Rob Liefeld - Worst comic book artist ever?
#501
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
I know this is an old topic that hasn’t been updated in awhile but I saw this on a fb group that I’m in.
Its Rob’s own fb page for comic book artists and fans too I suppose.
Seemed ironic to me.
Its Rob’s own fb page for comic book artists and fans too I suppose.
Seemed ironic to me.
#502
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
I love Sal Buscema's art.
As for John Romita Jr, I loved his art from the late 70's to mid 90's. The right inker (like Frank Giacoia or Bob Layton) made a difference. Inkers with a rougher style, like Bob Wiacek, did Jr no favors.
I just got the John Byrne and JMS era Spider-Man collections, and while I like Jr's early work more, I do like what he did there.
As for John Romita Jr, I loved his art from the late 70's to mid 90's. The right inker (like Frank Giacoia or Bob Layton) made a difference. Inkers with a rougher style, like Bob Wiacek, did Jr no favors.
I just got the John Byrne and JMS era Spider-Man collections, and while I like Jr's early work more, I do like what he did there.
#504
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
Eh, he did have dynamic (if not polished) art that stood out at the time. It's not like I look at those New Mutants or X-Force or Hawk and Dove pages and are just repulsed. His overuse of the same poses/facial expressions becomes overly recognizable over time, and the worst thing is that he didn't really evolve as an artist past around Youngblood number 1, at least not for the better. His Captain America Heroes Reborn run is rightfully reviled.
#505
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
Eh, he did have dynamic (if not polished) art that stood out at the time. It's not like I look at those New Mutants or X-Force or Hawk and Dove pages and are just repulsed. His overuse of the same poses/facial expressions becomes overly recognizable over time, and the worst thing is that he didn't really evolve as an artist past around Youngblood number 1, at least not for the better. His Captain America Heroes Reborn run is rightfully reviled.
#506
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
When Liefeld's art first hit, the style definitely made a splash. Go check out an average Marvel or DC monthly before the Image founders first appeared in the industry. Comic book art had mostly devolved into mediocre house styles outside of a few special books and graphic novels.
#507
Banned
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
I disagree. To my eye, it has been the opposite and that's why books have suffered. Since the success of David Aja's Hawkeye and Chris Samnee's Daredevil, Marvel and DC have chose stylized art over house style. That's the reason Erica Henderson and what I consider horrible art, was on Squirrel Girl for so long. Don't get me wrong. There are many books that the stylized art works great, even in some of the King Batman arcs, but many lower tier books have been saddled with artist trying too much to push their style over story. Still, I feel that there's a whole crop of great artists out there right now, but the problem is that they make much more money doing covers only, that they hardly accept to do interiors. Case in point, Alex Ross.
#508
Banned
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
As for Liefeld, even though I like him personally, he still is too sensitive to other's opinions, still somewhat immature in the way he acts on social media and his art has gotten worse. Liefeld was great when he was working in tandem with McFarlane, Jim Lee or Whilce Portacio. When he's by himself, without anyone reigning him in, we get this
#509
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
I disagree. To my eye, it has been the opposite and that's why books have suffered. Since the success of David Aja's Hawkeye and Chris Samnee's Daredevil, Marvel and DC have chose stylized art over house style. That's the reason Erica Henderson and what I consider horrible art, was on Squirrel Girl for so long. Don't get me wrong. There are many books that the stylized art works great, even in some of the King Batman arcs, but many lower tier books have been saddled with artist trying too much to push their style over story. Still, I feel that there's a whole crop of great artists out there right now, but the problem is that they make much more money doing covers only, that they hardly accept to do interiors. Case in point, Alex Ross.
I don't mind artists like Samnee or Aja or Quitely having a style that stands out, if they stay committed to the book and the writer works with them. There was a time when the X-books were oscillating between post-Generation-X Bachalo (who was nigh incomprehensible) and cartoony Ramos so I can completely understand why it turns people off, but I think when a writer works to the artists' strengths a stylistic comic can be awesome.
I'm not collecting anything monthly right now, but I do think there's just way too much stuff coming out that's largely disposable and/or going to be rebooted in a few months, and it's hard to have consistency with that.
#510
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
When Liefeld's art first hit, the style definitely made a splash. Go check out an average Marvel or DC monthly before the Image founders first appeared in the industry. Comic book art had mostly devolved into mediocre house styles outside of a few special books and graphic novels.
I also loved the DC styles guys like of Jim Aparo and Neal Adams.
But the stuff that came along in the late 80's & early 90's wasn't so much my thing. I'm not a big fan of McFarlane. Larsen was OK, Liefeld quickly became shit. I didn't mind Mark Bagley at all, so he was a step up from those guys as far as I was concerned.
