The Official Dark Tower Discussion & Questions Thread [SPOILERS!]
#76
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Originally posted by collven
Also, did anyone else notice King slipping up a couple of times regarding Susannah. Here is a part of one line, "... Susannah leaped to her feet and began to scream again." And a few paragraphs later, "...and once more slipped to her knees...". I'm suprised the editor didn't catch that. It jumped out at me when I read it.
Also, did anyone else notice King slipping up a couple of times regarding Susannah. Here is a part of one line, "... Susannah leaped to her feet and began to scream again." And a few paragraphs later, "...and once more slipped to her knees...". I'm suprised the editor didn't catch that. It jumped out at me when I read it.
Did anyone else think at the end that
Spoiler:
#77
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by collven
Also, did anyone else notice King slipping up a couple of times regarding Susannah. Here is a part of one line, "... Susannah leaped to her feet and began to scream again." And a few paragraphs later, "...and once more slipped to her knees...". I'm suprised the editor didn't catch that. It jumped out at me when I read it.
Also, did anyone else notice King slipping up a couple of times regarding Susannah. Here is a part of one line, "... Susannah leaped to her feet and began to scream again." And a few paragraphs later, "...and once more slipped to her knees...". I'm suprised the editor didn't catch that. It jumped out at me when I read it.
Spoiler:
#78
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally posted by plasmar
Spoiler:
#79
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I finished this a few days ago, and now that I've had some time to reflect upon it, I'd like to share my thougts on a few things.
1. I REALLY liked this series
2. I didn't like how everyone in novels 5, 6 and 7 picked up the Calla way of speaking. It jarred me out of the story. For the first four books I got used to a certain mid-world culture, dialect, and way of speaking, and all of the sudden I get a completly different version. I was fine while the ka-tet was in the Calla, but as soon as they left I don't get while everyone continued to speak with the "if it does ya" and "do ya ken" and I don't see any reason for some of the characters they met who had never been to the Callas to be speaking that way.
3. Concerning the ending:
4. I would have loved to see how this series had been different if King had never been in that accident. (I don't think he'd be in it for one)
5. Having King be a character in it was different, but I didn't really like it. I didn't see it as neccessary. *shrug*
6.
7. I know I'm in the minority here, but I greatly prefered the style of the original (unedited) version of "The Gunslinger" I think the sparse style was a better fit for the Gunslingers world than King's normal style, which he wrote the final 6 books in.
1. I REALLY liked this series
2. I didn't like how everyone in novels 5, 6 and 7 picked up the Calla way of speaking. It jarred me out of the story. For the first four books I got used to a certain mid-world culture, dialect, and way of speaking, and all of the sudden I get a completly different version. I was fine while the ka-tet was in the Calla, but as soon as they left I don't get while everyone continued to speak with the "if it does ya" and "do ya ken" and I don't see any reason for some of the characters they met who had never been to the Callas to be speaking that way.
3. Concerning the ending:
Spoiler:
4. I would have loved to see how this series had been different if King had never been in that accident. (I don't think he'd be in it for one)
5. Having King be a character in it was different, but I didn't really like it. I didn't see it as neccessary. *shrug*
6.
Spoiler:
7. I know I'm in the minority here, but I greatly prefered the style of the original (unedited) version of "The Gunslinger" I think the sparse style was a better fit for the Gunslingers world than King's normal style, which he wrote the final 6 books in.
#80
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Land of the Lobstrosities
Posts: 10,300
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I just finished it about an hour ago and I'm still digesting it.
Here are some random thoughts, including some agreement with previous comments.
After reading what I wrote below, I should say I focused on the negative, but I liked much of the book, particularly the adventurous story telling, which has been King's strength. The faults I see are mostly plot related.
EDIT: I wrote "I should think that", but I meant "I shouldn't think that".
Here are some random thoughts, including some agreement with previous comments.
After reading what I wrote below, I should say I focused on the negative, but I liked much of the book, particularly the adventurous story telling, which has been King's strength. The faults I see are mostly plot related.
Spoiler:
EDIT: I wrote "I should think that", but I meant "I shouldn't think that".
Last edited by wmansir; 10-09-04 at 01:06 AM.
#87
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Capitol of the Empire! Center of all Commerce and Culture! Crossroads of Civilization! NEW ROME!!!...aka New York City
Posts: 10,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTW...did anyone see King during Sat. Red Sox Yankee game? When asked what books he had out, he mentioned 'The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon' pop-up version...is he embarassed about the Dark Tower, or is he such a schill that he pumped the book without the built in audience?
#88
Moderator
Originally posted by Tommy Ceez
BTW...did anyone see King during Sat. Red Sox Yankee game? When asked what books he had out, he mentioned 'The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon' pop-up version...is he embarassed about the Dark Tower, or is he such a schill that he pumped the book without the built in audience?
