Panasonic RP-56 vs 62S
07-05-02, 08:30 PM
#1
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Panasonic RP-56 vs 62S
I know that the Panasonic RP-56 had the Sage/Faroudja chip in it. Since it is now discontinued does the new RP-62S have the same chip? I would hate to assume it and find out the hard way later.
I'm interested in this one because it has the good video capabilities and can play MP3's in a random order. I wish it would display jpeg images also. I looked at the new JVC 500bk that did play jpegs but it took almost 45 seconds to draw the image on the screen! And even then it didn't look good. Is there another player besides the Panasonic that might do what I need and keep me under $200?
I'm interested in this one because it has the good video capabilities and can play MP3's in a random order. I wish it would display jpeg images also. I looked at the new JVC 500bk that did play jpegs but it took almost 45 seconds to draw the image on the screen! And even then it didn't look good. Is there another player besides the Panasonic that might do what I need and keep me under $200?
07-06-02, 02:52 AM
#2
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ripped from CES 2002 Page:
"Once-exotic progressive DVD playback is now standard throughout Panasonic's new slate of single-disc DVD players, which all now incorporate the Sage/Faroudja deinterlacing introduced in last year's DVD-RP56, to be replaced in May/June by the $229 DVD-RP62..."
"Once-exotic progressive DVD playback is now standard throughout Panasonic's new slate of single-disc DVD players, which all now incorporate the Sage/Faroudja deinterlacing introduced in last year's DVD-RP56, to be replaced in May/June by the $229 DVD-RP62..."
07-07-02, 12:22 AM
#4
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, I didn't think I'd notice much difference but I swear the picture is better than my old 5 disc panasonic c220. I don't have a Digital TV yet but wanted the capability for progressive scan when I do get one. I already put in one of my MP3 disc's and hit the random button. It is better than having a jukebox. I just wish it would play jpeg images. Does anyone know if all the players display jpeg as poorly as the JVC 500BK? Am I missing something without it or are they all slow and low res?
07-07-02, 02:27 AM
#5
DVD Talk Legend
I went to a Home theater shop I used to go to a lot that I really trust and they actually opened one up to confirm that the new RP-62s had the Sage chip in it.
Strange that the price went down on this player also.
I must say i am very happy with mine and my $85 dollar misprice made it that much better
Strange that the price went down on this player also.
I must say i am very happy with mine and my $85 dollar misprice made it that much better
07-11-02, 12:21 PM
#6
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: State of perpetual confusion
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry this isn't really an answer to your question, but wanted to chime in because I have the RP56 and am really happy with it. Got it for Christmas and have watched dozens of movies, no problems! I do agree that it would be really nice to have one that could display jpegs, though. That may be the one feature I miss on this one.
07-12-02, 08:48 PM
#7
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The RP-62 does have the Sage Chip in it. The picture quality is similar to that of the 56.
The RP-62 has some changes including: thinner case and new remote designs, time remaining indicator and quick replay feature.
The price drop is the cheaper, better technological improvement thing.
The RP-62 has some changes including: thinner case and new remote designs, time remaining indicator and quick replay feature.
The price drop is the cheaper, better technological improvement thing.
07-14-02, 05:25 PM
#8
DVD Talk Gold Edition
This thing is sweet - I'm listening to random MP3 files on a CD-RW right now! My wife and I just finished watching Ali, and the picture IS leaps and bounds over my old Panasonic A110!
07-14-02, 07:09 PM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The RP-82 is just above the $200 mark and depending on your needs and receiver, might be worth the few extra bucks. You get the addition of DVD-RAM capabilities, a few extra video options, and Coax as well as Optical digital outputs (the RP62 only does Optical).
07-16-02, 12:14 PM
#12
DVD Talk Gold Edition
BTW, I did return my other player and now have the RP82! One note to folks - pictures I've seen make the player look silver and black, the front panel is actually chrome and highly reflective!
07-16-02, 06:54 PM
#14
DVD Talk Gold Edition
I have the RP-62. It's a good player. There are many as good. I have noticed some "lag" in the optical audio. Mouths sometimes move a split second before the sound. Oddly, it's not all the time, or even often.
07-16-02, 09:45 PM
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RockyMtnBri,
Hehe, I was kidding. I wouldn't do that either.
If you get a chance, ask them what chips are used though. Hopefully, the technician you talk with will know. I kind of doubt it's the fli2300.
Hehe, I was kidding. I wouldn't do that either.
If you get a chance, ask them what chips are used though. Hopefully, the technician you talk with will know. I kind of doubt it's the fli2300.
07-17-02, 07:37 AM
#17
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by parrotheads4
I have the RP-62. It's a good player. There are many as good. I have noticed some "lag" in the optical audio. Mouths sometimes move a split second before the sound. Oddly, it's not all the time, or even often.
I have the RP-62. It's a good player. There are many as good. I have noticed some "lag" in the optical audio. Mouths sometimes move a split second before the sound. Oddly, it's not all the time, or even often.
