Got the Scarface box set yesterday - impressions on the whole thing within
#52
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just picked it up and threw it in. Transfer looks good, pretty much what I expected.
Either way, it feels great to FINALLY see it on my DVD rack.
Oh, and VERY cool menus also! Diggin them.
Either way, it feels great to FINALLY see it on my DVD rack.
Oh, and VERY cool menus also! Diggin them.
Last edited by PJsig08; 09-30-03 at 01:38 PM.
#53
Banned
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Right now, my location is DVDTalk, but then again, you should already know that, shouldn't you?
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
In the history of DVD, this may be the first title I've purchased with full knowledge of a special boxed set version, yet just settled for the standard release anyway. Sure, I've purchased many titles (SUPERMAN, 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, etc.) that came out with a big collector's boxed set after the fact, and in at least one case (PULP FICTION), I was not aware of the collector's boxed set version when I purchased the standard release, but with SCARFACE, I knew the deal up front, and still chose to pass on the box. This is unprecedented for me--I'm a studio's wet dream when it comes to always shelling out the $ for the biggest, baddest version available, but today, I discovered my limit: a $29 difference (I price-matched Cirtcuit City) between the standard release and the boxed set--for what?! A goofy money clip (thanks Universal, I can enjoy Tony Montana without actually wanting to be the punk), a handful of slick--but not $29 slick--lobby cards, and a DVD of the original, "sorry, I'm sure it was great for it's time, but frankly, I found it to be weak and bland" version of the story? No thanks--if you'd thrown in a screenplay, or one-sheet reprint, or exclusive bonus DVD of more "making of" material, or even a Senitype film cel, I'd have made the plunge, but as it is, this boxed set defines uninspired marketing to me. All told, it's no biggie--the fact that I have both the original DVD release of this film (with the trailers, oh thank heavens!) and the Anniversary Edition, I feel like I managed to have the biggest, baddest version anyway...
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Steps
Check the 'Bargains" section.
Coconuts (weekly) flyer has the gift set for $49.99 with a $20 rebate. At $29.99 it's hard to pass up.
Check the 'Bargains" section.
Coconuts (weekly) flyer has the gift set for $49.99 with a $20 rebate. At $29.99 it's hard to pass up.
#55
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by Filmmaker
In the history of DVD, this may be the first title I've purchased with full knowledge of a special boxed set version, yet just settled for the standard release anyway. Sure, I've purchased many titles (SUPERMAN, 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, etc.) that came out with a big collector's boxed set after the fact, and in at least one case (PULP FICTION), I was not aware of the collector's boxed set version when I purchased the standard release, but with SCARFACE, I knew the deal up front, and still chose to pass on the box. This is unprecedented for me--I'm a studio's wet dream when it comes to always shelling out the $ for the biggest, baddest version available, but today, I discovered my limit: a $29 difference (I price-matched Cirtcuit City) between the standard release and the boxed set--for what?! A goofy money clip (thanks Universal, I can enjoy Tony Montana without actually wanting to be the punk), a handful of slick--but not $29 slick--lobby cards, and a DVD of the original, "sorry, I'm sure it was great for it's time, but frankly, I found it to be weak and bland" version of the story? No thanks--if you'd thrown in a screenplay, or one-sheet reprint, or exclusive bonus DVD of more "making of" material, or even a Senitype film cel, I'd have made the plunge, but as it is, this boxed set defines uninspired marketing to me. All told, it's no biggie--the fact that I have both the original DVD release of this film (with the trailers, oh thank heavens!) and the Anniversary Edition, I feel like I managed to have the biggest, baddest version anyway...
