Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

Disappointing Criterions

DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

Disappointing Criterions

Old 12-06-07, 04:35 PM
  #26  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Pizza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,136
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I guess I could steal another poster's bit of wit and say the only Criterion that ever disappointed me was "Good Burger."
Old 12-06-07, 04:39 PM
  #27  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Brent L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 13,617
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by chris_sc77
I just watched Jubilee as well and i found it very disapointing as well. The plot synopsis on the back cover makes it certainly sound cool but I found it didn't really decribe the actual movie that well.
ALso i found Ace In The Hole, Ivan's Childhood, La Jetee / Sans Soleil, Under The Volcano, to be rather dissapointing as well.
I know that everyone has different opinions, but would you mind explaining what you have against this one? I can understand someone not liking Jubilee and stuff like In the Mood For Love, but I don't get why someone wouldn't enjoy Ace.
Old 12-06-07, 05:08 PM
  #28  
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i didn't like Branded to Kill
Old 12-06-07, 06:30 PM
  #29  
g
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,291
Received 85 Likes on 43 Posts
I didnt like ace in the hole either. And Wilder is one of my all time favorite directors. I loved 39 steps though.
Old 12-06-07, 06:41 PM
  #30  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 234 Likes on 169 Posts
I didn't like The Royal Tenebaums.
Old 12-06-07, 06:44 PM
  #31  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
aintnosin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I may not agree with all of Criterion's tastes, but I would only be "disappointed" in one of their editions if the DVD itself wasn't up to their usual standards (extras, etc.)
Old 12-06-07, 07:00 PM
  #32  
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
tylergfoster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,540
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I agree that I am always disappointed when a Criterion disc contains only the theatrical trailer -- not that it's any different from a normal DVD containing only the trailer, but normal DVDs are only ten bucks.

Add me to the club who didn't like Withnail & I. I found How to Get Ahead in Advertising in a pawn shop for $3, bought it and thought it was hilarious and awesome, and eagerly bought Withnail & I, expecting more awesomeness but just found it pretentious and unfunny.
Old 12-06-07, 07:08 PM
  #33  
DVD Talk Hero
 
GoldenJCJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 27,273
Received 3,189 Likes on 2,057 Posts
Originally Posted by aintnosin
I may not agree with all of Criterion's tastes, but I would only be "disappointed" in one of their editions if the DVD itself wasn't up to their usual standards (extras, etc.)
That was one of my beefs with The Night Porter. If I remember correctly it was nonanamorphic, the transfer looked like crap, and it contained no features, not even a trailer.
Old 12-06-07, 07:35 PM
  #34  
DVD Talk Legend
 
islandclaws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 20,085
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I was a bit underwhelmed by Jigoku. I still liked it, but I was expecting a bit more from a film about Japanese Hell. Plus, my friend hyped it up BIG TIME which didn't help matters. Other than that I really haven't bought a Criterion that I didn't like.
Old 12-06-07, 07:52 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sydney / Australia !!!
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Armageddon

What a waste of opportunity not to have released this original anamorphically.

I want the 'internal release notes' on this DVD - stating whom at Criterion thought that they should not release this in the 16x9 format. I wonder if that person still works there ???
Old 12-06-07, 08:21 PM
  #36  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most of the early Criterions (like Armageddon) were not anamorphic. Apparently it wasn't till later that they thought it would be critical to have every release anamorphic.
Old 12-06-07, 08:32 PM
  #37  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 5,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brent L
I know that everyone has different opinions, but would you mind explaining what you have against this one? I can understand someone not liking Jubilee and stuff like In the Mood For Love, but I don't get why someone wouldn't enjoy Ace.

Ace in the Hole just never really got me involved. It's not a film I hate but i just felt that it was boring for me. Again it's not that I would call it a bad movie it's just something I didn't connect to for some reason.
Old 12-06-07, 08:48 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CALI!
Posts: 6,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chasing Amy, duh. Garbage Kevin Smith film did not deserve the Criterion treatment!
Old 12-06-07, 09:40 PM
  #39  
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Armageddon came out before they released anamorphic titles though, right? I can see it and the Rock being re-released.....

