Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

80's low budget dvd transfers

Community
Search
DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

80's low budget dvd transfers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-11, 08:11 AM
  #1  
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
80's low budget dvd transfers

I notice it a little on 70's low budget dvd transfers, but especially 80's low budget transfers: The picture has this kind of bland, peach or gray colored look. Not all low budget movies, but a lot of them.

Does anyone know what I'm talk about? If so, I wonder if you know why they look like that?
Old 09-16-11, 09:38 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Ash Ketchum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,640
Received 279 Likes on 214 Posts
Re: 80's low budget dvd transfers

Can you please give us examples of specific films and DVD transfers? That way if we actually have those DVDs, we can check them to see if what you're describing is evident to us or not.
Old 09-16-11, 04:26 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Reviewer/Moderator
 
Kurt D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Formerly known as L. Ron zyzzle - On a cloud of Judgement
Posts: 14,517
Received 1,851 Likes on 1,240 Posts
Re: 80's low budget dvd transfers

Peach and gray were very popular colors in the '80s. Problem solved.
Old 09-17-11, 10:12 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: 80's low budget dvd transfers

Airplane, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Chud, Alligator, Commando. To name a few.
Old 09-18-11, 12:57 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 80's low budget dvd transfers

I know THIEF has had about 3 different looking transfers.
It's not like the movies of this century where they are mostly teal colored.
Looks like the blue ray od SCARFACE doesn't look ;ole it did in 1983.
Depends on the dope who is doing the color correcting.
Old 09-18-11, 07:23 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Ash Ketchum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,640
Received 279 Likes on 214 Posts
Re: 80's low budget dvd transfers

Originally Posted by Yeti4623
Airplane, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Chud, Alligator, Commando. To name a few.
I saw one of those in a theater, one on cable, one on broadcast, one on VHS, and the other (CHUD) not at all, and absolutely none on DVD, so I'm afraid I can't help you out on this one. Sorry.
Old 09-18-11, 07:54 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
SterlingBen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 7,748
Received 330 Likes on 201 Posts
Re: 80's low budget dvd transfers

Originally Posted by Yeti4623
I notice it a little on 70's low budget dvd transfers, but especially 80's low budget transfers: The picture has this kind of bland, peach or gray colored look. Not all low budget movies, but a lot of them.

Does anyone know what I'm talk about? If so, I wonder if you know why they look like that?
Quality of the film stock used for digitization purposes.
Old 09-19-11, 08:14 AM
  #8  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lower Appalachia
Posts: 2,909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: 80's low budget dvd transfers

A number of things happened to make a lot (not all) of the films from the late 1970s and early 1980s look bad:

Much of the Eastman Kodak film stock from this period was poor, meaning the films never looked that great to start with, and were more susceptible to fading over time.

Movies started opening much wider (many more screens than before) so more wear and tear on the film elements to make more prints.

Cheaper lab processing was available for 35mm film (and became more popular because of having larger print runs), with resulting lowering of quality. Technicolor, for one, discontinued their top-of-the-line imbibition process in the late 1970s, which had always been expensive and had been being used by fewer and fewer films, but now it was gone completely.

Probably other reasons as well but these are a few I thought of. It isn't necessarily the transfers, the films themselves probably looked this way to start with, especially low budget ones.
Old 09-19-11, 11:22 AM
  #9  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 80's low budget dvd transfers

Originally Posted by Kurtie Dee
Peach and gray were very popular colors in the '80s. Problem solved.
Much like teal and orange are now. Was somewhat take aback recently as I watched bits of Fast and Furious and the Nightmare on Elm Street remake. Those colors were so ubiquitous, they were actually distracting, especially in Nightmare.

--THX
Old 09-19-11, 03:57 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 80's low budget dvd transfers

Originally Posted by CertifiedTHX
Much like teal and orange are now. Was somewhat take aback recently as I watched bits of Fast and Furious and the Nightmare on Elm Street remake. Those colors were so ubiquitous, they were actually distracting, especially in Nightmare.

--THX
I never heard of anyone in DVDTALK say they like teal & orange in their movies. Since DVDTALK members are mostly movie geeks one can assume that movie goers don't like it. So why does Hollywood continue for 11 years putting this out?
Only reason I can think of is that they have the guy on the desktop who does the color on the movie print with little time to work on the film.
So in order to finish the print quick he just leaves scenes in the 2 color shade.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.