In the history of DVD, this may be the first title I've purchased with full knowledge of a special boxed set version, yet just settled for the standard release anyway. Sure, I've purchased many titles (SUPERMAN, 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, etc.) that came out with a big collector's boxed set after the fact, and in at least one case (PULP FICTION), I was not aware of the collector's boxed set version when I purchased the standard release, but with SCARFACE, I knew the deal up front, and still chose to pass on the box. This is unprecedented for me--I'm a studio's wet dream when it comes to always shelling out the $ for the biggest, baddest version available, but today, I discovered my limit: a $29 difference (I price-matched Cirtcuit City) between the standard release and the boxed set--for what?! A goofy money clip (thanks Universal, I can enjoy Tony Montana without actually wanting to be the punk), a handful of slick--but not $29 slick--lobby cards, and a DVD of the original, "sorry, I'm sure it was great for it's time, but frankly, I found it to be weak and bland" version of the story? No thanks--if you'd thrown in a screenplay, or one-sheet reprint, or exclusive bonus DVD of more "making of" material, or even a Senitype film cel, I'd have made the plunge, but as it is, this boxed set defines uninspired marketing to me. All told, it's no biggie--the fact that I have both the original DVD release of this film (with the trailers, oh thank heavens!) and the Anniversary Edition, I feel like I managed to have the biggest, baddest version anyway...
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Filmmaker
In the history of DVD, this may be the first title I've purchased with full knowledge of a special boxed set version, yet just settled for the standard release anyway. Sure, I've purchased many titles (SUPERMAN, 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, etc.) that came out with a big collector's boxed set after the fact, and in at least one case (PULP FICTION), I was not aware of the collector's boxed set version when I purchased the standard release, but with SCARFACE, I knew the deal up front, and still chose to pass on the box. This is unprecedented for me--I'm a studio's wet dream when it comes to always shelling out the $ for the biggest, baddest version available, but today, I discovered my limit: a $29 difference (I price-matched Cirtcuit City) between the standard release and the boxed set--for what?! A goofy money clip (thanks Universal, I can enjoy Tony Montana without actually wanting to be the punk), a handful of slick--but not $29 slick--lobby cards, and a DVD of the original, "sorry, I'm sure it was great for it's time, but frankly, I found it to be weak and bland" version of the story? No thanks--if you'd thrown in a screenplay, or one-sheet reprint, or exclusive bonus DVD of more "making of" material, or even a Senitype film cel, I'd have made the plunge, but as it is, this boxed set defines uninspired marketing to me. All told, it's no biggie--the fact that I have both the original DVD release of this film (with the trailers, oh thank heavens!) and the Anniversary Edition, I feel like I managed to have the biggest, baddest version anyway...
In the history of DVD, this may be the first title I've purchased with full knowledge of a special boxed set version, yet just settled for the standard release anyway. Sure, I've purchased many titles (SUPERMAN, 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, etc.) that came out with a big collector's boxed set after the fact, and in at least one case (PULP FICTION), I was not aware of the collector's boxed set version when I purchased the standard release, but with SCARFACE, I knew the deal up front, and still chose to pass on the box. This is unprecedented for me--I'm a studio's wet dream when it comes to always shelling out the $ for the biggest, baddest version available, but today, I discovered my limit: a $29 difference (I price-matched Cirtcuit City) between the standard release and the boxed set--for what?! A goofy money clip (thanks Universal, I can enjoy Tony Montana without actually wanting to be the punk), a handful of slick--but not $29 slick--lobby cards, and a DVD of the original, "sorry, I'm sure it was great for it's time, but frankly, I found it to be weak and bland" version of the story? No thanks--if you'd thrown in a screenplay, or one-sheet reprint, or exclusive bonus DVD of more "making of" material, or even a Senitype film cel, I'd have made the plunge, but as it is, this boxed set defines uninspired marketing to me. All told, it's no biggie--the fact that I have both the original DVD release of this film (with the trailers, oh thank heavens!) and the Anniversary Edition, I feel like I managed to have the biggest, baddest version anyway...
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by agent2099
Only problem with this is I don't want mutilate my DVD case.
Only problem with this is I don't want mutilate my DVD case.
