UN issues 'final wake-up call' on population and environment

[grundle]

The overpopulation doomsayers have such a long, repeated track record of being wrong, and of not making any attempt to learn why they were wrong.

The reason they were wrong, and continue to be wrong, is because they don't understand that people create more resources than they consume, they don't understand science, technology, or innovation, and they don't understand economic incentives, the function of prices, or the benefits of private property.

They have such a long track record of making these bogus predictions, that they now claim that this is their "final" warning.

Of course they said the same thing multiple times in the past.

So, I don't believe that this is their "final" warning.


http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/10/...pe/environ.php

UN issues 'final wake-up call' on population and environment

By James Kanter

October 25, 2007

PARIS: The human population is living far beyond its means and inflicting damage on the environment that could pass points of no return, according to a major report issued Thursday by the United Nations.

Climate change, the rate of extinction of species and the challenge of feeding a growing population are among the threats putting humanity at risk, the UN Environment Program said in its fourth Global Environmental Outlook since 1997.

"The human population is now so large that the amount of resources needed to sustain it exceeds what is available at current consumption patterns," Achim Steiner, the executive director of the program, said in a telephone interview. Efficient use of resources and reducing waste now are "among the greatest challenges at the beginning of 21st century," he said.

The program described its report, which is prepared by 388 experts and scientists, as the broadest and deepest of those that the UN issues on the environment and called it "the final wake-up call to the international community."

Over the past two decades the world population has increased by almost 34 percent to 6.7 billion from 5 billion; similarly, the financial wealth of the planet has soared by about a third. But the land available to each person on earth had shrunk by 2005 to 2.02 hectares, or 5 acres, from 7.91 hectares in 1900 and was projected to drop to 1.63 hectares for each person by 2050, the report said.

The result of that population growth combined with unsustainable consumption has resulted in an increasingly stressed planet where natural disasters and environmental degradation endanger millions of humans, as well as plant and animal species, the report said.

Steiner said that demand for resources was close to 22 hectares per person, a figure that would have to be cut to between 15 and 16 hectares per person to stay within existing, sustainable limits.

Persistent problems identified by the report include a rapid rise of so-called dead zones, where marine life no longer can be supported because of depletion of oxygen caused by pollutants like fertilizers. Also included is the resurgence of diseases linked with environmental degradation.

The report is being published two decades after a commission headed by the former Norwegian prime minister Gro Harlem Brundtland warned that the survival of humanity was at stake from unsustainable development.

Steiner said many of the problems identified by the Brundtland Commission were even more acute because not enough had been done to stop environmental degradation as flows of goods, services, people, technologies and workers had expanded, even to isolated populations.

He did, however, identify some reasons for hope that pointed toward better environmental stewardship.

He said West European governments had taken effective measures to reduce air pollutants, and he praised efforts in parts of Brazil to roll back deforestation in the Amazon. He said an international treaty to tackle the hole in the earth's ozone layer had led to the phasing-out of release of 95 percent of ozone-damaging chemicals.

Steiner said more intelligent management of scarce resources including fishing grounds, land and water was needed to sustain a still larger global population, which he said was expected to stabilize at between 8 billion and 10 billion people.

"Life would be easier if we didn't have the kind of population growth rates that we have at the moment," Steiner said. "But to force people to stop having children would be a simplistic answer. The more realistic, ethical and practical issue is to accelerate human well-being and make more rational use of the resources we have on this planet."

Steiner said environmental tipping points, at which degradation can lead to abrupt, accelerating or potentially irreversible changes, would increasingly occur in locations like particular rivers or forests, where populations would lack the ability to repair damage because the gravity of a problem would be far beyond their physical or economic means.

Looking ahead, Steiner said parts of Africa could reach environmental tipping points if changing rainfall patterns stemming from climate change turned semi-arid zones into arid zones, and made agriculture that sustained millions of people much harder.

