Was anyone else disappointed by the Manchurian Candidate Remake?
#1
DVD Talk Hero
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hail to the Redskins!
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes
on
38 Posts
Was anyone else disappointed by the Manchurian Candidate Remake?
Maybe it's just that I've seen the original, so this one was very predictable, but I was NOT impressed. Denzel, as usual, is fantastic, but the rest of the performances were not that great (especially Shriever). The pacing was bad, many plot points were underscored and the ending predictable.
It's gotten tremendous reviews, but I think many might be from those unfamiliar with the original, which IMHO is much better.
It's gotten tremendous reviews, but I think many might be from those unfamiliar with the original, which IMHO is much better.
#2
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Was anyone else disappointed by the Manchurian Candidate Remake?
Originally posted by DVD Josh
Denzel, as usual, is fantastic
Denzel, as usual, is fantastic
What Denzel has done recently in film used to be called "repeating himself" back in the old days.
MANCHURIAN was actually a wonderful change of pace for the actor.
#4
DVD Talk Legend
I thought the original had some good points, but was overall flawed. It's one of those movies that I didn't mind seeing remade. But then I saw the remake. I don't know. It also has some good points, but it too is flawed.
There are fewer scenes that drag in the remake compared to the original. But all the scenes revolving around the [spoiler]'brainwashing'[/b] were far less effective in the new version. IMO. The politics angle is played better in the 2004 version. I did like the change in who the actual candidate was, but in turn I think this change hurt the finale, and that
. The remake also took all the bite out of the scene where
.
There are fewer scenes that drag in the remake compared to the original. But all the scenes revolving around the [spoiler]'brainwashing'[/b] were far less effective in the new version. IMO. The politics angle is played better in the 2004 version. I did like the change in who the actual candidate was, but in turn I think this change hurt the finale, and that
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
#5
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Was anyone else disappointed by the Manchurian Candidate Remake?
Originally posted by DVD Josh
Denzel...is fantastic, but the rest of the performances were not that great (especially Shriever).
Denzel...is fantastic, but the rest of the performances were not that great (especially Shriever).
#7
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Re: Was anyone else disappointed by the Manchurian Candidate Remake?
Originally posted by conscience
I agree with everything you said except for this statement. It is the other way around.
I agree with everything you said except for this statement. It is the other way around.
#12
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Corleone316
What's with the Denzel hate? The man is a fantastic actor and versatile, so what's the problem?
What's with the Denzel hate? The man is a fantastic actor and versatile, so what's the problem?
You say, "versatile." That IS the problem. I disagree with that classification of Washington's talents.
The GLORY to HE GOT GAME years, sure. But in the last five years, all the roles, characters, nuances have been the same. A good, powerful actor, yes. But hardly versatile.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by scott shelton
But in the last five years, all the roles, characters, nuances have been the same. A good, powerful actor, yes. But hardly versatile.
But in the last five years, all the roles, characters, nuances have been the same. A good, powerful actor, yes. But hardly versatile.
Manchurian Candidate, The (2004)
Man on Fire (2004)
Out of Time (2003/I)
Antwone Fisher (2002)
John Q (2002)
Training Day (2001)
Remember the Titans (2000)
Hurricane, The (1999)
Bone Collector, The (1999)
I'll grant that in half of them, he plays some sort of police/military/enforcement figure, but I really don't see how these characters have all been the same.
#14
DVD Talk Limited Edition
My problem with the remake is that it lacked the cold war era paranoia.
Changing the villain from communism to a corporation simply doesn't work because corporations (especially Halliburton) already own the government and they did it with special interest groups, campaign contributions and openly running their own people for office.
Changing the villain from communism to a corporation simply doesn't work because corporations (especially Halliburton) already own the government and they did it with special interest groups, campaign contributions and openly running their own people for office.
Last edited by Damfino; 09-07-04 at 12:55 PM.
#15
DVD Talk Legend
I was only disappointed by the reviews, most of which were touting it as great and a worthy remake. (It was 85% at rottentomatoes on the day it opened with a lot of reviews in at the time.)
I saw it and found it a solid movie, but worthy of a B- at the most generous.
I saw it and found it a solid movie, but worthy of a B- at the most generous.