Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
I don't see this being a good thing *at all*. Anything and everything NBC Universal touches turns to s#!t. See The Weather Channel. Bad. Really bad.
Beyond that, it seems this is going to establish such a huge conglomerate for media *and* distribution that... bad. Really bad. Is this really a no-brainer to be approved by the FCC/etc? Because I can't imagine it is. This creates a ridiculous monopolistic power in cable and network/media...
The Weather Channel and Directv shows how nice NBC plays with other content providers with networks they own.
Lastly, can NBC even afford to do this? If this ends up having some turbulence, well... I imagine NBC is having to put up it's soul to make this deal happen. Obviously they've had a rough go of late, and while it is a huge corporation with infinite properties, I haven't read much recently about positive financial news for the company either - so putting up a blockbuster bid for a blockbuster corporation nearly its equal... seems to me one wrong move and NBC could end up sunk.
Regardless, anything giving the awful company known as NBC Universal more toys to destroy is bad. Really bad. See Weather Channel. Sci-fi... sorry, SyFy!!! Bravo. NBC and Leno, Today Show, primetime, etc etc etc.
Beyond that, it seems this is going to establish such a huge conglomerate for media *and* distribution that... bad. Really bad. Is this really a no-brainer to be approved by the FCC/etc? Because I can't imagine it is. This creates a ridiculous monopolistic power in cable and network/media...
The Weather Channel and Directv shows how nice NBC plays with other content providers with networks they own.
Lastly, can NBC even afford to do this? If this ends up having some turbulence, well... I imagine NBC is having to put up it's soul to make this deal happen. Obviously they've had a rough go of late, and while it is a huge corporation with infinite properties, I haven't read much recently about positive financial news for the company either - so putting up a blockbuster bid for a blockbuster corporation nearly its equal... seems to me one wrong move and NBC could end up sunk.
Regardless, anything giving the awful company known as NBC Universal more toys to destroy is bad. Really bad. See Weather Channel. Sci-fi... sorry, SyFy!!! Bravo. NBC and Leno, Today Show, primetime, etc etc etc.
#3
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
It won't make things better, but I don't really see it making things much worse either.
It is kind of funny at least in my area how things have gone. Back in the 90s, Comcast had a presence in OC, running Fullerton, Anaheim and Santa Ana. Then one day they all just became Adelphia. After a few years, Adelphia went belly up, and Comcast and Time Warner split their territory. Time Warner got got all of the So Cal markets that Adelphia had, so those cities all became TWC. Now they could come full circle and be back in Comcast's hands.
Meanwhile, the city I live in has been Time Warner since the mid 90s, so it'll be an interesting change.
It is kind of funny at least in my area how things have gone. Back in the 90s, Comcast had a presence in OC, running Fullerton, Anaheim and Santa Ana. Then one day they all just became Adelphia. After a few years, Adelphia went belly up, and Comcast and Time Warner split their territory. Time Warner got got all of the So Cal markets that Adelphia had, so those cities all became TWC. Now they could come full circle and be back in Comcast's hands.
Meanwhile, the city I live in has been Time Warner since the mid 90s, so it'll be an interesting change.
#5
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
I don't see this being a good thing *at all*. Anything and everything NBC Universal touches turns to s#!t. See The Weather Channel. Bad. Really bad.
Beyond that, it seems this is going to establish such a huge conglomerate for media *and* distribution that... bad. Really bad. Is this really a no-brainer to be approved by the FCC/etc? Because I can't imagine it is. This creates a ridiculous monopolistic power in cable and network/media...
The Weather Channel and Directv shows how nice NBC plays with other content providers with networks they own.
Lastly, can NBC even afford to do this? If this ends up having some turbulence, well... I imagine NBC is having to put up it's soul to make this deal happen. Obviously they've had a rough go of late, and while it is a huge corporation with infinite properties, I haven't read much recently about positive financial news for the company either - so putting up a blockbuster bid for a blockbuster corporation nearly its equal... seems to me one wrong move and NBC could end up sunk.
Regardless, anything giving the awful company known as NBC Universal more toys to destroy is bad. Really bad. See Weather Channel. Sci-fi... sorry, SyFy!!! Bravo. NBC and Leno, Today Show, primetime, etc etc etc.
Beyond that, it seems this is going to establish such a huge conglomerate for media *and* distribution that... bad. Really bad. Is this really a no-brainer to be approved by the FCC/etc? Because I can't imagine it is. This creates a ridiculous monopolistic power in cable and network/media...
