Gangs of New York re-release/DC anytime soon?
#1
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gangs of New York re-release/DC anytime soon?
While at work today I was thinking about how much I enjoyed this film but how I also thought it would be great to see the original cut (I guess the first one that was reviewed? Over 3 hrs, maybe?).
Well, it's been over 3 1/2 mo's since it was first released, and my guess is that everyone who was going to buy it has already picked it up by now.
My question is this: Has anyone around here seen/heard/read any further info on a possible re-release of this film? I know that Scorsese has insisted that the theatrical cut was his true vision, but I also wonder how much of that was said to sell the first disc.
Any info would be greatly appreciated, and let's hope that something comes out soon b/c I would love to see this in it's original, uncut, all-out SE form that I feel it certainly deserves.
Well, it's been over 3 1/2 mo's since it was first released, and my guess is that everyone who was going to buy it has already picked it up by now.
My question is this: Has anyone around here seen/heard/read any further info on a possible re-release of this film? I know that Scorsese has insisted that the theatrical cut was his true vision, but I also wonder how much of that was said to sell the first disc.
Any info would be greatly appreciated, and let's hope that something comes out soon b/c I would love to see this in it's original, uncut, all-out SE form that I feel it certainly deserves.
#3
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To rehash what has already been stated elsewhere on this board: the version of GONY that Martin Scorsese released to theatres and dvd IS his director's cut, and he has gone on record as stating that there will be no further cuts of the film. So to answer your question, NO. I wouldn't expect a re-release anytime soon. The version that was put out is a fine enough release for me.
#4
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RyoHazuki7
You've been here since Oct. 2002 and you missed the 3,467 threads about this?
You've been here since Oct. 2002 and you missed the 3,467 threads about this?
Palmerjoss,
I realize that, but there was also speculation that Scorsese was saying this b/c the Weinstein's wanted him to. The film I am talking about was mentioned in a review (I can't seem to find it online right now), and I want to say it ran over 3 hrs. I have a hard time believing that Scorsese would let a film like this come out as flawed as it did if he had indeed been working on it for 25+yrs.
#7
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sitting on a beach, earning 20%
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally posted by REL77
Flawed.???? How was it Flawed Sir???
Flawed.???? How was it Flawed Sir???
If there is a director's cut of this, which is SO DOUBTFUL I WOULD BET MONEY IT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN AND I MUST BE CONFIDENT SINCE I DON'T HAVE MONEY, this place would go gaga and reubs, you'd find out when we would.
In the future, search, because this idea has been addressed 3,000 times already.
#8
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by DonnachaOne
Well, since you ask, it was dull and diskointed, never mind the terrible accents and poorly-written characaters. But that's beside the point - this film is Scorsese's baby, and the end product is his choice. If he cut anything for length, it was his choice and not the Weinstein pressure - the film is still damn near three hours.
If there is a director's cut of this, which is SO DOUBTFUL I WOULD BET MONEY IT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN AND I MUST BE CONFIDENT SINCE I DON'T HAVE MONEY, this place would go gaga and reubs, you'd find out when we would.
In the future, search, because this idea has been addressed 3,000 times already.
Well, since you ask, it was dull and diskointed, never mind the terrible accents and poorly-written characaters. But that's beside the point - this film is Scorsese's baby, and the end product is his choice. If he cut anything for length, it was his choice and not the Weinstein pressure - the film is still damn near three hours.
If there is a director's cut of this, which is SO DOUBTFUL I WOULD BET MONEY IT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN AND I MUST BE CONFIDENT SINCE I DON'T HAVE MONEY, this place would go gaga and reubs, you'd find out when we would.
In the future, search, because this idea has been addressed 3,000 times already.
#9
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Woodbridge, Virginia
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree. Daniel Day-Lewis was great in the film. Unfortunately Leonardo DiCaprio was again miscast as a man and Cameron Diaz fooled Scorsese into thinking she could act. The plot is slow paced and very disjointed. Scorsese should be embarassed that he foisted this on the public. I like some parts of the film, but I can't really recommend it to anyone.
#10
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree, I didnt think the movie was the greatest, Leo and Cameron were not good. I was asking that guy how reubs82 thought the DVD was FLAWED and why it needed to be re-released. Nothing about the quality of the movie, just the DVD release
#11
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by REL77
I agree, I didnt think the movie was the greatest, Leo and Cameron were not good. I was asking that guy how reubs82 thought the DVD was FLAWED and why it needed to be re-released. Nothing about the quality of the movie, just the DVD release
I agree, I didnt think the movie was the greatest, Leo and Cameron were not good. I was asking that guy how reubs82 thought the DVD was FLAWED and why it needed to be re-released. Nothing about the quality of the movie, just the DVD release
#12
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: "Sitting on a beach, earning 20%"
Posts: 6,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Easily Scorcese's worst film. His only film that's near unwatchable. As much as I'd like to see his original cut, I doubt it would improve the film since its problems seem so fundamental (bad acting, thin story, weak conclusion). The greatest Director's Cut in the world couldn't fix those basic problems.
#13
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What? This is a top 5 Scorsese movie, and was easily the best film of 2002... Just an excellent, excellent film! Staying on topic though, I agree with everyone else that the version released IS the DC, and that a new release won't be coming any time in the near future.