Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

Yeah, I gave up on comics in the mid-'90s, during most of those runs, thinking I'd outgrown them, when in reality, they just sucked. A lot of the comics collections I've been reading from more recent decades are so much better, it's not even funny.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

Rocket1312, how far through the XMen run are you going to go. I can make it through the era you mentioned just out of nostalgia and love for Joe Mad, and even past that Pacheco and Lobdell can get me through the whole Cecilia Reyes/Maggot era, but even my love of Kia Asamiya can't get me through the Chuck Austen era. Read this synopsis instead: https://comicdomwrecks.wordpress.com...austens-x-men/

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I stopped buying the books monthly sometime between AoA and Onslaught, but jumped back in when Morrison took over. I've read very little of the material from 1996-2001, so at the very least I hope to make it though that period. I've read the Austen run (have even re-read some of it) and at the very least I'll say that Austen seemed to have a vision for the book. That vision may have been awful, but my recollection is that it's mostly coherent and devoid of the editorial madness that plagues the 90's books. Whether or not I revisit that era is to be determined I guess. While I've been reading these 90's books, I've also been simultaneously re-reading the original Claremont run. I'm pretty familiar with most of the Claremont run, but the JRJR/Alan Davis era is a bit of a blindspot, as is New Mutants. So I might focus my efforts there when the time comes. I also haven't read anything post-Messiah Complex, so I might skip ahead to that point. Basically I'm just trying to fill in all my gaps.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

The X-Men were selling so well they became oversaturated and diluted with fans. I fear the same thing may be happening right now with Batman, which now makes up around 50% of all DC titles.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

To be fair, in the 90s everything was riddled with crossovers and nigh incomprehensible if you were just reading one title. In particular characters with multiple books like Spider-man and Superman were basically made for a reader to read a different title every week, which takes an amazing amount of editorial oversight but also makes for a disjointed at times story.

I don't remember exactly but I think Austen's run coincided with morrison's run, which is why it was more self contained and they didn't have all the crazy crossovers. But then you have stuff like Angel and a teenaged Husk taking off their clothes above Husk's parents. Heck, you have all these:
https://comicdomwrecks.wordpress.com...x-men-moments/

It's funny you complain about Batman being oversaturated and Bendis is now heading over to DC, since he fully embraced the popular characters. His Guardians basically included whoever he wanted to write as a member. He blatantly put Spider-man and Wolverine in his Avengers (and honestly, it worked).

As far as Xmen goes, I kind of agree that their popularity (and the popularity of the Image founders) kind of led to their ruin. I mean they were originally the outcasts, the underdogs, they were generally outmatched and hated everywhere they went, I mean at one point they were basically hiding out in Australia. When Lee, Portacio, Silvestri and Liefeld relaunched the books, they became more of a tactical team with a ton of members and a ton of titles. I'll admit as a kid I was super excited. But they completely lost being the underdog, and were more like any other superhero team. Morrison fully embraced this and made mutant culture a thing, which then kind of blew up when he left into entire cities of mutants. They tried to reign it back with M-day, but by then the X-men were pretty firmly entrenched with the rest of the Marvel Universe and nobody could really give a good explanation why mutants are persecuted and hated for being born that way while being exposed to cosmic rays or being given drugs by the government allowed you to be loved and adored by the public. Then you had the big Inhuman push, which just completely lost me.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

Yes, Austen was writing Uncanny while Morrison was doing his own thing on New and Claremont was doing his own thing on X-Treme. He basically got stuck with all of the leftover characters after Morrison and Claremont had their picks. Then Whedon started Astonishing, picking up where Morrison left off on New, X-Treme was cancelled and Claremont continued his stories in Uncanny, and Austen moved to New. All three were more or less continuations of what came before, but Marvel felt the need to shuffle the titles around. I don't know if that's better or worse than swapping in a new adjective and restarting the numbering every time they change writers.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....4,203,200_.jpg

Master of Kung Fu Omnibus v1
(SPECIAL MARVEL EDITION 15-16, MASTER OF KUNG FU 17-37, GIANT-SIZE MASTER OF KUNG FU 1-4, GIANT-SIZE SPIDER-MAN 2, and Material from IRON MAN ANNUAL 4)

Finally finished up volume 1 of MoKF. Like most who didn't buy these off the rack, I had never read these stories due to the fact that licensing problems kept Marvel from reprinting the series until now. That unavailability has given it a sort of mystique that I wasn't sure it could possibly live up to, but I was more than willing to give it a try. At the very least, I liked the idea of supporting Marvel's efforts in finally making these books a reality. Thankfully, the first volume delivered on most of my expectations.