Jubilee is cool, but it's like Border Radio, the synopsis Criterion provides hint at them being movies most won't appreciate and try to provide historical context for their importance...I like both, but I think their marketing is a little misleading.
Old 12-06-07, 09:44 PM
  #40  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anything by Michael Bay.

E
Old 12-06-07, 10:29 PM
  #41  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Electric Ladyland
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I fell asleep during Green for Danger so I guess that would be most disappointing recent Criterion purchase. Not that it was a bad film, but I certainly didn't become engrossed in it the way some reviews insisted I would.

Mr. Hulot's Holiday was a bit underwhelming, too, now that I think about it. Also Down by Law disappointed, considering I'm a great fan of both Jim Jarmusch and Tom Waits. Le Samourai was only so-so. Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas was quite a bore.

Conversely, Criterions that surprised me by how much I ended up liking them included Picnic at Hanging Rock, Onibaba, Knife in the Water, and Forbidden Games.
Old 12-06-07, 10:32 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hopscotch. It certainly wasn't a terrible movie, but I have a hard time seeing why Criterion would justify this as an "important" or "influential" film. It's certainly watchable, but I found it underwhelming considering it had such a great cast involved. The Bay movies at least were released so Criterion could get at some other choice titles, but what was the excuse for this one, other than the fact that the OOP VHS tape used to cost a small fortune?
Old 12-06-07, 10:42 PM
  #43  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: knoxville, tn
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Pixies
Armageddon came out before they released anamorphic titles though, right? I can see it and the Rock being re-released.....
The Rock is anamorphic, at least.
Old 12-06-07, 11:28 PM
  #44  
DVD Talk Hero
 
GoldenJCJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 27,273
Received 3,189 Likes on 2,057 Posts
Originally Posted by DeltaSigChi4
Anything by Michael Bay.

E
I know Michael Bay doesn't necessarily fit the Criterion mold, but The Rock is one of my top 3 DVDs ever.
Old 12-06-07, 11:47 PM
  #45  
g
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,291
Received 85 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by CloudVader
Hopscotch. It certainly wasn't a terrible movie, but I have a hard time seeing why Criterion would justify this as an "important" or "influential" film. It's certainly watchable, but I found it underwhelming considering it had such a great cast involved. The Bay movies at least were released so Criterion could get at some other choice titles, but what was the excuse for this one, other than the fact that the OOP VHS tape used to cost a small fortune?
They had the director available after his other director approved titles.
Old 12-07-07, 01:13 AM
  #46  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In a Academy Award nominated film
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jdpatri
Hmm. In The Mood for Love might be one of my TOP 5 Criterions.
I consider it one of the TOP 5 movies ever made.
Old 12-07-07, 01:26 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Giles
I didn't quite "get" The Earrings of Madame De... (future Criterion release)
I'm an admirer of Max Opuls but I understand your position.
Lola Montes or Letter from an Unknown Woman are better.
And I'd kill to get either of them on Criterion.

So... who do you want me to kill?
Old 12-07-07, 01:49 AM
  #48  
DVD Talk Hero
 
PopcornTreeCt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 25,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I can't say I've ever been disappointed. Days of Heaven didn't quite live up to the monumental expectations I had but the Criterion is a magnificent set.
Old 12-07-07, 08:23 AM
  #49  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,630
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Pizza
I guess I could steal another poster's bit of wit and say the only Criterion that ever disappointed me was "Good Burger."

post #26 - we're slipping here folks.

Originally Posted by Arpeggi
Chasing Amy, duh. Garbage Kevin Smith film did not deserve the Criterion treatment!
Old 12-07-07, 08:54 AM
  #50  
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only real dissapointments for me were both Jane Campion films. They did absolutely nothing for me.

The rest of the Criterion purchases I've made were quite satisfying; though I was underwhelmed by the presentation of The Pornographers (fine film, throwaway barebones DVD).

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.