Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

David Gordon Green is selling out!

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

David Gordon Green is selling out!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-04, 07:02 PM
  #1  
DVD Talk Hero
Thread Starter
 
PopcornTreeCt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 25,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
David Gordon Green is selling out!

If you know who this young talented director is, then kudos to you! His directorial debut was the terrific George Washington. I just read that he has a new movie coming out that sounds pretty good called Undertow starring Josh Lucas and Dermot Mulroney. But after he's done with that, he's working on A Confederacy of Dunces a comedy starring Will Ferrell and Drew Barrymore. Why David? Aren't you making enough money making artsy films?
Old 06-26-04, 07:21 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Michael T Hudson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Formerly known as "BigDaddy"/Austin, TX
Posts: 11,578
Received 46 Likes on 28 Posts
So selling out means you make money doing what you love to do?
Old 06-26-04, 07:36 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Mouthweathercity, IL.
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe he is allowed to direct completely after his own liking, without artistic limitations by the producers, actors etc. If so, then more power to him. If not maybe its time to make some money so he can afford making the films he wants later. Then also more power to him. George Washington and All the Real Girls were excellent!!!

Cheers

DVD Smurf
Old 06-26-04, 07:48 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
William Fuld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,072
Received 135 Likes on 80 Posts
PopcornTreeCt,

Do yourself a favor and read A Confederacy of Dunces.
Old 06-26-04, 08:16 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Pillowhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by William Fuld
PopcornTreeCt,

Do yourself a favor and read A Confederacy of Dunces.
Old 06-26-04, 08:17 PM
  #6  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 8,466
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Please. Selling out?



It isn't like he is directing a huge blockbuster Titanic film...
Old 06-26-04, 08:20 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 8,085
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by conscience
It isn't like he is directing a huge blockbuster Titanic film...
I'm pretty sure Jim Cameron wanted to make that film pretty badly. I wouldnt call that selling out.
Old 06-26-04, 09:32 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh geesh he's selling out. Pardon the man for taking a well paying job making doing exactly what he loves to do. So he's not making an arthouse movie with limited commercial appeal that doesn't pay that well. So he's taking a job with a much better payday, improving his career more than likely and giving himself the chance to make bigger films the way he wants.

But nooooo! He's selling out! Cause I mean...all of us here haven't sold out. No no no, we only do things for the love of it. None of us have like jobs and stuff. Not that this is even remotely the same as doing that.

H'es not selling out. He's (assuming the film isn't worthless) making a smart career move that if anything will widen his opportunities as a filmmaker. Not to mention, how do you know this isn't exactly what he's always wanted to do? If anything, him making an another art film like you would want could be the real definition of him selling out.
Old 06-26-04, 10:26 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Selling out?

It's not like he's working for Bruckheimer or something...
Old 06-26-04, 10:30 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Numanoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Down in 'The Park'
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A Confederacy of Dunces is a Pulitzer Prize winning book. Don't let the name "Drew Barrymore" scare you so much.
Old 06-26-04, 10:50 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Columbia, MD, USA
Posts: 11,249
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
He's keepin' it real!
Old 06-26-04, 11:39 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 8,466
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by RyoHazuki
I'm pretty sure Jim Cameron wanted to make that film pretty badly. I wouldnt call that selling out.
What I said wasn't a stab at Titanic, it was at all blockbusters where everyone says someone sells out for doing it.
Old 06-26-04, 11:59 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Hokeyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 20,406
Received 696 Likes on 430 Posts
This could be one of the most ignorant-minded threads I've seen in awhile.

Do yourself a favor and read A Confederacy of Dunces.
... and then call Green a sellout. Amen.
Old 06-27-04, 12:32 AM
  #14  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Compton (Straight Outta)
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pretty sure A Confederacy of Dunces (the movie) fell through.
Old 06-27-04, 01:10 AM
  #15  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read that book. While I was reading it, I was thinking that it might make a good movie.

