Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

The Criterion Collection "Equinox" (1967/1970): Thoughts

Community
Search
DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

The Criterion Collection "Equinox" (1967/1970): Thoughts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-06, 10:03 AM
  #1  
Suspended
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The Criterion Collection "Equinox" (1967/1970): Thoughts

From dvdtalk's review by Bill Gibron (http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=22148):
Final Thoughts:
As a celebration of old school F/X melded with lessons on realizing your dreams, the Criterion Collection presentation of Equinox is above reproach. While both movies may be marred by under realized ambitions and commerce minding missteps, this is still an important primer to the varying facets of filmmaking. Easily earning a Highly Recommended rating, this two disc DVD set stands as one of the premiere preservationist's most significant statement on cinema. Not every movie can be a foreign film classic, an influential documentary or a historically important entry in the artform. No, in the case of Equinox (in either arrangement), the movie is minor at best. But with the connection to Famous Monsters of Filmland, the eventual effects stardom of the original brotherhood of first time filmmakers, and the clearly illustrated lessons in how one group's grandiose vision can be varied -- and even violated -- by another's need for saleable merchandise, this is an electrifying education. In one of the first cases where Criterion's digital dimensions clearly outshine the film being featured, Equinox is a must own part of any genre fan's collection. It proves that, with perseverance, anyone can achieve their cinematic goals, even if, in the end, it's merely a saleable shadow of it's former flight of fancy self.
My thoughts: Equinox (the original student film) was a rather sloppy affair made to showcase old-school special effects by a group of penniless but ambitious amateurs. Its vaguely lovecraftian storyline didn't make sense and it was full of plot-holes. I won't even mention the acting (think "Valley of the Golly-gee" here). Its revamping by commercial entrepreneurs made it marginally less crappy as entertainment - although it's still a very negligible B-film by any stretch of the imagination, except for its cult status as the possible inspiration for The Evil Dead. Its actual improvement (by evil, cynical Hollywood capitalists, as implied by this review) is an object lesson on what conventional wisdom regarding story, character development and decent editing can do to a seemingly hopelessly flawed film: the finished product is eminently more watchable than the first version. I enjoyed the Criterion edition as a nice, very complete film-school seminar but certainly not as an example of good cinema.

Thank God I only rented this!

Last edited by baracine; 06-21-06 at 10:19 AM.
Old 06-21-06, 01:01 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by baracine
My thoughts: Equinox (the original student film) was a rather sloppy affair made to showcase old-school special effects by a group of penniless but ambitious amateurs. Its vaguely lovecraftian storyline didn't make sense and it was full of plot-holes. I won't even mention the acting (think "Valley of the Golly-gee" here). Its revamping by commercial entrepreneurs made it marginally less crappy as entertainment - although it's still a very negligible B-film by any stretch of the imagination, except for its cult status as the possible inspiration for The Evil Dead. Its actual improvement (by evil, cynical Hollywood capitalists, as implied by this review) is an object lesson on what conventional wisdom regarding story, character development and decent editing can do to a seemingly hopelessly flawed film: the finished product is eminently more watchable than the first version. I enjoyed the Criterion edition as a nice, very complete film-school seminar but certainly not as an example of good cinema.

Thank God I only rented this!
I wish I could only rent. I was thinking of picking this up eventually, but the above doesn't make it sound to promising.
Old 06-22-06, 09:24 AM
  #3  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,630
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
have yet to watch the actual feature but I did watch the animated short film:

The Magic Treasure

which is bittersweat and
Spoiler:
ultimately sad
Old 06-22-06, 03:19 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Papillion, NE!
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awaiting this from Overstock.com.

Just got it and watched it with Muren's commentary.

Having the two versions is excellent along with the liner notes is a great collection, but disc 2 is were CC knocxks it out of the park.

As for the movie, I just watched 1967 version and while its amature, its a hoot in the final half but a little too boring in the early section. I'd say this is the easily blind buy of the year for me. Not b/c of the Criterion label, but the wealth of knowledge this disc provides on the insights of amature filmmaking, something I take seriously, cuz I do it myself, hoping for the day to make "it".

If you love stop-motion or Harryhausen films or are a techie, this is easily a must buy. I'm sure you'll watch the film a couple of times, but more with the commentaries and extras will get the workout.

Film: C
Disc: A+

Last edited by Zodiac_Speaking; 06-23-06 at 03:03 PM.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.