The Weather Channel and Directv shows how nice NBC plays with other content providers with networks they own.
Lastly, can NBC even afford to do this? If this ends up having some turbulence, well... I imagine NBC is having to put up it's soul to make this deal happen. Obviously they've had a rough go of late, and while it is a huge corporation with infinite properties, I haven't read much recently about positive financial news for the company either - so putting up a blockbuster bid for a blockbuster corporation nearly its equal... seems to me one wrong move and NBC could end up sunk.
Regardless, anything giving the awful company known as NBC Universal more toys to destroy is bad. Really bad. See Weather Channel. Sci-fi... sorry, SyFy!!! Bravo. NBC and Leno, Today Show, primetime, etc etc etc.
More updated weather reports can be found on the internet.
#6
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
This will not pass.
#8
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
Those were my thoughts. When you can't beat the competition, buy them. I'm not sure the FTC will allow this merger.
The bigger cable/Internet providers are quickly becoming a critical chokepoint in today's society. Their decision-making unfortunately affects a wide array of issues beyond just their customers.
The bigger cable/Internet providers are quickly becoming a critical chokepoint in today's society. Their decision-making unfortunately affects a wide array of issues beyond just their customers.
#9
DVD Talk Legend
#11
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Land of the Lobstrosities
Posts: 10,300
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
Both companies are big Obama and Dem supporters, with Comcast in particular having very close ties to the Obama admin, so I don't expect this to face major regulatory opposition.
I'm a TWC customer and while I'm not thrilled with their service I also know I would be hit by Comcast's datacap if they took over and implemented it here.
I'm a TWC customer and while I'm not thrilled with their service I also know I would be hit by Comcast's datacap if they took over and implemented it here.
#12
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southside Virginia
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
This is the way I see it...
They'll only control 30% of the nation. This isn't going to have any significant antitrust problems.
It will start a bunch of mergers of cable companies (Charter/Cox, etc etc on down the line).
The prices will increase.
The increase in prices will kill these companies all the faster BECAUSE
The alternatives will get better AND
Congress will eventually take action on at least net neutrality and hopefully when there are only basically 4 cable companies left will hopefully force them into quasi-deregulation where they can have a content side and an infrastructure side and the infrastructure side will be highly regulated and open to competition.
That's sort of what I'm hoping for. Aereo has to win their lawsuit for that to be viable, and more online alternative content providers have to come into being/the ones we have need to raise their game.
They'll only control 30% of the nation. This isn't going to have any significant antitrust problems.
It will start a bunch of mergers of cable companies (Charter/Cox, etc etc on down the line).
The prices will increase.
The increase in prices will kill these companies all the faster BECAUSE
The alternatives will get better AND
Congress will eventually take action on at least net neutrality and hopefully when there are only basically 4 cable companies left will hopefully force them into quasi-deregulation where they can have a content side and an infrastructure side and the infrastructure side will be highly regulated and open to competition.
That's sort of what I'm hoping for. Aereo has to win their lawsuit for that to be viable, and more online alternative content providers have to come into being/the ones we have need to raise their game.
#13
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
Aren't they already pretty much monopolies in their respective areas? I don't think I've ever lived in an area where I had multiple cable companies to choose from; it's either one cable company, or go to antenna or satellite.
#14
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southside Virginia
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
Right, but there are other ways a monopoly could harm the market. If Comcast did 100% of the cable, they'd be able to squeeze down carriage fees for networks and at the same time increase prices because while there aren't 2 cable companies in most places for any single address, there are enough people who live in a place where they can easily move and get their choice that there is some meaningful competition.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
From one of Comcast's mouthpieces today:
In a conference call with reporters, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts defended the deal, calling it "pro-consumer, pro-competitive and strongly in the public interest."
One can only shake one's head in dis(may-gust-missal). Just about as much the polar opposite of those three categories as possible. I'm genuinely concerned if this moves forward... the tactics Comcast has been pulling with networks they own on other content providers has been a negative both for the cost of cable for consumers and the availability of the networks elsewhere, along with the quality of content they produce.
