Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Moore Di$ney Cen$or$hip - Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 911 [Merged]

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Moore Di$ney Cen$or$hip - Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 911 [Merged]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-04, 04:00 AM
  #1  
DVD Talk Godfather
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Moore Di$ney Cen$or$hip

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/index.php

Wednesday, May 5th, 2004
Disney Has Blocked the Distribution of My New Film... by Michael Moore


Friends,

I would have hoped by now that I would be able to put my work out to the public without having to experience the profound censorship obstacles I often seem to encounter.

Yesterday I was told that Disney, the studio that owns Miramax, has officially decided to prohibit our producer, Miramax, from distributing my new film, "Fahrenheit 9/11." The reason? According to today's (May 5) New York Times, it might "endanger" millions of dollars of tax breaks Disney receives from the state of Florida because the film will "anger" the Governor of Florida, Jeb Bush. The story is on page one of the Times and you can read it here (Disney Forbidding Distribution of Film That Criticizes Bush).

The whole story behind this (and other attempts) to kill our movie will be told in more detail as the days and weeks go on. For nearly a year, this struggle has been a lesson in just how difficult it is in this country to create a piece of art that might upset those in charge (well, OK, sorry -- it WILL upset them...big time. Did I mention it's a comedy?). All I can say is, thank God for Harvey Weinstein and Miramax who have stood by me during the entire production of this movie.

There is much more to tell, but right now I am in the lab working on the print to take to the Cannes Film Festival next week (we have been chosen as one of the 18 films in competition). I will tell you this: Some people may be afraid of this movie because of what it will show. But there's nothing they can do about it now because it's done, it's awesome, and if I have anything to say about it, you'll see it this summer -- because, after all, it is a free country.

Yours,

Michael Moore
[email protected]
www.michaelmoore.com

Get it.. I put Moore instead of More.. ha.... ha...
Old 05-05-04, 04:01 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 3,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The brewing war over Fahrenheit 9/11

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...sure_disney_dc

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Oscar-winning filmmaker Michael Moore (news)'s documentary linking President Bush (news - web sites) with powerful Saudi families, including that of Osama bin Laden (news - web sites), is stirring up controversy even before its release.

That's if it even gets released.

Hollywood trade paper Daily Variety said in its Wednesday edition that Walt Disney Co. has moved to prevent its Miramax Films unit from distributing "Fahrenheit 911."

The Disney edict could herald the bloodiest political battle yet between Miramax's feisty co-chairman Harvey Weinstein and Disney CEO Michael Eisner, who oversaw the purchase of Miramax a decade ago, Daily Variety said.

"Fahrenheit 911," Moore's follow-up to his Academy Award-winning film "Bowling for Columbine, will still premiere in competition at the Cannes Film Festival (news - web sites) in France later this month. Rumors had been circulating of a July release date in North America, but the film does not appear on Miramax's summer schedule, the paper said.

It quoted a Miramax spokesman as saying that the company was "looking forward to resolving this amicably."

Officials from Miramax and Disney were not immediately available for comment on the report.
Old 05-05-04, 04:28 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
sauce07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 6,547
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
this is just the beginning. Bush's cronies are coming out of the wood work to muzzle michael moore.
Old 05-05-04, 04:33 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Godfather
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
*Ahem*
Old 05-05-04, 04:37 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
sauce07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 6,547
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally posted by Jackskeleton
*Ahem*
Originally posted by sauce07
this is just the beginning. Bush's cronies are coming out of the wood work to muzzle michael moore.
Old 05-05-04, 04:54 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 18,362
Received 324 Likes on 242 Posts
Censorship!!!

Wow - I've actually waited to yell that in the forum...I think this is the first time it's actually been applicable.

Michael should just go the Mel Gibson route and get an independent release...when it "wows" them at Cannes, Disney is going to look like a bunch of Nazis keeping it from the public. Obviously, someone's trying to keep them from releasing it unitl AFTER the November elections.

Isn't it fun to live in a society that puts such a premium on freedom of speech?!
Old 05-05-04, 05:13 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Godfather
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Shannon Nutt
Censorship!!!

Wow - I've actually waited to yell that in the forum...I think this is the first time it's actually been applicable.



Actually it's still not applicable. Disney, as a company, has the right to NOT distribute whatever they feel like they don't want to. When this is actually proven to be some action that the United States Government commanded then perhaps it may be considered it. But for the time being a company has choosen that they do not want to distribute it because it may effect business in other aspects. Just like how the big studios passed on Passions. They felt that they would suffer from protestors. They, like disney, are making a business choice right now.

Michael should just go the Mel Gibson route and get an independent release...when it "wows" them at Cannes, Disney is going to look like a bunch of Nazis keeping it from the public. Obviously, someone's trying to keep them from releasing it unitl AFTER the November elections.
The issue here is Moore is not really liked in the public eye for many reasons. Passions had a market. Even if this does "wow" people in Cannes, that still doesn't mean the general public will give a rats ass about this and it wont generate big bucks like Passions did.

Isn't it fun to live in a society that puts such a premium on freedom of speech?! [/B]
He still has the freedom of speech. Just not the soap box at disney to stand on and yell his comments. Simple matter is he will either have to find someone else to distribute or just let it sit in limbo. Freedom of speech isn't effected in any way and "Censorship" is still not used in a correct manner.

Capitolism at it's best.

Oh yeah.. Repost. can we get a merge up in the house with my thread which was created a minute before and has a better thread title.
Old 05-05-04, 05:23 AM
  #8  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,288
Received 1,809 Likes on 1,129 Posts
Uh oh....Shannons gonna bust a nutt.

