Warner 2DVD SE- The Unbearable Lightness of Being
#26
DVD Talk Reviewer
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Blu-ray.com
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Egon's Ghost
This has nothing to do with the DVD: I liked the movie, but it should have been done by Czechs in Czech. Stupid accents, and the way Day-Lewis tries to pronounce"Tereza"...shudder. Of course, this means nothing to most of you, but what the hell.
Ciao,
Pro-B
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Other Side
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
This is actually a very valid argument. I was in Prague back in 1989 I think (a long time ago) and spoke with a guy who was involved with the marketing campaign at the time. To make a long story short they bet on the cast (Binoche/Del Lewis....) for the film to have a much larger Western appeal. This may not make much sense on this board but I also think (just as Marek did) that an all Czech cast would have not brought the attention the film consequently gathered. I am in full agreement with you though...some of the accents are rather dull!
Sadly, not many Czechs seem to know this movie.
#28
DVD Talk Reviewer
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Blu-ray.com
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is not only crazy...it is plain stupid. I recently reviewed Imagining Argentina with Emma Thompson and Antonio Banderas where Emma Thompson was speaking with a Spanish accent. It just 100% destroyed the film for me. The entire film is in Spanglish and believe it or not for someone with such a strong British accent to immitate Spanglish (and I want to underline "immitate") is plain stupid. This film was such a mess I could not handle it at all.
Back to Kundera's film...I would have certainly used the Czech language to retell the story. I always thought that many in in the Czech Republic (then Czechoslovakia) saw this film as a Western propaganda, hence your comment that the film is not that well known by many of the younger Czechs and Slovaks. Being a Slav myself I find this to be one of the greatest films from the last 20 years. For me it meant so, so much....
Ciao,
Pro-B
Back to Kundera's film...I would have certainly used the Czech language to retell the story. I always thought that many in in the Czech Republic (then Czechoslovakia) saw this film as a Western propaganda, hence your comment that the film is not that well known by many of the younger Czechs and Slovaks. Being a Slav myself I find this to be one of the greatest films from the last 20 years. For me it meant so, so much....
Ciao,
Pro-B
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Other Side
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where are you from, by the way? Just curious. Nice discussion! That reminds me, I think Enemy at the Gates did it right, by having Russian characters simply speak in a formal British accent. For many of the actors, it was their accent, anyway. Of course, I think Bob Hoskins had a cheesy Slavic accent, but I can't remember. Like Amadeus: the actors using their accents. So what? We know the characters are German or Italian or whatever.
#31
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reminds me of one of my faves, THE BEAST (Kevin Reynolds-1988)
People who've watched the film couldnt understand why the Afghanis spoke in their native tounge, while the Ruskies-spoke perfect midwest American English!
Except for their characters names, not a single Russian accent to be heard:
"Da, Kapitan Moscovitch-ve vill execute the Kapitalist Dog at sunrise!"
I think had the whole movie had been subtitled, it would have done even poorer.
And it probably wouldnt have been made at all, had its parallels to the US and the Vietnam war not been thinly veiled behind the stories' Russian-Afghani conflict fo the early 1980s;
And believe it or not-the films story source was a stage play!
And what other movie can you see Geroge Dzundza weighing only 150 pounds?
An excellent film-too bad SONY cant remaster an extended version-instead we get the 3rd reissue of GODZILLA and the likes....
People who've watched the film couldnt understand why the Afghanis spoke in their native tounge, while the Ruskies-spoke perfect midwest American English!
Except for their characters names, not a single Russian accent to be heard:
"Da, Kapitan Moscovitch-ve vill execute the Kapitalist Dog at sunrise!"
I think had the whole movie had been subtitled, it would have done even poorer.
And it probably wouldnt have been made at all, had its parallels to the US and the Vietnam war not been thinly veiled behind the stories' Russian-Afghani conflict fo the early 1980s;
And believe it or not-the films story source was a stage play!
And what other movie can you see Geroge Dzundza weighing only 150 pounds?
