Industry News: DVD Forum Chooses NEC/Toshiba Blue Laser Technology
#1
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Industry News: DVD Forum Chooses NEC/Toshiba Blue Laser Technology
From Afterdawn.com (11/11/03) :
Read another article about it at EETimes. The bad news about blue laser technology (from what I've read) is that it's NOT backward compatible with our current DVDs.
EDIT: The proposed blue laser format from NEC/Toshiba WILL be backwards-compatible. Sony's Blu-Ray technology, however, will not be.
In a rather surprising move, DVD Forum (the authority which controls the development of the DVD standards), has chosen a technology by NEC and Toshiba to work as a blueprint for next generation blue-laser DVDs.
This is big setback for a Blu-Ray Consortium, a group of nine big consumer electronic companies, who launched their blue-laser specs earlier this year hoping that by uniting their forces they could avoid current situation where markets have two competing red-laser technologies, the "minus" and the "plus" formats. But now it seems that this will be exactly the same story with blue-laser recordable standards as well.
NEC-Toshiba model users 0.6mm cover layer disk system, similiar to those used currently in red-laser DVD discs, while Blu-Ray uses 0.1mm cover layer. Blu-Ray can store upto 27GB of data per side, but the NEC-Toshiba disc can hold only appx. 20GB per side.
This is big setback for a Blu-Ray Consortium, a group of nine big consumer electronic companies, who launched their blue-laser specs earlier this year hoping that by uniting their forces they could avoid current situation where markets have two competing red-laser technologies, the "minus" and the "plus" formats. But now it seems that this will be exactly the same story with blue-laser recordable standards as well.
NEC-Toshiba model users 0.6mm cover layer disk system, similiar to those used currently in red-laser DVD discs, while Blu-Ray uses 0.1mm cover layer. Blu-Ray can store upto 27GB of data per side, but the NEC-Toshiba disc can hold only appx. 20GB per side.
EDIT: The proposed blue laser format from NEC/Toshiba WILL be backwards-compatible. Sony's Blu-Ray technology, however, will not be.
Last edited by vivarey; 11-19-03 at 08:16 PM.
#2
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hail to the Redskins!
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes
on
38 Posts
Re: Industry News: DVD Forum Chooses NEC/Toshiba Blue Laser Technology
Originally posted by vivarey
From Afterdawn.com (11/11/03) :
Read another article about it at EETimes. The bad news about blue laser technology (from what I've read) is that it's NOT backward compatible with our current DVDs.
From Afterdawn.com (11/11/03) :
Read another article about it at EETimes. The bad news about blue laser technology (from what I've read) is that it's NOT backward compatible with our current DVDs.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My 500+ DVD Collection is valued at over $10,000. Absolutely no way in hell will I rebuy all these titles. And if the new systems are not backwards-compatible, then how would that work with people's HT setups? I can just see it now, two sets of speak groups, two disc players, two receivers. Nah, ain't gonna happen. Why didn't the DVD industry just introduce this technology back in '97 instead of red light laser, and now expect this new technology to be embraced? If it were backwards-compatible, I would consider all my future purchases of titles I don't already own to be that of HD-DVD. But not this!!! I'm all for improvements in technology, but not at the immoral expense of ripping-off consumers like this. I hope it dies a miserable death.
#5
DVD Talk Special Edition
That EETimes article says Blu-Ray wasn't formally submitted for consideration by the DVD forum.
I have read so many conflicting things regarding backwards compatibility on Blu-Ray that I am just going to wait and see what reaches the market before making a fuss even though I have no problem having more than one player around. Already have several devices hooked up anyway.
What exactly is the DVD forum and does their decision have any real effect on the manufacture of next-gen players? Doesn't look like Blu-Ray will be stopped by this.
I have read so many conflicting things regarding backwards compatibility on Blu-Ray that I am just going to wait and see what reaches the market before making a fuss even though I have no problem having more than one player around. Already have several devices hooked up anyway.
What exactly is the DVD forum and does their decision have any real effect on the manufacture of next-gen players? Doesn't look like Blu-Ray will be stopped by this.