I loved the retro style of Ron Frenz, especially with Joe Sinnott inking. But the highly stylized art from the late 80's & early 90's (and beyond) that was less realistic just didn't work for me. Especially the real rough style with lots of haphazard lines. It wasn't detail, it was slop, IMO.
#511
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
I don't think I was a big fan of the Marvel "House style."
Walt Simonson on Thor, McFarlane on Amazing, Jim Lee on Uncanny, and Liefeld on New Mutants was great. I liked that those books had there own distinct art style. Even Sal Buscema had a very distinctive style when he was on Spectacular Spider-man. Wasn't Bill Sienkiewicz originally on New Mutants with his crazy style? Such a good era.
Anyways, I liked Liefeld's New Mutant work even if his characters faces look a little odd: hundreds of tiny little teeth, tiny noses, and tiny mouths. But it was really unique at the time. Little did I know he was imitating Art Adams. After he co-founded Image and was doing Youngblood he got a lot of flack for not drawing feet among other things. He took a long break and came back to drawing Youngblood with issue #6 and his work looked so much cleaner and polished. He switched his art style for an issue of the Lobo rip-off "Bloodwulf", imitating Keith Giffen, but again, it actually looked good.
Heroes Reborn was awful though. The Captain America pic everyone thinks of.
Since he came back to Marvel and DC every now and then his style has gotten worse. I don't see deformed Captain America bodies, but the way he draws torsos and legs now are really weird. So much of his post Heroes Reborn work looks sloppy and rushed.
Walt Simonson on Thor, McFarlane on Amazing, Jim Lee on Uncanny, and Liefeld on New Mutants was great. I liked that those books had there own distinct art style. Even Sal Buscema had a very distinctive style when he was on Spectacular Spider-man. Wasn't Bill Sienkiewicz originally on New Mutants with his crazy style? Such a good era.
Anyways, I liked Liefeld's New Mutant work even if his characters faces look a little odd: hundreds of tiny little teeth, tiny noses, and tiny mouths. But it was really unique at the time. Little did I know he was imitating Art Adams. After he co-founded Image and was doing Youngblood he got a lot of flack for not drawing feet among other things. He took a long break and came back to drawing Youngblood with issue #6 and his work looked so much cleaner and polished. He switched his art style for an issue of the Lobo rip-off "Bloodwulf", imitating Keith Giffen, but again, it actually looked good.
Heroes Reborn was awful though. The Captain America pic everyone thinks of.
Since he came back to Marvel and DC every now and then his style has gotten worse. I don't see deformed Captain America bodies, but the way he draws torsos and legs now are really weird. So much of his post Heroes Reborn work looks sloppy and rushed.
#512
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
Unfortunately (or maybe fortunately for some) Larsen's seemingly gone off the deep end drawing softcore porn for Savage Dragon now. Great point with Walt Simonson and Sienkiewicz deviating from the house style (and the latter getting a lot of flack for it, but you'll find a ton of artists have fond memories of that). I have always wished Art Adams would have been more prolific. But with all of those guys you can see their style develop; as cool as I still think the Longshot mini looks, Adams's style evolved well beyond that. Liefeld still has no idea how to line up weapons with the closed hand that's holding them (it's like he draws a fist, then thinks hey, lets add a gun or a sword, but doesn't think to redraw the hand or even line up the sword so that it looks like it's being held). I wonder just how much work the inkers had to do on his early stuff.
#513
Banned
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
He's talking about pre Image founders making a splash though, and he's largely right, while there were still standout artists before them, the house style ruled and there was a lot of "sameness" in the books. McFarlane brought a lot of style to Spider-man, much to the consternation of a lot of the old school artists; besides the huge eyes, he drew Mary Jane a lot differently (and often in lingerie). And the amount of details he put into the webs... well, let's just say some of the old school artists weren't very happy that these young bloods were putting that much effort into the monthly comics, not because they couldn't do it, but it was a lot more time consuming and artists were used to working on multiple books or cranking out stuff quickly. Splash pages also came into style. Of course, we saw that run it's course and a lot of copycat artists came and went who drew splash pages and a lot of detail but no understanding of anatomy, real or cartoon.
I don't mind artists like Samnee or Aja or Quitely having a style that stands out, if they stay committed to the book and the writer works with them. There was a time when the X-books were oscillating between post-Generation-X Bachalo (who was nigh incomprehensible) and cartoony Ramos so I can completely understand why it turns people off, but I think when a writer works to the artists' strengths a stylistic comic can be awesome.
I'm not collecting anything monthly right now, but I do think there's just way too much stuff coming out that's largely disposable and/or going to be rebooted in a few months, and it's hard to have consistency with that.
I don't mind artists like Samnee or Aja or Quitely having a style that stands out, if they stay committed to the book and the writer works with them. There was a time when the X-books were oscillating between post-Generation-X Bachalo (who was nigh incomprehensible) and cartoony Ramos so I can completely understand why it turns people off, but I think when a writer works to the artists' strengths a stylistic comic can be awesome.
