Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
#1
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Somewhere Hot Scoville Units: 9,999,999 Zodiac Sign: Capricorn
Posts: 12,259
Received 811 Likes
on
316 Posts
Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
Instead of waiting until the results thread goes up and forgetfulness sets in, I thought I'd try something new by posting it early while suggestions are still fresh in everyone's mind.
Link to this will be in my sig as usual.
Fire away.
Link to this will be in my sig as usual.
Fire away.
#2
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
There was a bit of discussion in the Nightmare Before Christmas thread about the daily subset film choices this year. I think it would be great to have some of that discussion migrate here. So, I'm going to post some of what I said over there in this thread (with some modifications and additions).
These daily films are optional. No one is required to watch them, but I will agree with others that I was underwhelmed with this year's picks on a whole. I blame a couple of things: (1) theme days getting increasingly narrow and restrictive (2) insistence on (nearly) all films being available for streaming. In the past, the streaming consideration really wasn't there. We expected people to make the necessary arrangements if they wanted to participate. I realize there's a great deal of "tough shit" in that for some participants, but it made the choices more varied and I think more personal. They were films that people felt a greater attachment to.
Streaming availability is a good consideration, but when you have themes like Splat Pack, Ice Terrors, Aquatic Horror, Killer Monkeys, Native American/Westerns, Harvest Horrors, Telephone Terrors and Musicals, then try to enforce the streaming requirement, you reach a point where there may not be a lot of films to choose from, which results in people choosing more based on what's available versus what they may really like or have a special attachment to.
I understand that it may force someone people from doing the daily subset because of financial considerations, but again, it's OPTIONAL. Plus, it's supposed to be a *challenge.* It's not supposed to be easy. I remember in past years having to rearrange my Netflix queue to be able to get all the DVDs that I would need to watch for the daily subset films. Now don't get me wrong. It was nice not to have to do all that, but it also made the accomplishment of watching all the subset films sort of an empty victory.
It's worth mentioning that the most discussed film last year (Blacula) was NOT available for streaming. One of the most discussed films this year was Lords of Salem, which also wasn't available for streaming. The most discussed film this year? Killer Tongue. But it should be noted that a few of the posts were in regard to the malware-filled original streaming site, which could be another reason why we should lessen our dependence on streaming. When we send people to more off the beaten path sites, you increase the threat of viruses and malware.
If anything, when you make someone work a little bit harder to get discs, forcing them to arrange their queue, wait for it to arrive in the mail, maybe even buy it, you will probably have people more willing to discuss it because they had to make some sort of sacrifice. If easy availability truly inspired more discussion, then all the most discussed movies should be the ones on YouTube, but that's not the case.
After all that discussion, it may sound hypocritical of me to say that I liked the easing up on the checklist. I think it got more people thinking about it and wasn't so restrictive, especially with the people categories. I remember not being especially happy with some of the actors last year. Having some choices made it less intimidating but still forced some people to watch things they may not have ordinarily watched.
All right, rant over. I still love the challenge and enjoyed participating in it for another year.
These daily films are optional. No one is required to watch them, but I will agree with others that I was underwhelmed with this year's picks on a whole. I blame a couple of things: (1) theme days getting increasingly narrow and restrictive (2) insistence on (nearly) all films being available for streaming. In the past, the streaming consideration really wasn't there. We expected people to make the necessary arrangements if they wanted to participate. I realize there's a great deal of "tough shit" in that for some participants, but it made the choices more varied and I think more personal. They were films that people felt a greater attachment to.
Streaming availability is a good consideration, but when you have themes like Splat Pack, Ice Terrors, Aquatic Horror, Killer Monkeys, Native American/Westerns, Harvest Horrors, Telephone Terrors and Musicals, then try to enforce the streaming requirement, you reach a point where there may not be a lot of films to choose from, which results in people choosing more based on what's available versus what they may really like or have a special attachment to.
I understand that it may force someone people from doing the daily subset because of financial considerations, but again, it's OPTIONAL. Plus, it's supposed to be a *challenge.* It's not supposed to be easy. I remember in past years having to rearrange my Netflix queue to be able to get all the DVDs that I would need to watch for the daily subset films. Now don't get me wrong. It was nice not to have to do all that, but it also made the accomplishment of watching all the subset films sort of an empty victory.
