Has Aaron Sorkin ever said what would happen if he wrote season 5 of West Wing?
#1
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has Aaron Sorkin ever said what would happen if he wrote season 5 of West Wing?
There were so many plot points set up in the season 4 cliffhanger...
Has he ever publically said what he would have done different?
Has he ever publically said what he would have done different?
#2
DVD Talk Legend
Even though Sorkin didn't announce his departure from the show until after Season Four had wrapped production, the handwriting was on the wall (so to speak) for two major reasons:
1--His level of involvement, writing or co-writing almost every single script, had to be wearing on him.
2--That involvement wreaked havoc on the production schedule (and episode costs) which drove NBC crazy.
The upshot is that NBC was not going to continue into Season Five production of The West Wing with Sorkin running the show and writing all the episodes, and Sorkin (despite his penchant for the shrooms) knew this was the case.
When Sorkin ended the season with the Vice-POTUS resigning and then the cliffhangers of Zoey's kidnapping and the POTUS resigning, he had to have discussed how he (Sorkin) envisioned the stories being resolved with John Wells.
So the only difference in the episodes where Zoey was recovered and POTUS retook office would have been that the dialogue would have been vastly improved.
1--His level of involvement, writing or co-writing almost every single script, had to be wearing on him.
2--That involvement wreaked havoc on the production schedule (and episode costs) which drove NBC crazy.
The upshot is that NBC was not going to continue into Season Five production of The West Wing with Sorkin running the show and writing all the episodes, and Sorkin (despite his penchant for the shrooms) knew this was the case.
When Sorkin ended the season with the Vice-POTUS resigning and then the cliffhangers of Zoey's kidnapping and the POTUS resigning, he had to have discussed how he (Sorkin) envisioned the stories being resolved with John Wells.
So the only difference in the episodes where Zoey was recovered and POTUS retook office would have been that the dialogue would have been vastly improved.
#3
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think your analysis about the direction of the show and his involvement is correct. However, I think the long term story arch of season 5 would have been very different.
He seemed to set things up about the Josh and Donna relationship - that still hasn't really been addressed.
He seemed to set things up about the Josh and Donna relationship - that still hasn't really been addressed.
#4
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
When Sorkin ended the season with the Vice-POTUS resigning and then the cliffhangers of Zoey's kidnapping and the POTUS resigning, he had to have discussed how he (Sorkin) envisioned the stories being resolved with John Wells.
So the only difference in the episodes where Zoey was recovered and POTUS retook office would have been that the dialogue would have been vastly improved.
So the only difference in the episodes where Zoey was recovered and POTUS retook office would have been that the dialogue would have been vastly improved.
#5
DVD Talk Legend
In my previous post, I was just addressing how Sorkin might have handled the cliffhangers of Zoey's kidnapping and Bartlet stepping down.
Realistically, there was only one possible resolution to the two cliffhangers.
Zoey would be rescued, and Bartlet would resume his duties as POTUS.
Sorkin can speculate about what he might have wanted to do, but if he thinks NBC would have let him kill the president's daughter, he is not just high, he is delusional.
Notice what happens in the first two episodes of Season Five (written by John Wells):
The plot of Zoey's kidnapping is resolved.
POTUS retakes office.
The Qumar story and Danny chasing the truth about the assasination (that Sorkin strung along all previous season) was dispensed with, and Danny disappeared from the show.
Toby's ex-wife Andi and his newborn twins made a cameo, and then followed Danny to the cornfield.
Wells is tying up Sorkin's loose ends...
...and we get the introduction of Josh's annoying intern (clearly a John Wells creation).
Then in the next episode, we get the whole idiot VP thing and Josh Malina (who was Sorkin's boy from Sport's Night) begins his move from ensemble regular to recurring character.
The treatment of Will Bailey says everything (IMHO) about the difference between Sorkin's Wing and the Wells Wing.
Will Bailey (under Sorkin) was the most idealistically liberal voice on the show, and it was a voice that was heard often.
Wells turned Will into a kind of scold, who by Season Six (with his pushing of Russell for Prez) had become the worst kind of political opportunist.
I said:
chamber715 answered back:
I was just talking about the plot points in the first two episodes and the resolution of the cliffhangers, not what Sorkin might have done over the course of the entire season.
Realistically, there was only one possible resolution to the two cliffhangers.
Zoey would be rescued, and Bartlet would resume his duties as POTUS.
Sorkin can speculate about what he might have wanted to do, but if he thinks NBC would have let him kill the president's daughter, he is not just high, he is delusional.
Notice what happens in the first two episodes of Season Five (written by John Wells):
The plot of Zoey's kidnapping is resolved.
POTUS retakes office.
The Qumar story and Danny chasing the truth about the assasination (that Sorkin strung along all previous season) was dispensed with, and Danny disappeared from the show.
Toby's ex-wife Andi and his newborn twins made a cameo, and then followed Danny to the cornfield.
Wells is tying up Sorkin's loose ends...
...and we get the introduction of Josh's annoying intern (clearly a John Wells creation).
Then in the next episode, we get the whole idiot VP thing and Josh Malina (who was Sorkin's boy from Sport's Night) begins his move from ensemble regular to recurring character.
The treatment of Will Bailey says everything (IMHO) about the difference between Sorkin's Wing and the Wells Wing.
Will Bailey (under Sorkin) was the most idealistically liberal voice on the show, and it was a voice that was heard often.
