DVI connection
#1
Moderator
Thread Starter
DVI connection
I manually searched and was unable to find anything on DVI, so I figured I'd ask my questions in a new thread...
First off, I like to think I'm somewhat knowledgeable on HT Gear, but I am not very versed on the DVI connection. My HD/DVD combo is a few years old and DVI wasn't an option, so I never really bothered to read up on it.
Recently however, I got a HD DVR for HD set #2 and both have a DVI option. I currently have the video connected via component cables (like set #1) but am wondering if it is worth connecting via DVI? I'm assuming DVI is for video and if so, is there a drastic improvement over the component option? Also, where is the best place to buy a DVI cable as I hear they are rather pricey?
Thx.
First off, I like to think I'm somewhat knowledgeable on HT Gear, but I am not very versed on the DVI connection. My HD/DVD combo is a few years old and DVI wasn't an option, so I never really bothered to read up on it.
Recently however, I got a HD DVR for HD set #2 and both have a DVI option. I currently have the video connected via component cables (like set #1) but am wondering if it is worth connecting via DVI? I'm assuming DVI is for video and if so, is there a drastic improvement over the component option? Also, where is the best place to buy a DVI cable as I hear they are rather pricey?
Thx.
#2
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no idea how much better it is... probably depends on your tv. but, i'd use the DVI just so i can say that i use it.
i got my cable from extremephone when i got the dvd player - about $20. i see the cables on ebay for that - i got a dvd to hdmi cable from a seller called lenexpo for $20+shipping.
i got my cable from extremephone when i got the dvd player - about $20. i see the cables on ebay for that - i got a dvd to hdmi cable from a seller called lenexpo for $20+shipping.
#3
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: PDX Metro
Posts: 8,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My understanding is that DVI really shines on a plasma or LCD display and that the benefit gained on an RPTV wouldn't truly be realized. I plan on eventually using my DVI connector just to free up a component connection.
#4
DVD Talk Legend
I recently got one of the HDDirecTiVos and switched from component to DVI. It's my opinion that HD programming looks pretty much the same on my RPTV, but SD programming looks better. But, as Tsar Chasm says, it does free up a component connection.
Your HD DVR didn't come with a DVI cable?
Your HD DVR didn't come with a DVI cable?
#5
DVD Talk Legend
but am wondering if it is worth connecting via DVI?
I'm assuming DVI is for video and if so, is there a drastic improvement over the component option?
#6
Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally posted by Chew
Your HD DVR didn't come with a DVI cable?
Your HD DVR didn't come with a DVI cable?
Based on the responses, I don't see a need to upgrade (though I may just to free up a component connection eventually.)
#7
The benefit to DVI is 1-to-1 pixel mapping. If your sourceDVI out and you connect it to the DVI-in of a digital monitor (LCD, LCD-RP, DLP-RP, or LCD-FP/DLP-FP) then every pixel on the source will be displayed EXACTLY the same on the monitor. Perfect transmission of your source to the display.
Otherwise, you're performing several digital-analog-digital conversion on the path, loosing quality each time.
Plasma and traditional HD sets (and tube sets) are NOT digital. You can not get 1-to-1 pixel mapping with these sets. You might eliminate a couple of a2d's, which might help the picture somewhat.
Otherwise, you're performing several digital-analog-digital conversion on the path, loosing quality each time.
Plasma and traditional HD sets (and tube sets) are NOT digital. You can not get 1-to-1 pixel mapping with these sets. You might eliminate a couple of a2d's, which might help the picture somewhat.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by gcbrowni
Plasma and traditional HD sets (and tube sets) are NOT digital. You can not get 1-to-1 pixel mapping with these sets. You might eliminate a couple of a2d's, which might help the picture somewhat.
Plasma and traditional HD sets (and tube sets) are NOT digital. You can not get 1-to-1 pixel mapping with these sets. You might eliminate a couple of a2d's, which might help the picture somewhat.
#10
Senior Member
Originally posted by gotapex
Plasmas are just as digital as LCD's, LCOS, SXRD, and D-ILA. You can get 1-1 pixel mapping on any of these technologies, as long as the individual display model supports it (ie. my Panasonic 42PWD6UY). DLP is, of course, the only true digital display, but that doesn't mean pixel perfect mapping is confined to DLP.
Plasmas are just as digital as LCD's, LCOS, SXRD, and D-ILA. You can get 1-1 pixel mapping on any of these technologies, as long as the individual display model supports it (ie. my Panasonic 42PWD6UY). DLP is, of course, the only true digital display, but that doesn't mean pixel perfect mapping is confined to DLP.
#12
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: DVI connection
Originally posted by Geofferson
Also, where is the best place to buy a DVI cable as I hear they are rather pricey?
Also, where is the best place to buy a DVI cable as I hear they are rather pricey?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It depends on the length and resolution. If you're going over 5 meters at near the limits of single link bandwidth, the cost goes up quite dramatically. You absolutely need a good cable in these cases. However, for lower lengths and or lower resolution/refresh rates, you can go with a pretty cheap cable.
#14
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by gotapex
It depends on the length and resolution. If you're going over 5 meters at near the limits of single link bandwidth, the cost goes up quite dramatically. You absolutely need a good cable in these cases. However, for lower lengths and or lower resolution/refresh rates, you can go with a pretty cheap cable.
