Review Wanted: Beijing Bicycle
#2
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I liked the movie a lot, but it's not for everyone. I'd recommend a rental before you decide on whether to buy it or not. But which DVD?:
STARMAX (Region 0, Korean)
SEVILLE (Region 1, Canadian)
SONY PICTURES (Region 1, US)
I'd go with the Korean edition if you can get it, otherwise you should probably order the Canadian edition.
Here's a further comparison of the three DVD versions - http://207.136.67.23/film/dvdcompare...gbicycle-3.htm
STARMAX (Region 0, Korean)
SEVILLE (Region 1, Canadian)
SONY PICTURES (Region 1, US)
I'd go with the Korean edition if you can get it, otherwise you should probably order the Canadian edition.
Here's a further comparison of the three DVD versions - http://207.136.67.23/film/dvdcompare...gbicycle-3.htm
#4
DVD Talk Reviewer
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Blu-ray.com
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Columbia version is ANAMORPHIC....as it is the case with most of their "CLASSICS" line....
http://www.dvdplanet.com/product_lis...653&format=DVD
http://www.dvdplanet.com/product_lis...653&format=DVD
#5
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cool. Yeah, I just found that out. The comparison at the above link lists the others as anamorphic. but not the Columbia one. Looks like they forgot to list it. I think I'll go ahead and pick it up. My Hollywood video has a previously viewed copy for 10 bucks
#6
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: sunny San Diego!
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by pro-bassoonist
The Columbia version is ANAMORPHIC....as it is the case with most of their "CLASSICS" line....[/url]
The Columbia version is ANAMORPHIC....as it is the case with most of their "CLASSICS" line....[/url]
I reviewed the Seville release, which IS anamorphic, and I did some extensive web research into the other editions which strongly supported the contention that the Columbia release is NOT anamorphic.
My review is here: http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=4936
with the relevant part being:
"It is worth noting that the DVD edition reviewed here, distributed by Seville Pictures, is not the same transfer as an earlier, non-anamorphic release through Columbia Tristar. The Seville release can be identified by the fact that the cover features the image of Jian riding the bicycle, in his white shirt and red tie, rather than a montage of images from the film including both characters."
I'd be interested to hear from any owners of the Columbia release.
#7
DVD Talk Reviewer
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Blu-ray.com
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ordway...I have emailed DVDPLANET and they have confirmed that the disc is indeed anamorphic. Furthermore....the "classiscs" line which I mentioned above is usually anamorphic....at least this has been the case with 100% of the titles I own. You could also look at the stats on the back of the release which clearly indicates that the disc is 16/9.
#9
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: sunny San Diego!
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by pro-bassoonist
ordway...I have emailed DVDPLANET and they have confirmed that the disc is indeed anamorphic. Furthermore....the "classiscs" line which I mentioned above is usually anamorphic....at least this has been the case with 100% of the titles I own. You could also look at the stats on the back of the release which clearly indicates that the disc is 16/9.
ordway...I have emailed DVDPLANET and they have confirmed that the disc is indeed anamorphic. Furthermore....the "classiscs" line which I mentioned above is usually anamorphic....at least this has been the case with 100% of the titles I own. You could also look at the stats on the back of the release which clearly indicates that the disc is 16/9.
I've seen non-anamorphic DVDs whose cases say they're anamorphic; anamorphic DVDs whose cases say they're NOT anamorphic; and one memorable documentary set whose case said it was anamorphic, but whose episodes were a mix of anamorphic and non-anamorphic.
It happens often enough that I never rely on the case for anything. Heck, not just for whether or not it's anamorphic; sometimes the soundtracks are different from what's described, or the subtitles; on several occasions I've found DVDs that were supposed to have audio commentary tracks, according to the case, but didn't.
#10
DVD Talk Reviewer
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Blu-ray.com
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think that DVDPLANET is actually one of the few etailers that tend to get their specs right...unlike dvdempire for example.
Furthermore, a perfect example is SLC PUNK which is also a Columbia Classics title and does not indicate on the back that the disc is 16/9 yet DVDPLANET has indicated that it is anamorphic...as it is the case with a number of other older Columbia titles. Anyway, I see your point though.
greatjedi....it's up to you now.....16/9 or not?
You have the disc...let us know!
Furthermore, a perfect example is SLC PUNK which is also a Columbia Classics title and does not indicate on the back that the disc is 16/9 yet DVDPLANET has indicated that it is anamorphic...as it is the case with a number of other older Columbia titles. Anyway, I see your point though.
greatjedi....it's up to you now.....16/9 or not?
You have the disc...let us know!
Last edited by pro-bassoonist; 04-17-03 at 09:49 PM.
#12
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: sunny San Diego!
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by greatjedi
Just checked it out. It is indeed anamophic!
Just checked it out. It is indeed anamophic!
I went back to my main source (DVD Beaver) and found that the non-anamorphic release was in fact the Sony edition, which is what I was thinking of. What an assortment of releases this film has had!