Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV
View Poll Results: .
Yes
19
61.29%
No
12
38.71%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-10, 12:59 AM
  #1  
En vacance
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,512
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Do you consider this show canon
Old 09-11-10, 01:04 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southside Virginia
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

No, and I think that's the massively prevailing view. I believe it is Roddenberry's own view, which is usually what determines the question at least in terms of creations during the creator's life.

It is also quite inconsistent with TOS and the TOS-era films if I understand the argument correctly. I haven't actually seen TAS since I was a kid, but I liked it then.
Old 09-11-10, 01:47 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
RoboDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A far green country
Posts: 5,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

David Gerrold and D.C. Fontana disagree. When they wrote episodes for TAS, they worked very hard to maintain both consistency and continuity with TOS. Plus, many of the characters, situations, places, ships, and other elements introduced in TAS were referenced in later series and films (such as Kirk's middle name).
Old 09-11-10, 02:43 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Boba Fett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,283
Received 38 Likes on 30 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Elements are canon, but only what was chosen for usage elsewhere. A similar example is the species name Twi'lek being adopted by Lucas from the EU, Aayala Secura was an EU character, the podraces were referenced in the Droids cartoon, Boba Fett was introduced in the Holiday Special and the designers of Ep. III using some scenes from the Holiday Special for inspiration in the design of Kashyyk.

Additionally, some speculate Lucas took the idea of Vader creating 3PO from a throwaway plot device in the "Splinter of the Minds Eye" novel from '78.

And don't get me started on all the Jedi stuff Lucas pulled from the West End Games RPGs.
Old 09-11-10, 03:22 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Navinabob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 8,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Yes to being cannon. Does everything fit well? Nope. But the show(s) contradict each other, and the movies, all the time so it is not that big of an issue really. Roddenberry called it cannon so it stays. Die-hard fans are split on the matter... I play the MMO game where "cannon" is always discussed to death.
Old 09-11-10, 08:16 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: behind the eight ball
Posts: 19,961
Received 237 Likes on 149 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Originally Posted by Boba Fett
Elements are canon, but only what was chosen for usage elsewhere. A similar example is the species name Twi'lek being adopted by Lucas from the EU, Aayala Secura was an EU character, the podraces were referenced in the Droids cartoon, Boba Fett was introduced in the Holiday Special and the designers of Ep. III using some scenes from the Holiday Special for inspiration in the design of Kashyyk.
Don't forget Courscant, which also came from the EU.

Haven't seen TAS in a loooong time, but it's only $19.99 at wal-mart. I remember it being a step above a lot of the animated fare at the time, not so much for the animation, but I could tell even as a kid that the stories were a lot better. As for it being canon, about the only major plot I remember was something about Spock's childhood.
Old 09-11-10, 09:10 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Chew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: South of Titletown
Posts: 18,628
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

I agree with "some parts are, others not". There's plenty of references to TAS in the later series.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Tr...s#Canon_issues
Old 09-11-10, 09:33 AM
  #8  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southside Virginia
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

As I understand canon in general, incorporation of a non-canon material by a canon material makes the part referenced in the canon canonical. There is nothing improper about that. Non-canon does not mean this is definitively outside the realm of this universe, just that it has not been established definitively as part of the universe.
Old 09-11-10, 11:14 AM
  #9  
DVD Talk Legend
 
calhoun07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

I look at it as Star Trek season 4.
Old 09-11-10, 01:33 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Boba Fett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,283
Received 38 Likes on 30 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Originally Posted by calhoun07
I look at it as Star Trek season 4.
I always felt the PC games "Star Trek: 25th Anniversary" and "Judgment Rites" were the unofficial 4th Season.
On the CD version they had the entire original cast do voice work.
Old 09-11-10, 03:06 PM
  #11  
En vacance
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,512
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Originally Posted by calhoun07
I look at it as Star Trek season 4.
I'm in the TAS=TOS S4 camp too. The amount of running time for TAS totals to around half of a TOS season.
Old 09-12-10, 03:23 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
Posts: 29,834
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

seems to me if you get a lot of the same writers from TOS, it has the same actors come back to do their voices, and Roddenberry is involved it's canon

