![]() |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 10839393)
One of the dilemmas is the wait-for-the-trade culture. I understand the appeal for readers and why the publishers are so keen to put collected editions into circulation, but it has a detrimental effect on monthly sales--and back issues. While the publishers obviously don't get anything out of back issue sales, they do keep LCSes in business. That's always been the most unique element of the comics industry; the way that sales of older inventory can actually be more profitable than when the merchandise was new.
I honestly think it's time to give up on the LCS and work out something with Amazon. I'd gladly set up a monthly subscription with Amazon, with a subscription discount of course. Sure they're not going to be able to stick Amazon with stock like they do with the LCS but opens their distribution ability up greatly. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by boredsilly
(Post 10839377)
1. I see this argument time and time again, and it baffles me every time. Do people think DC (and Marvel, and everyone else) don't want there books in ever super market and newstand across the country? Of course they would love that, but what people forget is that the direct market was created, in part, because the newstand stopped wanting comics. Not the other way around. You may see comics in a 7-11 here, and a Supermarket there, but the days when you could find them everywhere are gone. And yes, I see Archie in Wal-Marts and Supermarkets all the time, but from what I've come to understand that publisher has a grandfather deal with a lot of those places which is why it's still carried.
2. Glossy paper isn't why comics are expensive. Going to old newsprint, from what I've learned, could actually be more expensive to use than glossy in some instances. I'm not 100% up on this, but Chris from the 11 O'Clock Comics podcast works in printing, and talked about this a while ago. Apparently flat matte paper, because of economies of scale, would cost more to use since it's not used by a lot of printers, compared to the glossy stuff everyone does. Something along those lines. And digital coloring, because it speeds up the process, makes comics cheaper than they would be if the coloring was done by hand. [...] I have concerns and doubts about all of this stuff too. Hell, I think this whole effort would be better served if it was focused on Vertigo instead of DC. I think Vertigo books are a much better gateway to the 20-something iPad owner, than a redesigned Superman relaunch, but I'm still really hopeful that this will work. And DC, in my eyes, has big balls to do something this major, when they could have just rested on their laurels for a few more years in a decaying direct market. The problem with getting comics back into the neighborhood drug store is that 1) the neighborhood drugstore doesn't exist anymore, and 2) grocery stores don't want to deal with comic books. There's a lot of nostalgia at play here; it's a different world today than it was in the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s. Mass retailers don't want to deal with comic books, and I don't think enough kids today would be interested in reading comic books to keep such a scheme afloat. You know why kids read comic books in the 60s? Because they didn't have X-Boxes, Playstations, the Cartoon Network, and the Disney Channel. Comic books were cheap, disposable entertainment for kids who had little money and fewer entertainment options. The world has moved on. Never mind that the entire magazine industry is currently in shit-poor shape. And going back to newsprint isn't going to change anything. I've also heard that newsprint would actually increase printing costs because nobody uses it anymore. And very little of the cover price of a comic book actually goes to printing costs -- saving a few pennies per unit isn't going to decrease the cover price in any meaningful way. That $2.99 comic book was sold to your retailer for about $1.50; the company sold it to the distributor for about $1.25. And out of that $1.25, you have to pay the writer, penciler, inker, colorist, letterer, editor, office overhead, and printer -- and make a profit on top of that. The printing cost is only one small part of the equation. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 10839393)
One of the dilemmas is the wait-for-the-trade culture. I understand the appeal for readers and why the publishers are so keen to put collected editions into circulation, but it has a detrimental effect on monthly sales--and back issues. While the publishers obviously don't get anything out of back issue sales, they do keep LCSes in business. That's always been the most unique element of the comics industry; the way that sales of older inventory can actually be more profitable than when the merchandise was new.
The problem is that the comic book companies have been in business for decades and have been pumping out hundreds of books a month. It becomes a mathematical problem in that there's no way for a store with limited floor space to keep a collection of back issues. A store with, maybe five hundred feet of floor space can only house so much merchandise and most of the stuff that fills back issue bins turns slowly, so you're wasting a lot of valuable real estate on a low profit generator. So getting a bigger store to keep the ever-growing backstock is not an option. And eBay probably killed off what little profit back issues had for most stores. It's also nearly impossible for a small business to cherry pick a good selection of desirable backstock. Most of the stuff in those tattered white longboxes is the stuff that didn't sell in the first place. Look at two of the biggest franchises, Batman and X-Men. Marvel and DC have flooded the market with so many X-Men and Batman books the past couple of decades that it's basically impossible for a new reader to simply jump in and start collecting. So new readers aren't coming in any meaningful way, and the trend we've seen in the sales indicates that older readers are leaving their once favorite franchises behind. Why should any retailer bother trying to stock back issues of those books when they are spread over so many titles of miniseries, one-shots, and ongoings? |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by Timber
(Post 10839577)
Trades keep them in Borders/B&N and thus keep them in business.