Last edited by philo; 11-19-03 at 08:02 PM.
#7
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Our own Geoffrey Kleinman wrote a good article about the impending format war, after attending this year's Video Store Magazine DVD Conference:
http://www.dvdtalk.com/ourweek/
A few relevant paragraphs from that:
http://www.dvdtalk.com/ourweek/
A few relevant paragraphs from that:
HD-DVD The Real Issue
But a format war might be a moot point if the studios can't figure out how to make the next generation of DVD compelling for people to buy. As it stands now the key selling points for HD-DVD are: 1) it's got much better copy protection than DVD (something that was repeated over and over and over again through out the day); 2) it has higher resolution picture; and, 3) "Interactivity". When pressed about what exactly 'Interactivity' means, the best response I could get was a 'Wow Experience', but throughout the day no one could really quite define or describe exactly what that was. Unfortunately, I believe no one can define 'Interactivity' because they simply don't have any idea what it really is. Studios on the whole seem to be a little surprised at just how successful DVD is, and just how popular all special features are with consumers, I think they are hard pressed to come up with anything to 'one up DVD'.
When you really boil it down, the rush to HD-DVD is less about what consumers want or need and more about the needs of the studios. The two biggest issues facing studios are copy protection and an end to the explosive growth of home video. Studios somehow think that they can capture lightning in a bottle and re-create the DVD explosion with HD-DVD. Several presenters at the DVD in 50 convention likened the launch of HD-DVD to a 'PS-2' type event with visions of consumers quickly tossing aside their DVD Players and collections and re-purchasing their favorite titles again in HD. I think some of these studios are going to get a serious wake-up call. Home Video isn't games and the jump from DVD to HD is no where near the tremendous leap between PS1 and PS2 or Nintendo 64 and Gamecube. Studios look at the consumer behavior surrounding game systems and think it can be emulated in the Home Video Market. It can't. I believe that DVD buyers are going to take more of a 'wait and see' approach to HD-DVD instead of fire selling their DVD collections on Ebay to jump on the HD-DVD bandwagon. I also think that studios are over estimating how quickly people are going to actually be upgrading their standard TVs to view HD content. Currently the FCC has a 2006 deadline for total broadcast conversion to HD. Most of the big name retailers I spoke with at the show admit that the 2006 deadline won't be met and they don't expect HD to be as mass a product as DVD until as late as 2010! All this combined with a format war, I fear HD-DVD has a fairly rocky road ahead of it.
But a format war might be a moot point if the studios can't figure out how to make the next generation of DVD compelling for people to buy. As it stands now the key selling points for HD-DVD are: 1) it's got much better copy protection than DVD (something that was repeated over and over and over again through out the day); 2) it has higher resolution picture; and, 3) "Interactivity". When pressed about what exactly 'Interactivity' means, the best response I could get was a 'Wow Experience', but throughout the day no one could really quite define or describe exactly what that was. Unfortunately, I believe no one can define 'Interactivity' because they simply don't have any idea what it really is. Studios on the whole seem to be a little surprised at just how successful DVD is, and just how popular all special features are with consumers, I think they are hard pressed to come up with anything to 'one up DVD'.
When you really boil it down, the rush to HD-DVD is less about what consumers want or need and more about the needs of the studios. The two biggest issues facing studios are copy protection and an end to the explosive growth of home video. Studios somehow think that they can capture lightning in a bottle and re-create the DVD explosion with HD-DVD. Several presenters at the DVD in 50 convention likened the launch of HD-DVD to a 'PS-2' type event with visions of consumers quickly tossing aside their DVD Players and collections and re-purchasing their favorite titles again in HD. I think some of these studios are going to get a serious wake-up call. Home Video isn't games and the jump from DVD to HD is no where near the tremendous leap between PS1 and PS2 or Nintendo 64 and Gamecube. Studios look at the consumer behavior surrounding game systems and think it can be emulated in the Home Video Market. It can't. I believe that DVD buyers are going to take more of a 'wait and see' approach to HD-DVD instead of fire selling their DVD collections on Ebay to jump on the HD-DVD bandwagon. I also think that studios are over estimating how quickly people are going to actually be upgrading their standard TVs to view HD content. Currently the FCC has a 2006 deadline for total broadcast conversion to HD. Most of the big name retailers I spoke with at the show admit that the 2006 deadline won't be met and they don't expect HD to be as mass a product as DVD until as late as 2010! All this combined with a format war, I fear HD-DVD has a fairly rocky road ahead of it.