Steiner said other tipping points triggered by climate change could occur in areas like India and China if Himalayan glaciers shrank so much that they no longer supplied adequate amounts of water to populations in those countries.

He also warned of a global collapse of all species being fished by 2050, if fishing around the world continued at its present pace.

The report said 250 percent more fish are being caught than the oceans can produce in a sustainable manner, and that the number of fish stocks classed as collapsed had roughly doubled to 30 percent globally over the past 20 years.

The report said that current changes in biodiversity were the fastest in human history, with species becoming extinct a hundred times as fast as the rate in the fossil record. It said 12 percent of birds were threatened with extinction; for mammals the figure was 23 percent and for amphibians it was more than 30 percent.

"Scientists now refer to a sixth major extinction crisis that's under way," Steiner said.

The first mass extinction, about 440 million years ago, and the four succeeding extinctions were the result of physical shocks to the planet like volcanic eruptions and plate tectonic shifts.

The report said that annual emissions of CO2 from fossil fuels have risen by about one-third since 1987 and that the threat from climate change now was so urgent that only very large cuts in greenhouse gases of 60 to 80 percent could stop irreversible change.

The effects of global warming, like the melting ice in the Arctic are "accelerating at a pace that goes beyond the scenarios and models we've been using," Steiner said.

Climate change, however, was an issue that gained huge momentum over the past year, with governments, industries and citizens increasingly seeking solutions to the problem, Steiner said. The recent award of the Nobel Peace Prize to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and to former Vice President Al Gore was a sign of widespread scientific consensus that climate change is under way, he said.

Steiner called for an accelerated effort on a far wider range of environmental issues to build the same sense of urgency as shown on climate change over the past year to address the worsening situations of biodiversity, land degradation, fisheries and freshwater.

Many biologists and climate scientists have concluded that human activities have become a dominant influence on the planet's climate and ecosystems. But there is still a range of views on whether this could result in a catastrophic unraveling of natural resources as the human population heads toward nine billion by midcentury, or more of a steady diminution in diversity.

[nemein]

The human population is living far beyond its means and inflicting damage on the environment that could pass points of no return, according to a major report issued Thursday by the United Nations.

I thought we had already passed the point of no return

[grundle]

Originally Posted by nemein

I thought we had already passed the point of no return

Exactly. That's my whole point of why I started this thread.

They keep making this same bogus prediction again, and again, and again.

[grundle]

Originally Posted by Vandelay_Inds

The thing is, overpopulation occurs precisely in such places that lack those qualities and abilities. Usually, this happens when there is a mismatch between constant or increasing birth rates and decreasing death rates due to greater nutrition or sanitation, and a lagging rate of productivity increase, meaning more people living off fewer resources.

In advanced societies, where such developments do take place, we see a demographic implosion, which can be equally destabilizing. That's the reason, by the way, why immigration is such an indispensable factor for mature societies.

Poor countries are not overpopulated - they are underdeveloped.

Here's a list of countries in order of population density. The rich countries of western Europe, the Asian tigers, and Israel, are way, way more densely populated than the poor countries of Africa.

In fact, Africa's most densely populated country, Mauritius, is also its richest.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...lation_density

[DVD Polizei]

The effects of global warming, like the melting ice in the Arctic are "accelerating at a pace that goes beyond the scenarios and models we've been using," Steiner said.

Climate change, however, was an issue that gained huge momentum over the past year, with governments, industries and citizens increasingly seeking solutions to the problem, Steiner said. The recent award of the Nobel Peace Prize to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and to former Vice President Al Gore was a sign of widespread scientific consensus that climate change is under way, he said.


Well, I think we know what crazy camp he's from. Don't we.