I don't understand how making this movie is selling out though. It's not like he's turning into Michael Bay.
Old 06-27-04, 04:02 AM
  #16  
Banned by request
 
Supermallet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Termite Terrace
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by Dan Average
I'm pretty sure A Confederacy of Dunces (the movie) fell through.
It did, many times over. Green is not the first filmmaker to try and adapt the book.
Old 06-27-04, 01:30 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Hero
Thread Starter
 
PopcornTreeCt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 25,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have not read the book. I assume it must be pretty good if it won a Pulitzer. The casting of Will Ferrell and Drew Barrymore doesn't sound award-winning in itself. There used to be filmmakers that had near flawless filmographies: Hitchcock, Kubrick, Welles, Ford, they wouldn't taint their body of work just for some extra cash. I guess its probably just that the times have changed as every director has to pay his dues nowadays.
Old 06-27-04, 03:28 PM
  #18  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by PopcornTreeCt
I have not read the book. I assume it must be pretty good if it won a Pulitzer. The casting of Will Ferrell and Drew Barrymore doesn't sound award-winning in itself. There used to be filmmakers that had near flawless filmographies: Hitchcock, Kubrick, Welles, Ford, they wouldn't taint their body of work just for some extra cash. I guess its probably just that the times have changed as every director has to pay his dues nowadays.
Well Kubrick turned out quite a few studio pics right up until Spartacus. None of those flicks did he have final cut. Orson Welles is an anomoly: he got final cut on his first major motion picture when he was 25. Nonetheless, everyone has at some point worked on something that wasn't 100% theirs. In fact, I'd venture to say only a couple directors even have the ability to flex that much control over their projects. Spielberg, Lucas, Cameron at this point. But those guys also played studio director too...check out Cameron's Pirahna 2. That's not to mention...just cause Will Ferrell is in it doesn't mean you're selling out.

Times haven't changed...you just named a very select group of directors. Those men turned out some enormously well received (both critically acclaimed and box office earning films) that gave them the ability to make their movies any way they wanted. You'll realize that if you try to expand your list, it's very short. This David Gordon Green...well, his film resume just isn't strong enough that I could see any company just letting him do what he wants with vast amounts of money.
Old 06-27-04, 03:46 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Hero
Thread Starter
 
PopcornTreeCt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 25,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by jaeufraser
Well Kubrick turned out quite a few studio pics right up until Spartacus. None of those flicks did he have final cut. Orson Welles is an anomoly: he got final cut on his first major motion picture when he was 25. Nonetheless, everyone has at some point worked on something that wasn't 100% theirs. In fact, I'd venture to say only a couple directors even have the ability to flex that much control over their projects. Spielberg, Lucas, Cameron at this point. But those guys also played studio director too...check out Cameron's Pirahna 2. That's not to mention...just cause Will Ferrell is in it doesn't mean you're selling out.

Times haven't changed...you just named a very select group of directors. Those men turned out some enormously well received (both critically acclaimed and box office earning films) that gave them the ability to make their movies any way they wanted. You'll realize that if you try to expand your list, it's very short. This David Gordon Green...well, his film resume just isn't strong enough that I could see any company just letting him do what he wants with vast amounts of money.
You brought up some good points. I know directors have had to pay their dues upfront like Kubrick and James Cameron but Green has estabilished himself as a director with a certain style and he seems to be abandoning that. Paul Thomas Anderson, though a short resume also, has always made his style of films as has Quentin Tarantino.
Old 06-27-04, 03:58 PM
  #20  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
William Fuld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,072
Received 135 Likes on 80 Posts
So when you heard Tarantino was adapting an Elmore Leonard book did you call him a sell-out? Or how about when you heard Anderson was making a movie with Adam Sandler?
Old 06-27-04, 04:07 PM
  #21  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by PopcornTreeCt
You brought up some good points. I know directors have had to pay their dues upfront like Kubrick and James Cameron but Green has estabilished himself as a director with a certain style and he seems to be abandoning that. Paul Thomas Anderson, though a short resume also, has always made his style of films as has Quentin Tarantino.
They do, but how much freedom do those directors have? If PTA or Tarantino wanted to make a 100 million dollar movie, do you really think any studio in their right mind would give them the money? Perhaps Tarantino could, but I doubt Anderson could. IF they wanted to move on to these other types of projects, they would have to play ball. Tarantino is particularly limited considering he's not even in the DGA. But Tarantino has Weinstein to back him up..that's how he really gets to do as he pleases.

