are 22 to 37 inch.

Does it matter, help, seem the price for both are all over the place. Any help would be great..

Q
Old 02-04-12, 07:37 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend & 2021 TOTY Winner
 
Obi-Wanma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Detroit
Posts: 12,525
Received 740 Likes on 366 Posts
Re: 120 Hz vs 240 hz

You can't really notice the difference 120 and 240, and the motion smoothing that it is responsbile for is an annoying feature that you'll probably want to turn off anyway (it makes film look like video), so don't worry about. I certainly wouldn't pay extra for 240.
Old 02-05-12, 09:09 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 8,905
Received 120 Likes on 108 Posts
Re: 120 Hz vs 240 hz

Having a LCD in the past...Sony 52" Z5100, I can highly recommend looking at or at least consider a Plasma. In short I had to buy a new set to replace the broken Sony and was set on a new LED from Sony or Samsung. I know what you see in B.B stores is not the best but after nearly 2Hrs there and almost a full hour with Magnolia Rep I was sold on Plasma. The technology has vastly improved even over the last couple of years and cost is generally 20-30% less than LED's. The PQ of mid level plasmas can compete with higher LED models. As with any type; be it LCD, LED and Plasma each has pros & cons.
Old 02-05-12, 11:38 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: It's always Hot!
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 120 Hz vs 240 hz

Originally Posted by K&AJones
Having a LCD in the past...Sony 52" Z5100, I can highly recommend looking at or at least consider a Plasma. In short I had to buy a new set to replace the broken Sony and was set on a new LED from Sony or Samsung. I know what you see in B.B stores is not the best but after nearly 2Hrs there and almost a full hour with Magnolia Rep I was sold on Plasma. The technology has vastly improved even over the last couple of years and cost is generally 20-30% less than LED's. The PQ of mid level plasmas can compete with higher LED models. As with any type; be it LCD, LED and Plasma each has pros & cons.
Years ago I used to work with computers on the back end. The 1st RDC-i700 had a plasma screen on it. I was told and seen 1st hand the life/hours of these. Within a hour of so of the end of life the plasma died. This was back in 97/01. I think (THINK?) the life is now 10,000 hour has anyone had them burn out at the end of life?
Old 02-05-12, 12:08 PM
  #5  
Moderator
 
TheBigDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,432
Received 513 Likes on 369 Posts
Re: 120 Hz vs 240 hz

Originally Posted by drq2
Years ago I used to work with computers on the back end. The 1st RDC-i700 had a plasma screen on it. I was told and seen 1st hand the life/hours of these. Within a hour of so of the end of life the plasma died. This was back in 97/01. I think (THINK?) the life is now 10,000 hour has anyone had them burn out at the end of life?
The current Panasonic models claim:

"Thanks to a newly designed phosphor process and new panel technology, our plasma panels last for up to 100,000 hours before the brightness decreases by half. That's more than 30 years of viewing 8 hours a day."
Old 02-05-12, 12:38 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: It's always Hot!
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 120 Hz vs 240 hz

Originally Posted by TheBigDave
The current Panasonic models claim:

"Thanks to a newly designed phosphor process and new panel technology, our plasma panels last for up to 100,000 hours before the brightness decreases by half. That's more than 30 years of viewing 8 hours a day."
Hmmm I will look into that. 10x or 100,000 hours is great. I leave my TV (front room) on all day long as background. This would still give me 15 to 20 years of life. I and deal with that. The TV I have now I got in 2000 still good but want better.
Old 02-05-12, 01:44 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Legend
 
JimRochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Rochester, NY. USA
Posts: 18,014
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Re: 120 Hz vs 240 hz

Sounds like my parents. That freakin TV is on all day long and naturally it's turned up super loud because they can't hear. I call over there and have to tell mom to turn the TV down. I can hear it clearly over the phone. She calls it "background noise"
Old 02-05-12, 01:54 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Legend & 2021 TOTY Winner
 
Obi-Wanma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Detroit
Posts: 12,525
Received 740 Likes on 366 Posts
Re: 120 Hz vs 240 hz

I'm not in the market for a new TV, but this seems as good a place as any to ask this question, since we have people discussing plasma v. LCD. Is it bad to watch a lot of 4:3 content on a new plasma, displayed at the correct aspect ratio? Just asking, because my kids watch 4:3 content pretty much all day long, and so do my brother's kids. He has a plasma, I have an LCD. Anyway, when his TV was new, he was displaying the content in the proper aspect ratio, and he started to notice that the black boxes on the sides were getting burnt into his screen. Since that time he decided to stretch the picture, and for me personally, that is an option I cannot deal with. I can't stand watching a stretched picture. If I ever do make the switch over to plasma, is this something I should be concerned about?
Old 02-05-12, 02:24 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: It's always Hot!
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 120 Hz vs 240 hz