[bhk]

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...SS&attr=797093

20 reasons why the human race may not survive, by the UN
(Michael Reynolds/EPA)
Consumption is growing rapidly but so is inequality


Wildlife

60 per cent of ecosystems are degraded or used unsustainably

Freshwater vertebrates declined 50 per cent from 1987-2003

Food

Insects eat 14 per cent of all crops annually

That consumption forecast to grow up to 350 per cent by 2050

By 2030 developing countries forecast to need 120 million hectares of agricultural land to feed themselves

Consumption

21.9 hectares are needed to supply each person today; Earth’s sustainable level is 15.7 hectares per person

Climate change

Carbon dioxide levels highest for the last 500,000 years

Average global temperature will rise by 1.8C – 4C this century

Air pollution

2 million people are killed each year by air pollution

Culture

90 per cent of 6,000 languages could be lost by 2100

Population

34 per cent higher than 20 years ago

Could reach 9.7 billion by 2050

Conflict

More than 8 million people have died directly or indirectly as a result of war in Africa since 1960

Water

Growing consumption means 10 per cent of major rivers fail to reach the sea for part of the year

3 million people die each year from water-borne disease

1.8 billion people will face serious shortages by 2025

Inequality

Annual income of the richest 1 billion people is almost 15 times that of 2.3 billion poorest

Urbanisation

2007 is first year in world history when majority of people live in towns and cities

Output

In 1987 1.8 tonnes of crops were yielded per hectare of farmland; today it is 2.5 tonnes

Trade is three times greater now than in 1987

Malthus has been proven wrong!....Rachel Carson has been proven wrong!.....Paul Ehrich has been proven wrong!.....But the chuckleheads at the UN get it right........sorry, not buyin' it.

Reason #21: people actually start believeing the dopes at the UN.

[movielib]

Demographers (including those at the U.N.) mostly seem to think that the population of the world will reach about 9-10 billion by about 2050 and then start declining as the trend in birth rates continues to decline which always happens with increased prosperity, which is expected even in developing nations as long as authoritarian governments or stupid environmental policies (yes, I'm talking especially about CO2 mitigation schemes which will cost trillions and do virtually nothing) don't prevail. I'd love to be around 80-100 years from now when everyone is whining about too few people and a labor shortage. Maybe then they'll finally get it.

[movielib]

Originally Posted by grundle

Poor countries are not overpopulated - they are underdeveloped.

Here's a list of countries in order of population density. The rich countries of western Europe, the Asian tigers, and Israel, are way, way more densely populated than the poor countries of Africa.

In fact, Africa's most densely populated country, Mauritius, is also its richest.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...lation_density

Also, the birth rates in almost all developing countries are declining. Almost all, even in many instances in spite of continued stupid authoritarian and anti-capitalist policies, are becoming more wealthy which is virtually always accompanied by declining birthrates. Those countries which adopt more capitalistic policies such as South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Ireland, Estonia and The Czech Republic experience increased prosperity at soaring rates.

[DarkestPhoenix]

I don't get it. First, they say there's not enough land to feed everybody, then they bitch about 8 million dying in Africa.

Also, wiping out 5,400 languages seems to be awesome, to me. It's like a reverse Tower of Babel. It's not like people will just stop speaking or some important language like Russian will die out. Just a bunch of clicks and whistles disappearing.

[DarkestPhoenix]

Originally Posted by DarkestPhoenix

I don't get it. First, they say there's not enough land to feed everybody, then they bitch about 8 million dying in Africa.

Also, wiping out 5,400 languages seems to be awesome, to me. It's like a reverse Tower of Babel. It's not like people will just stop speaking or some important language like Russian will die out. Just a bunch of clicks and whistles disappearing.

You heartless bastard! Joking about genocide...thanks...now I know I can ignore your posts.



Wheeeeeee-wooooooo-waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!*

*You son of a bitch!

[stp115]

Originally Posted by Times Online

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...SS&attr=797093

Urbanisation

2007 is first year in world history when majority of people live in towns and cities

Output

In 1987 1.8 tonnes of crops were yielded per hectare of farmland; today it is 2.5 tonnes

Trade is three times greater now than in 1987

How are either of these considered negative?

