Release List Reviews Shop Join News DVD Giveaways Video Games Advertise
DVD Reviews | Theatrical Reviews | Adult DVD Reviews | Video Game Reviews | Price Search Buy Stuff Here
DVD Talk
DVD Reviews DVD Talk Headlines HD Reviews


Add to My Yahoo! - RSS 2.0 - RSS 2.0 - DVD Talk Podcast RSS -


Go Back   DVD Talk Forum > General Discussions > Other Talk > Religion, Politics and World Events

Religion, Politics and World Events They make great dinner conversation, don't you think? plus Political Film

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-15-05, 09:47 AM   #1
grundle
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
grundle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,769
Thomas Sowell wrote this overwhelming column about the marijuana court case.

Thomas Sowell explains that the ruling isn't so much about marijuana, as it is about the 10th amendment, federal power, and limits on federal power. He raises many great points in here:

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/t...20050614.shtml

The high cost of nuances

Thomas Sowell

June 14, 2005

The Supreme Court's recent decision saying that the federal government can prosecute those using marijuana for medical purposes, even when state laws permit such use, has been seen by many as an issue of being for or against marijuana. But the real significance of this decision has little to do with marijuana and everything to do with the kind of government that we, our children, and our children's children are going to live under.

The 10th Amendment to the Constitution says that all powers not granted to the federal government belong to the states or to the people.

Those who wrote the Constitution clearly understood that power is dangerous and needs to be limited by being separated -- separated not only into the three branches of the national government but also separated as between the whole national government, on the one hand, and the states and the people on the other.

Too many people today judge court decisions by whether the court is "for" or "against" this or that policy. It is not the court's job to be for or against any policy but to apply the law.

The question before the Supreme Court was not whether allowing the medicinal use of marijuana was a good policy or a bad policy. The legal question was whether Congress had the authority under the Constitution to regulate something that happened entirely within the boundaries of a given state.

For decades, judges have allowed the federal government to expand its powers by saying that it was authorized by the Constitution to regulate "interstate commerce." But how can something that happens entirely within the borders of one state be called "interstate commerce"?

Back in 1942, the Supreme Court authorized the vastly expanded powers of the federal government under Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration by declaring that a man who grew food for himself on his own land was somehow "affecting" prices of goods in interstate commerce and so the federal government had a right to regulate him.

Stretching and straining the law this way means that anything the federal government wants to do can be given the magic label "interstate commerce" -- and the limits on federal power under the 10th Amendment vanish into thin air.

Judicial activists love to believe that they can apply the law in a "nuanced" way, allowing the federal government to regulate some activities that do not cross state lines but not others. The problem is that Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's nuances are different from Justice Antonin Scalia's nuances -- not only in the medical marijuana case but in numerous other cases.

Courts that go in for nuanced applications of the law can produce a lot of 5 to 4 decisions, with different coalitions of Justices voting for and against different parts of the same decision.

A much bigger and more fundamental problem is that millions of ordinary citizens, without legal training, have a hard time figuring out when they are or are not breaking the law. Nuanced courts, instead of drawing a line in the sand, spread a lot of fog across the landscape.

Justice Clarence Thomas cut through that fog in his dissent when he said that the people involved in this case "use marijuana that has never been bought or sold, that has never crossed state lines, and that has had no demonstrable effect on the national market for marijuana."

Instead of going in for fashionable "nuance" talk, Justice Thomas drew a line in the sand: "If Congress can regulate this under the Commerce Clause, then it can regulate virtually anything -- and the Federal Government is no longer one of limited and enumerated powers."

In short, the kinds of limitations on the power of the national government created by the Constitution are being nuanced out of existence by the courts.

Ironically, this decision was announced during the same week when Janice Rogers Brown was confirmed to the Circuit Court of Appeals. One of the complaints against her was that she had criticized the 1942 decision expanding the meaning of "interstate commerce." In other words, her position on this was the same as that of Clarence Thomas -- and both are anathema to liberals.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-05, 09:53 AM   #2
elektra
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: new england
Posts: 8,173
I think this is the first time I've found myself agreeing with Clarence Thomas.
__________________
I have multiple personalities and none of them like you.
GODDESS OF THE OTHER FORUM
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-05, 02:11 PM   #3
weargle
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Working in the "evil" pharmaceutical industry booga booga
Posts: 7,999
Marijuana has been illegal in the US before CA let it be used. Where's the 10th amendment issue here?
__________________
The apocalypse is coming soon! No, not because of the hurricanes, but because the Redskins beat the Cowboys on Monday Night Football in Dallas!!!11!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-05, 02:16 PM   #4
Red Dog
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 112,128
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=425630
__________________
"A question for you. Would you rather Bucknell make the NCAA's once every 20 years or so and get ass raped by teams like Kansas in the first round or have them drop down a rung to a confernce where they can compete for a title?"
- Josh Hinkle
1st Round Final Scores: Bucknell 64 Kansas 63 | Bucknell 59 Arkansas 55
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-05, 02:53 PM   #5
movielib
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Madison, WI ("77 square miles surrounded by reality")
Posts: 27,983
Thomas Sowell has long been one of my favorites. I wish one of our local papers carried his column.
__________________
"What I 'dislike' the most is that I find myself agreeing with you more than anyone else on this forum. Damn, that sucks." - DeputyDave
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-05, 03:12 PM   #6
grundle
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
grundle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by weargle
Marijuana has been illegal in the US before CA let it be used. Where's the 10th amendment issue here?
Because there is nothing in the U.S. Constitution that gives the federal government the power to outlaw the use of marijuana. So according to the 10th amendment, it should be up to the states and/or the people.

When they outlawed alcohol, they had to amend the Constitution, because they knew that the federal government did not have the power to outlaw it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-05, 03:13 PM   #7
grundle
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
grundle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Dog
Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-05, 03:14 PM   #8
grundle
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
grundle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by movielib
Thomas Sowell has long been one of my favorites. I wish one of our local papers carried his column.
Here you go!

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/col...l.archives.asp
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-05, 03:50 PM   #9
Red Dog
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 112,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by movielib
Thomas Sowell has long been one of my favorites. I wish one of our local papers carried his column.

The Wash Times carries his columns. He can be hit or miss, like most conservatives.
__________________
"A question for you. Would you rather Bucknell make the NCAA's once every 20 years or so and get ass raped by teams like Kansas in the first round or have them drop down a rung to a confernce where they can compete for a title?"
- Josh Hinkle
1st Round Final Scores: Bucknell 64 Kansas 63 | Bucknell 59 Arkansas 55
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-05, 05:03 PM   #10
sherm42
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,057
I love how being liberal always seems to be equated with wanting more government intrusion and regulation. To a certain extent, I can see that. BUT, I see no difference in conservatives. Does anyone believe that the Bush administration and the mostly repulican senate and house do not want the power to regulate here?

I don't see the feds moving at all to lessen the size of big government.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-05, 05:20 PM   #11
grundle
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
grundle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by sherm42
I love how being liberal always seems to be equated with wanting more government intrusion and regulation. To a certain extent, I can see that. BUT, I see no difference in conservatives. Does anyone believe that the Bush administration and the mostly repulican senate and house do not want the power to regulate here?

I don't see the feds moving at all to lessen the size of big government.
I agree with you. It was Reagan who launched the war on drugs. And since Bush became Preisdent, with a Republican Congress, the federal budget has increased by one third. The Republican Party loves big government.

I am glad I voted Libertarian.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM.

Rules - DVD Talk - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright 2011 DVDTalk.com All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.