Looking for Charade Criterion 1st printing Info
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looking for Charade Criterion 1st printing Info
Hello,
I recently purchased a Copy of Charade Criterion OOP and I wanted to verify that it is not a bootleg. I would greatly appreciate it if somebody that owns the disc could post the UPC and ISBN numbers that belong to this edition.
Also if somebody could email me a scan of the back that would be great, my email is: apguzman at gmail.com.
Thanks,
Armando
I recently purchased a Copy of Charade Criterion OOP and I wanted to verify that it is not a bootleg. I would greatly appreciate it if somebody that owns the disc could post the UPC and ISBN numbers that belong to this edition.
Also if somebody could email me a scan of the back that would be great, my email is: apguzman at gmail.com.
Thanks,
Armando
#3
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why would you purchase you purchase the out-of-print version? The new, in-print version, as far as I know, has exactly the same features and is anamorphic (which the OOP one isn't). I hope you got the OOP one for a very low price...
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fandango - Thanks a bunch. The numbers match so I'll go ahead and open it.
Walter - I got if for fairly cheap, ~$15, but I got it as an experiment. I want to see first hand how much an anamorphic transfer improves the picture quality. I plan to get the new one and compare them side by side. My current TV is 1.33 but it does anamorphic squeeze.
When I get a widescreen TV, I plan to test them again and see then I should see a really big improvement.
Hey DVDs are not just about the movie every time, some times its fun to just play with the technology.
Walter - I got if for fairly cheap, ~$15, but I got it as an experiment. I want to see first hand how much an anamorphic transfer improves the picture quality. I plan to get the new one and compare them side by side. My current TV is 1.33 but it does anamorphic squeeze.
When I get a widescreen TV, I plan to test them again and see then I should see a really big improvement.
Hey DVDs are not just about the movie every time, some times its fun to just play with the technology.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Assume?
Actually, from what I saw at DVDBeaver (don't have the link, sorry), the 1.33 letterbox version looks slightly better on a 1.33 display.
But YMMV, of course.
I figure I'm gonna hold on to my OOP Charade 1st printing until I have the 16x9 display on which to properly show off the upgrade. Of course, if that goes out of print, I'll upgrade lickety split.
CDE,
CS
But YMMV, of course.
I figure I'm gonna hold on to my OOP Charade 1st printing until I have the 16x9 display on which to properly show off the upgrade. Of course, if that goes out of print, I'll upgrade lickety split.
CDE,
CS
#7
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 9,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#9
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The non-anamorphic image is sharper and has better contrast, even though it's lower-res than the newer 16:9.
On a 4:3 display I'd much rather watch the original disc anytime.
On a 4:3 display I'd much rather watch the original disc anytime.