The initial Englehart/Starlin issues are fun, with the debut issue being particularly strong. Marvel, however, was really only interested in exploiting the current kung-fu craze and insisted on more action/less character/more Fu Manchu. After the first third or so of the book the stories start becoming rather formulaic. There are some good issues and some bad and it's clear that new creative team Doug Moench and Paul Gulacy (Englehart and Starlin left due to creative differences) are still trying to figure out what the book should be. Then comes issue #29. Obviously Marvel saw the light and decided to let Moench and Gulacy start doing the sort of stories they wanted to do. The book becomes less of an episodic Kung-Fu tv series clone and more of a serialized, globe trotting James Bond/Enter the Dragon clone. The stories are more exciting and less routine. Gulacy's art immediately goes up a level. The only real bummer are the fill-in issues that plague Gulacy's run. Even though Moench was writing everything by this point, it's obvious that the non-Gulacy issues are just filler. #'s 36 & 37, which close out the volume, are particularly painful. Thankfully, from what I understand, this first volume is only scratching the surface. I'm eager to crack open the second volume as it supposedly contains the best of the Moench/Gulacy run.

All in all, this is a difficult recommendation. The series itself is so far easy to recommend, but as of right now, $125 omnibus volumes are the only way to read it. Marvel has solicited volume 1 of a new Epic Collection line, but who knows if they'll ever complete the entire run as they have with the omnibuses. As it is, that first epic volume is only slated to contain up through #28, which is the last issue before the series starts to get really good. I'm perfectly happy with my decision to dive into the omnibuses, but generally speaking I'm a fan of that format. I can see how it might be a tougher decision for others.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I've thought about that MoKF omnibus, but it would be a blind buy for me.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I bought all the MOKF and DHOKF omnibuses blind on the rumor that they wouldn't be released any other way, so the Epic announcement was kind of a disappointment. Glad to hear it's good reading, though. :D

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I obviously have no idea what the agreement with Sax Rohmer was/is, but it was pretty well understood that these omnibuses were it. Marvel was going to fast track the whole series in the span a year and there was no guarantee they'd be seen again. I think the omnibuses did better than expected, so maybe the original agreement was changed. I still don't think there's any guarantee the whole series will come out in Epic. Until that happens (or until the whole thing is released digitally) I'm going to feel pretty good about my omnibuses. A bird in the hand so to speak.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I'd considered picking up the first few MoKF Ominoo earlier this year, but the timing wasn't right and I didn't want to commit to three or 4 volumes as a blind buy.

I would definitely give them a shot if they put them out in the Epic format.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I'm tempted by the MoKF omnibi, since they are still available cheaply, but would prefer digital on these if I knew they were coming.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I guess we'll get a sense of the digital status once the first Epic comes out in March. Typically Marvel has been releasing digital Epics day and date with the printed copies.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I didn't read this, since it hasn't come out yet, but is it just me or is Marvel scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to come up with collections they haven't done yet?

https://www.bleedingcool.com/2017/12...er-pachyderms/

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1zxHF1SMvL.jpg

X-Men: The Complete Onslaught Epic v.1-4
(Cable 34-36, Uncanny X-Men 335-337, X-Force 57-58, X-Man 18-19, X-Men 53-57, Onslaught: X-Men, Onslaught: Marvel Universe, Onslaught: Epilogue, Avengers 401-402, Fantastic Four 415-416, Incredible Hulk 444-445, Wolverine 104-105, X-Factor 125-126, Excalibur 100, Sensational Spider-Man 8, Amazing Spider-Man 415, Green Goblin 12, Spider-Man 72, Iron Man 332, Punisher 11, Thor 502, X-Men: Road to Onslaught 1)