It's worth mentioning that the most discussed film last year (Blacula) was NOT available for streaming. One of the most discussed films this year was Lords of Salem, which also wasn't available for streaming. The most discussed film this year? Killer Tongue. But it should be noted that a few of the posts were in regard to the malware-filled original streaming site, which could be another reason why we should lessen our dependence on streaming. When we send people to more off the beaten path sites, you increase the threat of viruses and malware.
If anything, when you make someone work a little bit harder to get discs, forcing them to arrange their queue, wait for it to arrive in the mail, maybe even buy it, you will probably have people more willing to discuss it because they had to make some sort of sacrifice. If easy availability truly inspired more discussion, then all the most discussed movies should be the ones on YouTube, but that's not the case.
After all that discussion, it may sound hypocritical of me to say that I liked the easing up on the checklist. I think it got more people thinking about it and wasn't so restrictive, especially with the people categories. I remember not being especially happy with some of the actors last year. Having some choices made it less intimidating but still forced some people to watch things they may not have ordinarily watched.
All right, rant over. I still love the challenge and enjoyed participating in it for another year.
#3
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
A couple of minor personal thoughts: I have very little disposable income at the moment, my library has a limited selection (and only allows four films at a time) and I don't have Netflix. BUT I like the idea of the subset since it does "force me to watch something I would not ordinarily seek out." This year I got lucky because there were options available, but I would be very opposed to the idea of suggesting everyone should have to spend money* to watch the 31 chosen films...
*Particularly since it could easily - dare I say positively likely in some cases? - be money utterly wasted on films that will never be watched again, or even enjoyed the first time.
*Particularly since it could easily - dare I say positively likely in some cases? - be money utterly wasted on films that will never be watched again, or even enjoyed the first time.
#4
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
Netflix regularly offers free trials. Plus, again, you don't have to participate in the daily subset. You can do the theme days, which would force you to still watch other things and maybe not have to spend any money. If all the daily subset choices have to be accessible to everyone, then our choices get even more limiting. Maybe I'm wrong, but I felt like a lot of choices this year, more so than in the past, were made just because they were there, sort of like it was out of obligation. I'm not saying it was that way for all of them, but it does feel like something needs to change or be updated.
#5
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
I don't think we ended up with such a strong "streaming only" stance this year. Several choices like Killer Tongue, In Their Skin, Lords of Salem, etc weren't streaming. There seemed to be a point in earlier planning it was decided to be more open. My opinion is that's is critical subset options be reasonably attainable, it's not realistic to expect participants to shell out funds for a lot of the picks as random blind buys.
I think one of the biggest limitations to the subset films is that we can not select previous choices so now so many years out a lot of landmark acclaimed films have already served their duty. One role the subset and theme nights play is to encourage film diversity and discussion, like Ntnon said. I never would have thought to watch Killer Tongue but as much as I disliked it (after blind buying) I appreciate the exposure to... something new. I'm not a fan of changing that but it does force more random/questionable suggestions challenging us to explore new items.
Trevor suggested planning theme nights and subsets early to give people time to plan, that's an interesting idea. As long as people can reasonable access selections I think we just need to come up with more creative choices - even just streaming there are 100s of Netflix/YouTube/etc options.Blacula was annoying to track down, I ended up having to illicitly download it when the year before it was at Walmart for $5 it was then nowhere to be found. I remember when Embodiment of Evil, a then newly released blu-ray not carried at many brick/mortar stores, was on the listen and that was a dog to track down (I wasn't able to) so fortunately it was changed.
I think one of the biggest limitations to the subset films is that we can not select previous choices so now so many years out a lot of landmark acclaimed films have already served their duty. One role the subset and theme nights play is to encourage film diversity and discussion, like Ntnon said. I never would have thought to watch Killer Tongue but as much as I disliked it (after blind buying) I appreciate the exposure to... something new. I'm not a fan of changing that but it does force more random/questionable suggestions challenging us to explore new items.