Anyway, screw Moore. However, if in fact Disney is holding his film back for political reasons that's sucks.
Old 05-05-04, 05:24 AM
  #9  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,288
Received 1,809 Likes on 1,129 Posts


and Jack is usually one of the 1st ones to make a "Use search" comment.
Old 05-05-04, 05:27 AM
  #10  
DVD Talk Godfather
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hey, I won by the minute. I deserve to have a Moore thread that will go 14 pages before two political "counter views" are said and it's closed.
Old 05-05-04, 06:59 AM
  #11  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 5,979
Received 143 Likes on 98 Posts
I can't say that I'm surprised by Disney's move. I mean really, this is Disney we're talking about here. Hopefully Moore can find another outlet since I would really like to watch this film.
Old 05-05-04, 07:39 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nowhere near your neighborhood
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since it worked so great wit CDs, just put on this still right before the movie starts, and everything will be hunky dory:

Old 05-05-04, 07:46 AM
  #13  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 5,759
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
So is it possible for Moore to use a different studio or perhaps an independent release instead of Di$ney/Miramax? Or are they under contract with eachother, which would prevent Moore from taking it to another studio? Must... see... this... film.
Old 05-05-04, 07:59 AM
  #14  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,324
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Only Moore would call this censorship.
Old 05-05-04, 08:02 AM
  #15  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,383
Received 122 Likes on 84 Posts
Originally posted by renaldow
Only Moore would call this censorship.
I think the good book would back him up on this. I direct your attention to Class 3:16.
Old 05-05-04, 08:36 AM
  #16  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,630
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally posted by steebo777
So is it possible for Moore to use a different studio or perhaps an independent release instead of Di$ney/Miramax? Or are they under contract with eachother, which would prevent Moore from taking it to another studio? Must... see... this... film.
Disney/Miramax + Moore =

How did these two come together in the first place - working for the mouse, hmmm (live and learn).
Old 05-05-04, 08:41 AM
  #17  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 7,466
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Moore needs to suck it up . . . how many hundreds of movies have been held from release from how many hundreds of different reasons? Just because his has a political message does not mean that it is safe from the proverbial chopping block.
Old 05-05-04, 09:00 AM
  #18  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: MN
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Giles
Disney/Miramax + Moore =
Disney usually keeps its hands out of Miramax stuff. Miramax is like the worker you hate, but they bring in a lot of dough (in this case lots of Oscars).

Miramax has options, one of which is to create a temporary company outside of Disney control and probably paid for straight from non-Miramax money via the Weinstein brothers.

As for other movies getting held up, yes that does happen. However, Michael Moore is a hot commodity after Bowling for Columbine (which was done under Miramax as well). Cannes will probably be a good test of whether it is as great a movie as Moore thinks it is. Harvey Weinstein is usually pretty good at noticing good stuff and he often takes a hands-on approach with that kind of stuff.

Moore's next movie: Eisner and Me?
Old 05-05-04, 09:22 AM
  #19  
DVD Talk Hero
 
CRM114's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 42,732
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The issue here is Moore is not really liked in the public eye for many reasons. Passions had a market. Even if this does "wow" people in Cannes, that still doesn't mean the general public will give a rats ass about this and it wont generate big bucks like Passions did.


Bowling for Columbine grossed $40 million worldwide. Obviously, he's not as famous as Christ (The Passion) but to say he's not liked is a stretch. Considering how well his books sell and how well his films do, I'd say you are wrong. BFC made $37 million. Nothing to sneeze at.
Old 05-05-04, 09:24 AM
  #20  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Dimension X's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The unknown world of the future
Posts: 5,525
Received 461 Likes on 275 Posts
Originally posted by Jackskeleton
He still has the freedom of speech. Just not the soap box at disney to stand on and yell his comments.
I don't understand why it's so hard for some people to understand this.
Old 05-05-04, 09:25 AM
  #21  
DVD Talk Hero
 
CRM114's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 42,732
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Dimension X
I don't understand why it's so hard for some people to understand this.
I have no problem with Disney's stance. Just give up the rights to the film.
Old 05-05-04, 09:29 AM
  #22  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 36,363
Received 1,259 Likes on 837 Posts
Originally posted by CRM114


Bowling for Columbine grossed $40 million worldwide. Obviously, he's not as famous as Christ (The Passion) but to say he's not liked is a stretch. Considering how well his books sell and how well his films do, I'd say you are wrong. BFC made $37 million. Nothing to sneeze at.
I agree. Moore has followers and haters just like Howard Stern. One word, "controversy". And that sells, just like for The Passion.

Arguing that this is a business decision based on predictions that people don't like Moore and this film won't sell just doesn't add up.
Old 05-05-04, 09:38 AM
  #23  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't see what the big deal is. Moore is just a flavor of the month that people like or hate cuz it's still trendy to like or hate him. "Oooo he's so great because he hates the president." So what if Disney doesn't wanna release his movie. Move on and find another studio to do it. I'm sure there's one out there that would love to release it... And if he shows his film at Cannes and people like it, I'm sure he'll find one.
Old 05-05-04, 09:49 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't Disney already pay for the production of the movie? Or was this a distribution-only deal?
Old 05-05-04, 09:55 AM
  #25  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Times Square
Posts: 12,135
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by necros
I don't see what the big deal is. Moore is just a flavor of the month ....
I would hardly call someone who first had a high-profile movie released 15 years ago (Roger & Me, 1989) and has been tweaking the American conscience in film, TV and print ever since a "flavor of the month.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.