Sony - Blue Ray HD-DVD and Its Ties to PS3
Make no mistake about it, Sony IS doing Blue Ray. The Blue Ray format is currently being sold in Japan as a recordable format and they're making it clear that they intend to pursue the Blue Ray format for the US. So far Sony has lined up Panasonic, Phillips, Samsung, Pioneer, Sharp, Hitachi, and Mitsubishi who all have pledged their support for Blue Ray. It seems like Sony may green light Blue Ray with or without the broader support of the DVD Forum. In a talk about the future of DVD and HD-DVD Benjamin Feingold, president of Columbia Tri-Star Home Entertainment (A Sony Company) tipped his hand when he suggested that Sony was looking to the capacity provided by blue laser, not only for moves but also video games. He also suggested that the next generation Sony game systems could very well use Blue Laser. I strongly believe that Sony is so determined to be on the winning side of a format (Betamax, Mini Disc, SACD), that they're going to be betting the farm on Blue.
Make no mistake about it, Sony IS doing Blue Ray. The Blue Ray format is currently being sold in Japan as a recordable format and they're making it clear that they intend to pursue the Blue Ray format for the US. So far Sony has lined up Panasonic, Phillips, Samsung, Pioneer, Sharp, Hitachi, and Mitsubishi who all have pledged their support for Blue Ray. It seems like Sony may green light Blue Ray with or without the broader support of the DVD Forum. In a talk about the future of DVD and HD-DVD Benjamin Feingold, president of Columbia Tri-Star Home Entertainment (A Sony Company) tipped his hand when he suggested that Sony was looking to the capacity provided by blue laser, not only for moves but also video games. He also suggested that the next generation Sony game systems could very well use Blue Laser. I strongly believe that Sony is so determined to be on the winning side of a format (Betamax, Mini Disc, SACD), that they're going to be betting the farm on Blue.
#8
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Tom Campbell
After reading the EETimes article, the impression I got was that the Toshiba-NEC model was gooing to be backwards compaticle.
After reading the EETimes article, the impression I got was that the Toshiba-NEC model was gooing to be backwards compaticle.
Okay, here's where it gets a little twisted. Toshiba & NEC didn't join the Blu-ray group. They proposed their own Blue-laser format; a high-capacity, High Definition, blue-laser format available as early as next year which allows manufacturers to continue using existing DVD plants & equipment. And, allows backwards compatibility with existing red-laser discs, but will be incompatible with Blu-ray. Toshiba & NEC also plan for Blue-laser to cover both read-only high definition discs as well as read-and-write discs. They feel "it provides a cost-effective upgrade path for media vendors & backward-compatible solution for the many consumers who have built DVD libraries."
Last edited by vivarey; 11-19-03 at 08:23 PM.
#9
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The can put all the formats they want out to the public. Competition between formats is good for us consumers and technology. However it is the market that will ultimately decide which one lives or dies. I just hope that if there is a format war that it is resolved quickly (remember divx?) rather than years (like Betamax and VHS).
#10
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally posted by iove
The can put all the formats they want out to the public. Competition between formats is good for us consumers and technology. However it is the market that will ultimately decide which one lives or dies. I just hope that if there is a format war that it is resolved quickly (remember divx?) rather than years (like Betamax and VHS).
The can put all the formats they want out to the public. Competition between formats is good for us consumers and technology. However it is the market that will ultimately decide which one lives or dies. I just hope that if there is a format war that it is resolved quickly (remember divx?) rather than years (like Betamax and VHS).