The thing that jumps out first and foremost is just how chaotic this all feels. Whatever craziness was going on at Marvel behind the scenes in 1996 in the wake of the industry crash and Marvel's impending bankruptcy is evident on the page. The story makes no sense and issue to issue there are more continuity gaffes than I can ever remember seeing in a crossover like this. I get the sense that literally no one was looking at any of these books before they went to print. There also doesn't seem to be any logic or flow to the reading order. Stuff just sort of happens and there's no real way to discern what books are the 'main' books and which ones are just the cash-ins. Even the trades can't get it right. X-Men Unlimited #11, which is the resolution to Rogue's time away from the team and tells the story of how she meets up with Joseph/Magneto before joing the fray with the rest of the X-Men, is skipped, yet some random issues of Punisher and Green Goblin (?!) are included because they happen to feature Sentinels. (XU #11 is included in the omnibus, so they at least got it right later on down the road.)

All that said, it probably doesn't even really matter becaue there's barely a story here at all. Some of the individual issues are solid, but for the most part it's just a lot of omnious overtures mixed with heroes standing around talking and making plans. As vague and as nebulous as villains like Sinister and Apocalypse are (both are of course present and accounted for, lurking in the shadows, because it wouldn't be a 90's X-Men crossover without them), Onslaught is even worse. I challenge anyone who has read the story to explain what it is he's even trying to accomplish or why.* His powers allow him to do pretty much anything he wants, and he's apparently made of pure psionic energy of some sort, yet the plan of attack always seems to just be to punch him, or the castle he's holed up in, really hard. None of this even begins to get into the fact that this crossover marked the end of the line for the original run of Marvel's core non-X/Spider heroes. I know Marvel has committed far more egregious acts against its own history/legacy in recent years, but seeing the final original run issue of Fantastic Four, the series that started it all, given over to a crappy 90's x-crossover still makes me sad for some reason.

As for positives, I will say that some of the art is nice. I don't necessarily love the manga-ish style in general, but Joe Mad's stuff is really striking. It's just so much more bold and confident than the third rate Image clones that populated most of the books at the time. Andy Kubert is another one I've never loved, but he does the over-the-top 90's style better than most. Like I mentioned earlier, I also think some of the individual issues are decent reads, even if they don't add up to much in the big picture. Mark Waid, who I had completely forgotten briefly replaced Fabian Nicieza on X-Men, shows that even the most asinine of stories can be made readable in the hands of a solid pro who knows how to construct a story. No surprise that he quit and/or was run out after only a few months. I also quite liked Peter David's second Hulk tie-in, even if the art is kind of crappy and not being a Hulk reader I had no clue what was going on with some of the sub-plots. All of this also indirectly led to Marvel's neo-classic revival in the late 90's, so I guess that's another positive. All in all though, I couldn't possibly recommend any of this other than to those who like the idea of a trainwreck. I enjoyed reading it for nostalgia's sake, but I can't imagine I'll be revisting anytime soon. I'm so glad that I only spent about $8 on the digital trades rather than spending $65+ on the omnibus.

*There's something called "X-Men: The Road to Onslaught" included at the end of the last volume which is mostly just a recap book including pages and summaries of stuff from the years leading up to the crossover. It's Kind of like the comic book equivalent of a clip show. Also included is presumably the writers' original thesis/concept/whatever for the Xavier/Onslaught reveal. It specifically details Onslaught's motivations going forward and even tries to retcon some of what led up to the reveal, which was necessary because Onslaught wasn't meant to be Xavier until late into the process. Not only is it kind of strange that Marvel actually published this, but even stranger is that what they had in mind kind of makes sense and might have even made for a decent story. I don't know if it was because of the Heroes Reborn stuff getting shoehorned into the story, or maybe just the general editorial chaos of the times, but almost none of this actually ended up on the page. I guess none of it is specifically contradicted by the published story either, so maybe Marvel put it out just to say "see, there was a point to all of this." Who knows.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

While I'm on a roll, more 90's crossover madness.

