View Poll Results: Would you refuse to see a film remake of a favorite book?
Yes
5
12.82%
No
32
82.05%
I often debate this
2
5.13%
Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll
Would you refuse to see a film remake of a favorite book?
#1
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
Would you refuse to see a film remake of a favorite book?
The thread on the new film, "The Mist" got me thinking about this question.
It's one of my favorite stories when I was a kid. It was all about atmosphere and the menacing unknown; written so well that it left a heckuva impression that I remember to this day. I read it once over 20 years ago.
Because of its impact I really have no interest to see it in film form due to the other "menacing unknown" - Hollywood. At least in my opinion, their track record is definitely helping along my decision.
If I see it, I feel that any memories I have of the story will be crushed, replaced by something ridiculously wrong - silly 1 dimensional characters, the finalization of plot points that you can see a mile away .. whatever really. My impression will be left forever ruined.
Bottom line, I won't see it.
Ever feel this way?
It's one of my favorite stories when I was a kid. It was all about atmosphere and the menacing unknown; written so well that it left a heckuva impression that I remember to this day. I read it once over 20 years ago.
Because of its impact I really have no interest to see it in film form due to the other "menacing unknown" - Hollywood. At least in my opinion, their track record is definitely helping along my decision.
If I see it, I feel that any memories I have of the story will be crushed, replaced by something ridiculously wrong - silly 1 dimensional characters, the finalization of plot points that you can see a mile away .. whatever really. My impression will be left forever ruined.
Bottom line, I won't see it.
Ever feel this way?
Last edited by visitor Q; 11-14-07 at 05:39 PM.
#2
DVD Talk Godfather
No, but I've already experienced the worst: Jurassic Park.
Two of my favorite books have been turned into movies: Catch-22 and The Milagro Beanfield War. I don't rush out to see them.
Two of my favorite books have been turned into movies: Catch-22 and The Milagro Beanfield War. I don't rush out to see them.
#4
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by The Bus
No, but I've already experienced the worst: Jurassic Park.
#8
Moderator
I've never seen a movie based on a Nick Hornby novel and possibly never will, so I guess, yeah.
#9
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It just depends on who is adapting it really.
I enjoy the Harry Potter series and its been adapted well.
But really Jurassic Park is your fave book? It was an entertaining read as was Lost World but nothing I felt was really amazing. Of all the Chrichton books I think "Sphere" was the most disapointing though.
I enjoy the Harry Potter series and its been adapted well.
But really Jurassic Park is your fave book? It was an entertaining read as was Lost World but nothing I felt was really amazing. Of all the Chrichton books I think "Sphere" was the most disapointing though.
#10
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
Why? Are they making a movie based on Catcher in the Rye? I wouldn't refuse to see it.
#11
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CALI!
Posts: 6,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wendersfan
I've never seen a movie based on a Nick Hornby novel and possibly never will, so I guess, yeah.
High Fidelity is very good, so is About A Boy. Fever Pitch with Jimmy Fallon is garbage.
#12
DVD Talk Hero - 2023 TOTY Award Winner
Already made, Catch-22. It sucked.
I would have reservations if the book was seemingly impossible to adapt, but there have been some pretty damn good films made from "unadaptable" novels in recent years.
I would have reservations if the book was seemingly impossible to adapt, but there have been some pretty damn good films made from "unadaptable" novels in recent years.
#13
Moderator
Originally Posted by Arpeggi
Fever Pitch with Jimmy Fallon is garbage.
#14
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally Posted by Ronnie Dobbs
But really Jurassic Park is your fave book? It was an entertaining read as was Lost World but nothing I felt was really amazing. Of all the Chrichton books I think "Sphere" was the most disapointing though.
That said, Rising Sun and Congo were passable and Disclosure was mildly enjoyable.
#15
Member
I have no problem with a movie based from the book. What I find annoying is that people somehow expect the movie to be as good as the book, or that it should be EXACTLY like the book. But I suppose it depends on the story. Some books only work because of all the details, while others can be adjusted easily for film.
#17
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Ronnie Dobbs
It just depends on who is adapting it really.
I enjoy the Harry Potter series and its been adapted well.
But really Jurassic Park is your fave book? It was an entertaining read as was Lost World but nothing I felt was really amazing. Of all the Chrichton books I think "Sphere" was the most disapointing though.
I enjoy the Harry Potter series and its been adapted well.
But really Jurassic Park is your fave book? It was an entertaining read as was Lost World but nothing I felt was really amazing. Of all the Chrichton books I think "Sphere" was the most disapointing though.
All that said, I read his newest one (at least I think it's his newest one) called Next. Terrible in my opinion. The book more or less had no story and it was almost a research paper rather than a novel. Interesting ideas but the story went nowhere. When I finished it all I could say was "What? That's it? Where's the climax?"
#18
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Brack
I have no problem with a movie based from the book. What I find annoying is that people somehow expect the movie to be as good as the book, or that it should be EXACTLY like the book. But I suppose it depends on the story. Some books only work because of all the details, while others can be adjusted easily for film.
In any event, books and movies are two different mediums. They don't necessarily have to be exactly the same. A movie based on a book is simply another person's (director's) vision of the story. Sometimes it's better, but usually it's worse mainly because of time and monetary constraints.
#19
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sesame Street (the apt. next to Bob's)
Posts: 20,195
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
I would refuse to see it if I felt it was terribly miscast.
Like how there were rumors about A Confederacy of Dunces being made with Will Ferrell as Ignatius. I would never bother to see that crap.
Like how there were rumors about A Confederacy of Dunces being made with Will Ferrell as Ignatius. I would never bother to see that crap.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by visitor Q
If I see it, I feel that any memories I have of the story will be crushed, replaced by something ridiculously wrong - silly 1 dimensional characters, the finalization of plot points that you can see a mile away .. whatever really. My impression will be left forever ruined.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unless you have killed your brain with booze or drugs, I don't see how it could replace the memory of the original. If that was the case, we would have to avoid anything even remotely similar to a beloved story. Just look at the movie as a completely separate thing, which it is.
#24
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Traveling at the speed of drunk.
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nope. I'd watch the movie out of pure curiosity. Wouldn't have pre-conceived notions that one is better than the other. It's always interesting to see different takes on a subject, especially when transferred from one medium to another.
Really looking forward to seeing "Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell" by Susanna Clarke.
Really looking forward to seeing "Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell" by Susanna Clarke.