BTW...did anyone see King during Sat. Red Sox Yankee game? When asked what books he had out, he mentioned 'The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon' pop-up version...is he embarassed about the Dark Tower, or is he such a schill that he pumped the book without the built in audience?
#90
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Geofferson
Has anyone read the short story, "The Little Sisters of Eluria" from King's Everything's Eventual?
Has anyone read the short story, "The Little Sisters of Eluria" from King's Everything's Eventual?
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spoiler:
As for the the Insomnia mindtrap, I think that was just his explanation to get himself out of having to fulfill the prophecy as written in Insomnia.
While there were some disappointing elements to this book (CK, Mordred, and Walter), I still found it to be an enjoyable read, and I just glad we finally got an ending...
#93
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by hardcore
I know I read somewhere (maybe the Wizard and Glass afterword?) that King said that there was going to be 3 more books and one of them would occur in the past. I think he originally intended (pre-accident) for one of the books to cover the events of Jericho Hill, and I was a bit disappointed that we never got the details of that.
As for the the Insomnia mindtrap, I think that was just his explanation to get himself out of having to fulfill the prophecy as written in Insomnia.
While there were some disappointing elements to this book (CK, Mordred, and Walter), I still found it to be an enjoyable read, and I just glad we finally got an ending...
I know I read somewhere (maybe the Wizard and Glass afterword?) that King said that there was going to be 3 more books and one of them would occur in the past. I think he originally intended (pre-accident) for one of the books to cover the events of Jericho Hill, and I was a bit disappointed that we never got the details of that.
As for the the Insomnia mindtrap, I think that was just his explanation to get himself out of having to fulfill the prophecy as written in Insomnia.
While there were some disappointing elements to this book (CK, Mordred, and Walter), I still found it to be an enjoyable read, and I just glad we finally got an ending...
#94
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Thread Starter
Originally posted by kcbrett5
I thought what he said in the wizard and glass afterward was that 2 books would be in Roland's World primarily and 1 book in our world primarily.
I thought what he said in the wizard and glass afterward was that 2 books would be in Roland's World primarily and 1 book in our world primarily.
#95
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now that you mention it, that does sound familiar... Well even though he's finished, maybe he'll find time to go back a do a short story to cover those events. Something like "The Little Sisters of Eluria"... I'd much rather see that than a revised Drawing of the Three/The Wastelands.
#96
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally posted by Geofferson
Yeah, I saw that. He talked about that book during his Good Morning America interview a few weeks back as well. Not sure why he didn't pump DT7 as it's his best work in years, IMO.
Yeah, I saw that. He talked about that book during his Good Morning America interview a few weeks back as well. Not sure why he didn't pump DT7 as it's his best work in years, IMO.
The Girl who loved Tom Gordon book is pretty sweet. Checked it out at Target. Doubt I will buy it though.
#97
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Thread Starter
Yeah. TGTLTG pop-up sounds cool but I probably wont pick it up either. Who did the art? Pics?
(Probably the first time anyone has ever asked for pics in the book forum)
(Probably the first time anyone has ever asked for pics in the book forum)
#98
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I finished the 7th book earlier this week and was disappointed with the ending. After having spent this much time and waiting so long for this book, I thought that there would be an ending but there isn't. It has made me question alot of things concerning the intent of Stphen King and the Tower itself.
If I could ask Stephen King just one question about this book, the question would be, Why do you hate the character Roland so much? I haven't read all of Kings books but all of them I have read, do have endings except for this one. King has cursed Roland to an eternal task that will have no ending, ever. He is like the character in Greek??? mythology that has to spend eternity in Hades pushing the boulder to the top of a hill. He gets the rock almost to the top and then it slips out of his hands and rolls to the bottom so he has to start all over again. The only difference between his eternal punishment and Roland's is that the greek guy remembers all of the attempts and thinks that he may make it this time and Roland has no/little memory of the tries before the current one he is on. Roland is just screwed. He has an irrational desire to achieve his goal of reaching the Tower at any cost and when he fianlly achieves what he thinks is the goal. Suprise Sucker, game reset. King has really got a hardon hate for Roland.
Other questions that occured to me are these. Is the Dark Tower sentient? Is it aware like the Beams are? If so, is it a force of good are evil? It seems to be using Roland rather poorly and I would say that is is an evil entity.
Could it be like/one of the machines that the ancients made and has since gone insane and uses Roland for sport to amuse itsself?
Why does it only send him back to the dessert and not all of the way back to Gilead? What did Roland do around the time he entered the desert that was such a crucial turning point that this is where his journey has to restart over and over again?
And for those of you that think that Susannah continued to live happily ever after when she left Roland. Why do you think that? The way I see it, is that everything resets. He has to do everything the same this time as in every time before. There can be no changes in the script or dialog. So when he reached the top of the Tower, everything everywhere reset back to where it was at that time and location when Roland was in the desert.