A format war is in NO WAY good for consumers. What will happen is that you will get studios only supporting one format or the other and you will possibly have to have 2 players to watch all the movies you want. Do you really think DVD would have taken off like it has if there had been a competing format? (No, I don't consider Divx a truly competitive format). DVD grew faster than any other consumer electronic device ever, and that was because the DVD forum decided on one format and pretty much everyone supported it. Also look how quickly DVD players dropped in price. Nothing good can come of competing HD-DVD technologies being released into the marketplace.
#11
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, i thought blue ray was defintely the best format from what heard in posts and quotes long ago. as far as backwards ability, i thought blue ray players would come with an already cheap red laser that would read our current dvds.
#12
I Don't Use Spoiler Tags
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i don't know why every one complains about backwards compatibility, does your vcr, play dvd's no!, you will not need 2 receivers. Do you need 2 receivers now to view dvds, and vhs tapes? NO!
And to say there won't be a visual leap in quality from DVD to HD-DVD is absurd, it is a bigger jump in pq from vhs to DVD, IMO.
I have already sold off most of my dvd's that I knew I would not need to view more than once in rhe next 2-3 years. I for one am damn ready for Hd-DVD, and will buy the first player, no matter what the cost. I already have owned 7 HDtv's and currently own 4, and I am a 22 year old on a measly salary, so I am sure others will jump ship as well.
And to say there won't be a visual leap in quality from DVD to HD-DVD is absurd, it is a bigger jump in pq from vhs to DVD, IMO.
I have already sold off most of my dvd's that I knew I would not need to view more than once in rhe next 2-3 years. I for one am damn ready for Hd-DVD, and will buy the first player, no matter what the cost. I already have owned 7 HDtv's and currently own 4, and I am a 22 year old on a measly salary, so I am sure others will jump ship as well.
#13
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i don't know why every one complains about backwards compatibility, does your vcr, play dvd's no!
#14
Well, when the LOTR: EE Complete Trilogy is released as HD-DVD, I will certainly buy a new DVD player just for this reason.
#15
I Don't Use Spoiler Tags
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
tom, but everyone already rebuys new dvd that get a new transfer anyways so there will be no need for backwards compabalitily, the new HD transfers will blow everything else out of the water, the only reason to still have a dvd player will be to watch movies not yet released, just like a vcr is used for today.
and once hd-dvd's catch on dvd's will be worthless, just like vhs movies, it may take 10 years but it will happen, that is the facts of life.
I do not care either way if it is backwards compatiable or not, the reason I prefer them not to be is because say J6P can go Matrix for $15 on dvd or $30 on HD-DVD, he will always buy the $15 version, unless he already bought a hd-dvd player, but that same situation works the other way.
This is another reason we need more HD programming, I aldreay get CBS, NBC, Fox(480p until next year, then 720p), ABC, HBO, Showtime, Discovery, and ESPN. But we still need ALOT more for the average consumer to take a leap into this expensive format.
and once hd-dvd's catch on dvd's will be worthless, just like vhs movies, it may take 10 years but it will happen, that is the facts of life.
I do not care either way if it is backwards compatiable or not, the reason I prefer them not to be is because say J6P can go Matrix for $15 on dvd or $30 on HD-DVD, he will always buy the $15 version, unless he already bought a hd-dvd player, but that same situation works the other way.
This is another reason we need more HD programming, I aldreay get CBS, NBC, Fox(480p until next year, then 720p), ABC, HBO, Showtime, Discovery, and ESPN. But we still need ALOT more for the average consumer to take a leap into this expensive format.
#16
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm glad they finally came to a decision about formats. Now if we could just get the digital television revolution on now.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Corky Roxbury
tom, but everyone already rebuys new dvd that get a new transfer anyways so there will be no need for backwards compabalitily, the new HD transfers will blow everything else out of the water, the only reason to still have a dvd player will be to watch movies not yet released, just like a vcr is used for today.
tom, but everyone already rebuys new dvd that get a new transfer anyways so there will be no need for backwards compabalitily, the new HD transfers will blow everything else out of the water, the only reason to still have a dvd player will be to watch movies not yet released, just like a vcr is used for today.
Are HDTV aspect ratios fixed? The HDTV Attack of the Clones was not in 2.35:1, and upon closer look, I've never seen HDTV in anything other than 1.85:1....
