Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Music Talk
Reload this Page >

Album covers that were misrepresented or changed in the CD era

Community
Search
Music Talk Discuss music in all its forms: CD, MP3, DVD-A, SACD and of course live

Album covers that were misrepresented or changed in the CD era

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-15, 09:09 AM
  #26  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Rival11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Western N.Y.
Posts: 7,383
Received 192 Likes on 129 Posts
Re: Album covers that were misrepresented or changed in the CD era

Yeah, Two people beat me to it already but they did a good job with the Zepplin re-issues.

I bought III recently and i remeber setting it down and the cover looked different (I accidentally turned the wheel when putting it down) I was kind of freaked out and just said "Ok, I KNOW that wasn't like that just a second ago"
Old 05-24-15, 07:40 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Album covers that were misrepresented or changed in the CD era

Originally Posted by rbrown498
Madonna's Like a Prayer LP had patchouli mixed in with the glue that held the jacket together, so it gave off a strong smell even after years of sitting on the shelf. The CD doesn't have an odor.
I read somewhere that early pressings of the CD (that came with the AIDS Awareness insert - which was also included with the early scented pressings of the LP) are also scented.

I found a used copy of an early pressing of the CD with the insert but it isn't scented so I'm not sure if the scent wore off or if the information I read was inaccurate. I do, however, own a scented copy of the LP and I will say, 25+ years later and that scent is still SO strong!
Old 05-27-15, 02:29 PM
  #28  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,802
Received 41 Likes on 29 Posts
Re: Album covers that were misrepresented or changed in the CD era

Originally Posted by Hiro11
The original New Order single "Blue Monday" had one of the most iconic sleeves in history: a beautifully detailed and die cut sleeve designed to look like a floppy disk. Famously (and perhaps apocryphally) , the cost of producing the sleeve meant that New Order actually lost money on the single's sales, despite it being the best selling 12 inch single of all time (a record it still holds).
Yes, the story is bogus. However, since New Order practically funded Factory Records all by themselves, the label would have made a lot more money off a more conventional sleeve. Then again, Factory Records was never known for its "wise money management".

Not exactly what the OP is looking for, but by the time a lot of British New Wave bands became popular in the US, they'd already released 3-5 albums back home. In a lot of cases, the US record company would combine a couple of these early albums into 2-for-1 cassettes or "specially-priced double albums" which only cost a dollar or two more than a typical album. Most cassette artwork had plain black backgrounds and both original album covers shrunk down to small squares, so they'd both fit on the cover. LPs either did that, or maybe had one album cover on the front and the other on the back. But for some reason, Elektra (The Cure's US label) decided to create an all new "album" instead of doing a "2 for 1" deal. It was called ... happily ever after and had its own original artwork. Then, of course, CDs happened. Almost all of the "2-for-1" albums and cassettes were (surprise! surprise!) sold as individual CDs. So if you wanted the contents of ... happily ever after on CD, you had to buy Seventeen Seconds and Faith separately. But there was a tiny run of ... happily ever after on CD. I bought one at a store's going out of business sale for $2.98 and sold it on eBay in 1997 for $137. So there's that.

Last edited by Rex Fenestrarum; 05-27-15 at 05:30 PM. Reason: Clarity
Old 05-27-15, 03:44 PM
  #29  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 0
Received 250 Likes on 176 Posts
Re: Album covers that were misrepresented or changed in the CD era

Originally Posted by Rex Fenestrarum
Yes, the story is bogus. However, since New Order practically funded Factory Records all by themselves, the label would have made a lot more money off a more conventional sleeve. Then again, Factory Records and "wise money management" never went together.

Not exactly what the OP is looking for, but by the time a lot of British New Wave bands became popular in the US, they'd already released 3-5 albums back home. In a lot of cases, the US record company would combine a couple of these early albums into 2-for-1 cassettes or "specially-priced double albums" which only cost a dollar or two more than a typical album. Most cassettes had plain black backgrounds and both original album covers shrunk down to small squares, so they'd both fit on the cover. LPs either did that, or maybe had one album cover on the front and the other on the back. But for some reason, Elektra (The Cure's US label) decided to create an all new "album" instead of doing a "2 for 1" deal. It was called ... happily ever after and had its own original artwork. Then, of course, CDs happened. Almost all of the "2-for-1" albums and cassettes were (surprise! surprise!) sold as individual CDs. So if you wanted the contents of ... happily ever after on CD, you had to buy Seventeen Seconds and Faith separately. But there was a tiny run of ... happily ever after on CD. I bought one at a store's going out of business sale for $2.98 and sold it on eBay in 1997 for $137. So there's that.
Same type thing happened with Deep Purple. The first three albums with Rod Evans were never released in the U.S. When the label(Tetragammenon?) went belly up, Warner Bros., who had picked up "Hush" for U.S. single release ,stepped in and signed them to worldwide distribution deal. WB also made them fire and replace Evans as part of the deal.
DP didn't make it big until three years later. "Woman From Tokyo" was the first U.S. single and MII were already broke up by then. It was Made in Japan when everybody took notice. "Smoke On The Water" hit the airwaves and became known 2-3 years after Machine Head was released.
See a hit band on their hands, Warner Brothers released the three early albums as a 2-LP set called "Purple Passions" around 1974. Over five years since they first came out in the UK. People took notice because it was the first time "Hush" and "Kentucky Woman" were available in U.S. in LP form.
There were so many non-LP singles in the vinyl era that greatest hits LPs really flew off the shelves. But for a different reason. There were no "bonus track reissues" so if you owned every Jethro Tull album you still bought "Living in the Past" double LP as it was the only way to get "Teacher" and "Living in The Past" on LP.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.