#60
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Filmmaker
In the history of DVD, this may be the first title I've purchased with full knowledge of a special boxed set version, yet just settled for the standard release anyway. Sure, I've purchased many titles (SUPERMAN, 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, etc.) that came out with a big collector's boxed set after the fact, and in at least one case (PULP FICTION), I was not aware of the collector's boxed set version when I purchased the standard release, but with SCARFACE, I knew the deal up front, and still chose to pass on the box. This is unprecedented for me--I'm a studio's wet dream when it comes to always shelling out the $ for the biggest, baddest version available, but today, I discovered my limit: a $29 difference (I price-matched Cirtcuit City) between the standard release and the boxed set--for what?! A goofy money clip (thanks Universal, I can enjoy Tony Montana without actually wanting to be the punk), a handful of slick--but not $29 slick--lobby cards, and a DVD of the original, "sorry, I'm sure it was great for it's time, but frankly, I found it to be weak and bland" version of the story? No thanks--if you'd thrown in a screenplay, or one-sheet reprint, or exclusive bonus DVD of more "making of" material, or even a Senitype film cel, I'd have made the plunge, but as it is, this boxed set defines uninspired marketing to me. All told, it's no biggie--the fact that I have both the original DVD release of this film (with the trailers, oh thank heavens!) and the Anniversary Edition, I feel like I managed to have the biggest, baddest version anyway...
In the history of DVD, this may be the first title I've purchased with full knowledge of a special boxed set version, yet just settled for the standard release anyway. Sure, I've purchased many titles (SUPERMAN, 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, etc.) that came out with a big collector's boxed set after the fact, and in at least one case (PULP FICTION), I was not aware of the collector's boxed set version when I purchased the standard release, but with SCARFACE, I knew the deal up front, and still chose to pass on the box. This is unprecedented for me--I'm a studio's wet dream when it comes to always shelling out the $ for the biggest, baddest version available, but today, I discovered my limit: a $29 difference (I price-matched Cirtcuit City) between the standard release and the boxed set--for what?! A goofy money clip (thanks Universal, I can enjoy Tony Montana without actually wanting to be the punk), a handful of slick--but not $29 slick--lobby cards, and a DVD of the original, "sorry, I'm sure it was great for it's time, but frankly, I found it to be weak and bland" version of the story? No thanks--if you'd thrown in a screenplay, or one-sheet reprint, or exclusive bonus DVD of more "making of" material, or even a Senitype film cel, I'd have made the plunge, but as it is, this boxed set defines uninspired marketing to me. All told, it's no biggie--the fact that I have both the original DVD release of this film (with the trailers, oh thank heavens!) and the Anniversary Edition, I feel like I managed to have the biggest, baddest version anyway...
You call it bland but you need to take the time period in which the film was made into perspective. Your not going to find too many "R" rated films, let alone films with chainsaw weilding drug dealers in them, during the 1930's.
IMO, it's one of the best Gangster films. Paul Muni's performance is fantastic. While they are totally different films, you can see a lot of similarities / scenes / themes borrowed from the 1932 version.
This was the only reason I purchased the box set. Perhaps I could have waited for Universal to release it seperately, but I wanted it now.
Unispired marketing? I would tend to agree, but in my case, it was smart marketing on their part. I had to buy a bunch of junk to get one of my all time favorites. Those marketing bastards!!!
Last edited by dgc; 10-01-03 at 11:37 AM.
#61
Banned
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Right now, my location is DVDTalk, but then again, you should already know that, shouldn't you?
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
dgc, I'm not bagging on the film--I did note it may have been the bee's knees when it was originally released--it's just that, in my never humble opinion, it doesn't stand the test of time. I found myself chuckling throughout when I saw it a few years ago, and I couldn't derive a trace of tension out of the entire film, not even when Muni was hurtling wheelchair users down staircases. It's all subjective, of course, but it doesn't have what, say, a WIZARD OF OZ, a METROPOLIS, a virtually-any-given-Hitchcock-film has...continued relevance and impact, even for modern audiences. You note the intriguing similarities between the original and the 1983 remake, but they only serve to show me the enormity of the remake's script, performance and production design improvements over the original. I'm really happy that you're happy with your purchase--drinks all around!--but again, for me, it was part of a stunningly unimpressive incentive on Universal's part for me to shell out nearly $30 more than for the 1983 stand-alone disc. My comments are not meant to disparage those who find worth in the boxed set, but merely to opine that I hope future boxed set releases from this studio and others try to up the ante, 'cause if you can't get a total marketing whore's (like me) money, you must be doing something wrong...
