Stargate SG-1 - The Complete Stargate SG-1 Series Collection ----- $115 at DDD
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: upstate ny
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stargate SG-1 - The Complete Stargate SG-1 Series Collection ----- $115 at DDD
#2
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Buyers do beware.. There are a lot of complains about bad packing designs for this collector's set and causes a lot of badly scratched discs during shipment. Some resellers are just repackaging scratched discs as new sealed box and may try to sell them again for low price.
#3
DVD Talk Legend
Also beware, this likely has the shorter version of the pivotal episode "Threads" from season 8.
Last month I bought the Season 8 set with a FOx/MGM logo, and it had the shorter episode, even though the Sony release had corrected it with the longer version. I had to go find one with a Sony logo to get the full length episode.
Last month I bought the Season 8 set with a FOx/MGM logo, and it had the shorter episode, even though the Sony release had corrected it with the longer version. I had to go find one with a Sony logo to get the full length episode.
#4
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
Also beware, this likely has the shorter version of the pivotal episode "Threads" from season 8.
Last month I bought the Season 8 set with a FOx/MGM logo, and it had the shorter episode, even though the Sony release had corrected it with the longer version. I had to go find one with a Sony logo to get the full length episode.
Last month I bought the Season 8 set with a FOx/MGM logo, and it had the shorter episode, even though the Sony release had corrected it with the longer version. I had to go find one with a Sony logo to get the full length episode.
#6
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by leeta
I just checked my season 8 slim set (MGM logo) and it had the extended version of Threads. Guess I lucked out.
More importantly, does your set have a FOX logo on it?
If so, then maybe they did correct it again.