Wells turned Will into a kind of scold, who by Season Six (with his pushing of Russell for Prez) had become the worst kind of political opportunist.
I said:
The only difference in the episodes where Zoey was recovered and POTUS retook office would have been that the dialogue would have been vastly improved.
I think the difference between a non-Sorkin season 5 and a Sorkin season 5 would have been more than just better dialogue.
#6
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
I was just talking about the plot points in the first two episodes and the resolution of the cliffhangers, not what Sorkin might have done over the course of the entire season.
#8
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This question probably isn't deserving of it's own post but
What exactly are the names on the blackboard in Josh's office.
I assume they're senator's names and have something to do with how many votes are needed to pass a bill. Anyone know.
What exactly are the names on the blackboard in Josh's office.
I assume they're senator's names and have something to do with how many votes are needed to pass a bill. Anyone know.
#10
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I remember reading a clipping from an interview with Sorkin saying the he basically washed his hands of the show after that season's finale. Something to the extent that even had Wells asked him how it should be resolved, he wouldn't tell him how to do it, as it was now Wells' show.
#11
DVD Talk Legend
Sorkin saying the he basically washed his hands of the show after that season's finale. Something to the extent that even had Wells asked him how it should be resolved, he wouldn't tell him how to do it
I assumed that Sorkin was a professional and had pride in his creation.
#12
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
If that is the case then I was clearly mistaken in what I posted earlier.
I assumed that Sorkin was a professional and had pride in his creation.
I assumed that Sorkin was a professional and had pride in his creation.
#13
DVD Talk Legend
There was a lot of strife between Sorkin and WB that season. Many episodes were produced slowly and as a result would be done late. Even though the show had writers Sorkin would rewrite practically everything. And the production costs were too high for the ratings the show was receiving for WB. In the end Sorkin was pretty pissed off at them.
Look. I consider Sorkin's (basically) writing every episode of the first four seasons of The West Wing to be one of the greatest creative achievements in the history of television.
We're constantly being told how TV shows are produced by committee, and how the content is watered down.
If someone actually has an artistic vision that they want to bring to the small screen, then they are supposed to take it to cable and produce a dozen episodes a year.
What Sorkin did was amazing. The West Wing was so his vision, so one man's voice. And it was on Network TV and it attracted a huge audience.
And as much as I respect and admire Sorkin as an artist, I also assumed or expected that somehow he was also enough of a businessman to realize that he couldn't keep producing the show the way he was going (for the reasons in the above quote and also because he couldn't keep it up forever).
Whatever bitterness and hard feelings he had when he parted ways with the show, I always thought that he had enough affection for his creation, and maybe some respect for the people he worked with who were still going to be working there, that he wouldn't have just dumped the show in John Wells lap and walked away saying. " I left some loose ends for you to tie up. Good luck with that, sucker."
#14
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
Whatever bitterness and hard feelings he had when he parted ways with the show, I always thought that he had enough affection for his creation, and maybe some respect for the people he worked with who were still going to be working there, that he wouldn't have just dumped the show in John Wells lap and walked away saying. " I left some loose ends for you to tie up. Good luck with that, sucker."
And while Sorkin had ideas about how he was going to resolve those cliffhangers, I can understand why he didn't just tell Wells what he planned. Again, it let Wells get his footing with characters he had never written before.
#15
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Josh's chalk board - He's had lists and lists of names on it from season one. It's not tied to the VP list.
Re: Sorkin saying Good luck. I completely understand his not wanting to offer advice. It's really no longer his show. His time with it is over. He would have loved done to continue to write it but he and WB parted ways - not very ammicably. It would be emotionally hard and not very practical to kibitiz. It's sort of like getting a call from an ex-girlfriend's lover and saying, "How should I make her happy?" Well, it's in your lap now.
If Sorkin wanting NOTHING to do with the show he wouldn't have left lose ends and many posibilities in the Season 4 cliffhanger. He would have wrapped up everthing with a little bowl. Instead, he made you really, really want to see what happened next.
Also his commentaires for the DVDs were recorded after he left the show. Clearly he clears about it.
He's also said that in this current political environment he would not know how to write for the show.
Re: Sorkin saying Good luck. I completely understand his not wanting to offer advice. It's really no longer his show. His time with it is over. He would have loved done to continue to write it but he and WB parted ways - not very ammicably. It would be emotionally hard and not very practical to kibitiz. It's sort of like getting a call from an ex-girlfriend's lover and saying, "How should I make her happy?" Well, it's in your lap now.
If Sorkin wanting NOTHING to do with the show he wouldn't have left lose ends and many posibilities in the Season 4 cliffhanger. He would have wrapped up everthing with a little bowl. Instead, he made you really, really want to see what happened next.
Also his commentaires for the DVDs were recorded after he left the show. Clearly he clears about it.
He's also said that in this current political environment he would not know how to write for the show.
#16
DVD Talk Special Edition
There are rumors that Sorkin MIGHT come back to write the final few episodes this season. Ran across them on TWOP when I was reading a few weeks back; not sure what the latest is.
#17
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's a recentish Sorkin interview for anyone interested:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/featu...525148,00.html
As to the original question: I doubt Sorkin had anything but the most general idea of what he wanted to do with the start of Season Five.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/featu...525148,00.html
As to the original question: I doubt Sorkin had anything but the most general idea of what he wanted to do with the start of Season Five.