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1i7SUT87bL.jpg

Avengers Epic Collection: Operation Galactic Storm
(Avengers 345-347, Avengers West Coast 80-82, Quasar 32-34, Wonder Man 7-9, Iron Man 278-279, Thor 445-446, Captain America 398-401

I had never read Operation Galactic Storm before. In fact, I specifically remember being a poor 12 year old and electing to stop buying Iron Man (a series I was reading monthly at that point) because there was no way I could afford to buy all of the crossover issues. Much like most 90's crossovers, I always assumed it sucked. However, I found it to be a nice throwback sort of story that fits in nicely in the grand scheme of "Marvel cosmic." I don't know if any of the themes and ideas brought up by the story carried over long term (there's much gnashing of teeth over whether or not the Avengers have the right to kill), but there's at least a little bit of meat to go with the obligatory fight scenes. The most interesting thing to me is that the individual titles within the crossover more or less maintain their identity. For example, the Wonder Man installments actually focus on Wonder Man. It makes the story feel somewhat episodic, but it actually kind of works. It especially helps with keeping the continuity of the story on track. It was clear that (unlike Onslaught) the editors knew what they were doing and everyone seems to be on the same page. There is one head scratching moment when Lilandra seemingly changes her mind between issues, but it doesn't take too much to explain that away.

With that said, the crossover goes on WAY too long. 19 parts was at least 5-7 too many. Not nearly enough happens to justify the length. Maybe if I were reading week to week it wouldn't seem as big a deal, but doing it in 2 or 3 sittings was a real chore. And while I generally liked the story, the whole affair is somewhat pedestrian. I can't imagine this is anyone's favorite story for anything other than nostalgic reasons. Also, this came out in early 1992, which was sort of an awkward time, artistically speaking, at Marvel. The previous generation of stars like John Byrne, Walt Simonson, Frank Miller and Barry Smith, among others, had mostly moved on. However, the guys who had replaced them (the Image crew) had also just picked up and left. At a time when there were seemingly new titles being launched on a weekly basis, Marvel was in a bit of a talent drought. Also, Image had yet to take over the world at that point, so the guys they did have were still doing a vague amalgamation of Marvel's 80's house style and Jim Lee, rather than going full on insane 90's. All that is to say is that the art isn't the total 90's poop show it could have been had it been published a year later, but it's also not that solid, clean, classical Marvel storytelling either. It's just sort of mediocre.

In the end, I was glad to have finally read this. If you like the Avengers, and in particular enjoy stuff like the Kree/Skrull war, you'll get some mileage out of this. It's probably one of the last vaguely memorable Avengers moments until the Busiek/Perez relaunch of the late 90's. Just don't expect to be telling your grandkids about it someday and you'll be fine.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

Still reading this - it's surprisingly good!

I say surprisingly, because I had heard nothing about this run during it or even until this omnibus came out - probably because I'm much more of a Marvel guy.

If you like Batman at all, I highly recommend it!

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I've seen that Batman series but it really wasn't on my radar. Taking note of it for future consideration.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....4,203,200_.jpg

The Uncanny X-Men Omnibus Vol. 2
(UNCANNY X-MEN 132-153, ANNUAL 4-5, AVENGERS ANNUAL 10, MARVEL FANFARE 1-4, MARVEL TREASURY EDITION 26-27, MARVEL TEAM-UP 100, BIZARRE ADVENTURES 27, PHOENIX: THE UNTOLD STORY 1)

This is probably the 3rd or 4th time through this material for me and there's not much to say that hasn't been said before. Claremont/Byrne/Austin was the best this book ever got and it's really a shame that they couldn't have worked together longer. Reading this as I've also been reading through a bunch of 90's X-Men makes me yearn for the day that there was only one x-book driven by a single creative vision. Sigh.

I will say that I was struck with just how much Claremont struggled to keep things going in the immediate aftermath of Byrne's departure. Coming off of Dark Phoenix and Days of Future Past will do that, I guess, but the series really feels like it's spinning it's wheels for a while. Issue #150 is notable as a huge step in Claremont's re-imagining of Magneto (probably his greatest accomplishment on the x-books post-Byrne), but otherwise that first year or so is just sort of blah. Part of that might be just how Kitty-centric it is. I can't say I'm a huge fan. My recollection is that things pick up considerably when the Brood show up in volume 3, and I know Paul Smith's run is loved by many, though I never quite understood the love myself. I'm looking forward to revisiting it either way.