Trevor suggested planning theme nights and subsets early to give people time to plan, that's an interesting idea. As long as people can reasonable access selections I think we just need to come up with more creative choices - even just streaming there are 100s of Netflix/YouTube/etc options.Blacula was annoying to track down, I ended up having to illicitly download it when the year before it was at Walmart for $5 it was then nowhere to be found. I remember when Embodiment of Evil, a then newly released blu-ray not carried at many brick/mortar stores, was on the listen and that was a dog to track down (I wasn't able to) so fortunately it was changed.
Last edited by Undeadcow; 11-02-13 at 06:17 PM.
#6
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
I don't understand why the only options are stream or blind buy. Why not a 1-month Netflix trial? Do they not include disc trials anymore? Or maybe going to a video rental store? Am I the only person who still lives in an area where you can rent movies? If everything is supposed to be free, then we probably shouldn't even include Netflix in our options.
Chad posted a streaming link for In Their Skin, so the only non-streaming titles were Lords of Salem and Killer Tongue (which had some of the biggest discussion participation). What were the rest of the etc., Undeadcow? I don't believe there were any others. Killer Tongue was chosen partly because it was streaming, but the site ended up having malware. I would say 29 out of 31 is a pretty strong stance.
Yes, there are a lot of movies streaming online, but there weren't as many that would fit into some of the narrow themes we had. And let's be honest, a great many of the films streaming on Netflix are crap.
I guess I'm the only one who feels this way.
Chad posted a streaming link for In Their Skin, so the only non-streaming titles were Lords of Salem and Killer Tongue (which had some of the biggest discussion participation). What were the rest of the etc., Undeadcow? I don't believe there were any others. Killer Tongue was chosen partly because it was streaming, but the site ended up having malware. I would say 29 out of 31 is a pretty strong stance.
Yes, there are a lot of movies streaming online, but there weren't as many that would fit into some of the narrow themes we had. And let's be honest, a great many of the films streaming on Netflix are crap.
I guess I'm the only one who feels this way.
Last edited by clckworang; 11-02-13 at 07:38 PM.
#7
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
I only watched 4 subset films because I owned them. I'm in Canada so most streaming sites don't work up here, so maybe my opinion shouldn't count, but I do agree that streaming should not be a requirement. As was said, it is supposed to be a challenge. If less are able to accomplish it then that makes it that much sweeter for those that can. Of course it will likely limit the discussions somewhat. But I like the idea that those picking the titles are free to pick their favorites and not whatever is available. I agree that the key is that the themes and subset films be decided as soon as possible so we can arrange to beg, borrow or steal (not really steal, but that is the expression) these titles any way we can figure it out.
#8
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
As an aside, I think we are ending the end of the era of reasonable brick and mortar physical media rentals. I recently moved to Houston and the only option anywhere near here is Blockbuster or Redbox, which are serviceable but very limited and Blockbuster is struggling. When I lived in Austin there were several mom and pop indie video rental stores with amazing variety including VHS only releases, OOP/cult DVD titles, etc. I've depended on Netflix rentals in the past but if not carefully balanced those have a turnaround time that limits effectiveness.
#9
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
Maybe we should just not get hung up on people having to watch all of them. Since it kind of goes that way, it can turn off people that might not have some of them and then just decide not to watch any of them.
Another way that would make it easier on a wallet would be to do a weekly pick instead of a daily one. Then possibly try to have the theme nights for that week also be applicable to the film. I think a weekly pick would be much more accessible to someone that only watches 30-50 films a challenge, since I think the people doing the daily subset are the ones getting higher numbers in the challenge.
I'm sure I'm in the minority but I thought I'd throw it out there.
Another way that would make it easier on a wallet would be to do a weekly pick instead of a daily one. Then possibly try to have the theme nights for that week also be applicable to the film. I think a weekly pick would be much more accessible to someone that only watches 30-50 films a challenge, since I think the people doing the daily subset are the ones getting higher numbers in the challenge.
I'm sure I'm in the minority but I thought I'd throw it out there.
#10
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
I think that you'll be amazed at some of the films on the list:
Spoiler:
If we were to use ONLY films from that list, it would cover the subset choices for the next four challenges. I'm not advocating that, but I AM advocating that we think about using some of the films on the list (and there are many, many others just as worthy) instead of subjecting everyone to I SPIT ON YOUR LUNCH II: THE AFTERTHOUGHT or some other such rubbish. With all of the classic and semi-classic films still out there that many people may not have seen yet, we really owe it to ourselves to explore the heritage of horror and not just pick the latest direct-to-video sequel to a film that wasn't particularly good to begin with.
