What's the difference between Dolby Digital 5.1 EX & DTS 6.1 ES?
#2
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
5.1- Two front, two rear, one front center discrete channels and one subwoofer channel.
6.1- Two Front, two rearone front center and one rear center discrete channels and one subwoofer channel.
6.1- Two Front, two rearone front center and one rear center discrete channels and one subwoofer channel.
#4
I've had my JVC receiver for 5 years now. It's a 5.1 DD and DTS. I was thinking of upgrading to a receiver that produces EX and DTS 6.1
Does that rear center speaker make a big difference when compared to standard 5.1 sound?
Does that rear center speaker make a big difference when compared to standard 5.1 sound?
#5
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
I've had my JVC receiver for 5 years now. It's a 5.1 DD and DTS. I was thinking of upgrading to a receiver that produces EX and DTS 6.1
Does that rear center speaker make a big difference when compared to standard 5.1 sound?
Does that rear center speaker make a big difference when compared to standard 5.1 sound?
Receivers that are equipped with Surround Back Channel capabilities, enabled to use two surround back speakers configurations for future 7.1 audio as well, instead of one speaker, depending on the user's preference during the initial set-up. It's emphatically worth the upgrade... You gonna love it.
Last edited by SINGLE104; 12-02-05 at 08:59 AM.
#6
Moderator
I have admit I haven't heard either in a home theatre setup, but from my experience in the theatres the Toy Story II 6.1 soundmix was pretty cool. One notable scene had a hubcap of a car clanging directly behind you, which was a startling but cool nonetheless.
#7
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SINGLE104
Receivers that are equipped with Surround Back Channel capabilities, enabled to use two surround back speakers configurations for future 7.1 audio as well, instead of one speaker, depending on the user's preference during the initial set-up. It's emphatically worth the upgrade... You gonna love it.
#8
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shagrath
Dolby Digital 5.1 EX - Matrixes the two left and right rear speakers to the rear center channel.
DTS-ES 6.1 - Has a unique rear center channel.
DTS-ES 6.1 - Has a unique rear center channel.
Also, DTS-ES can be either matrixed like Dolby or discrete. There is a list at dtsonline.com that tells you which DVDs are which.
#9
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
So what is going to happen when things go to 10.1+?
It seems alittle absurd that you would need more than 5 speakers to 'enjoy' a good audio experiance with a film made in surround sound.
It seems alittle absurd that you would need more than 5 speakers to 'enjoy' a good audio experiance with a film made in surround sound.
#10
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Julie Walker
So what is going to happen when things go to 10.1+?
It seems alittle absurd that you would need more than 5 speakers to 'enjoy' a good audio experiance with a film made in surround sound.
It seems alittle absurd that you would need more than 5 speakers to 'enjoy' a good audio experiance with a film made in surround sound.
#11
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Spiky
I think Shagrath meant "Matrixes the rear center channel to the two left and right rear speakers."
Also, DTS-ES can be either matrixed like Dolby or discrete. There is a list at dtsonline.com that tells you which DVDs are which.
Also, DTS-ES can be either matrixed like Dolby or discrete. There is a list at dtsonline.com that tells you which DVDs are which.
As for the DTS-ES 6.1, that is always discrete. It's the regular DTS-ES that does the matrix rear center channel, as far as I'm aware.
#12
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by awmurray
Ahhh, but is it worth it if the center channel is $2,500.... yikes. I don't want to buy another Martin Logan Theater speaker...
Antecedent to purchasing, I strongly advise you to visit your local high end, state of the art Home Theater Dealer and asked to listen to a 6.1 sound demonstration in their showroom, and make a final decision if you would want to invest in a expensive surround back channel speaker (s) afterwards.
#13
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shagrath
Actually, isn't it in DD EX where it matrixes the left and right rear speakers to the center rear? I've got a 6.1 setup, and I'm pretty sure that's what it does, not the other way around.
As for the DTS-ES 6.1, that is always discrete. It's the regular DTS-ES that does the matrix rear center channel, as far as I'm aware.
As for the DTS-ES 6.1, that is always discrete. It's the regular DTS-ES that does the matrix rear center channel, as far as I'm aware.
But on Dolby, the 6th channel is matrixed into the 4th and 5th channels when mixed, by recording it out of phase with those channels. The receiver pulls it out when in 6.1 mode and puts it into the rear center speaker(s). Maybe this is just more semantics, but it doesn't have anything to do with the 4th/5th speakers since it is out of phase. I did write it poorly in that quote, sorry.
Julie,
I'm astounded that someone who cares about audio as much as you do thinks there is no value to more channels. (assuming they are used properly) That being said, the rear center channel is behind you and hard to hear, and there aren't all that many 6.1 recordings, matrixed or discrete. It's value is usually directly related to the pocketbook of the individual.
awmurray,
If you can afford one.....