If you're interested in the X-Men and have never read it, this is a no-brainer. Although I will say that reading omnibus v.1 and the first 300 or so pages of v.2 (through #143, Byrne's final issue) is probably all you need if you're just looking to read the really good stuff.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1B5Y5XlVdL.jpg

Spider-Man: Tombstone v.1
(Spectacular Spider-Man 137-150, Spectacular Spider-Man Annual 8)

This is from the Conway/Sal Buscema run on Spectacular that coincided with Michelinie/MacFarlane on Amazing. The MacFarlane stuff is legendary for all the reasons that everyone already knows, but it's not that interesting of a read. I'm just a casual Spidey fan, but I much preferred this book. It's nothing special, just good, solid super-hero comics with some nice focus on Spider-Man's supporting cast. I don't love Sal B. inking himself (I don't think the reproduction on this book does his thin, wispy inking lines any favors), but it's nice to be able to read a long run with a stable creative team and no fill-ins. There's a bit of business tying up loose ends from the original 70's clone saga that I didn't totally understand (I've never read those stories), but otherwise this was fun and I hope they continue to collect this run.

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1Q298gEykL.jpg

Captain America Masterworks v.3
(Captain America 101-113)

As a kid I thought Captain America was lame. However, the older I get and the more of his stories I read, the more I've really come to enjoy the character. I've said it before, but I think these Cap stories are my favorite of the Lee/Kirby ouvre. FF and Thor are probably more impressive on balance, but these are tons of fun. Kirby was just killing it at this point and it almost doesn't matter if the stories themselves are good or not. Then, at the end of the book, Steranko shows up and seemingly catapults the medium forward 20 years in the span of a couple months. It doesn't get much better than this. The only real negative is the constant need to force Rick Jones into these stories. Words cannot express how much I loathe that character. I've never read much Hulk, so maybe he's fine there. Marvel should had kept him there.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

You should pick up the Classic X-Men omnibus that just came out as a companion to that collection.

I'm reading at the moment Justice League: Volume 4 from the New 52 era. Written by Geoff Johns, it runs up into Trinity War. This is an arc trying to break new members into the Justice League like Element Woman (a derivative Metamorpho rip-off) and a female Atom I've never heard of before.

It's solid superhero storytelling, if trying a bit too hard to emulate the funny ensemble cast of Giffen's Justice League.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

Oh definitely. It's next on my list. I just picked up the new Deadpool/X-Force
omnibus as well as Master of Kung-Fu 3 & 4, so it'll probably have to wait until after the new year. I'm eager to hear how it is though. It's over 1000 pages, which seems like an awful lot for what's in there. Are the new and re-edited pages given some sort of context? How about the back-up stories? My assumption is that the book is presented more as an appendix or a companion rather than a standalone, readable volume.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I loved Operation Galactic Storm when it came out, though it was definitely a money grab. I thought Iron Man's space armor was so cool. I didn't mind the length, especially next to something like the Kree Skrull war which looking back was so tiny. What's funny about that era art wise is that I thought the Avengers art by Epting was so run of the mill, and years later his runs in Crossgen and Captain America were incredible,many I've always wondered if it was time crunch, inking, or just evolution of his art. In comparison Jeff Johnson on Wonder Man and Greg Capullo on Quasar were just putting out stellar stuff.

When I was a kid my mom collected comics and she had incredible taste, so we had the whole Claremont/Byrne run in single issue form. Of course, we thought of comics as largely disposable so they were kept in paper grocery bags stacked up out of order, and as a kid I never could follow the continuity as much. Until they released Dark Phoenix Saga as one of the only trade paperbacks of the era. I read that volume again and again, and I still think of that as the highlight of the run.

I'm also reading the new 52 justice league John's title in digital single issue form, and it does go kind of off the rails when they introduce these secondary characters for seemingly no reason. I think they also spin off Green Arrow and Trevor into a separate JLA title which doesn't help at all.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

Funny story about Epting. I also didn't like Epting as a kid, but was blown away when I saw his Captain America and realized just how wrong I had been. I saw him at a con a couple years ago and tried to express this to him in a way to both compliment him and make fun of myself for being a stupid kid, but it came out wrong and I think he just thought I was being a dick.

