film critics, why are they so rude?
#1
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
film critics, why are they so rude?
I was reading the reviews for Unleashed on rottentomatoes.com and i saw this from the village voice:
"Missing from Unleashed is every hallmark of good filmmaking."
-- Benjamin Strong, VILLAGE VOICE
I get the impression sometimes that some film critics aren't noteworthy because they have 'good' taste in film, but because they have the ability to write reviews of movies that either brazenly or oh so cleverly praise/destroy a movie.
at some point, shouldn't this affect your credibility? i mean, come on. if Unleashed goes the entire movie without a stage hand walking across the screen or a boom peeking in the frame, there's at least one hallmark of good filmmaking in Unleashed.
Maybe every once in a while, a gigli or a plan 9 comes along that's just so fundamentally bad that outlandish critiques are justified. but it seems every movie is either the 'i'd rather get a bikini wax than have to sit thru another showing of house of wax' or 'my reverence for titanic will go on and on'
can't a 'eh, it's not bad' be sufficient, even if it doesn't catch the eye?
"Missing from Unleashed is every hallmark of good filmmaking."
-- Benjamin Strong, VILLAGE VOICE
I get the impression sometimes that some film critics aren't noteworthy because they have 'good' taste in film, but because they have the ability to write reviews of movies that either brazenly or oh so cleverly praise/destroy a movie.
at some point, shouldn't this affect your credibility? i mean, come on. if Unleashed goes the entire movie without a stage hand walking across the screen or a boom peeking in the frame, there's at least one hallmark of good filmmaking in Unleashed.
Maybe every once in a while, a gigli or a plan 9 comes along that's just so fundamentally bad that outlandish critiques are justified. but it seems every movie is either the 'i'd rather get a bikini wax than have to sit thru another showing of house of wax' or 'my reverence for titanic will go on and on'
can't a 'eh, it's not bad' be sufficient, even if it doesn't catch the eye?
#2
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A lot of critics write like you say, stating their opinion and having most movies be in the "eh" category anyway. But, truth be told, the outlandish, "best movie of the year!" or "this movie sucked more then a french whore!" type critics get quoted more, and get more attention. But it's also easy to figure out who these dolts are and just flat out ignore them.
#3
You have to understand how much crap Hollywood puts out. Critics, I think, rip on bad movies more than usual in an attempt to get Hollywood to make better movies. But unfortunately, Hollywood runs on money not praise. I believe critics should be harsher because Hollywood churns out crap week after week. I've seen a whopping 2 movies this year. Usually there's only about 4 or 5 movies that I thoroughly enjoy a year. Hollywood needs to make better movies, plain and simple.
#4
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by pdinosaur
I was reading the reviews for Unleashed on rottentomatoes.com and i saw this from the village voice:
"Missing from Unleashed is every hallmark of good filmmaking."
-- Benjamin Strong, VILLAGE VOICE
i mean, come on. if Unleashed goes the entire movie without a stage hand walking across the screen or a boom peeking in the frame, there's at least one hallmark of good filmmaking in Unleashed.
"Missing from Unleashed is every hallmark of good filmmaking."
-- Benjamin Strong, VILLAGE VOICE
i mean, come on. if Unleashed goes the entire movie without a stage hand walking across the screen or a boom peeking in the frame, there's at least one hallmark of good filmmaking in Unleashed.
That's like saying that any restaurant that doesn't give you food poisoning has a "hallmark of good cooking."
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's best to take the majority of reviews on rotten tomatoes with a grain of salt. They'll either bash or praise movies for attention--people are much more drawn to the critics that are quoted with big long clever metaphors than the ones who simply give a rational opinion on the film. It makes them all seem egocentric but its what works.
#6
DVD Talk Legend
#7
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jay G.
#8
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Hollywood runs on money not praise.
#9
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by pdinosaur
if Unleashed goes the entire movie without a stage hand walking across the screen or a boom peeking in the frame, there's at least one hallmark of good filmmaking in Unleashed.
#10
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Salty
No, that's a hallmark of competent filmmaking. Competent ? good.
Originally Posted by marty888
That's like saying that any restaurant that doesn't give you food poisoning has a "hallmark of good cooking."
#13
Retired
Yep, everyone nailed it on the head. They're just quote whores hoping to get there names in ads, magazine covers, dvd covers with the overly positive quotes, and just to draw attention to themselves with the negative ones.
#15
Retired
Originally Posted by Terrell
Make good films to make good money. That's the way it should be. That's how it works.
You're right that's how it should be, however it's definitely not how it works.
Plenty of good films don't make much money, and plenty of crap makes a ton of money. Hype, marketing and star power determine ticket sales more than quality in the US.
#16
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sitting on a beach, earning 20%
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Well, I know it's VERY true with teh internet... the more outlandish and cutting a critic is, the more people seem to read him/her. There's tons of critics out there, all very similar, so a lot try to outdo someone else with their sarcasm or 'wit'. Usually this means blasting a film with an apparently-original jet of vitriol.
#17
DVD Talk Legend
One critic I used to like but have grown to loathe over the past two years or so is Peter Travers from Rolling Stone. He used to give well written reviews, now he seems to have his mind made up ahead of time as to what he will think of a movie and proceeds to either shill endlessly for it or bash it into oblivion. The problem is he never really tells you why it sucks or rocks, just how much it sucks or rocks.
#19
DVD Talk Legend
The full sentence is:
Missing from Unleashed is every hallmark of good filmmaking, but its most glaring omission is a cliché: Morgan Freeman's trademark voice-over.
Missing from Unleashed is every hallmark of good filmmaking, but its most glaring omission is a cliché: Morgan Freeman's trademark voice-over.
#21
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by QuiGonJosh
Because their pathetic people who wished that they were able to make a movie and they piss on anything that isn't some little artsy fartsy or foreign film.
The biggest difference between professional movie critics and those of us who come to Internet message boards like DVD Talk to spout off our opinions is that movie critics are smart enough to have figured out how to get paid for it.
#22
DVD Talk Hero
... film critics ... have 'good' taste in film ,... because they have the ability to write reviews of movies...
#23
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Salty
Yet there are thousands of examples of countless critics giving positive reviews to movies that never would be mistaken for "little artsy fartsy or foreign" films. So you might have a point if it weren't for the fact that it's provably wrong.
The biggest difference between professional movie critics and those of us who come to Internet message boards like DVD Talk to spout off our opinions is that movie critics are smart enough to have figured out how to get paid for it.
The biggest difference between professional movie critics and those of us who come to Internet message boards like DVD Talk to spout off our opinions is that movie critics are smart enough to have figured out how to get paid for it.
#24
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if someone at the people's choice awards was smart enough, they'd be exploiting the fact that the oscars are seemingly degrading into a 'my movie's more artsy than yours' award show joke.
#25
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
film critics, why are they so rude?
Because they have small penises. You show me a guy that says "Greatest movie of the year" or "Worst effort of a film ever put on celluloid" and I'll show you a guy with a teeny weeny peeny.
Meanwhile, a critic merely says it was "ok" or "kinda dull". He's hung like a bull.
Wow, I think this is the BEST THREAD EVER! Uh, I mean this thread is kinda interesting.
Because they have small penises. You show me a guy that says "Greatest movie of the year" or "Worst effort of a film ever put on celluloid" and I'll show you a guy with a teeny weeny peeny.
Meanwhile, a critic merely says it was "ok" or "kinda dull". He's hung like a bull.
Wow, I think this is the BEST THREAD EVER! Uh, I mean this thread is kinda interesting.