#64
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the sound is awful on this DVD. They give it the full 5.1 DD and DTS treatment and yet I've never bought a disc that was this quiet (except the old Scarface DVD). I needed to almost double my normal volume setting to get a comfortable volume. Even with 5.1 channels it sounded strikingly similar to the stereo mix on the old collectors edition. Hardly any activity from the back, muted dialog....I know its not Saving Private Ryan, but at least they could have kicked it up a notch.
#65
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with Filmmaker. It's very rare that I'd pass on a box set - especially when it's a film I love - and I'm a big fan of DePalma's Scarface. Bought the first version in '98, and dropped $16 yesterday on the re-issue at Circuit City. I am not a fan of the 1932 original and didn't need reprinted lobby cards or a money clip. The extra $30 I would have dropped on a box set was well spent on other discs - The Man Who Laughs, The Kids Are Alright and Dreamcatcher.
#67
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I got mine yesterday...the box is DAMN cool. I have still yet to watch it, since I am i the processing of moving. But it's DAMN cool.....and for only $28 for the box set...it could not be beat. I'll spend the extra $13 for all the extra stuff!
#68
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love the box, but it's too big for my shelves. I just took the dvd's out and put them with my original copy of Scarface.
Picked mine up at FYE for $49.99 and already sent in for the $20 rebate. Also, I got a free Scarface theatrical poster when I bought it--not too shabby IMO. If I can frame it I will put it on the wall with my other posters.
Picked mine up at FYE for $49.99 and already sent in for the $20 rebate. Also, I got a free Scarface theatrical poster when I bought it--not too shabby IMO. If I can frame it I will put it on the wall with my other posters.
#70
DVD Talk Reviewer
Well I picked mine up the second Best Buy openned but I just had the chance to finish watching both films. I love this set. I love that little money clip. I love the cards that came with it. And I love how the Al Pacino version sits in the red cloth. Gives it that special treatment that it deserves. And underneath, the 1932 version, great setup there for this. And it's cool that the 1932 version was included with and only with this set. I love old films and I love old black and white shows, and I for the first time seeing the original scarface, really have to say I liked it. It was like the newer scarface, just back about 70 years, heh. And it was shorter and more to the point, which gave it that entertaining old fashioned 'fun' movie kind of feel. Thumbs up.
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Barre, Massachusetts
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone out here know how many of these Scarface Deluxe Box sets were actually pressed? I'm kind of surprised that these weren't a numbered limited edition?
Someone on Ebay has an auction for this and says only 2000 were made, and they are ALL sold out? I'm having a little hard time believing that one though? Although they are scarce even around here, in the Boston area.
I just basically would like to know if anyone knows if this was how many were made?
Someone on Ebay has an auction for this and says only 2000 were made, and they are ALL sold out? I'm having a little hard time believing that one though? Although they are scarce even around here, in the Boston area.
I just basically would like to know if anyone knows if this was how many were made?
#72
Banned
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Right now, my location is DVDTalk, but then again, you should already know that, shouldn't you?
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally posted by Giallofan:
Someone on Ebay has an auction for this and says only 2000 were made
I haven't heard anything of the sort, but if it's true, then the Best Buy in Tulsa, OK must have half of 'em...
Someone on Ebay has an auction for this and says only 2000 were made
I haven't heard anything of the sort, but if it's true, then the Best Buy in Tulsa, OK must have half of 'em...
#73
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Woodbridge Va.
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got mine from Amazon yesterday. It's sitting there on the top shelf of my dvd collection. It's still in it's package. I haven't opened it yet. It's beconing me to open her. I will this friday night. It's too beautiful to open.
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Possible disc error?
Just watched the GIFT SET version of Scarface (83), and right after Tony
the disc pauses, skips for a few seconds, then a blue screen saying "disc error" came on the TV. I removed the disc, checked it over, looked fine, put it back in, skipped to chapter 35, and it worked. Could this be a future problem? Any one else have this error?
Just watched the GIFT SET version of Scarface (83), and right after Tony
is shot to death |
the disc pauses, skips for a few seconds, then a blue screen saying "disc error" came on the TV. I removed the disc, checked it over, looked fine, put it back in, skipped to chapter 35, and it worked. Could this be a future problem? Any one else have this error?