While Comcast is hardly alone gouging other companies for the networks they own, they're one of the worst... again, see Weather Channel and DirecTV. I shudder to imagine the issues Comcast's added leverage will give them in continuing and increasing those sorts of practices - I also fear for HBO specifically, and what changes/costs Comcast might seek to implement. Worst of all, if this goes forward, it's only the beginning. The other players will respond, will merge, and we'll all suffer for it. I think at the very least a Dish/DirecTV deal is a no-brainer. Verizon might also seek to add a major content provider/network conglomerate - they've become a major player with video/broadband, and now this merger only highlights the disadvantage they've got without any real networks/content producers under their control.
A tiny issue, all things considered, but I have to wonder what this spells for the CW - a 50/50 partnership between Warner and CBS. Whenever the current contract ends I've got to imagine Warner pulls out and does something similar with NBC, simply replacing CBS with Comcast owned NBC. At the very least, ending the CW experiment by not continuing a partnership with what's soon to be one of their major rivals. Just one example, but clearly the ramifications and aftershocks that'll follow in the wake of this deal will be far-reaching and seemingly unending.
In a conference call with reporters, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts defended the deal, calling it "pro-consumer, pro-competitive and strongly in the public interest."
One can only shake one's head in dis(may-gust-missal). Just about as much the polar opposite of those three categories as possible. I'm genuinely concerned if this moves forward... the tactics Comcast has been pulling with networks they own on other content providers has been a negative both for the cost of cable for consumers and the availability of the networks elsewhere, along with the quality of content they produce.
While Comcast is hardly alone gouging other companies for the networks they own, they're one of the worst... again, see Weather Channel and DirecTV. I shudder to imagine the issues Comcast's added leverage will give them in continuing and increasing those sorts of practices - I also fear for HBO specifically, and what changes/costs Comcast might seek to implement. Worst of all, if this goes forward, it's only the beginning. The other players will respond, will merge, and we'll all suffer for it. I think at the very least a Dish/DirecTV deal is a no-brainer. Verizon might also seek to add a major content provider/network conglomerate - they've become a major player with video/broadband, and now this merger only highlights the disadvantage they've got without any real networks/content producers under their control.
A tiny issue, all things considered, but I have to wonder what this spells for the CW - a 50/50 partnership between Warner and CBS. Whenever the current contract ends I've got to imagine Warner pulls out and does something similar with NBC, simply replacing CBS with Comcast owned NBC. At the very least, ending the CW experiment by not continuing a partnership with what's soon to be one of their major rivals. Just one example, but clearly the ramifications and aftershocks that'll follow in the wake of this deal will be far-reaching and seemingly unending.
#16
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southside Virginia
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
Um, no worries about HBO or CW. Time Warner Cable is a distinct company from Time Warner. They only bought cable franchises here, not content.
#18
DVD Talk Reviewer & TOAT Winner
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
My dream is for Comcast to take over all the cable companies and then go through a spectacular death, just as Blockbuster did.
#19
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southside Virginia
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
The closest you're going to get to the second is what happened to the phone companies. The cable they own buried underground will always be valuable. The rest of what they do...not so much.
#20
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
For all Time Warner customers, get ready for less HD Channels!
I have Com-Crap (sorry I meant Comcast) simply because they have a monopoly in my area because they won't offer Philadelphia Comcast Sportnet to DirecTV, so as a Philly Sports fan I have to go with Comcast.
We are in 2014 and the NBA, NHL and MLB Sports Tickets are not in HD. Thats right it is only offered in grainy, blurry standard like a 1990's TV. But Com-Crap can get away with it because South Jersey/Philadelphia Customers are stuck with them. I also have many problems with my On-Demand as many days it doesn't even work, and when I call I get the same crap, "Turn off your box for 30 seconds and try it now." Which of course it never works.
And also Comcast discontinued the Picture-In-Picture function a few years ago. I loved it as a sports fan, and they told me they would offer it in 2013, needless to say I'm still waiting!
This is what happens when you have a monopoly in this economy and they can get away with all this crap, simply because they know most customers have no alternative. Yet the FCC continues to allow these big mergers???
I have Com-Crap (sorry I meant Comcast) simply because they have a monopoly in my area because they won't offer Philadelphia Comcast Sportnet to DirecTV, so as a Philly Sports fan I have to go with Comcast.
We are in 2014 and the NBA, NHL and MLB Sports Tickets are not in HD. Thats right it is only offered in grainy, blurry standard like a 1990's TV. But Com-Crap can get away with it because South Jersey/Philadelphia Customers are stuck with them. I also have many problems with my On-Demand as many days it doesn't even work, and when I call I get the same crap, "Turn off your box for 30 seconds and try it now." Which of course it never works.
