Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Around the World in 80 Days - Highly Underrated

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Around the World in 80 Days - Highly Underrated

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-04, 06:47 PM
  #1  
Suspended; also need updated email
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 16,564
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Around the World in 80 Days - Highly Underrated

Obviously competing with Spidey gonna be hard at the box office but i thought it was great!

a really good fun action adventure romp for the whole family. Good chemistry between the three leading actors.

Loved seeing Samo and Jackie fight together

Overall some very good cameos

Do you reckon this film will make back it's money ?
Old 07-11-04, 07:40 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its made like $20+ so far in a month almost... its budget was somewhere in the $110+ mil. Will DVD bring it up that high? I dunno...
Old 07-11-04, 09:59 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Madison, WI ("77 square miles surrounded by reality")
Posts: 30,012
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I thought it was decent and I expected it to be lousy. The original was a lot better but they're so different there's almost no way to compare them.
Old 07-11-04, 10:37 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: NYC
Posts: 17,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by movielib
I thought it was decent and I expected it to be lousy. The original was a lot better but they're so different there's almost no way to compare them.
After the complete and absolutely unredeemable messes that were The Tuxedo and The Medallion, I think I've decided I'm not going to see another Jackie Chan movie in the theater unless it has Owen Wilson or Chris Tucker in it.

I'll rent it.
Old 07-11-04, 10:43 PM
  #5  
Suspended; also need updated email
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 16,564
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Mate it has Owen Wilson in it !
Old 07-11-04, 11:05 PM
  #6  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: NYC
Posts: 17,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Original Desmond
Mate it has Owen Wilson in it !
As a main character, I mean.
Old 07-11-04, 11:06 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Talos 4
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's too bad the original was completely destroyed and this other copy took it's place we could have had more of Cantinflas jokes.
Old 07-12-04, 01:00 AM
  #8  
Suspended; also need updated email
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 16,564
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally posted by Breakfast with Girls
As a main character, I mean.
fussy bastard
Old 07-12-04, 02:23 AM
  #9  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bethleham, New Jersey
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, it was a lot better than I thought too. My sister and I decided to watch it after we got to the the theater and found out Badassss! didn't start until 9:45. The female lead got annoying and the film is probably only around ** but still worth watching at the dollar theatre.
Old 07-12-04, 05:25 AM
  #10  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,270
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,121 Posts
I really liked it. The cameos, the ones I recognized, were great and the the female lead was gorgeous.

I'm also a big fan of Jim Broadbent and Ian McNeice and they were great as usual. Some of the movie was kinda silly but I knew it was aimed at the family crowd so it was no big deal.

I will buy the dvd.
Old 07-12-04, 05:37 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just hated this new version. I thought it was very poorly made, and it threw out half of the original story. It was pretty dull, too, and the cameos (especially Arnold's) were simply embarrasing. I should throw out that I am a Jackie Chan fan, but this was far below even stuff like THE TUXEDO.

I think the 1956 version is good, but I also like the 1989 mini-series with Pierce Brosnon. Both of them are much closer in spirit to the Jules Verne novel.

I'd say you'll only enjoy the new one if you've not read the novel or seen previous film adaptations.
Old 07-12-04, 05:41 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Germantown Maryland
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by VOOM
It's too bad the original was completely destroyed and this other copy took it's place we could have had more of Cantinflas jokes.
Cantinflas was the only thing I liked about the original.

Worst. Oscar. Winner. Ever.
Old 07-12-04, 06:04 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Madison, WI ("77 square miles surrounded by reality")
Posts: 30,012
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by Rivero
Cantinflas was the only thing I liked about the original.

Worst. Oscar. Winner. Ever.
Three words:

1. Out
2. of
3. Africa
Old 07-12-04, 06:56 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Germantown Maryland
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
six more:

1. Close
2. But
3. Not
4. Quite
5. As
6. Bad

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.