I'm not collecting anything monthly right now, but I do think there's just way too much stuff coming out that's largely disposable and/or going to be rebooted in a few months, and it's hard to have consistency with that.
There are 2 artists I can't follow at all and that is Humberto Ramos and Ed Mcguiness. Their cartoony style is a complete turnoff for me. It takes me out of the story as it almost never fits the look of the book they are working in.
#514
Banned
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
I forgot to mention, I'm not a big fan of Amanda Conner's style either, but at least she's always working on books like Harley Quinn, that are comedy and fit her style.
#515
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
Here's the interview with Bob McLeod that I was referring to above about McFarlane and company, the reception they had with old school artists, how Romita would redraw the heads of characters if they didn't follow the style guide, etc. I think I've posted this here in this forum at least twice (maybe even in this thread) but I always misplace it:
BOB MCLEOD RETURNS
BOB: Sure. Because of mainly McFarlane and Rob Liefeld, the new guys coming into comics got the rep of being all flash and no substance. They often didn't draw backgrounds; they didn't know storytelling; and their figure drawing was weak. When I drew Peter Parker, he had to look a certain way or [John, Sr.] Romita would re-ink the heads. Todd's Peter Parker and Mary Jane usually looked very little like the traditional characters. There was a consensus among the older artists that industry standards had reached a new low, and that much of the work being published was not really at a professional level.
BOB: Definitely. Originally, mostly 3rd rate artists drew comics, because there was so much more money and prestige in illustration and advertising. Comics were considered a ghetto business. But as the fans grew up and entered the business, they started writing stories to fulfill their own fantasies instead of just writing for kids, who were most of the audience. This has led to very violent, sexual comics, and almost the exclusion of comics for kids and young girls, and almost no humor in comics. Where are CRAZY, PLOP, BRAND ECCH, HERBIE, PLASTIC MAN, etc.? Where are all the Harvey comics? Neal Adams, renowned for adding realism to comics, entered the business drawing Jerry Lewis comics!
The new generations of artists started trying to do the best art they could, not caring whether they made any money. Which doesn't mean the older artists didn't try to do great work, but they were usually trying to make a living as well. The new, younger artists often lived at home or willingly lived in poverty in order to spend 16 hours a day or more on a single page.
Frank Giacoia, a wonderful artist, groaned when he saw all the detailed work Barry [Windsor] Smith was doing on Conan, because he knew that would become the new standard, meaning less money and longer hours for everyone. And many of the new artists were not well trained, and lacked a sound knowledge of the fundamentals of art, so their efforts were spent in adding more details and superfluous line work, creating art that often wowed the fans, but was in fact not on a professional level. Even the often denigrated old inker Vinnie Colletta could draw rings around many of the new younger artists of the '80s and '90s.
BOB MCLEOD RETURNS
Related to working with McFarlane: There did seem to be a band of GenX artists that arrived in the late 80's, most of the artists without much in the way of storytelling abilities or even good draftsmanship. They pretty much wanted to ape their favorite artists' drawing style. Most them did a rip off Michael Golden, or at least Art Adams’ version of Golden and also, to a lesser extent, Frank Miller circa Dark Knight.
Did you notice that change in the kind of young "artistic talent" that came in the late 80's, or am I generalizing? Did other artists of your age or generation talk much about the guys that became hot at Marvel in the late 80's and early 90's and went onto form Image?
Did you notice that change in the kind of young "artistic talent" that came in the late 80's, or am I generalizing? Did other artists of your age or generation talk much about the guys that became hot at Marvel in the late 80's and early 90's and went onto form Image?
BOB: Sure. Because of mainly McFarlane and Rob Liefeld, the new guys coming into comics got the rep of being all flash and no substance. They often didn't draw backgrounds; they didn't know storytelling; and their figure drawing was weak. When I drew Peter Parker, he had to look a certain way or [John, Sr.] Romita would re-ink the heads. Todd's Peter Parker and Mary Jane usually looked very little like the traditional characters. There was a consensus among the older artists that industry standards had reached a new low, and that much of the work being published was not really at a professional level.
Marie Severin once commented in an interview with the Comic Book Artist magazine that the way comics were made changed when the fans started coming in as creators. I imagine that would include Shooter, Roy Thomas, Claremont, etc. When you went into the business, especially from your perspective of not being a super hero fan, did you notice a generation gap in the way comics were conceived, written, drawn, lettered, colored, etc. both in the Marvel office and outside in the freelancers world?