Last edited by rbrown498; 11-03-13 at 09:46 AM.
#11
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
I have to disagree with you on this one, Undeadcow. Yes, it's true that we've already used many, many classics...but I did a relatively quick match-up of classic films that we've already used against some of what I consider to be noteworthy (for one reason or another) films in the genre, and I came up with a pretty big list of titles that are at least somewhat "classic" that haven't been used yet.
I think that you'll be amazed at some of the films on the list:
I think that you'll be amazed at some of the films on the list:
#12
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
a) it looks like maybe we'll be backing off a bit on the streaming requirement,
and
b) who knows what'll be streaming eleven months from now?
I think that many, many of the films on that list would be worthwhile additions to any horror fan's library, and even the ones that may not be "classics" (such as Werewolves on Wheels or Idle Hands, to name two) should generate some interesting discussion. If we could get the subset list finalized a few weeks before the Challenge, that would give everyone time to hunt down the ones that they'd like to watch*.
*I usually place an order with GoHastings.com as soon as the subset films are finalized, since one can find most any older horror title in used or previously-viewed condition there for cheap--usually $3 shipped or lower. I'd love to be able to rent some, but in my town, it's Redbox ONLY, which leaves only Netflix for non-new releases.
#13
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
Last year I had trouble getting films like Blacula on Netflix. When the challenge started it went from available to unknown status. I think because everybody was renting it from Netflix for this challenge.
#14
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
Too ADHD right now to read and respond appropriately perhaps, but figured I'd at least get a quick comment in on the current main discussion.
I see the point of how limiting subset choices to streaming options could be too restrictive, but personally I'd be very opposed to moving away from the limit. I'd even want 100% of the films to be easily available. Yes the list is optional, but we shouldn't force anyone to spend more than the cost of one month of Netflix and a couple redbox rentals.
And some themes were difficult to finding streaming choices, but remember that their are thousands of themes. We should choose the 33 subset films first, each one has multiple possible themes they would fit.
If Chad does decide to make it less restrictive, then I'd very much request removing subset compliance from any sort of prize determination. Or perhaps make completing all the streaming titles count as 100% compliance. So this year, for example, the 27 that streamed are as good as all 31.
I see the point of how limiting subset choices to streaming options could be too restrictive, but personally I'd be very opposed to moving away from the limit. I'd even want 100% of the films to be easily available. Yes the list is optional, but we shouldn't force anyone to spend more than the cost of one month of Netflix and a couple redbox rentals.
And some themes were difficult to finding streaming choices, but remember that their are thousands of themes. We should choose the 33 subset films first, each one has multiple possible themes they would fit.
If Chad does decide to make it less restrictive, then I'd very much request removing subset compliance from any sort of prize determination. Or perhaps make completing all the streaming titles count as 100% compliance. So this year, for example, the 27 that streamed are as good as all 31.
#15
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
I don't think we ended up with such a strong "streaming only" stance this year. Several choices like Killer Tongue, In Their Skin, Lords of Salem, etc weren't streaming. There seemed to be a point in earlier planning it was decided to be more open. My opinion is that's is critical subset options be reasonably attainable, it's not realistic to expect participants to shell out funds for a lot of the picks as random blind buys.
It's not that they're the only options, merely the two easiest. These challenges (despite the name!) are surely meant to be fun, enjoyable and inclusive. Not a hassle and a scramble...
While I don't know the answer to the second part, a disc trial would not - as I remember it - help much with a daily subset, because of the turnaround required. So it'd be streaming only - and since not all of the films were on Netflix, it would be an obligation required only for a couple of films.
In any case, Netflix is a tangent - the original question was about why streaming was a consideration in the first place..! So if streaming wasn't considered, a Netflix trial would presumably be of little-to-no benefit....
We have none - or, I'll correct that: none nearby. And the nearest (not terribly near) has a woeful selection.
Sarcasm noted, but: Agreed!
Last edited by ntnon; 11-03-13 at 02:41 PM.