#14
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would love to see an 8.2 system with 2 fronts, 2 front centers, 2 sides/rears, 2 rear centers, and 2 sub channels. Better for those with wide rooms and very large screens. But it isn't going to happen.
They are working on things like height channels. Presumably to put 2 speakers in front above the main front speakers.
They are working on things like height channels. Presumably to put 2 speakers in front above the main front speakers.
#15
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Spiky
I would love to see an 8.2 system with 2 fronts, 2 front centers, 2 sides/rears, 2 rear centers, and 2 sub channels. Better for those with wide rooms and very large screens. But it isn't going to happen.
They are working on things like height channels. Presumably to put 2 speakers in front above the main front speakers.
They are working on things like height channels. Presumably to put 2 speakers in front above the main front speakers.
#16
Mod Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Gone to the islands - 'til we meet again.
Posts: 19,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spiky
I would love to see an 8.2 system with 2 fronts, 2 front centers, 2 sides/rears, 2 rear centers, and 2 sub channels. Better for those with wide rooms and very large screens. But it isn't going to happen.
They are working on things like height channels. Presumably to put 2 speakers in front above the main front speakers.
They are working on things like height channels. Presumably to put 2 speakers in front above the main front speakers.
I was thinking 8.2, but in a different way. First we had two channels, front Right and Left (FR:FL), we eventually progressed to five channels (FR:FC:FL:LR:RR). I see the natural progression being a simple circle like FR:FC:FL:LC:LR:CR:RR:RC.
#17
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Shannon
Yamaha actually already has this. The call them effects channels and the expand the sound stage. I believe it makes a difference!
#18
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Originally Posted by Spiky
Julie,
I'm astounded that someone who cares about audio as much as you do thinks there is no value to more channels.
I'm astounded that someone who cares about audio as much as you do thinks there is no value to more channels.
And realistically,you do not need that many speakers to enjoy a film,especially at home. I'm sure dialogue driven films will not need such mixes. Since they will be mostly front speaker heavy anyway. And plenty of other films even though made in surround/5.1 don't always use up every speaker on a regular basis. Many are front heavy with small bits of rear speaker action or none at all. Some are more agressive,while others are not. It all depends on how it was mixed and what the filmmakers intended. But still there are many complaints when 5.1 films have little 'speaker action'.
So basically what I am saying is,5.1 is good enough for modern audio. And anything beyond that is stretching it quite abit. Since more and more speakers will be barely put to use unless they want to sound gimmicky for gimmick sake.
And I am sure like the complaints over lack of 6.1/7.1 dvds. There will be even more once even more speaker formats come out.
#19
Originally Posted by Julie Walker
I do care about audio,but do find it alittle ridiculous that nothing is ever 'good enough'. It is like now 5.1 is not good enough for some viewers. So they make a 6.1,then a 7.1..and so forth. And which ever one becomes the more predominant audio choice. A new one speaker more version will come to take it's place.
And realistically,you do not need that many speakers to enjoy a film,especially at home. I'm sure dialogue driven films will not need such mixes. Since they will be mostly front speaker heavy anyway. And plenty of other films even though made in surround/5.1 don't always use up every speaker on a regular basis. Many are front heavy with small bits of rear speaker action or none at all. Some are more agressive,while others are not. It all depends on how it was mixed and what the filmmakers intended. But still there are many complaints when 5.1 films have little 'speaker action'.
So basically what I am saying is,5.1 is good enough for modern audio. And anything beyond that is stretching it quite abit. Since more and more speakers will be barely put to use unless they want to sound gimmicky for gimmick sake.
And I am sure like the complaints over lack of 6.1/7.1 dvds. There will be even more once even more speaker formats come out.
And realistically,you do not need that many speakers to enjoy a film,especially at home. I'm sure dialogue driven films will not need such mixes. Since they will be mostly front speaker heavy anyway. And plenty of other films even though made in surround/5.1 don't always use up every speaker on a regular basis. Many are front heavy with small bits of rear speaker action or none at all. Some are more agressive,while others are not. It all depends on how it was mixed and what the filmmakers intended. But still there are many complaints when 5.1 films have little 'speaker action'.
So basically what I am saying is,5.1 is good enough for modern audio. And anything beyond that is stretching it quite abit. Since more and more speakers will be barely put to use unless they want to sound gimmicky for gimmick sake.
And I am sure like the complaints over lack of 6.1/7.1 dvds. There will be even more once even more speaker formats come out.
#20
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Julie Walker
So basically what I am saying is,5.1 is good enough for modern audio. And anything beyond that is stretching it quite abit. Since more and more speakers will be barely put to use unless they want to sound gimmicky for gimmick sake.
