View Poll Results: .
Yes
19
61.29%
No
12
38.71%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll
Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
#2
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southside Virginia
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
No, and I think that's the massively prevailing view. I believe it is Roddenberry's own view, which is usually what determines the question at least in terms of creations during the creator's life.
It is also quite inconsistent with TOS and the TOS-era films if I understand the argument correctly. I haven't actually seen TAS since I was a kid, but I liked it then.
It is also quite inconsistent with TOS and the TOS-era films if I understand the argument correctly. I haven't actually seen TAS since I was a kid, but I liked it then.
#3
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A far green country
Posts: 5,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
David Gerrold and D.C. Fontana disagree. When they wrote episodes for TAS, they worked very hard to maintain both consistency and continuity with TOS. Plus, many of the characters, situations, places, ships, and other elements introduced in TAS were referenced in later series and films (such as Kirk's middle name).
#4
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
Elements are canon, but only what was chosen for usage elsewhere. A similar example is the species name Twi'lek being adopted by Lucas from the EU, Aayala Secura was an EU character, the podraces were referenced in the Droids cartoon, Boba Fett was introduced in the Holiday Special and the designers of Ep. III using some scenes from the Holiday Special for inspiration in the design of Kashyyk.
Additionally, some speculate Lucas took the idea of Vader creating 3PO from a throwaway plot device in the "Splinter of the Minds Eye" novel from '78.
And don't get me started on all the Jedi stuff Lucas pulled from the West End Games RPGs.
Additionally, some speculate Lucas took the idea of Vader creating 3PO from a throwaway plot device in the "Splinter of the Minds Eye" novel from '78.
And don't get me started on all the Jedi stuff Lucas pulled from the West End Games RPGs.
#5
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 8,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
Yes to being cannon. Does everything fit well? Nope. But the show(s) contradict each other, and the movies, all the time so it is not that big of an issue really. Roddenberry called it cannon so it stays. Die-hard fans are split on the matter... I play the MMO game where "cannon" is always discussed to death.
#6
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
Elements are canon, but only what was chosen for usage elsewhere. A similar example is the species name Twi'lek being adopted by Lucas from the EU, Aayala Secura was an EU character, the podraces were referenced in the Droids cartoon, Boba Fett was introduced in the Holiday Special and the designers of Ep. III using some scenes from the Holiday Special for inspiration in the design of Kashyyk.
Haven't seen TAS in a loooong time, but it's only $19.99 at wal-mart. I remember it being a step above a lot of the animated fare at the time, not so much for the animation, but I could tell even as a kid that the stories were a lot better. As for it being canon, about the only major plot I remember was something about Spock's childhood.
#7
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
I agree with "some parts are, others not". There's plenty of references to TAS in the later series.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Tr...s#Canon_issues
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Tr...s#Canon_issues
#8
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southside Virginia
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
As I understand canon in general, incorporation of a non-canon material by a canon material makes the part referenced in the canon canonical. There is nothing improper about that. Non-canon does not mean this is definitively outside the realm of this universe, just that it has not been established definitively as part of the universe.
#10
#11
#12
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
Posts: 29,834
Received 18 Likes
on
12 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
seems to me if you get a lot of the same writers from TOS, it has the same actors come back to do their voices, and Roddenberry is involved it's canon
TAS wasn't like the various EU books that are written by who ever and often don't line up with each other
besides Generations has one of the biggest contradictions ever, having Scotty know of Kirks death when in Relics Scotty says he bets it was "Jim Kirk himself who hauled the old girl out of mothballs to come looking for me"
TAS wasn't like the various EU books that are written by who ever and often don't line up with each other
besides Generations has one of the biggest contradictions ever, having Scotty know of Kirks death when in Relics Scotty says he bets it was "Jim Kirk himself who hauled the old girl out of mothballs to come looking for me"
#13
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
I'm pretty sure that someway, somehow, the plan was to have Kirk come back at some point. Wasn't there a whole series of books about Kirk being rescued from the Nexus?
#14
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Home of 2013 NFL champion Seahawks
Posts: 52,611
Received 1,015 Likes
on
839 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
Elements are canon, but only what was chosen for usage elsewhere. A similar example is the species name Twi'lek being adopted by Lucas from the EU, Aayala Secura was an EU character, the podraces were referenced in the Droids cartoon, Boba Fett was introduced in the Holiday Special and the designers of Ep. III using some scenes from the Holiday Special for inspiration in the design of Kashyyk.
Additionally, some speculate Lucas took the idea of Vader creating 3PO from a throwaway plot device in the "Splinter of the Minds Eye" novel from '78.
And don't get me started on all the Jedi stuff Lucas pulled from the West End Games RPGs.
Additionally, some speculate Lucas took the idea of Vader creating 3PO from a throwaway plot device in the "Splinter of the Minds Eye" novel from '78.
And don't get me started on all the Jedi stuff Lucas pulled from the West End Games RPGs.
#15
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
No, but Shatner "wrote" a series of books about Kirk being brought back to life in the 24th century following "Generations".
#16
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
Outside of the Nexus Picard is considered dead. Whether or not they were able to bring Kirk back remains to be seen.
I realize this is not how it has gone down in the movies and books, but it would be kind of cool if they did a book series or a movie that revealed this is how it played out after all this time.
#19
Moderator
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
Yes.
#20
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
Yes, "written" by Shatner, and like Star Trek V they're practically fanfic with Kirk as the Shat's Mary Sue. Not only aren't they canon, but they don't even belong to the same non-canon canon as the other Trek novels.
#23
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Trek: Animated Series: canon or not
Gene Roddenberry agreed with you.
Note that in the TNG episode featuring Sarek, he introduces his wife as his second, implying that he either illogically knocked up some Vulcan chick and left her pregnant, or that Sybok doesn't exist in the TNG-verse.
Originally Posted by [url=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/StarTrekVTheFinalFrontier
TV Tropes[/url]]
Canon Dis Continuity: It's still technically part of the canon, but the events have never been directly referenced in another canonical Star Trek work again. Rumor has it the writers are specifically told not to as a matter of course. Gene Roddenberry said he considered some elements of the movie apocryphal, but he apparently never told anyone which ones.
The novels, which are now vetted more thoroughly than they used to be, have featured Sybok exactly once—in an alternate universe where humanity was conquered by the Borg and Spock was never born.
Canon Dis Continuity: It's still technically part of the canon, but the events have never been directly referenced in another canonical Star Trek work again. Rumor has it the writers are specifically told not to as a matter of course. Gene Roddenberry said he considered some elements of the movie apocryphal, but he apparently never told anyone which ones.
The novels, which are now vetted more thoroughly than they used to be, have featured Sybok exactly once—in an alternate universe where humanity was conquered by the Borg and Spock was never born.