The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
#1
Moderator
Thread Starter
The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
#2
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,818
Received 1,881 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
I checked the log to see who closed the thread, and...um, apparently it was me on Dec. 18th. If I had a reason why, I guess I've forgotten. (Maybe I did it by accident? Is that even possible? I don't fiddle with threads in forums I don't moderate.) It's been reopened. Sorry about that. I'm pretty mystified.
#4
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Part of the Left-Wing Conspiracy
Posts: 7,539
Received 204 Likes
on
118 Posts
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
How about the target gun thread I posted in Vegas Forum? It was deleted, yet the gory deer thread stays open...
#5
Banned
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
Agreed. Whether you hunt or not, the gore is disgustingly displayed. It's in such poor taste that I can't imagine why it's allowed to remain open. I eat meat, though I don't hunt, and I have no pity for the animals I eat. And I know where/how my food arrives at my table. But that thread is disgusting, and those who are contributing pics are just....disturbed.
#9
Banned
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
I know this thread (http://forum.dvdtalk.com/store-forum...hese-days.html ) was closed because the OP requested it after insulting other members, but I think that is a stupid rule. I don't think that just because other members have a different opinion than him, the OP should take the ball and go home.
#10
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
#11
DVD Talk God
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
I know this thread (http://forum.dvdtalk.com/store-forum...hese-days.html ) was closed because the OP requested it after insulting other members, but I think that is a stupid rule. I don't think that just because other members have a different opinion than him, the OP should take the ball and go home.
#12
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
I know this thread (http://forum.dvdtalk.com/store-forum...hese-days.html ) was closed because the OP requested it after insulting other members, but I think that is a stupid rule. I don't think that just because other members have a different opinion than him, the OP should take the ball and go home.
The OP should not 'own' a thread or have any more rights in it than any other DVDTalker.
#13
#14
Banned
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
Why this was closed? It was becoming the thread of the year.
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/other-talk/...-please-4.html
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/other-talk/...-please-4.html
#15
Moderator
Thread Starter
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
Why this was closed? It was becoming the thread of the year.
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/other-talk/...-please-4.html
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/other-talk/...-please-4.html
#16
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
While we're on the subject of closing threads, I recently bumped a nearly three year old thread of Target sale prices in the Hot Deals forum. I did so because I recently bought the Target exclusive Casino Royale that went on sale that week and thought it the most appropriate place to ask a question about the ISBN for the product, as I did not get the packaging with my book. I made sure to post, in bold font, that this was not a current thread thinking that would dispel the inevitable, "Dammit! I thought Speedy was back!" remarks that accompany every such bump. I was chastised anyway. One poster even remarked something to the effect of how, for every two failures to use the search feature there's an instance of someone using it when they shouldn't have.
I suppose I should have instead found a thread about the title in the DVD section, but my reasoning for the hot deals was simply that I sought ISBN information, and I know that the regular readers of that section are generally more conscious of such information. (I mean, hell, we've even had side conversations emerge over what the SKU number was for a specific store exclusive on occasion.)
In any event, that thread is now closed...in large part due to a spattering of entirely unnecessary remarks such as the ones espousing confusion and anger at my bump. I'm fine with the closure, actually, and it got me to thinking. I move that every Hot Deals thread started by Speedy be closed. Let it be a monument to his retirement, ending these unpopular bumps (though I still believe I had a legitimate, if dubious, reason).
I suppose I should have instead found a thread about the title in the DVD section, but my reasoning for the hot deals was simply that I sought ISBN information, and I know that the regular readers of that section are generally more conscious of such information. (I mean, hell, we've even had side conversations emerge over what the SKU number was for a specific store exclusive on occasion.)
In any event, that thread is now closed...in large part due to a spattering of entirely unnecessary remarks such as the ones espousing confusion and anger at my bump. I'm fine with the closure, actually, and it got me to thinking. I move that every Hot Deals thread started by Speedy be closed. Let it be a monument to his retirement, ending these unpopular bumps (though I still believe I had a legitimate, if dubious, reason).
