Should I get 32" Flat with anamorphic squeeze or 36" curved?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Zonie
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Should I get 32" Flat with anamorphic squeeze or 36" curved?
I'm looking to put the biggest TV possible in my entertainment center. It will fit a 36" TV without the side speakers. With the Superbowl sales I can get one for around $500. I can also get a 32" Flat with anamorphic squeeze (vertical compression) for about the same price.
So is the sacrifice in 36" curved screen real estate worth the smaller flat screen with anamorphic squeeze?
Here are the models I'm looking at:
Sharp 32" Stereo TV with Vertical Compression 32F631 for $550 before 10%
Toshiba 32" Flat-Tube Stereo TV w/ Video Inputs 32AF43 for $600 before 10%
So is the sacrifice in 36" curved screen real estate worth the smaller flat screen with anamorphic squeeze?
Here are the models I'm looking at:
Sharp 32" Stereo TV with Vertical Compression 32F631 for $550 before 10%
Toshiba 32" Flat-Tube Stereo TV w/ Video Inputs 32AF43 for $600 before 10%
Last edited by digitalmanAZ; 01-28-04 at 01:34 PM.
#3
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd go with the flat screen. You can view it from (within reason)any angle in the room, and it will still look fine. Also, IMO, the anamorphic squeeze is the selling point. I love my Wega, and much of that is due to the the picture quality w/ the squeeze while watching movies.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Zonie
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like the Sony 32" WEGA Flat-Tube Stereo TV with 16:9 Enhanced Mode Model: KV-32FS100 is 35 3/8" wide. I have 35 1/4". I'll check it at the store but it may not fit.
EDIT: The Sony won't fit. The Toshiba will just squeeze in at 34 1/2".
EDIT: The Sony won't fit. The Toshiba will just squeeze in at 34 1/2".
Last edited by digitalmanAZ; 01-29-04 at 04:26 AM.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Zonie
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm leaning towards the Toshiba. The other contender I saw at the store was a JVC 32" Flat-Tube Stereo TV AV32F734. Of the 3 I think the Tosh is probably worth the extra $50.
#8
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Hell - see you when you get here.
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just remember that only anamorphic dvd'd support the squeeze..
Majority of the DVDs out there do not... so i would not make that a selling point if i were you.
then again i own a 36 VVega, .. the flat screen in itself is worth it.
Majority of the DVDs out there do not... so i would not make that a selling point if i were you.
then again i own a 36 VVega, .. the flat screen in itself is worth it.
#9
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally posted by Oraphus
just remember that only anamorphic dvd'd support the squeeze..
Majority of the DVDs out there do not... so i would not make that a selling point if i were you.
then again i own a 36 VVega, .. the flat screen in itself is worth it.
just remember that only anamorphic dvd'd support the squeeze..
Majority of the DVDs out there do not... so i would not make that a selling point if i were you.
then again i own a 36 VVega, .. the flat screen in itself is worth it.
Most DVDs are anamorphic nowadays. Unless you are talking about 4x3 TV shows on DVD. Pretty much every widescreen movie is anamorphic now.
#10
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Oraphus
just remember that only anamorphic dvd'd support the squeeze..
Majority of the DVDs out there do not... so i would not make that a selling point if i were you.
then again i own a 36 VVega, .. the flat screen in itself is worth it.
just remember that only anamorphic dvd'd support the squeeze..
Majority of the DVDs out there do not... so i would not make that a selling point if i were you.
then again i own a 36 VVega, .. the flat screen in itself is worth it.
To the original poster I would tell you that if you want quality you must go flat screen but if you want quantity (size that is over quality) the go the 36" route.
#11
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Get a VVega flat and Vert Squeeze 36" I LOVE mine, a little more up front but a TV is used for several years with a LOT of use in my house. Well worth the expense. The HDTV picture is stunning.
I only have a handful of DVD's that are not anamorphic the majority are.
I only have a handful of DVD's that are not anamorphic the majority are.
Last edited by cseyer; 01-30-04 at 07:39 AM.
#12
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Hell - see you when you get here.
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
really.. i always thought majorityu were not.. ahouldn't it say on the box if the DVD is anamorphis or not.. most of mine dont have it
#13
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i would dump the entertainment center and not limit myself to said restrictions. just my opinion but most set ups without a entertainment center look much nicer...anyway, if you like it keep it.
however, i would go with the flat screen choice given the two options.
however, i would go with the flat screen choice given the two options.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Zonie
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went with the Toshiba 32" Flat-Tube 32AF43.
Popped in Sound&Vision Home Theater Tune-Up to do the video calibrations and it looks great. Contrast was at a factory setting of 100! That came down to 60. Also turned SVM off. The difference on the Sharpness cal page and the other cal pages with lots of lines and circles (can't remember the names) was astounding. SVM turned on looks horrible.
Did a quick compare of (DVD 4:3Letterbox/TV 4:3) and (DVD 16:9/TV 16:9) with Pirates of the Caribbean Chap 5. The closeups of Johnny Depp in the jail cell really show off the extra resolution. Very nice.
Thx for all the replies.
Popped in Sound&Vision Home Theater Tune-Up to do the video calibrations and it looks great. Contrast was at a factory setting of 100! That came down to 60. Also turned SVM off. The difference on the Sharpness cal page and the other cal pages with lots of lines and circles (can't remember the names) was astounding. SVM turned on looks horrible.
Did a quick compare of (DVD 4:3Letterbox/TV 4:3) and (DVD 16:9/TV 16:9) with Pirates of the Caribbean Chap 5. The closeups of Johnny Depp in the jail cell really show off the extra resolution. Very nice.
Thx for all the replies.
#15
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Oraphus
really.. i always thought majorityu were not.. ahouldn't it say on the box if the DVD is anamorphis or not.. most of mine dont have it
really.. i always thought majorityu were not.. ahouldn't it say on the box if the DVD is anamorphis or not.. most of mine dont have it
#16
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Hell - see you when you get here.
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well.. i can admit when i am wrong.... just watched Matrix Reloaded in its full anamorphic glory (though no mention of it on the box) and the quality blew me away. Good to know
#17
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Oraphus
well.. i can admit when i am wrong.... just watched Matrix Reloaded in its full anamorphic glory (though no mention of it on the box) and the quality blew me away. Good to know
well.. i can admit when i am wrong.... just watched Matrix Reloaded in its full anamorphic glory (though no mention of it on the box) and the quality blew me away. Good to know