It depends on the length and resolution. If you're going over 5 meters at near the limits of single link bandwidth, the cost goes up quite dramatically. You absolutely need a good cable in these cases. However, for lower lengths and or lower resolution/refresh rates, you can go with a pretty cheap cable.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It depends.
I put a DVI cable in the wall, so I wanted to make sure that it could support 1920x1080 at 60hz (progressively). To do this, it either takes a signal amplifier or optical DVI cable. My 10 meter DVI-D fiber optic cable (with electric/optic converters on both ends) was $500. It fully supports the max bandwidth of DVI at that length.
Some people have said that if you have a thick, high quality enough DVI cable, it may work at those lengths. I've heard that 22AWG cabling will work, but I have not tried it. These are the only 22 gauge ones I've seen so far:
http://www.cobaltcable.com/product/dvi_cable.htm
The 10m is $185.
Again, if you don't need max bandwidth or long lengths, you can go much MUCH cheaper. There are good choices down to $15-20 or so.
I put a DVI cable in the wall, so I wanted to make sure that it could support 1920x1080 at 60hz (progressively). To do this, it either takes a signal amplifier or optical DVI cable. My 10 meter DVI-D fiber optic cable (with electric/optic converters on both ends) was $500. It fully supports the max bandwidth of DVI at that length.
Some people have said that if you have a thick, high quality enough DVI cable, it may work at those lengths. I've heard that 22AWG cabling will work, but I have not tried it. These are the only 22 gauge ones I've seen so far:
http://www.cobaltcable.com/product/dvi_cable.htm
The 10m is $185.
Again, if you don't need max bandwidth or long lengths, you can go much MUCH cheaper. There are good choices down to $15-20 or so.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sugar Grove, IL
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by gotapex
Plasmas are just as digital as LCD's, LCOS, SXRD, and D-ILA. You can get 1-1 pixel mapping on any of these technologies, as long as the individual display model supports it (ie. my Panasonic 42PWD6UY). DLP is, of course, the only true digital display, but that doesn't mean pixel perfect mapping is confined to DLP.
Plasmas are just as digital as LCD's, LCOS, SXRD, and D-ILA. You can get 1-1 pixel mapping on any of these technologies, as long as the individual display model supports it (ie. my Panasonic 42PWD6UY). DLP is, of course, the only true digital display, but that doesn't mean pixel perfect mapping is confined to DLP.
Also, any chance you're using DirecTV? How's it look (standard definition). If you've got an HD feed going into the TV, how much better is it? And if so, what are you using for your HD feed? I selected the Panny specifically because we'll still be watching a lot of standard definition programming, but might be interested in checking out HD with either an OTA set-top box of HD DirecTV (anxiously awaiting price reductions on the HD DirecTivos).
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Try the DV-563A first and see if you like it before spending more money on DVI.
I'm currently using the LG electronics LST-3510A, which is an OTA HDTV box (with one of the absolute best, most sensitive tuners on the market, better than my Samsung SIR-T165, SIR-T151, and SIR-T351) plus a built in DVD player with DVI w/hdcp output. It costed just under $400 new, which I thought was a fair price, since HDTV set top boxes tend to cost about there without the DVD.
I also have a Bravo D1, but that's attached to my JVC DLA-SX21 projector.
Do not get the Samsung, as it uses PC levels for its DVI output. The Bravo uses the correct video levels.
If you do decide to get the DVI setup, please be aware that you need to calibrate that input. The settings will be vastly different from the Component input.
HD, especially over the air, is vastly superior to standard definition. That panny is one of the better at handling SD (though not the absolute best). I'm currently using cable for my SD, which sucks. Voom's was better, but I realized that most of prime time was HD over the air, and that comprised most of my viewing.
I'm currently using the LG electronics LST-3510A, which is an OTA HDTV box (with one of the absolute best, most sensitive tuners on the market, better than my Samsung SIR-T165, SIR-T151, and SIR-T351) plus a built in DVD player with DVI w/hdcp output. It costed just under $400 new, which I thought was a fair price, since HDTV set top boxes tend to cost about there without the DVD.
I also have a Bravo D1, but that's attached to my JVC DLA-SX21 projector.
Do not get the Samsung, as it uses PC levels for its DVI output. The Bravo uses the correct video levels.
If you do decide to get the DVI setup, please be aware that you need to calibrate that input. The settings will be vastly different from the Component input.
HD, especially over the air, is vastly superior to standard definition. That panny is one of the better at handling SD (though not the absolute best). I'm currently using cable for my SD, which sucks. Voom's was better, but I realized that most of prime time was HD over the air, and that comprised most of my viewing.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sugar Grove, IL
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the advice. I guess I'll wait to get a DVI player (which probably means I'll wait a month instead of a week!).
I might have to look into that LG HDTV box / DVD player. I'd like to avoid paying for only a few HD channels through DirecTV, so OTA sounds like a better option. I'll just have to look into what channels I'll be able to get (I'm about 40 miles west of Chicago).
I might have to look into that LG HDTV box / DVD player. I'd like to avoid paying for only a few HD channels through DirecTV, so OTA sounds like a better option. I'll just have to look into what channels I'll be able to get (I'm about 40 miles west of Chicago).
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts