Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Feedback > Forum Feedback and Support
Reload this Page >

are there things wrong w/ the Search feature on this forum?

Community
Search
Forum Feedback and Support Post forum feedback and related problems, here.

are there things wrong w/ the Search feature on this forum?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-06 | 12:51 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
are there things wrong w/ the Search feature on this forum?

i've noticed this for a long time now.. when i search for things, lots of stuff doesn't show up when it's suppose to..

for example, i was in the TV Talk forum, searched for "Thief", and this thread didn't even show up, it's the most recent thread too with Thief right in the title:

http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=464041
Old 05-08-06 | 06:18 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 29,850
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
From: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
there are lots of things wrong with search
Old 05-08-06 | 08:36 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, OR
The search isn't perfect, but there are advanced search options, one of which is "search titles only". This has your link as the second result.

Google has ruined people.
Old 05-08-06 | 12:50 PM
  #4  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah, you have to go to the advanced search. The search feature has a glitch and if you do a regular search it doesn't search titles and thus misses stuff.

Among other problems.

And it's not google ruining things, the search here just sucks compared to other sites in general.
Old 05-08-06 | 07:47 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 29,850
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
From: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
Originally Posted by Tracer Bullet
The search isn't perfect, but there are advanced search options, one of which is "search titles only". This has your link as the second result.

Google has ruined people.
google has nothing to do with it
search here has gotten progressively worse
other forums I frequent, with similar amounts of posts, have more accurate search mechanisms
Old 05-09-06 | 08:42 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by mikehunt
google has nothing to do with it
search here has gotten progressively worse
other forums I frequent, with similar amounts of posts, have more accurate search mechanisms
No, it does. It's the Google-mindset where you don't have to put any thought whatsoever into your search, and get frustrated when you don't get the results you want. People want to type random keywords into a box without thinking about it and get 100% accurate and quality results, and that's never going to happen.
Old 05-09-06 | 12:30 PM
  #7  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The problem here is you can type 5 out of 6 words in a thread title your looking for and it often won't find it if you don't go to advanced search and make it search titles.

Its not people typing random words, it's the that the search is sucky (as Geoff himself has said) and further limited by bandwith contraints requring 4 or more letters per word.

But even if that wasn't the case, I still don't get your point. Companies like Google come along and raise the bar, and people should expect that quality everywhere, and complain when they don't get it. That's how you spread quality innovations.
Old 05-09-06 | 03:19 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Josh Hinkle
But even if that wasn't the case, I still don't get your point. Companies like Google come along and raise the bar, and people should expect that quality everywhere, and complain when they don't get it. That's how you spread quality innovations.
No, I get that the search is broken. It should index the thread titles.

I'm in library school, so we sit around a lot and lament the lack of a coherent search process. Google is great, but it has "dumbed down" people's searching skill. People have no idea how to structure a search, use Boolean operators, etc. If you sit down at a terminal, fire up an online journal index, and search it as though it were Google, you're not getting anywhere.
Old 05-09-06 | 06:25 PM
  #9  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I know, as grad student I do a lot of searches.

But I don't blame google, I blame the online journal indexes for not catching up yet.
Old 05-09-06 | 10:34 PM
  #10  
GeoffK's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 6,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Marblehead, MA
I added a new search link to the front of the forum:

<a href="http://www.google.com/custom?domains=forum.dvdtalk.com&sitesearch=forum.dvdtalk.com&client=pub-1670216450445443&forid=1&channel=2882123274&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1&cof=GALT%3A%23008000%3BGL%3A1%3BDIV%3A%23336699%3BVLC%3A663399%3BAH%3Acenter%3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BLBGC %3A336699%3BALC%3A0000FF%3BLC%3A0000FF%3BT%3A000000%3BGFNT%3A0000FF%3BGIMP%3A0000FF%3BFORID%3A1%3B&h l=en&q=dvd">Search</a> - it's google powered. Lets see how that goes
Old 05-10-06 | 08:39 AM
  #11  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Josh Hinkle
But I don't blame google, I blame the online journal indexes for not catching up yet.
I'm as big a proponent as anyone of a Google-type indexing search for journal indexes, but I'm not in denial about how much work it would be for the index companies. Plus, Google's index system (pagerank) wouldn't really work for journal indexes.

I still don't think it's any excuse for search laziness.
Old 05-11-06 | 07:05 AM
  #12  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'll admit to having whined about the forum's search feature as of late. That being said, am I just having some sort of brainlock this morning or has there been another change in the search option (besides the addition of Google search as mentioned by Geoff). The forum's search feature (besides Google) now only seems to appear when I'm logged in. Is this a work in progress or is that the way it is going to be from now?
Old 05-11-06 | 10:29 AM
  #13  
pilot's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by flixtime
I'll admit to having whined about the forum's search feature as of late. That being said, am I just having some sort of brainlock this morning or has there been another change in the search option (besides the addition of Google search as mentioned by Geoff). The forum's search feature (besides Google) now only seems to appear when I'm logged in. Is this a work in progress or is that the way it is going to be from now?
we've disabled searching for non registered or logged in users (i.e. guests cannot search) in hopes that it will cut down on some of the problems (slowness & the search disabled message)
Old 06-21-06 | 04:15 PM
  #14  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just wanted to note that the google search link you provided works great. I've been able to find the thread I've wanted (at the top of the list) 99% of the time using it when the forum search comes up empty a lot of the time still if you don't go into advanced (which takes much longer than the google option).


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.