Sure Green could stick it out, but you don't know the film he had in mind here. Was it a betrayal of his previous work? Did Alfonso Cuaron sell out by doing a Harry Potter movie? I for one think he did a wonderful job, and while by all means it put some green into his pocket, and stuck him with some chosen name actors, there's no doubt that he was able to infuse his own artisitc ablities in there.
Old 06-27-04, 05:00 PM
  #22  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Firstly, I think it's important to note that the Confederacy of Dunces project is dead in the water.

Soderbergh doesn't even have it on his plate anymore, and rumor has it David's looking to do something else now too. IMDB is just late on the draw taking it down.

Secondly, David is far from a sell-out. I know him personally, and I can tell you that he's a man of integrity. I'm personally looking forward to his next film, The Undertow, which he's already shot and should be coming out this Fall. It's a dark, southern tale starring Dermot Mulroney, Josh Lucas, and Jamie Bell, and could not be in any way perceived as a "sell out" film.

Also, David's kept himself busy shooting a series of anti-smoking public service announcements (the one where all the people are getting their heads shaved in Times Square, others). He's truly one of the most talented new directors we've got. You people are jumping the gun calling him a sell out.
Old 06-27-04, 05:57 PM
  #23  
Banned by request
 
Supermallet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Termite Terrace
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Orson Welles, not a sell out?

This is the man who would take work anywhere he would get it to fund other projects or just because he needed some quick cash. Hell, even The Lady From Shanghai was done because he owed the head of the studio.

And, really, David Gordon Green isn't nearly as good as any of the other filmmakers you mention. I mean Hitchcock, Welles, Ford, KUBRICK!? These guys were giants in the industry. Green is, right now, a footnote, and not because he's obscure. He's just not that great. He's got this sort of "Terence Malick meets mindless meandering" thing going on that has yet to deliver a good movie, in my opinion. Even someone like Paul Thomas Anderson, who so far has one very good movie (Hard Eight), one bad movie (Boogie Nights), one terrible movie (Magnolia), and one amazing movie (Punch-Drunk Love) is a more consistently interesting filmmaker than Green.

*Flame suit on*
Old 06-27-04, 06:36 PM
  #24  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Troy Stiffler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Under an I-10 Overpass
Posts: 25,822
Received 366 Likes on 266 Posts
Originally posted by Suprmallet
Even someone like Paul Thomas Anderson, who so far has one very good movie (Hard Eight), one bad movie (Boogie Nights), one terrible movie (Magnolia), and one amazing movie (Punch-Drunk Love)

...

*Flame suit on*
That suit better be bulletproof too.
Old 06-27-04, 07:32 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Suprmallet
Orson Welles, not a sell out?

This is the man who would take work anywhere he would get it to fund other projects or just because he needed some quick cash. Hell, even The Lady From Shanghai was done because he owed the head of the studio.

And, really, David Gordon Green isn't nearly as good as any of the other filmmakers you mention. I mean Hitchcock, Welles, Ford, KUBRICK!? These guys were giants in the industry. Green is, right now, a footnote, and not because he's obscure. He's just not that great. He's got this sort of "Terence Malick meets mindless meandering" thing going on that has yet to deliver a good movie, in my opinion. Even someone like Paul Thomas Anderson, who so far has one very good movie (Hard Eight), one bad movie (Boogie Nights), one terrible movie (Magnolia), and one amazing movie (Punch-Drunk Love) is a more consistently interesting filmmaker than Green.

*Flame suit on*
::Grabbing Flamethrower::

Granted, I have not seen Hard Eight, but Magnolia Terrible?!?!?!

::rubs eyes::

Yup, still says Magnolia is Terrible.

I'm just in dis-belief.

You just said this to piss people off, right?


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.