#17
Moderator
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
What you're talking about, MinLShaw, is a real issue on this board when it comes to the search feature. It's either, "Why didn't you use the search function?!" or it's "Why did you bump this thread?!" It's frustrating.
#18
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
I never understand why that matters. In my opinion, the OP of a thread is no more important than anyone else who participates in it. Closing threads is stupid. Punish the one or two people who break the rules.
I think most of the people questioning the thread bump were just joking, and if they weren't, they need to get over it. I thought it was a fine bump.
While we're on the subject of closing threads, I recently bumped a nearly three year old thread of Target sale prices in the Hot Deals forum. I did so because I recently bought the Target exclusive Casino Royale that went on sale that week and thought it the most appropriate place to ask a question about the ISBN for the product, as I did not get the packaging with my book. I made sure to post, in bold font, that this was not a current thread thinking that would dispel the inevitable, "Dammit! I thought Speedy was back!" remarks that accompany every such bump. I was chastised anyway. One poster even remarked something to the effect of how, for every two failures to use the search feature there's an instance of someone using it when they shouldn't have.
I suppose I should have instead found a thread about the title in the DVD section, but my reasoning for the hot deals was simply that I sought ISBN information, and I know that the regular readers of that section are generally more conscious of such information. (I mean, hell, we've even had side conversations emerge over what the SKU number was for a specific store exclusive on occasion.)
In any event, that thread is now closed...in large part due to a spattering of entirely unnecessary remarks such as the ones espousing confusion and anger at my bump. I'm fine with the closure, actually, and it got me to thinking. I move that every Hot Deals thread started by Speedy be closed. Let it be a monument to his retirement, ending these unpopular bumps (though I still believe I had a legitimate, if dubious, reason).
I suppose I should have instead found a thread about the title in the DVD section, but my reasoning for the hot deals was simply that I sought ISBN information, and I know that the regular readers of that section are generally more conscious of such information. (I mean, hell, we've even had side conversations emerge over what the SKU number was for a specific store exclusive on occasion.)
In any event, that thread is now closed...in large part due to a spattering of entirely unnecessary remarks such as the ones espousing confusion and anger at my bump. I'm fine with the closure, actually, and it got me to thinking. I move that every Hot Deals thread started by Speedy be closed. Let it be a monument to his retirement, ending these unpopular bumps (though I still believe I had a legitimate, if dubious, reason).
#19
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Detroit, Michigan PSN: JohnSlider
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#20
Moderator
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
Really? I thought it was pretty mean-spirited and unnecessary.
#21
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Detroit, Michigan PSN: JohnSlider
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
Mean spirited? Towards the guy who did Drink Man Comics? I doubt he took much offense.
#22
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The People's Republic of Boulder
Posts: 24,756
Received 575 Likes
on
416 Posts
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
But I think dogmatica was responding to something else (the search vs why did you bump this comments).
#23
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
Personally, I find it a little irritating when someone bumps a thread over a year or so old to ask something only tangentially related to the discussion at hand.
Every message board has its own temperament, some boards will expect all "Star Wars" discussion to go into a "one and only Star Wars" thread that might stretch over hundreds pages. Which, in my mind, makes it next to impossible to get anything out of it.
#24
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
I much prefer bumps of old threads than starting new ones. A bump of an old thread will often inspire new discussion and interest in the subject, and having all the old conversation right there is only a benefit.
Starting a new thread will just lead to people asking the same old questions that were answered in the old threads.
Starting a new thread will just lead to people asking the same old questions that were answered in the old threads.
#25
Mod Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Outside of the U.S.A.
Posts: 10,674
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
Ideally, when an ongoing thread here exceeds a certain number of posts, currently around 600 (I think - but it may be 800, I forget what was agreed), the idea is to start a new part two/three/whatever and ask a mod to close the older one.