TAS wasn't like the various EU books that are written by who ever and often don't line up with each other

besides Generations has one of the biggest contradictions ever, having Scotty know of Kirks death when in Relics Scotty says he bets it was "Jim Kirk himself who hauled the old girl out of mothballs to come looking for me"
Old 09-12-10, 04:12 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Legend
 
chuckd21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,704
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Originally Posted by mikehunt
besides Generations has one of the biggest contradictions ever, having Scotty know of Kirks death when in Relics Scotty says he bets it was "Jim Kirk himself who hauled the old girl out of mothballs to come looking for me"
I'm pretty sure that someway, somehow, the plan was to have Kirk come back at some point. Wasn't there a whole series of books about Kirk being rescued from the Nexus?
Old 09-12-10, 04:17 PM
  #14  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
davidh777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Home of 2013 NFL champion Seahawks
Posts: 52,611
Received 1,015 Likes on 839 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Originally Posted by Boba Fett
Elements are canon, but only what was chosen for usage elsewhere. A similar example is the species name Twi'lek being adopted by Lucas from the EU, Aayala Secura was an EU character, the podraces were referenced in the Droids cartoon, Boba Fett was introduced in the Holiday Special and the designers of Ep. III using some scenes from the Holiday Special for inspiration in the design of Kashyyk.

Additionally, some speculate Lucas took the idea of Vader creating 3PO from a throwaway plot device in the "Splinter of the Minds Eye" novel from '78.

And don't get me started on all the Jedi stuff Lucas pulled from the West End Games RPGs.
Old 09-12-10, 07:52 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,182
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Originally Posted by chuckd21
I'm pretty sure that someway, somehow, the plan was to have Kirk come back at some point. Wasn't there a whole series of books about Kirk being rescued from the Nexus?
No, but Shatner "wrote" a series of books about Kirk being brought back to life in the 24th century following "Generations".
Old 09-12-10, 08:14 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Legend
 
calhoun07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Originally Posted by chuckd21
I'm pretty sure that someway, somehow, the plan was to have Kirk come back at some point. Wasn't there a whole series of books about Kirk being rescued from the Nexus?
I prefer to think Guinan was right...Picard could NOT leave the Nexus. So him "getting out" of the Nexus and Kirk dying and all that crap actually took place in the Nexus. And Picard is still in the Nexus, though all the movies and books he's been in since Generations.

Outside of the Nexus Picard is considered dead. Whether or not they were able to bring Kirk back remains to be seen.

I realize this is not how it has gone down in the movies and books, but it would be kind of cool if they did a book series or a movie that revealed this is how it played out after all this time.
Old 09-13-10, 08:01 AM
  #17  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 130,262
Received 614 Likes on 493 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Sure.
Old 09-13-10, 08:39 AM
  #18  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Meglos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,407
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Yes.
Old 09-13-10, 08:58 AM
  #19  
Moderator
 
wendersfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: America!
Posts: 33,922
Received 164 Likes on 120 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Yes.
Old 09-13-10, 09:28 AM
  #20  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Originally Posted by mikehunt
TAS wasn't like the various EU books that are written by who ever and often don't line up with each other
That's no longer true. Now that the books are the only source for TNG-era stories, the publisher has taken to coordinating the books much more closely and building larger arc stories.

Originally Posted by chuckd21
I'm pretty sure that someway, somehow, the plan was to have Kirk come back at some point. Wasn't there a whole series of books about Kirk being rescued from the Nexus?
Yes, "written" by Shatner, and like Star Trek V they're practically fanfic with Kirk as the Shat's Mary Sue. Not only aren't they canon, but they don't even belong to the same non-canon canon as the other Trek novels.
Old 09-13-10, 09:52 AM
  #21  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 130,262
Received 614 Likes on 493 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Speaking of ST V, if TAS isn't canon, then ST V shouldn't be.
Old 09-13-10, 10:31 AM
  #22  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Chew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: South of Titletown
Posts: 18,628
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Wait, there was a movie between Voyage Home and Undiscovered Country?
Old 09-13-10, 03:43 PM
  #23  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not

Originally Posted by Red Dog
Speaking of ST V, if TAS isn't canon, then ST V shouldn't be.
Gene Roddenberry agreed with you.

Originally Posted by [url=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/StarTrekVTheFinalFrontier
TV Tropes[/url]]
Canon Dis Continuity: It's still technically part of the canon, but the events have never been directly referenced in another canonical Star Trek work again. Rumor has it the writers are specifically told not to as a matter of course. Gene Roddenberry said he considered some elements of the movie apocryphal, but he apparently never told anyone which ones.

The novels, which are now vetted more thoroughly than they used to be, have featured Sybok exactly once—in an alternate universe where humanity was conquered by the Borg and Spock was never born.
Note that in the TNG episode featuring Sarek, he introduces his wife as his second, implying that he either illogically knocked up some Vulcan chick and left her pregnant, or that Sybok doesn't exist in the TNG-verse.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.