And also Comcast discontinued the Picture-In-Picture function a few years ago. I loved it as a sports fan, and they told me they would offer it in 2013, needless to say I'm still waiting!
This is what happens when you have a monopoly in this economy and they can get away with all this crap, simply because they know most customers have no alternative. Yet the FCC continues to allow these big mergers???
#22
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
For all Time Warner customers, get ready for less HD Channels!
I have Com-Crap (sorry I meant Comcast) simply because they have a monopoly in my area because they won't offer Philadelphia Comcast Sportnet to DirecTV, so as a Philly Sports fan I have to go with Comcast.
We are in 2014 and the NBA, NHL and MLB Sports Tickets are not in HD. Thats right it is only offered in grainy, blurry standard like a 1990's TV. But Com-Crap can get away with it because South Jersey/Philadelphia Customers are stuck with them. I also have many problems with my On-Demand as many days it doesn't even work, and when I call I get the same crap, "Turn off your box for 30 seconds and try it now." Which of course it never works.
And also Comcast discontinued the Picture-In-Picture function a few years ago. I loved it as a sports fan, and they told me they would offer it in 2013, needless to say I'm still waiting!
This is what happens when you have a monopoly in this economy and they can get away with all this crap, simply because they know most customers have no alternative. Yet the FCC continues to allow these big mergers???
I have Com-Crap (sorry I meant Comcast) simply because they have a monopoly in my area because they won't offer Philadelphia Comcast Sportnet to DirecTV, so as a Philly Sports fan I have to go with Comcast.
We are in 2014 and the NBA, NHL and MLB Sports Tickets are not in HD. Thats right it is only offered in grainy, blurry standard like a 1990's TV. But Com-Crap can get away with it because South Jersey/Philadelphia Customers are stuck with them. I also have many problems with my On-Demand as many days it doesn't even work, and when I call I get the same crap, "Turn off your box for 30 seconds and try it now." Which of course it never works.
And also Comcast discontinued the Picture-In-Picture function a few years ago. I loved it as a sports fan, and they told me they would offer it in 2013, needless to say I'm still waiting!
This is what happens when you have a monopoly in this economy and they can get away with all this crap, simply because they know most customers have no alternative. Yet the FCC continues to allow these big mergers???
TWC has more HD because of better infrastructure, but really that gap isn't that huge. On TWC we have 2 HD Channels for NHL Center Ice/MLB Extra innings (shared), and one for NBA League Pass. The rest of the games are SD. It's a bandwidth issue on cable, which means for every HD feed they add to one of those premium sports packages, is one they can't add to the general lineup.
That being said, MLB.tv blows MLB Extra Innings out of the water, and it's much cheaper.
Can you not get Verizon FiOS where you live? They have CSN Philly from what I've heard. Also, Comcast is now being forced to offer it to Dish/DirecTV, but that doesn't mean they have to take the deal. Time Warner's gonna have a fight to get the Dodger Station carried, just like they did with the Laker channel.
I'm not trying to defend Comcast here, anymore than I would TWC. All these companies are greedy dinosaurs trying to remain relevant in a changing world.
#23
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
A tiny issue, all things considered, but I have to wonder what this spells for the CW - a 50/50 partnership between Warner and CBS. Whenever the current contract ends I've got to imagine Warner pulls out and does something similar with NBC, simply replacing CBS with Comcast owned NBC. At the very least, ending the CW experiment by not continuing a partnership with what's soon to be one of their major rivals. Just one example, but clearly the ramifications and aftershocks that'll follow in the wake of this deal will be far-reaching and seemingly unending.
#24
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
Competition is good for consumers. Which is why corporations will seek to quash it at every given opportunity. (And it's why there will never be a true free market - 0.002 seconds after all government intervention is lifted, monopolies will form in every sector.)
#25
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable
Can you not get Verizon FiOS where you live? They have CSN Philly from what I've heard. Also, Comcast is now being forced to offer it to Dish/DirecTV, but that doesn't mean they have to take the deal. Time Warner's gonna have a fight to get the Dodger Station carried, just like they did with the Laker channel.
The bottom line is every consumer in the Philadelphia/South Jersey area should be able to get either DirecTV or DISH Network with ComcastSportsnet, FIOS or Comcast, as that would atleast get some competition going in this area. Right now DirecTV is irrelevant if you are a Philly sports fan, and FIOS is only available in a limited amount of towns.