Which brings up another question. We have been told throughout this story that time only runs in one direction in the Keystone world and in Roland's world but with this info, we know that is not right. When Roland starts over again, he has to still draw the Three, he has to stop Sombra and North Central Positronics, he has to set up the Tet Corp to help save the Rose. He has to stop the breakers. All of this has to happen in the past if time only flows in one direction, therefore this is the classic paradox. Which means that the info we were fed was wrong.
I think King needs to go back to the drawingboard and rewrite a real ending to this story.
Just my two cents. But here is one more bit of food for thought. If Roland were real and if he read this story and if he were to meet Stephen King afterward. Stephen King would be one sorry person at that meeting.
If I could ask Stephen King just one question about this book, the question would be, Why do you hate the character Roland so much? I haven't read all of Kings books but all of them I have read, do have endings except for this one. King has cursed Roland to an eternal task that will have no ending, ever. He is like the character in Greek??? mythology that has to spend eternity in Hades pushing the boulder to the top of a hill. He gets the rock almost to the top and then it slips out of his hands and rolls to the bottom so he has to start all over again. The only difference between his eternal punishment and Roland's is that the greek guy remembers all of the attempts and thinks that he may make it this time and Roland has no/little memory of the tries before the current one he is on. Roland is just screwed. He has an irrational desire to achieve his goal of reaching the Tower at any cost and when he fianlly achieves what he thinks is the goal. Suprise Sucker, game reset. King has really got a hardon hate for Roland.
Other questions that occured to me are these. Is the Dark Tower sentient? Is it aware like the Beams are? If so, is it a force of good are evil? It seems to be using Roland rather poorly and I would say that is is an evil entity.
Could it be like/one of the machines that the ancients made and has since gone insane and uses Roland for sport to amuse itsself?
Why does it only send him back to the dessert and not all of the way back to Gilead? What did Roland do around the time he entered the desert that was such a crucial turning point that this is where his journey has to restart over and over again?
And for those of you that think that Susannah continued to live happily ever after when she left Roland. Why do you think that? The way I see it, is that everything resets. He has to do everything the same this time as in every time before. There can be no changes in the script or dialog. So when he reached the top of the Tower, everything everywhere reset back to where it was at that time and location when Roland was in the desert.
Which brings up another question. We have been told throughout this story that time only runs in one direction in the Keystone world and in Roland's world but with this info, we know that is not right. When Roland starts over again, he has to still draw the Three, he has to stop Sombra and North Central Positronics, he has to set up the Tet Corp to help save the Rose. He has to stop the breakers. All of this has to happen in the past if time only flows in one direction, therefore this is the classic paradox. Which means that the info we were fed was wrong.
I think King needs to go back to the drawingboard and rewrite a real ending to this story.
Just my two cents. But here is one more bit of food for thought. If Roland were real and if he read this story and if he were to meet Stephen King afterward. Stephen King would be one sorry person at that meeting.
Last edited by MScottM; 10-28-04 at 12:03 PM.
#99
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MScottM
And for those of you that think that Susannah continued to live happily ever after when she left Roland. Why do you think that? The way I see it, is that everything resets. He has to do everything the same this time as in every time before. There can be no changes in the script or dialog. So when he reached the top of the Tower, everything everywhere reset back to where it was at that time and location when Roland was in the desert.
And for those of you that think that Susannah continued to live happily ever after when she left Roland. Why do you think that? The way I see it, is that everything resets. He has to do everything the same this time as in every time before. There can be no changes in the script or dialog. So when he reached the top of the Tower, everything everywhere reset back to where it was at that time and location when Roland was in the desert.
Spoiler:
#100
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RaraFemina
That's not true
That's not true
Spoiler:
He needs to do everything exactly the same to get to where he got to all of the other times. Could he make it without drawing the three to him? No. Could he do it without saving the beam first? No. Could he do it without saving Stephen King in the book? No. All of the events would have to transpire the same way for him to achieve the goal of reaching the Tower.
As far as I can tell, the only way for him to win this game (because that is what this story is, one big video game with only 2 positions, start and wherever he may happen to be at the time in the game) is for him to die or give up his quest. He will never give it up if he doesnt realize what happens to him every time he reaches the Tower. And the Tower wont let him die. So he has no chance of winning without some outside intervention i.e. Stephen King character showing up at the tower and telling him what will happen when he reaches the top again.
Right now it is like an evil version of Groundhog Day (which was a great movie that I highly recommend). But even in Groundhog day the main character (Bill Murray) knew that there was a time loop. Without that knowledge, there is no way he can escape it. And what is more, there is no desire on his part to do anythig differently.
Each person is only the sum of all of their experiences. If you block out those experiences that explain what will happen when you do a certain thing, then you are destined to repeat the process over and over and over again.
How could there possibly be a different outcome without an outside influence?