I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry
03-31-07, 03:12 AM
#1
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: In the Universe.
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-04-07, 09:28 PM
#10
Moderator
Originally Posted by Tracer Bullet
Wow, that looks incredibly offensive.
04-05-07, 12:19 AM
#11
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This could go either way. It looked kinda funny in the preview, but I don't really get why these two guys (especially when one of them is already married) end up getting married. I guess it's for some sort of benefits for his children or something, but I'm not totally sold on that aspect yet.
Jessica Biel does look great, and I think she looked even better in glasses!
Jessica Biel does look great, and I think she looked even better in glasses!
04-05-07, 08:37 AM
#12
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by wendersfan
Gee, you think?
I predict lots of homophobic jokes in the first half. Then, they will discover that gay people are just normal folks who like to decorate and lisp.
Condescending tripe.
04-05-07, 05:45 PM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Port Moody, BC
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tracer Bullet
Condescending tripe.
I think it looks very predictable. I like Sandler and James so I'm sure there will be a few funny moments. Add in Biel and it'll be at least worth a rental.
05-15-07, 08:44 AM
#21
Moderator
Originally Posted by droidguy1119
I guess Sandler had it screened for GLAAD and they said it was all good. So perhaps not.
I read that GLAAD had screened this. I can't recall their impressions of the film though.
05-15-07, 10:17 AM
#23
DVD Talk Hero
Yes, yes Biel is too hot for words, but this just looks like a retarded sit-com.
It hard to believe that Alexander Payne had a hand in writing this abortion.
It hard to believe that Alexander Payne had a hand in writing this abortion.
05-18-07, 05:10 PM
#24
DVD Talk Legend
Someone sent me the shooting script for this one earlier today, dated 8/17/06. It says by Barry Fanaro based on a treatment by Lew Gallo. That's totally fine, nothing unusual there. However, after that, it goes on and says "Revisions by" and it lists nine revisions, for a total of 13 different people, and after all of that it says "Current revision by" and it lists a group of four, one of which not previously mentioned with everyone else.
I've read a bunch of scripts, and I almost never come across one with this many people listed. There are 16 people total listed.
I've read a bunch of scripts, and I almost never come across one with this many people listed. There are 16 people total listed.
Last edited by BrentLumkin; 05-18-07 at 05:16 PM.
