Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Edward Norton's Frida Role

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Edward Norton's Frida Role

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-03, 04:11 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Edward Norton's Frida Role

hey, I was just wondering, is norton's role in frida extremely small?
Old 06-16-03, 04:15 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Docking Bay 94
Posts: 14,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by chrisfarrar
hey, I was just wondering, is norton's unit in frida extremely small?
Well, I wouldn't say extremely. But, it's pretty short... yes.
Old 06-16-03, 04:31 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
short indeed
Old 06-16-03, 04:41 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Working in the "evil" pharmaceutical industry booga booga
Posts: 7,991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hey, check out the unit on that guy! Whooooooooooaaaa!
Old 06-16-03, 05:26 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't say small. He rewrote the screenplay, uncredited.
Old 06-16-03, 06:01 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: "Sitting on a beach, earning 20%"
Posts: 6,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by jmj713
I wouldn't say small. He rewrote the screenplay, uncredited.
I hope that's a joke, if it's not that guy's out of control
Old 06-16-03, 06:03 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He's the guy that's banging Frida.

Oh, that's in real life, nevermind.

(I am SO jealous of him!!)
Old 06-16-03, 06:24 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Pants
I hope that's a joke, if it's not that guy's out of control
Not a joke. Julie Taymor confirms it on the AFI Q&A on the DVD.
Old 06-16-03, 06:46 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Sessa17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: NJ, the place where smiles go to die
Posts: 7,393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I usually hate when people do this, but b/c I've had it done to me when my topics are relevant. I'm going to do it here. . .

Why is this in the DVD talk forum. Shouldn't it be in the movie forum. This question doesn't have anything to do w/ DVDs.
Old 06-16-03, 06:48 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Jennifer Lopez was considered to play the role of Frida Kahlo.


Madonna, who is a fan of Frida and owns some of her work, was reportedly keen to play the role.
Thank god she didn't get the role

Edward Norton did an uncredited rewrite of the script.


Salma Hayek did some of the paintings in the movie.


The whole film was digitally color corrected at 2K resolution.
Old 06-16-03, 07:20 PM
  #11  
Suspended - needs to provide a working email
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I read awhile back that Salma Hayek stepped up production because Jennifer Lopez was thinking about doing her own Kahlo film. I'm glad she decided to save herself the embarrassment of letting Hayek do a proper film.
Old 06-16-03, 07:58 PM
  #12  
Cool New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: A Big Black Army Helmet
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by elise
I think I read awhile back that Salma Hayek stepped up production because Jennifer Lopez was thinking about doing her own Kahlo film. I'm glad she decided to save herself the embarrassment of letting Hayek do a proper film.

Whoa wa! Love to see Lopez as the Frida!!!!!!!!!

Old 06-16-03, 08:13 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why? J-lo from the block would have ruined Frida's name if she played her.
Old 06-16-03, 09:14 PM
  #14  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cedar Lake, IN
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Jackskeleton
Why? J-lo from the block would have ruined Frida's name if she played her.
No doubt about that...

Salma was perfect...

I still haven't picked up the DVD. I must!
Old 06-16-03, 09:16 PM
  #15  
Cool New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: A Big Black Army Helmet
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Jackskeleton
Why? J-lo from the block would have ruined Frida's name if she played her.
Salma's definitely cool and stuff. But J-Lo was born for that role! Maybe later down the line.
Old 06-16-03, 09:39 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Hokeyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 20,406
Received 696 Likes on 430 Posts
Salma's definitely cool and stuff. But J-Lo was born for that role! Maybe later down the line.
I'm a little strapped this week... they got any dime bags of what you're smoking?
Old 06-16-03, 09:59 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by vaddarstepp
Salma's definitely cool and stuff. But J-Lo was born for that role! Maybe later down the line.