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: WBB
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think HD-DVD is going to be anything like what people are expecting.
DVD succeeded because it offered such a significant advantage over VHS that people HAD to pay attention to it. HD-DVD does not.
We are not the majority here. J6P is.
J6P may like the better picture, but that wasn't the main selling point of DVD to him. The main point was that "Wow, you don't have to rewind them? And there's MORE than just a movie on there?"
Unless HD-DVD can serve me dinner and jerk me off, I'm not going to care too much.
DVD succeeded because it offered such a significant advantage over VHS that people HAD to pay attention to it. HD-DVD does not.
We are not the majority here. J6P is.
J6P may like the better picture, but that wasn't the main selling point of DVD to him. The main point was that "Wow, you don't have to rewind them? And there's MORE than just a movie on there?"
Unless HD-DVD can serve me dinner and jerk me off, I'm not going to care too much.
#21
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Eh, I really don't care about the next generation of DVD players..I won't be upgrading. I only buy technology that makes a big difference - and watching a DVD is a heck of a lot better than VHS. I don't see HD-DVD really replacing DVD...its more of a small step, not evolutionary.
#22
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have already sold off most of my dvd's that I knew I would not need to view more than once in rhe next 2-3 years. I for one am damn ready for Hd-DVD, and will buy the first player, no matter what the cost. I already have owned 7 HDtv's and currently own 4, and I am a 22 year old on a measly salary, so I am sure others will jump ship as well.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another question:
What will happen with all the home movies I have had recorded from old VHS tapes onto recordable DVDs? With some of them, I no longer have the VHS tape. I assume one will be able to record existing DVD-RW or DVD-R (or whatever format) onto the new blue-ray, HD-DVD discs. A lot of people have taken homemade VHS tapes and recorded them onto DVD. My neighbor even has over 200 DVDs of duplicated porn on DVD.
I'd like to know how these issues would be addressed.
What will happen with all the home movies I have had recorded from old VHS tapes onto recordable DVDs? With some of them, I no longer have the VHS tape. I assume one will be able to record existing DVD-RW or DVD-R (or whatever format) onto the new blue-ray, HD-DVD discs. A lot of people have taken homemade VHS tapes and recorded them onto DVD. My neighbor even has over 200 DVDs of duplicated porn on DVD.
I'd like to know how these issues would be addressed.
#24
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Tarnower
My neighbor even has over 200 DVDs of duplicated porn on DVD.
My neighbor even has over 200 DVDs of duplicated porn on DVD.
But seriously though... recordable discs will come with any laser-based DVD format. And it will just get cheaper and cheaper. No worries.
#25
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally posted by Gyno Rhino
I don't think HD-DVD is going to be anything like what people are expecting.
DVD succeeded because it offered such a significant advantage over VHS that people HAD to pay attention to it. HD-DVD does not.
We are not the majority here. J6P is.
J6P may like the better picture, but that wasn't the main selling point of DVD to him. The main point was that "Wow, you don't have to rewind them? And there's MORE than just a movie on there?"
Unless HD-DVD can serve me dinner and jerk me off, I'm not going to care too much.
I don't think HD-DVD is going to be anything like what people are expecting.
DVD succeeded because it offered such a significant advantage over VHS that people HAD to pay attention to it. HD-DVD does not.
We are not the majority here. J6P is.
J6P may like the better picture, but that wasn't the main selling point of DVD to him. The main point was that "Wow, you don't have to rewind them? And there's MORE than just a movie on there?"
Unless HD-DVD can serve me dinner and jerk me off, I'm not going to care too much.
With HDTV being the television format for the majority of the rest of our lives a format is needed to get the most out of that whether it be in a few years or several. The average consumer having to rebuy their dvd collection isn't as big of deal to the type of people that visit here as they are unlikely to break 50 so that won't be a big stumbling block.
Even those with extensive libraries will move to the HD-DVD format eventually being it will likely remain stagnant as long as HDTV is around.
Perhaps that is just wishful thinking but it is my approach for the time being.