I honestly think it's time to give up on the LCS and work out something with Amazon. I'd gladly set up a monthly subscription with Amazon, with a subscription discount of course. Sure they're not going to be able to stick Amazon with stock like they do with the LCS but opens their distribution ability up greatly. Also, you know what would be an easy thing to do? Put an actual ad for DC Comics inside the DVDs of DC-based movies. A kid asks for Batman: Gotham Knight. When he opens the case, there should be a flier staring him in the face promoting Batman comic books, a subscription ordering form and information encouraging him to find his nearest LCS. How hard is that? And how much exposure would it be? My guesses are "not very" and "quite a lot."
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 10839665)
Back issues haven't been a viable revenue stream for a long time.
The problem is that the comic book companies have been in business for decades and have been pumping out hundreds of books a month. It becomes a mathematical problem in that there's no way for a store with limited floor space to keep a collection of back issues. And eBay probably killed off what little profit back issues had for most stores. The store has already sunk its money into the issues. How does it make sense to maintain prices higher than what eBay sellers are asking--and getting? If the equilibrium market price drops, then it should drop. I think too many LCS owners become convinced that they have to get "at least" that quarter over cover to justify having housed it for so long. It seems to me they'd be much better off moving merchandise more quickly. Not only do they then at least get something for it, but they'll keep the back issue boxes rotating more quickly, which is likelier to make those regulars who do browse to feel a more compelling sense of urgency if they see something they like. It may be gone the next time they visit. It's also nearly impossible for a small business to cherry pick a good selection of desirable backstock. Most of the stuff in those tattered white longboxes is the stuff that didn't sell in the first place. ...new readers aren't coming in any meaningful way, and the trend we've seen in the sales indicates that older readers are leaving their once favorite franchises behind. Why should any retailer bother trying to stock back issues of those books when they are spread over so many titles of miniseries, one-shots, and ongoings?
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 10839651)
You know why kids read comic books in the 60s? Because they didn't have X-Boxes, Playstations, the Cartoon Network, and the Disney Channel. Comic books were cheap, disposable entertainment for kids who had little money and fewer entertainment options. The world has moved on.
I found this out a few years ago when I got my nephew some comics for Christmas based on Teen Titans and Justice League Unlimited. He loved the shows, but to this day has refused to even look inside the cover of either comic. If I press him hard enough, he'll admit he just doesn't want to have to read. I can't tell you how foreign that is to me, that someone would actively resist reading that much, even of something they know they like. I don't know what to even do about it. In that case, he was already enabled in his "reading is the devil" mindset by my sister-in-law years before I even met my wife, so I never had a chance to influence him. Before I wrote off the future entirely, though, a few weeks ago I was at my LCS and there was a guy there browsing with his son. They were pilfering the sale boxes, and the dad told his son to grab anything he wanted. I heard them talk, and the son was telling his dad which issues they did or didn't have, and what he wanted to read because the cover looked good, that kind of thing. The kid must have been about seven or eight. It warmed my little geek heart. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 10839857)
I found this out a few years ago when I got my nephew some comics for Christmas based on Teen Titans and Justice League Unlimited. He loved the shows, but to this day has refused to even look inside the cover of either comic. If I press him hard enough, he'll admit he just doesn't want to have to read. I can't tell you how foreign that is to me, that someone would actively resist reading that much, even of something they know they like. I don't know what to even do about it. In that case, he was already enabled in his "reading is the devil" mindset by my sister-in-law years before I even met my wife, so I never had a chance to influence him. . There was no Batman or Spider-man cartoon. So the only way to explore this fantasy world of those two characters was to buy their comic books. Had their been an animated series for those two at the time, I might not have stuck with the comics as much. Comic books need to offer something that other mediums don't. Kids can get their Batman and Spider-man fix from the Disney channel or Cartoon Network. The only mainstream comic type format that I'm actually a little interested in is Shonen Jump and stuff like that. It's roughly the same price or a little higher and it's in black and white but it seems like it's more bang for the buck. TIME, GQ, National Geographic, Archie, Shonen Jump, Simpsons Magazine, these all offer me ALOT more than DC and Marvel. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
The New 52:
http://www.newsarama.com/comics/dcnu...fo-110701.html MinLShaw makes a lot of good points. I've gotten my GF reading some comics. I used Dark Tower as a gateway since she likes the book. However her 10 year old son, who will watch comic movies and cartoon all day, wont touch the comics. We even picked up a big stack of 10 cent comics at Heroes Con, but there is very little interest. However he will show some interest in my trade collection. With that said, as much as I like floppies, I think I would prefer everything switching to OGN. That way you have have complete stories, and issue numbering is not a problem for either side. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by stingermck
(Post 10841963)
* Why not call it a reboot? It's not a reboot. A reboot is typically a restart of the story or character that jettisons away everything that happened previously. This is a new beginning which builds off the best of the past. For the stories launching as new #1s in September, we have carefully hand-selected the most powerful and pertinent moments in these characters' lives and stories to remain in the mythology and lore. And then we've asked the best creators in the industry to modernize, update and enhance the books with new and exciting tales. The result is that we retained the good stuff, and then make it better. * Does The New 52 undo events or continuity that I've been reading? Some yes, some no. But many of the great stories remain. For example - Batgirl. The Killing Joke still happened and she was Oracle. Now she will go through physical rehabilitation and become a more seasoned and nuanced character because she had these incredible and diverse experiences. I really do wish them well with this, but it seems every official statement I read just makes this seem even more of a half-baked act of confused desperation. Barbara Gordon has never been as popular with readers as Batgirl as she has been as Oracle (particularly since Gail Simone got hold of her). Why tamper with that investment? Because Barbara is the familiar alter ego of Batgirl to the lay public? That might be a satisfactory marketing reason, but it's still a bad storytelling reason. You know, looking back I think the boldest thing DC may have ever done was when they killed Superman. I'm not talking about the death itself, mind you. I'm talking about those three entire months after "Funeral for a Friend" where not one of the ongoing Superman titles was published. There were a few one-shots (The Legacy of Superman, Supergirl and Team Luthor, I think Superman Gallery came out during that time, too), but not one of the four primary titles published a single issue. Remember, this was at a time when the Superman comics were so tightly organized they had the triangle numbers on each cover to let you know where an issue fit in that entire year's worth of Superman storytelling. That's twelve missing triangle numbers, for all intents and purposes. It gave us readers a chance to digest what had happened, and to build anticipation for what would come next. And I can say, The Adventures of Superman #500 wasn't at all what I thought it would be. I kept turning each page, expecting a clear reveal of how Superman's return would be explained and it kept not coming. I remember finishing it and thinking, "Wow, three months of nothing and then this ambiguity?!" I can't imagine today's editorial leadership having the guts to put forth that kind of scheme. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Also, it seems that at least one of my previous criticisms has (finally) been addressed. Earlier in this thread I wrote:
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 10839857)
Also, you know what would be an easy thing to do? Put an actual ad for DC Comics inside the DVDs of DC-based movies. A kid asks for Batman: Gotham Knight. When he opens the case, there should be a flier staring him in the face promoting Batman comic books, a subscription ordering form and information encouraging him to find his nearest LCS. How hard is that? And how much exposure would it be? My guesses are "not very" and "quite a lot."
Related marketing content and promotional information will be packaged and highlighted in millions of Warner Home Video DVDs will be going out 4th quarter. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 10841972)
I really do wish them well with this, but it seems every official statement I read just makes this seem even more of a half-baked act of confused desperation. Barbara Gordon has never been as popular with readers as Batgirl as she has been as Oracle (particularly since Gail Simone got hold of her).
It gave us readers a chance to digest what had happened, and to build anticipation for what would come next. And I can say, The Adventures of Superman #500 wasn't at all what I thought it would be. I kept turning each page, expecting a clear reveal of how Superman's return would be explained and it kept not coming. I remember finishing it and thinking, "Wow, three months of nothing and then this ambiguity?!" I can't imagine today's editorial leadership having the guts to put forth that kind of scheme. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
I have read just about everything on this reboot, and it is a reboot for all intents and purposes. It is the closest thing we will ever get to Crisis On Infinite Earths: Part 2, but DC Comics does not want to say that publicly for fear of alienating the tradition-minded readers left who make up most of the monthly buyers. Basically any character that was not meeting sales expectations is getting rebooted, including Superman.