[grundle]

Originally Posted by bhk

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...SS&attr=797093


Malthus has been proven wrong!....Rachel Carson has been proven wrong!.....Paul Ehrich has been proven wrong!.....But the chuckleheads at the UN get it right........sorry, not buyin' it.

Reason #21: people actually start believeing the dopes at the UN.

Also, today, the average person in the world has more calories of food, a higher income, more square footage of housing, more technology, more access to health care and education, more material possessions, and a longer life expectancy, than ever before.

So in every way, the average person of the world is better off today, than ever before.

All those numbers from the doomsayers totally ignore the fact that people are better off today they were than in the past. They say, "X per cent of the population is hungry," while ignoring that fact the current percentage of people who are hungry is lower than it has ever been.

It's also funny that they simultaneously claim that we are overpopulated, and headed for extinction!

The IUCN Red List lists humans as "least concern." So the real scientists are not at all worried about humans going extinct.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human

[grundle]

Originally Posted by movielib

Demographers (including those at the U.N.) mostly seem to think that the population of the world will reach about 9-10 billion by about 2050 and then start declining as the trend in birth rates continues to decline which always happens with increased prosperity, which is expected even in developing nations as long as authoritarian governments or stupid environmental policies (yes, I'm talking especially about CO2 mitigation schemes which will cost trillions and do virtually nothing) don't prevail. I'd love to be around 80-100 years from now when everyone is whining about too few people and a labor shortage. Maybe then they'll finally get it.

They will always find some reason why the earth is about to end!

[grundle]

Originally Posted by DarkestPhoenix

I don't get it. First, they say there's not enough land to feed everybody, then they bitch about 8 million dying in Africa.

Also, wiping out 5,400 languages seems to be awesome, to me. It's like a reverse Tower of Babel. It's not like people will just stop speaking or some important language like Russian will die out. Just a bunch of clicks and whistles disappearing.

I also think it's odd that they think we need that many different languages.

[grundle]

Originally Posted by stp115

How are either of these considered negative?

That's an excellent question. I guess the doomsayers think that everything is bad, even when it's good.

[Birrman54]

It'd be funny if they weren't so serious (and if they weren't in a position to enforce and prolong useless and economically damaging policies)

[kvrdave]

Move evidence of overpopulation....

Spoiler:

I have made my thoughts on overpopulation well known. It's a crock. It's a verifiable crock.

[bhk]

Oh and the UN's answer to all these problems: increase taxes.

[The Bus]

Originally Posted by Vandelay_Inds

That's the reason, by the way, why immigration is such an indispensable factor for mature societies.

Let's see how Japan's xenophobia pays off in about 15 years.

[DarkestPhoenix]

Who voted yes???

Come on, fess up...

[Tuan Jim]

Originally Posted by The Bus

Let's see how Japan's xenophobia pays off in about 15 years.

I don't disagree with you on the background or principle, but they have been steadily increasing their numbers of work visas specifically for health care workers from the Philippines, Indonesia, manual labor from Turkey, etc. It may not be enough yet, but I think the government recognizes the issue.

[Ky-Fi]

Originally Posted by The Bus

Let's see how Japan's xenophobia pays off in about 15 years.

I do think in 15 years we're definitely going to see whether Japan's "xenophobia" or Europe's multiculturalism was a more prudent approach towards immigration.

[Mordred]

Originally Posted by kvrdave

I have made my thoughts on overpopulation well known. It's a crock. It's a verifiable crock.

Who wants to live in that crap hole though? I enjoy electricity and running water you backwoods yokel.

[grundle]

Originally Posted by kvrdave

Move evidence of overpopulation....

Spoiler:

I have made my thoughts on overpopulation well known. It's a crock. It's a verifiable crock.

Heh heh heh.

[grundle]

Originally Posted by bhk

Oh and the UN's answer to all these problems: increase taxes.

That's exactly it. They choose to ignore the real world solutions that actually solve problems, such as property rights, free market prices, nuclear power, and desalination.