He did tell me the big difference between then and now is that Tom Palmer was his primary inker back then. In retrospect this is pretty obvious. Palmer is a legend, but his work can overwhelm the penciler at times. You almost always know you're looking at a Tom Palmer inked page, no matter who the penciler.

That said, I do think his work on Avengers in the highlight of Galactic Storm. Capullo only did one issue (and for me hadn't really hit his stride yet). MAybe I need to take another look at Johnson. I thought his stuff was fine, but pretty typical of early 90's Marvel. It will be interesting if and when any of this stuff gets the Masterwork treatment. I don't think the print/repro quality from this era is quite up to snuff and I'd love to see it in Masterwork quality.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I wanna get that, but I already have the two Uncanny Omnibuses that contain all those issues (not to mention the original floppies both Uncanny and Classic, but bagged in a box somewhere). Dunno if the bonus stories are worth re-buying it all - though I do love John Bolton, who did the art on a majority of those stories.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I actually thing Capullo's best work was his early stuff. This and X-Force (which to me was his prime) were his best work. I think when he turned himself into a McFarlane clone he was good but not on the same level as the simplicity of his X-Force stuff.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

Oh you don't have to sell me on Capullo X-Force. I LOVE Capullo X-Force. I even own an original page from X-Force #16 that is the crown jewel of my meager original art collection. That said, I don't think he was close to reaching his peak at that point. He was improving month to month, but didn't yet have the sort of consistency that is typical of a top artist. Looking through those old X-Force issues it's easy to find all sorts of wonky stuff.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

? Capullo did a lengthy run in Quasar, didn't he draw all the issues included in Galactic Storm? I just remember really liking his linework and relative "cleanness" of his style on Quasar. He changed his style a bit for X-Force, but I still liked it, but then I thought his Spawn run was just too cluttered, almost opposite of his Quasar style. I mean it was still really good, but not what I liked about his earlier run, plus he was replacing a legend.

I liked Jeff Johnson for similar reasons, he had a simpler, almost animated style with a lot of fluid movements and expressive faces. I thought both stood out in that era of Marvel artists. But again, a lot of that perhaps has to do with inkers.

I remember, for instance, being so excited about John Byrne on Wonder Woman. He inked himself, and I thought it was... sub par compared to his previous works. It may just be my tastes changed or time crunch, but I thought Terry Austin really complemented him well in that Uncanny run and the Superman run.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I love Bolton but have been confused by the Classic release. So it's all backup stories that were new at the time, accompanying reprints?

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

When they were reprinting Uncanny in the "Classic X-men" series, Claremont wrote a bunch of backups, plus extra pages (and edits) to help connect the story. Since the extra pages and edits wouldn't make much sense outside of the original reprints, I guess this is only the backups. Me, I just liked the reprints because of the Art Adams covers.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

Quasar #'s 32-34 were part of Operation: Galactic Storm, but Capullo only did the art for #32. I've never read more than 2 or 3 issues of his Spawn, but wasn't McFarlane inking him in the beginning? I have to imagine they did everything they could to keep the book's visual style consistent. I felt like the storytelling of Capullo's recent Batman stuff was a little too chaotic at times, but that the figure work is far superior to his early 90's Marvel work.

As for Austin, he's awesome. So clean and fluid. I've seen Byrne mention before that when people claim that they're big fans of his work, but turn around and say like his older art better, what they really mean is that they are fans of Byrne/Austin. Incidentally, Austin inked Jeff Johnson on early issues of Wonder Man (and I think did covers for most of the run) and looking through some those now, imo, the Austin inked issues are far superior to what came after.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

Over at the Marvel Masterworks forum, Jeph York, who edited the Classic X-Men omnibus, posted the following rundown of the book's contents/layout:

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

No, I believe it's all the issues (the credits include Cockrum & Byrne) and it goes up to Classic #44, which is X-Men #138, the issue after the Phoenix Saga, where Cyclops leaves the team. It's over 1,000 pages, so it can't be just the backup stories.

