What is the criteria for being a Criterion?
#1
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,418
Received 907 Likes
on
767 Posts
What is the criteria for being a Criterion?
I always wondered how and why a movie becomes a Criterion. It seems in the olden days they took some major commercial movies like "The Rock", "Armageddon", even "Traffic", but now, not so much.
So what determines a Criterion exactly?
So what determines a Criterion exactly?
#2
DVD Talk Limited Edition
#3
They spend a lot of time releasing Janus film releases which is one of their affiliated companies. They also release Rialto Films releases.
Last edited by g; 01-31-06 at 07:16 PM.
#4
DVD Talk Reviewer & TOAT Winner
In the laserdisc days, they used to put out movies from MGM, Columbia and New Line. They haven't been able to release any titles on DVD from those companies, though they just recently started doing Universal movies, and I've heard they'll be putting out 20th Century Fox titles as well.
#9
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some of Criterion'd work is just amazing, but they were loads of fun in the days of laserdisc. With audio commentary from people like John Woo and 4 disc editions of movies in CAV format (for some reason, side breaks and disc changes never bothered me and I actually paid $100 for Pulp Fiction and SE7EN) in their original theatrical aspect ratio, their releases made the experience of already classic films even better. I have no idea why they didn't go ahead and go with anamorphic transfers of their initial dvd releases. I know someone who used to work at a facility they used for editing and he said that the person in charge was extremely picky when it came to quality of masters. It always shows.
#11
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by grem458
I wonder if they ever consider any animated films.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Durham, NC USA
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The logic is this - they do what they what and charge what they what. I can find no ryhme or reason for the films they choose or any consistency in their audio/video transfers or qualify of their supplements. As far as 'not screwing up' - I guess you haven't seen their W.C. Fields transfers....slightly above par than Mandacy. Sorry - it really irks me that people put this company on a higher platform than others. Yes, they do some incredible transfers, some incredible supplements of some incredible films (that they charge an incredible price for) but they have some lousy transfers, lousy supplements, of horrible films (that they still charge an incredible price for).
#14
Banned
I wonder if they ever consider any animated films.
Originally Posted by Shagrath
Akira was one of their laserdisc titles. I'm sure they would add some to their dvd collection if they could find some good films to license. Most studios, however, know that they can make money off animated stuff and just release it themselves.
#15
Originally Posted by Steve
The logic is this - they do what they what and charge what they what. I can find no ryhme or reason for the films they choose or any consistency in their audio/video transfers or qualify of their supplements. As far as 'not screwing up' - I guess you haven't seen their W.C. Fields transfers....slightly above par than Mandacy. Sorry - it really irks me that people put this company on a higher platform than others. Yes, they do some incredible transfers, some incredible supplements of some incredible films (that they charge an incredible price for) but they have some lousy transfers, lousy supplements, of horrible films (that they still charge an incredible price for).
#16
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
Warner Bros. does some really incredible transfers too with great features. But they only charge $29.99
I agree with you about WB - their product line has been amazing. But keep in mind (concerning the pricing) that WB actually owns the films that they are releasing and therefore does not pay a licensing fee like Criterion. A perfect example would be the Criterion Hitchcock editions that are now out of print (Rebecca, etc.) - the price for those products had to cover the cost of all the wonderful extras while keeping in mind that they might lose the license and have only an abbreviated sales window to recoup their investment.
#17
DVD Talk Legend
There is no real determination per se, such as to quality of the film or whatever. It's just an economic decision as to if the movie can be profitable or can draw attention to the company. Most of their reputation stems from the Laserdisc days, which carried over to DVD and was spread to new DVD users.
#18
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Originally Posted by Steve
The logic is this - they do what they what and charge what they what. I can find no ryhme or reason for the films they choose or any consistency in their audio/video transfers or qualify of their supplements. As far as 'not screwing up' - I guess you haven't seen their W.C. Fields transfers....slightly above par than Mandacy. Sorry - it really irks me that people put this company on a higher platform than others. Yes, they do some incredible transfers, some incredible supplements of some incredible films (that they charge an incredible price for) but they have some lousy transfers, lousy supplements, of horrible films (that they still charge an incredible price for).
#20
DVD Talk Legend
It seems to me that the movie must be A)A cult hit from a studio that never achieved mainstream success, B) A lost title from a long since defunct studio, C) A foreign title where DVD distiribution is easy to acquire, or D) a little bit/all of the above.
#21
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Steve
I guess you haven't seen their W.C. Fields transfers....slightly above par than Mandacy.
The Criterion folks are skilled at what they do, but they're not magicians.
#22
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#23
DVD Talk Reviewer
Originally Posted by Shagrath
Akira was one of their laserdisc titles. I'm sure they would add some to their dvd collection if they could find some good films to license. Most studios, however, know that they can make money off animated stuff and just release it themselves.
#24
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Steve
The logic is this - they do what they what and charge what they what. I can find no ryhme or reason for the films they choose or any consistency in their audio/video transfers or qualify of their supplements. As far as 'not screwing up' - I guess you haven't seen their W.C. Fields transfers....slightly above par than Mandacy. Sorry - it really irks me that people put this company on a higher platform than others. Yes, they do some incredible transfers, some incredible supplements of some incredible films (that they charge an incredible price for) but they have some lousy transfers, lousy supplements, of horrible films (that they still charge an incredible price for).
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film/DVDRev..._6_shorts_.htm
Despite the fact it's interlaced video, the visual quality is stunning. Universal's remaster of W.C. Field's The Bank Dick is an improvement over the Criterion DVD, but theirs was still quite good. Not really a good example, though, since Universal provided them with the master.