BOB: Definitely. Originally, mostly 3rd rate artists drew comics, because there was so much more money and prestige in illustration and advertising. Comics were considered a ghetto business. But as the fans grew up and entered the business, they started writing stories to fulfill their own fantasies instead of just writing for kids, who were most of the audience. This has led to very violent, sexual comics, and almost the exclusion of comics for kids and young girls, and almost no humor in comics. Where are CRAZY, PLOP, BRAND ECCH, HERBIE, PLASTIC MAN, etc.? Where are all the Harvey comics? Neal Adams, renowned for adding realism to comics, entered the business drawing Jerry Lewis comics!
The new generations of artists started trying to do the best art they could, not caring whether they made any money. Which doesn't mean the older artists didn't try to do great work, but they were usually trying to make a living as well. The new, younger artists often lived at home or willingly lived in poverty in order to spend 16 hours a day or more on a single page.
Frank Giacoia, a wonderful artist, groaned when he saw all the detailed work Barry [Windsor] Smith was doing on Conan, because he knew that would become the new standard, meaning less money and longer hours for everyone. And many of the new artists were not well trained, and lacked a sound knowledge of the fundamentals of art, so their efforts were spent in adding more details and superfluous line work, creating art that often wowed the fans, but was in fact not on a professional level. Even the often denigrated old inker Vinnie Colletta could draw rings around many of the new younger artists of the '80s and '90s.
#517
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
Jim Lee and Bart Sears are my favorite artists. Sears brought correct anatomy to the fold with regards to drawing male and female superheroes.
#518
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
As a fan who pays good money for this shit, why would I want an artist to put LESS work and detail into their pages?
I understand the consternation of an employee working more for the same amount of money, but as someone who buys and reads these things, give me Art Adams over some of these "more talented" guys that crank out 3 pages in one afternoon, which all end up looking the same.
I understand the consternation of an employee working more for the same amount of money, but as someone who buys and reads these things, give me Art Adams over some of these "more talented" guys that crank out 3 pages in one afternoon, which all end up looking the same.
#519
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
As a fan who pays good money for this shit, why would I want an artist to put LESS work and detail into their pages?
I understand the consternation of an employee working more for the same amount of money, but as someone who buys and reads these things, give me Art Adams over some of these "more talented" guys that crank out 3 pages in one afternoon, which all end up looking the same.
I understand the consternation of an employee working more for the same amount of money, but as someone who buys and reads these things, give me Art Adams over some of these "more talented" guys that crank out 3 pages in one afternoon, which all end up looking the same.
As I've re-read some of these 80's & 90's comics I've found I really don't like the style of artists like McFarlane or Liefeld. Too busy, too messy, and not particularly realistic. And they don't do dialogue well when they write their own.
#520
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
My favorite example of a superhero artist with clean smooth lines, who knows how to tell a story from panel to panel, who also throws in good detail with great facial expressions is Alan Davis...
#521
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
Alan Davis is great!
Him and Paul Neary working with Mike W. Barr on Detective Comics was perfection. It's a short run, but I'd almost say it was almost the definitive version of Batman & Robin. I really like his work on the 90s Excalibur.
Him and Paul Neary working with Mike W. Barr on Detective Comics was perfection. It's a short run, but I'd almost say it was almost the definitive version of Batman & Robin. I really like his work on the 90s Excalibur.
#522
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
I know why Jim Lee gets lumped into that "Image Group" but he was a different breed. Hell all of them were different. Lee had an ultra realistic detail heavy style. McFarlane was very stylistic. Portacio, who I think never got the credit he deserved had a very unique, yet realistic style.
Alan Davis is one of my all time favorite artists. Hell the list is long with him, Lee, Portacio, and Gary Frank probably at the top of it.
Alan Davis is one of my all time favorite artists. Hell the list is long with him, Lee, Portacio, and Gary Frank probably at the top of it.
#523
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
I know why Jim Lee gets lumped into that "Image Group" but he was a different breed. Hell all of them were different. Lee had an ultra realistic detail heavy style. McFarlane was very stylistic. Portacio, who I think never got the credit he deserved had a very unique, yet realistic style.
Alan Davis is one of my all time favorite artists. Hell the list is long with him, Lee, Portacio, and Gary Frank probably at the top of it.
Alan Davis is one of my all time favorite artists. Hell the list is long with him, Lee, Portacio, and Gary Frank probably at the top of it.
Alan Davis is amazing, I'd probably put him over Frank; I even loved his Clandestine. But my favorites list is huge: Art Adams (like I said, I wish he did more), Mike Wieringo (RIP), Travis Charest, Chris Sprouse, George Perez, Garcia Lopez, John Byrne (inked by Austin), Walter Simonson, Michael Golden, Mignola, Lee, Paul Smith, etc. And they're all pretty distinct.
#524
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?
I never saw Jim Lee work as being ultra realistic at all.
Will agree that Davis and Neary were great, one of the best pairings ever to me.
Will agree that Davis and Neary were great, one of the best pairings ever to me.
#525
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Rob Liefeld (or Sal Buscema?!?!?!?!) - Worst comic book artist ever?