An excellent film-too bad SONY cant remaster an extended version-instead we get the 3rd reissue of GODZILLA and the likes....
Last edited by Seashellz; 02-02-06 at 03:39 PM.
#32
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slop101
Ugh - the new Warner 2disc splits the movie up over the 2 discs and the image doesn't look any better than the Criterion.
I may rent it from Netflix to see the little doc that was added. Otherwise the same as the Criterion? Actually, Warner doesn't do inserts, so I'm guessing it may not include the Criterion essay.
#33
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm actually now a bit upset that I sold off my Criterion in anticipation of this release. I had moderate expectations, but this is pretty disappointing. Oh well...
#34
I have this pre-ordered at Columbia House. I'll keep the dvd, but it is disappointing that they have spread the movie on 2-discs and did not improve the image quality. Very rare that Warner's botches a release.
#35
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Damn. That sucks. Warner didn't have to do that......
I will stick with my Criterion Collection copy, and the MGM version I got cheap. This release will still tempt me if I ever find it on the cheap side though, and only because of the documentary feature.
Tell your Criterion versions to stay put.
I will stick with my Criterion Collection copy, and the MGM version I got cheap. This release will still tempt me if I ever find it on the cheap side though, and only because of the documentary feature.
Tell your Criterion versions to stay put.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Other Side
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Seashellz
Reminds me of one of my faves, THE BEAST (Kevin Reynolds-1988)
People who've watched the film couldnt understand why the Afghanis spoke in their native tounge, while the Ruskies-spoke perfect midwest American English!
People who've watched the film couldnt understand why the Afghanis spoke in their native tounge, while the Ruskies-spoke perfect midwest American English!
#37
DVD Talk Reviewer
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Blu-ray.com
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am working on the review as we speak (got the DVD this morning) and hopefully will have the review in the next 48 hours. I wanted to quickly point out however that this is one remarkably poor presentation: the transfer is mediocre at best (I have strong suspicions that it is the same master WB used in Europe), the film is split over two discs for no reason (I would have tolerated such a move if the transfer was cleaned up and visibly improved), there are tons of dust specks/dirt, and a visible contrast boosting. The only thing that I find slightly better than the Criterion release is the color scheme. Either way, a very, very poor treatment of a classic film.
My review should be up before the end of the week,
Ciao,
Pro-B
My review should be up before the end of the week,
Ciao,
Pro-B
#39
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aw man, why did I have to read this thread now? Not a good way to start the day. Can't believe Warner did this, I have to give them a big thumbs down for this. They better not keep this crap up.
#40
DVD Talk Reviewer
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Blu-ray.com
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SlingshotBandit
the reviews coming in from this thread =
now I guess I have to shell out more money to get the OOP Criterion version again.
now I guess I have to shell out more money to get the OOP Criterion version again.
Thank you,
Pro-B
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gary Tooze at DVD Beaver has posted his review with screencap comparisons---which don't appear nearly as dire as preliminary reports have suggested. I, too, am disappointed that Warner split the film over 2 discs, but the video presentation at least appears on a par with the 2001 Criterion transfer.
#43
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the link.
The just about last three screenshots there give DVDbeaver a whole new meaning. lol. I love that scene in the film with that gorgeous actress.
The just about last three screenshots there give DVDbeaver a whole new meaning. lol. I love that scene in the film with that gorgeous actress.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Other Side
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the screenshots, the Criterion image looks the best. The colors look the most natural. A lot of pixelisation going on in shadows or color variation--Day-Lewis' left shoulder, for example, in the first screen captures.
#47
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was planning on buying this (actually had it pre-ordered), but cancelled once I saw the screencaps on DVD Beaver (flawed or not, I still prefer the Criterion image). A brief doc was not enough to get me to buy it. It has indeed gone out of print, quickly and quietly.
It's a shame that this great film can't seem to stay in print for long. I'm glad I held onto my Criterion.
It's a shame that this great film can't seem to stay in print for long. I'm glad I held onto my Criterion.