#16
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
I think one of the biggest limitations to the subset films is that we can not select previous choices so now so many years out a lot of landmark acclaimed films have already served their duty. One role the subset and theme nights play is to encourage film diversity and discussion, like Ntnon said. I never would have thought to watch Killer Tongue but as much as I disliked it (after blind buying) I appreciate the exposure to... something new. I'm not a fan of changing that but it does force more random/questionable suggestions challenging us to explore new items.
Thus, there's several pulls on the subset: novelty (past years), novelty (participants), availability (at all), availability (ease), availability (cost) and so forth... all over and above the theme nights.
CAVEAT: This is carping and semi-complaining for hopefully productive purposes. I am in almost no way actually critical of the subset idea, process and choices and hope that this is seen as such!
Trevor suggested planning theme nights and subsets early to give people time to plan, that's an interesting idea. As long as people can reasonable access selections I think we just need to come up with more creative choices - even just streaming there are 100s of Netflix/YouTube/etc options.Blacula was annoying to track down, I ended up having to illicitly download it when the year before it was at Walmart for $5 it was then nowhere to be found. I remember when Embodiment of Evil, a then newly released blu-ray not carried at many brick/mortar stores, was on the listen and that was a dog to track down (I wasn't able to) so fortunately it was changed.
Should there still be restrictions based on 'previous picks', though..? Or could people potentially nominate the same favourite every few years..?
Last edited by ntnon; 11-03-13 at 02:57 PM.
#17
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
Chad posted a streaming link for In Their Skin, so the only non-streaming titles were Lords of Salem and Killer Tongue (which had some of the biggest discussion participation). What were the rest of the etc., Undeadcow? I don't believe there were any others. Killer Tongue was chosen partly because it was streaming, but the site ended up having malware. I would say 29 out of 31 is a pretty strong stance.
It occurred to me the other day that not-quite-one-for-one swapping the theme night categories with the lengthy checklist might widen the daily choices considerably. And sort-of eliminate the difficulty some of the more restrictive themes present by a) giving 31 days to find an eligible title, and b) only requiring a percentage of them for checklist completion.
Last edited by ntnon; 11-03-13 at 02:59 PM.
#18
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
Another way that would make it easier on a wallet would be to do a weekly pick instead of a daily one. Then possibly try to have the theme nights for that week also be applicable to the film. I think a weekly pick would be much more accessible to someone that only watches 30-50 films a challenge, since I think the people doing the daily subset are the ones getting higher numbers in the challenge.
Or do it side-by-side: a weekly uber-pick (that could be - but needn't be - harder to get hold of, but with only 4-5 it wouldn't be outrageous), with sub-subset picks for the hardcore that are easier/free-r to find.
With two groupings (4-5 and 31) most people could easily - if they wanted - do the former, and then there's still the more involved option for others.
#19
Senior Member
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
I can only speak for myself, as a first time participant, but I treated the subset films as something that was optional and tried to watch them if they were available to me. I didn't see it as an "all or nothing" sort of proposition. I ended up watching 16/31 of the subset films which included some very good surprises that I wouldn't have otherwise watched. The films I didn't watch were either due to a time crunch on a particular day, limited availability, or simply because I had already watched a film within the year or prior and wasn't interested in watching it again at this point. I wasn't particularly worried about not being eligible for one of the big prize packs or whatever for not completing the entire subset films. It is after all a choice whether or not to complete them. I'm sure other people have different priorities and have to complete everything though. That is totally understandable.
#20
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
I'm kind of an all or nothing type when it comes to subsets/theme nights/checklist for a couple reasons. If I'm going to do one of them, I'm going to go all the way with it. Otherwise it feels like wasted effort. As for the subsets films, many people contributed towards making the list and so I'm going to follow through with the created project. If I watch all or none, then I'm at least being fair to everyone. Even if there's something I consider a turd as one of them, I'll still give it a chance and watch it again.
#21
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
I enjoy the subset component and am confused by some of the criticism. Even duds are fun to explore, and primarily discuss (like Killer Tongue this year shows films of questionable merit are still fun to discuss). I like the subset like it is.
This is a challenge designed around watching 100 movies in a month. The subset films recommend some common viewings to increase discussion.
Nice list, it's hard to argue with that. There are still tons of quality films for subset selection.