Originally Posted by JimRochester
Sounds like my parents. That freakin TV is on all day long and naturally it's turned up super loud because they can't hear. I call over there and have to tell mom to turn the TV down. I can hear it clearly over the phone. She calls it "background noise"
It's not really all that loud. I started doing this many year ago when I had live TV. I had on Cnet all the time, if not that channel it would be NASCAR or hockey (I no longer watch live TV). I still have it on with a TV show in the background when I am cooking. Other then that its not on. Still a LCD 40inch runs me about 90 cents a month to run all day long. Where a tube cost me about 90 a hour to run. This is the main idea why all the TVs are now going from tube to lcd.
Old 02-05-12, 04:24 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 120 Hz vs 240 hz

Originally Posted by Obi-Wan Jabroni
I'm not in the market for a new TV, but this seems as good a place as any to ask this question, since we have people discussing plasma v. LCD. Is it bad to watch a lot of 4:3 content on a new plasma, displayed at the correct aspect ratio? Just asking, because my kids watch 4:3 content pretty much all day long, and so do my brother's kids. He has a plasma, I have an LCD. Anyway, when his TV was new, he was displaying the content in the proper aspect ratio, and he started to notice that the black boxes on the sides were getting burnt into his screen. Since that time he decided to stretch the picture, and for me personally, that is an option I cannot deal with. I can't stand watching a stretched picture. If I ever do make the switch over to plasma, is this something I should be concerned about?
2 thoughts come to mind.....

You won't like:
Geez. I'll GIVE you my old Mits 27" tube, let them watch crap SD on that. And save your nice TV for nice viewing. Better yet, I'll give you my old 5" monitor. Maybe they'll hate it and go outside to play.

You will like:
Honestly, I think modern plasmas are probably ok with that kind of abuse, they've improved the tech way beyond what it was 10 years ago. But that is if set up properly. Meaning the contrast and brightness at proper levels. And there may be a mode to put them in to protect against burn-in.
Old 02-05-12, 09:30 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Numanoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Down in 'The Park'
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: 120 Hz vs 240 hz

I told this story before, but I bought a Samsung plasma last July. One day when I came home from work I was shocked to find my TV on, displaying a Windows desktop (I use it as an HTPC). I had left the TV on all day... nine or ten hours... on a static screen with no screen saver! I closed my eyes and changed the image, expecting to see some kind of burn in. But there was nothing. Not even a little temporary image retention. I was amazed.

Now, I did do the 100 hours burn in (let colored slides run continuously for the first 100 hours or so) since I had to wait several days before I could hang it anyway. But this little accidental test tells me that, most likely, with modern plasmas you don't have to worry about burn in.
Old 02-05-12, 10:03 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Home again, Big D
Posts: 35,154
Received 412 Likes on 357 Posts
Re: 120 Hz vs 240 hz

1. Life of a Plasma (or any technology) is a non-issue. You will want to upgrade to get the newest gee whiz feature or cool blue light long before the TV set goes out (any set).

2. Plasma's are pretty much safe from what is thought of as burn in. Many who get a new one are careful during an initial break in period. But just as many think this is pointless. Besides, when I read the owners manual of my Samsung LCD when I got it, it warned me about watching something with a stationary logo, or playing games to much or it could "burn in".

3. Get the biggest size you have room for. The only tricky part comes from do you (or how much) do you drop in quality for size. It is a tough call and would depend on what your watching. I would stay away from the off brand stuff and just wait for a deal on the name brand one's.

4. Enjoy.
Old 02-06-12, 10:34 AM
  #13  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Little Elm TX (Dallas)
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: 120 Hz vs 240 hz

Originally Posted by Obi-Wan Jabroni
...and the motion smoothing that it is responsbile for is an annoying feature that you'll probably want to turn off anyway (it makes film look like video), so don't worry about. I certainly wouldn't pay extra for 240.
Not totally correct. You are confusing the 120/240Hz with motion smoothing technology such as Samsung's "Auto Motion Plus". They are totally independent "features". You are correct in that you can turn AMP off, but it has zero effect on the Hz that your TV is displaying. If you have a 120Hz TV, you will always be displaying 120Hz whether AMP is turned on or off, they aren't related.

The "soap opera effect" is in no way related to the Hz of your display. This is a too-common misconception.

Last edited by SubZeri; 02-06-12 at 10:42 AM.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.