*edit - I take that back, I guess it is just the backup stories and extra pages. Does't seem like that would be enough to fill over one thousand pages though.

This if from the editor of the book as to how the material's presented:

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

Wow, that's a book that seems lovingly put together, though it still seems like it would be difficult to read unless you are really familiar with the run. But Art Adams covers and original art? Ugh, like I need another 1000 page hardcover.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

Yeah, it's clearly meant to act as a supplement to the already existing hardcovers. For what it's worth, that's exactly how I had hoped they would handle it, but at the same time I get the appeal of straight Classic X-Men reprints, especially if that's how you originally read those stories.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I agree with slop that it seems odd that it's a thousand pages and with fuji that it sounds like a PITA to read.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

Just doing some quick math here:

110 new front covers
110 original front covers
44 frontispieces
36 back covers
43 back-up stories x 12 pages (back-up lengths varied, but most are 12)
= 516

That comes out to 816 pages. Add in all of the new and edited interior pages (with comparisons), as well as pin-ups and other extras, and it's easy to see how you can get to 1000.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1MD9Cnip1L.jpg

Batman Illustrated by Neal Adams Vol. 1
(WORLD'S FINEST COMICS 175-176, THE BRAVE AND THE BOLD 79-85)

Pre-Crisis DC is a huge blindspot for me. I've read very little. I've always wanted to read the classic 70's Batman stories in particular, but DC's collected edition methodology is somewhat lacking to say the least (they seem to be doing better lately). Even though I picked up digital copies of these Neal Adams books for cheap some time ago, I've avoided reading them due to DC allowing Adams to go all Lucas on the art. Let's just say that I hate the revised colors/art and leave it at that. One note though, only certain issues are re-colored. Some retain their original coloring, but often times the reproduction on those is horrible. I don't know if that's the case with the physical book or if it's just a Comixology thing. The book also contains all of Adams's cover work from the time period, but there's at least one instance where he did not do the cover for one of the included issues, so they just omit that cover and go straight to the story. Oh DC, why is it so difficult for you sometimes? This isn't rocket science.

As for the actual comics, my first reaction is that writer Bob Haney is a crazy person. Being a Marvel guy through and through, it took me a while to get in sync with the style, but once I did, I was able to recognize it for the fun that it is. My understanding (again, not a DC guy) is BatB was kind of the nutty step sibling of the Bat books and that Haney was more or less allowed to do whatever he wanted. It works in the sense that the stories are all self contained and there's no need to worry about continuity or anything. They're just fun. On the other hand, these stories are insane? On more than a couple of occasions reading this, I said to myself "wait, what?" and had to go back a couple of pages and re-read stuff. The time Flash runs into outer space and into the sun in order to destroy a magical totem is one example. And it's not just the stories themselves. The rhythm of the storytelling is really odd at times. Again, maybe I'm just so used to the Marvel style that I just need to get used to it. I don't know.

All in all I enjoyed this first volume for what it is. Adams work is still a little rough around the edges at this point (I don't know if I like Adams inking himself), but it's hard to say with the revisions. I did see that the Brave and the Bold Omnibus that came out this past year includes the original, unmolested art work. I don't think I enjoyed this enough to buy that book, but I'd be happy to pick up the digital trade if they make that available. Now DC just needs to get to work on collecting the two main Bat-books from the 70's the right way.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

I'm not sure but from what I remember Capullo and McFarlane were credited with "art" credits when Capullo first came over. It wasn't until much later (Spawn 50 maybe) when Capullo got full penciling credit. I could be wrong on my timeline recollection though.

Re: What's the last TPB/Graphic Novel you read?
 

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....UiG5-k%2BL.jpg

Thunderbolts Classic Vol. 1
(Thunderbolts 1-5,-1, Annual '97, Incredible Hulk 449, Tales of the Marvel Universe 1, Spider-Man Team-Up 7)

This book has to be the best thing to come out of the whole Onslaught fiasco, right? Talk about being given lemons and making lemonade. Even being familiar with the history and the premise of Thunderbolts before diving in didn't diminish this at all for me. I question how long the concept can sustain itself before everything crumbles, but so far, so good.