As for the switch back to Batgirl, Warner Bros. just can't sell Oracle-branded merchandise like it can for the real Barbara Gordon version of Batgirl. This reboot is as much about appealing to female readers as anything, notice the supposed edict now at DC about scanty female costumes and the "no skirts" rule. That is a clear move to try and move comic books into the norms of mainstream entertainment and out of the adolescent male fantasy world it has been in since inception. It is a bold gamble, because it is very possible that comic books just can't compete in a modern information environment where the nature of entertainment has fundamentally changed. DC may lose the few readers it has left, for some mythical future replacement reader that does not exist. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 10842311)
I have read just about everything on this reboot, and it is a reboot for all intents and purposes. It is the closest thing we will ever get to Crisis On Infinite Earths: Part 2, but DC Comics does not want to say that publicly for fear of alienating the tradition-minded readers left who make up most of the monthly buyers. Basically any character that was not meeting sales expectations is getting rebooted, including Superman.
As for the switch back to Batgirl, Warner Bros. just can't sell Oracle-branded merchandise like it can for the real Barbara Gordon version of Batgirl. This reboot is as much about appealing to female readers as anything, notice the supposed edict now at DC about scanty female costumes and the "no skirts" rule. That is a clear move to try and move comic books into the norms of mainstream entertainment and out of the adolescent male fantasy world it has been in since inception. It is a bold gamble, because it is very possible that comic books just can't compete in a modern information environment where the nature of entertainment has fundamentally changed. DC may lose the few readers it has left, for some mythical future replacement reader that does not exist. They want it to be a reboot for the general public but they want it to be anything but a reboot to the people that are currently buying their books. These "future readers" do not exist in my opinion. There are very few kids begging their parents to take them to comic book stores. When I make a trip to Borders/B&N I'm always the only person looking at the trades, there may be some younger kids looking at the manga stuff but even that is rare. Hell I don't even think digital is going to save them or even prolong there demise. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Does anyone actually want these? As a life-long DC fan who's pretty much collecting only TPBs at this point, I have lost total interest in anything cutting edge.
I do hope this doesn't prevent DC from releasing compendiums and TPBs of recent storylines such as Darkest Night, etc. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by Timber
(Post 10842416)
Strange that I agree with most of what you said but I'm firmly in the "not a reboot camp"
They want it to be a reboot for the general public but they want it to be anything but a reboot to the people that are currently buying their books. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by Eric F
(Post 10843045)
Does anyone actually want these? As a life-long DC fan who's pretty much collecting only TPBs at this point, I have lost total interest in anything cutting edge.
I do hope this doesn't prevent DC from releasing compendiums and TPBs of recent storylines such as Darkest Night, etc. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
DCBS has a special this month where you can order all 52 books for $80 or half off. Thinking why not, I added the whole thing to my cart.
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by stingermck
(Post 10843194)
DCBS has a special this month where you can order all 52 books for $80 or half off. Thinking why not, I added the whole thing to my cart.
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by stingermck
(Post 10843194)
DCBS has a special this month where you can order all 52 books for $80 or half off. Thinking why not, I added the whole thing to my cart.
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
I'm kinda interested. I've always found it kind of daunting to keep up with all the books and characters, and usually cherry-pick (via trade paperbacks) the stories I want. I'm actually thinking about picking up a few of these new books (probably GL, Batman, Superman and JLA) monthly and see how they are. :shrug:
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
The cover to Batgirl #2 has been revealed, and she looks like she is getting de-aged to a teenager. :brickwl2:
http://www.comicvine.com/news/adam-h...-cover/143299/ http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/0...__2_super.jpeg |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by kgrogers1979
(Post 10843696)
The cover to Batgirl #2 has been revealed, and she looks like she is getting de-aged to a teenager. :brickwl2:
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by kgrogers1979
(Post 10843696)
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
If they are reviewed well and there are good stories I will definitely pick up a TPB or two sometime down the line. I know there are a lot of people like me who've pretty much given up on single-issue collecting.
After a while I decided I just couldn't afford it, keep up, and got pissed there were so many crossovers. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 10843909)
She looks like Amy Pond.
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by boredsilly
(Post 10844210)
That's is some serious fantasy fuel right there. -wink-
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
I went back to my DCBS order, and went through each DC title to see which one I was actually interested in. 39, which was mostly titles i'm reading before the relaunch anyway. So I applaud DCBS for having the all you can eat option, but i'd rather save some money and see which titles are still standing 6 months later.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.