Likewise here. ...But if I think about it, there's no reason I should have to complete EVERYTHING other than my own pettiness.Gohastings.com is my "go to" for subset films too, especially when Gohastings has a discount sale.
This is a challenge designed around watching 100 movies in a month. The subset films recommend some common viewings to increase discussion.
Last edited by Undeadcow; 11-04-13 at 11:54 AM.
#22
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
I think the subset and theme nights are fine as is... I'd say streaming of some sort is best, but doesn't have to be 100%... 100 movies is attainable with work for a prize consideration... then the 31 films and subsets is with a little work, attainable... its not the end of the world if one doesnt watch the 31 films... but at the same time if you watch all 31 films on their day then you actually get 2 prize chances...1 for the 31 films and one for the theme nights
#23
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
I think there's definitely a place for comedies and oddball films with the subset list. Variety is important and it helps prevent you from getting burned out with films that are too similar. ParaNorman was one of my favorite new viewings this month. I just felt like the overall list skewed a bit too far on the goofy side.
Nearly a third of the films were silly, and that would be fine if there were more spooky films to balance things out. And here's where I'm not sure if the problem was with me or the list. I had already seen Return of the Living Dead 3, John Dies at the End, Scream, Grave Encounters, Pontypool, and a Nightmare Before Christmas, many of which I felt were among the best films of the subset list. So there weren't many surprising gems that really spooked me out this month, whereas last year was full of great new films that creeped me out.
Was it a weak list? Or am I just becoming a jaded horror fan that is desensitized. I'm not sure. Again, I enjoyed most of the films on the subset list, I just didn't find many of my first viewings to be very scary. I am thinking of just holding off on horror movies as much as possible until next October, that way I won't spoil myself on any potentially great subset picks for next year, and perhaps will go into the month feeling a bit more fresh and easy to scare.
Part of the problem is that I don't have much time to devote to the challenge, I can typically only watch one, maybe two films a night. I'm also OCD enough to feel compelled to complete the challenge once I've started it. Next year I think I'll be better prepared by saving some spooky selections to watch during the weekend after completing the subset/theme night of the day.
Nearly a third of the films were silly, and that would be fine if there were more spooky films to balance things out. And here's where I'm not sure if the problem was with me or the list. I had already seen Return of the Living Dead 3, John Dies at the End, Scream, Grave Encounters, Pontypool, and a Nightmare Before Christmas, many of which I felt were among the best films of the subset list. So there weren't many surprising gems that really spooked me out this month, whereas last year was full of great new films that creeped me out.
Was it a weak list? Or am I just becoming a jaded horror fan that is desensitized. I'm not sure. Again, I enjoyed most of the films on the subset list, I just didn't find many of my first viewings to be very scary. I am thinking of just holding off on horror movies as much as possible until next October, that way I won't spoil myself on any potentially great subset picks for next year, and perhaps will go into the month feeling a bit more fresh and easy to scare.
Part of the problem is that I don't have much time to devote to the challenge, I can typically only watch one, maybe two films a night. I'm also OCD enough to feel compelled to complete the challenge once I've started it. Next year I think I'll be better prepared by saving some spooky selections to watch during the weekend after completing the subset/theme night of the day.
#24
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
I'm kind of an all or nothing type when it comes to subsets/theme nights/checklist for a couple reasons. If I'm going to do one of them, I'm going to go all the way with it. Otherwise it feels like wasted effort. As for the subsets films, many people contributed towards making the list and so I'm going to follow through with the created project.
#25
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Comments, Suggestions & Feedback for the 2014 Horror Challenge
And here's where I'm not sure if the problem was with me or the list. I had already seen Return of the Living Dead 3, John Dies at the End, Scream, Grave Encounters, Pontypool, and a Nightmare Before Christmas, many of which I felt were among the best films of the subset list. So there weren't many surprising gems that really spooked me out this month, whereas last year was full of great new films that creeped me out.
You're just too well versed in horror but I offer this list to you http://www.icheckmovies.com/lists/to...horror+movies/
There's some duds in it and if you're like me when I first saw it, you've probably already seen a good portion of them. I still managed to find some new gems when finishing it up, so maybe you'd like it too.
I have my moments of clarity