Bands with a self-titled song?
#3
DVD Talk Legend
#4
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 3,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by The_Infidel
Wow, you linked a thread that asks a different question. Good work...
#5
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's not a different question, that existing threat answers that question within.
Creating a self-titled song happens to be one way for a band to "namecheck" itself and that's covered in the other thread.
Creating a self-titled song happens to be one way for a band to "namecheck" itself and that's covered in the other thread.
#6
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by SonOfAStu
Wow, you linked a thread that asks a different question. Good work...
#7
DVD Talk Legend
The difference is the old one only asks who mentions themselves in a song. This one asks which artists titled a song after themselves. They are different questions.
#9
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 3,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cdollaz
The difference is the old one only asks who mentions themselves in a song. This one asks which artists titled a song after themselves. They are different questions.
#12
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by cdollaz
The difference is the old one only asks who mentions themselves in a song. This one asks which artists titled a song after themselves. They are different questions.
#13
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 3,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by The_Infidel
I wasn't aware this had turned into a poll...and now we've deviated away from the subject of the thread unnecessarily, when all I was doing to begin with was pointing out that you asked the same question as in a previous thread. I added no comments or sarcasm, I only linked to the other thread. Anything beyond that was, again, unnecessary.
How can you not see the difference between writing a song with the exact same name as your band, and just mentioning your band's name in any random song?
That is not the same thing. I'm sorry that your attempt to point out a dupicate thread failed, but just give it up.
#17
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is not the same thing. I'm sorry that your attempt to point out a dupicate thread failed, but just give it up.
#18
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by The_Infidel
I wasn't aware this had turned into a poll...and now we've deviated away from the subject of the thread unnecessarily, when all I was doing to begin with was pointing out that you asked the same question as in a previous thread. I added no comments or sarcasm, I only linked to the other thread. Anything beyond that was, again, unnecessary.
#19
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by cdollaz
I didn't ask anything. What are you talking about?
#20
Mod Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Outside of the U.S.A.
Posts: 10,674
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by The_Infidel
[....]this debate has become tiresome.
Self-titled songs comprise a sub-set of songs including a name-check.
That said, if everyone can swallow their egos and lose the attitude then this near duplicate thread will stay open by way of a "part two".
#21
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by benedict
I agree.
Self-titled songs comprise a sub-set of songs including a name-check.
That said, if everyone can swallow their egos and lose the attitude then this near duplicate thread will stay open by way of a "part two".
Self-titled songs comprise a sub-set of songs including a name-check.
That said, if everyone can swallow their egos and lose the attitude then this near duplicate thread will stay open by way of a "part two".
My ego is so big I can't swallow.
Seems a bit odd that the other thread was closed for being similar to a new thread. I see you calling this a "part two" but wouldn't it make sense to either merge or at the least point out why the other thread was closed in that thread?
#22
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 3,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't see why they don't both exist. The threads are NOT asking the same thing. I don't give two shits about bands that write any random song with their band name in it. I was actually really interested to know of other bands who wrote a song that was named after the band. That other thread doesn't help me.
#25
Mod Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Outside of the U.S.A.
Posts: 10,674
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Buford T Pusser
My ego is so big I can't swallow.
Seems a bit odd that the other thread was closed for being similar to a new thread. I see you calling this a "part two" but wouldn't it make sense to either merge or at the least point out why the other thread was closed in that thread?
Seems a bit odd that the other thread was closed for being similar to a new thread. I see you calling this a "part two" but wouldn't it make sense to either merge or at the least point out why the other thread was closed in that thread?
Originally Posted by SonOfAStu
I can't see why they don't both exist. The threads are NOT asking the same thing. I don't give two shits about bands that write any random song with their band name in it. I was actually really interested to know of other bands who wrote a song that was named after the band. That other thread doesn't help me.
Last edited by benedict; 10-22-06 at 06:30 PM.