How the hell was she born for the role? this isn't like Patrick Stewart being born to play Pro. Xavier. J-lo looks nothing like her and hell she's not even from the same place as Frida. Maybe she was born to play Selena, but she shouldn't be allowed to ruin frida's story.
Old 06-16-03, 10:06 PM
  #18  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, Is this movie worth a blind buy? What are the extra features like?
Old 06-16-03, 11:41 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,297
Received 214 Likes on 189 Posts
The supplements are extensive and pretty much tell you everything you ever wanted to know about the movie. The only thing its missing is actual documentary material (there are some brief printed notes) on the "real" Frida Kahlo. There are 30-40 minute interviews with both Julie Taymor and Salma Hayek, as well as featurettes on the production design and the special effects. That being said, you're reaction to the supplement will depend on your reaction to the film. I thought the filmmaking was impressive, but, overall, it was a fairly standard "bio-pic", -one of those "who I screwed and who screwed me" stories, livened up by a terrific cast and Taymor's unusual visual flourishes. As I rented the disc, I tried to watch all of the supplement in one night, and it started to get tiresome...
Old 06-16-03, 11:49 PM
  #20  
Mod Emeritus
 
Gallant Pig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 15,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The script could have been better. They were going to have someone write it (or rewrite it) but that person got busy with another project and Taymor wanted a rewrite so Norton stepped in. That cameo was pure cheese too. I wish Taymor would have had something better to work with.

Anyone remember the guy who was going to rewrite it?
Old 06-17-03, 10:13 AM
  #21  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Salma's definitely cool and stuff. But J-Lo was born for that role! Maybe later down the line.
Are you insane?


Ok, Is this movie worth a blind buy? What are the extra features like?
I was a bit let-down. I liked Taymor's first film well enough (didn't love it), and on the basis of that I was expecting a highly experimental narrative structure with brilliant flights of hallucinatory imagery. What I got was a completely by-the-book, conventional bio-pic with only one or two brilliant flights of hallucinatory imagery. It's not quite hagiographic, but she definitely smoothed over the rough edges to make this as palatable as possible to a wide audience. If you go in expecting an artfilm, or an unflinching in-depth portrait, you'll be as disappointed as I.

Not strictly commercial, but mostly.
Old 06-17-03, 10:15 AM
  #22  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And the sex scenes are as unsexy as any in Hollywood these days. If you're buying it for the hot sexiness, you'll be deeply disappointed. Some nude Salma, yes, but I was left unmoved (if you know what I mean).

Try "Sex and Lucia" for hot latin lovin'.
Old 06-17-03, 12:55 PM
  #23  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PDX
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would assume that Norton's rewrite went uncredited due to the guild's practice of calculating what percentage of the script was actually written by whom. Norton's rewrite more than likely didn't give him the percentage needed to get credit.
Old 06-17-03, 01:31 PM
  #24  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Formerly known as "brizz"/kck
Posts: 23,427
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
I wasn't expecting much, but was thoroughly impressed with this film....Hayek was amazingly good. J Lo? You've got to be kidding.

If I remember correctly, Taymor said that she and Norton did the rewrite together....and while his role was small, he was good, and there wasn't really another one for him unless he wanted to don tons of make-up and try and play Trotsky - the movie takes place in Mexico after all
Old 06-17-03, 01:59 PM
  #25  
Cool New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: A Big Black Army Helmet
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Richard Malloy
And the sex scenes are as unsexy as any in Hollywood these days. If you're buying it for the hot sexiness, you'll be deeply disappointed. Some nude Salma, yes, but I was left unmoved (if you know what I mean).

Try "Sex and Lucia" for hot latin lovin'.
J. Lo would have added a bit of sensuosity to the role. As we've often seen in movies, you don't have to be from the same town as the character in order to get INTO the character. Take Renee Zelwegger as Bridget Jones. She was great and did the job better than any Briitsh girl could have ever done. Its all about the love of the role, and I think J-Lo would have put a little more effort into the role thank Salma did. I was left dissatisfied with the performance.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.