View Poll Results: Best of AFI's top Sci-Fi movies
E.T. - The Extra Terrestrial
0
0%
Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll
Best of AFI's top Sci-Fi movies
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Best of AFI's top Sci-Fi movies
Results thus far as voted by the members:
Best of AFI's top Sports movies: Rocky
Best of AFI's top Sci-Fi movies: ???
Best of AFI's top Sports movies: Rocky
Best of AFI's top Sci-Fi movies: ???
Last edited by abe55; 09-30-08 at 07:31 PM.
#2
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This was really tough for me. I narrowed it down to Blade Runner and 2001 and ultimately went with 2001... but in a different moment I might have gone for Blade Runner. Both are towering achievements.
I know this list was compiled by AFI, but does anyone else find it weird that they count E.T. and Star Wars as science fiction? I would argue that they're wonderful fantasy stories but have no element of science fiction in them. Back to the Future and Alien are also questionable examples of "science fiction" in my opinion.
I know this list was compiled by AFI, but does anyone else find it weird that they count E.T. and Star Wars as science fiction? I would argue that they're wonderful fantasy stories but have no element of science fiction in them. Back to the Future and Alien are also questionable examples of "science fiction" in my opinion.
#3
DVD Talk Legend
#4
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought about that one but can justify it to a certain extent because it deals with the ethical dilemma that can arise with the technology of mind/behavior alteration.
#6
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
A Clockwork Orange is at least as much science fiction as Star Wars: ANH, if not more.
http://scifi.about.com/od/scififanta...SCIFI_defs.htm
Ray Bradbury
"Science fiction is really sociological studies of the future, things that the writer believes are going to happen by putting two and two together."
Isaac Asimov
"Modern science fiction is the only form of literature that consistently considers the nature of the changes that face us, the possible consequences, and the possible solutions. That branch of literature which is concerned with the impact of scientific advance upon human beings"
John W. Campbell, Jr.
"The major distinction between fantasy and science fiction is, simply, that science fiction uses one, or a very, very few new postulates, and develops the rigidly consistent logical consequences of these limited postulates. Fantasy makes its rules as it goes along...The basic nature of fantasy is "The only rule is, make up a new rule any time you need one!" The basic rule of science fiction is "Set up a basic proposition--then develop its consistent, logical consequences.""
I knew I had read the "one (or few) ifs, and presenting effects of those" definition somewhere, I thought it was Asimov, but I'll take Campbell's word for it.
There are many science fiction aficionados who believe Star Wars is not science fiction at all. However, Hollywood seems to think spaceships = scifi.
Actually the "one if" idea is espoused by many SF personalities, especially golden age and earlier: Groff Conklin, Heinlein, Wolleheiim.
Reading many of those quotes, I'm more strongly calling ACO "science fiction". Even apart from the "one if", the more expansive definition is "fiction that presents the effects on society of certain scientific advances", and ACO definitely presents that.
http://scifi.about.com/od/scififanta...SCIFI_defs.htm
Ray Bradbury
"Science fiction is really sociological studies of the future, things that the writer believes are going to happen by putting two and two together."
Isaac Asimov
"Modern science fiction is the only form of literature that consistently considers the nature of the changes that face us, the possible consequences, and the possible solutions. That branch of literature which is concerned with the impact of scientific advance upon human beings"
John W. Campbell, Jr.
"The major distinction between fantasy and science fiction is, simply, that science fiction uses one, or a very, very few new postulates, and develops the rigidly consistent logical consequences of these limited postulates. Fantasy makes its rules as it goes along...The basic nature of fantasy is "The only rule is, make up a new rule any time you need one!" The basic rule of science fiction is "Set up a basic proposition--then develop its consistent, logical consequences.""
I knew I had read the "one (or few) ifs, and presenting effects of those" definition somewhere, I thought it was Asimov, but I'll take Campbell's word for it.
There are many science fiction aficionados who believe Star Wars is not science fiction at all. However, Hollywood seems to think spaceships = scifi.
Actually the "one if" idea is espoused by many SF personalities, especially golden age and earlier: Groff Conklin, Heinlein, Wolleheiim.
Reading many of those quotes, I'm more strongly calling ACO "science fiction". Even apart from the "one if", the more expansive definition is "fiction that presents the effects on society of certain scientific advances", and ACO definitely presents that.
#10
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I like A Clockwork Orange (which I've always considered to be Science Fiction, and first saw at a Science Fiction Convention in the late 70's) best of those movies.
#14
DVD Talk Legend
For me, THE best sci-fi film is a tie between "Blade Runner" and "Alien". And a close second is "Close Encounters".
#16
DVD Talk Godfather & 2020 TOTY Winner
2001 edging out Alien and Blade Runner.
#20
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Typical nonsensical AFI list -- Star Trek II is superior to any of the Star Wars films, and Forbidden Planet deserves a spot more than The Day the Earth Stood Still.