And I am sure like the complaints over lack of 6.1/7.1 dvds. There will be even more once even more speaker formats come out.
And I am sure like the complaints over lack of 6.1/7.1 dvds. There will be even more once even more speaker formats come out.
But when 6.1 (there is no 7.1 and may never be) is done well, and played back properly, it is wonderful. LOTR EE, Star Wars II, Gladiator, many movies have fabulous benefit from the rear channel. One of my favorite things is to scare the crap out of someone (even those used to 5.1) with the tiger in Gladiator, you swear it's about to rip your back open in one particular moment.
#21
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Archives, Indiana
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with Julie. For people who already have a great 5.1 setup, making the switch to 6.1 is something that should be pondered a bit before doing so, because you don't want to go from a good quality 5.1 receiver to a so-so 6.1 receiver. I made the switch this year but I'm not sure it was really worth the upgrade...and as has been mentioned, 5.1 is the standard and likely will be for some time to come- I just don't see the studios rushing to get 6.1 tracks on their releases, and I don't think there will be a pronounced effort to do so until some HD disc becomes a popular standard; as it is we get far too few DTS tracks and mediocre DD 5.1 mixes.
Granted, 6.1 capability gives you various matrixes that would otherwise not be possible, but a really good 5.1 setup is hard to beat and would be plenty good enough for most users.
Granted, 6.1 capability gives you various matrixes that would otherwise not be possible, but a really good 5.1 setup is hard to beat and would be plenty good enough for most users.
Last edited by nightmaster; 12-02-05 at 11:27 AM.
#22
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Julie Walker
I do care about audio,but do find it alittle ridiculous that nothing is ever 'good enough'. It is like now 5.1 is not good enough for some viewers. So they make a 6.1,then a 7.1..and so forth. And which ever one becomes the more predominant audio choice. A new one speaker more version will come to take it's place.
And realistically,you do not need that many speakers to enjoy a film,especially at home. I'm sure dialogue driven films will not need such mixes. Since they will be mostly front speaker heavy anyway. And plenty of other films even though made in surround/5.1 don't always use up every speaker on a regular basis. Many are front heavy with small bits of rear speaker action or none at all. Some are more agressive,while others are not. It all depends on how it was mixed and what the filmmakers intended. But still there are many complaints when 5.1 films have little 'speaker action'.
So basically what I am saying is,5.1 is good enough for modern audio. And anything beyond that is stretching it quite abit. Since more and more speakers will be barely put to use unless they want to sound gimmicky for gimmick sake.
And I am sure like the complaints over lack of 6.1/7.1 dvds. There will be even more once even more speaker formats come out.
And realistically,you do not need that many speakers to enjoy a film,especially at home. I'm sure dialogue driven films will not need such mixes. Since they will be mostly front speaker heavy anyway. And plenty of other films even though made in surround/5.1 don't always use up every speaker on a regular basis. Many are front heavy with small bits of rear speaker action or none at all. Some are more agressive,while others are not. It all depends on how it was mixed and what the filmmakers intended. But still there are many complaints when 5.1 films have little 'speaker action'.
So basically what I am saying is,5.1 is good enough for modern audio. And anything beyond that is stretching it quite abit. Since more and more speakers will be barely put to use unless they want to sound gimmicky for gimmick sake.
And I am sure like the complaints over lack of 6.1/7.1 dvds. There will be even more once even more speaker formats come out.
The November Issue of Widescreen Review magazine, a reliable source for A/V product news, and reviews has introduced two new upcoming sound designs from Dolby, which are:
Dolby Digital Plus -The long awaited 7.1 audio, and more.
Dolby True HD - An MLP Lossless, (first used for DVD Audio), but with double the maximum bit rate of (18 Mbps), and double the number of channels (14.0).
The renown SDDS (Sony Dynamic Digital Sound) offers up to eight (8) discrete channels, only available theatrically are vastly beneficial, but as stated from their representative, that all SDDS soundtracks are not fully encoded with eight discrete channels, only selected films, that will definitely benefit from their overall sound system.
Sound Engineers, and Technicians earn an astronomical salary for their profession to produce new audio inventions continuously, and they are unable to stymied from developing new products in the future, because of the current 5.1 digital sound design is a normality for Home Theater, and Theatrical use.
http://www.dolby.com/consumer/techno...ital_plus.html
http://www.dolby.com/promo/HD/trueHD.html
Last edited by SINGLE104; 12-28-05 at 11:40 AM.
#23
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I have been more concerned with having the best 5.1 set up that I can afford. I wonder if some of those upgrading to 6.1 and up with get better results if they instead invested on improving their current 5.1 set up.