Release List Reviews Shop Join News DVD Giveaways Video Games Advertise
DVD Reviews | Theatrical Reviews | Adult DVD Reviews | Video Game Reviews | Price Search Buy Stuff Here
DVD Talk
DVD Reviews DVD Talk Headlines HD Reviews


Add to My Yahoo! - RSS 2.0 - RSS 2.0 - DVD Talk Podcast RSS -


Go Back   DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Reviews and Recommendations

DVD Reviews and Recommendations Read, Post and Request DVD Reviews.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-06-99, 11:07 AM   #1
consoleman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 493
I've read plenty of bad reviews of the movie "Batman and Robin" and I pretty much stayed away thinking it was must be one of the worst movies made ever as movies based on comic book characters go (as bad as Superman 3 and 4). Well, just last week, I couldn't resist and rented it on DVD, and to my surprise, I didn't think it was bad at all.

While I did enjoy the first "Batman" movie a lot and the second one and third I thought was OK, I guess I'm not into "dark" movies as much as other movie fans are. The "lighter" feel of "Batman and Robin" with a more comic-book feel to it was more to my liking. Even though the storyline isn't particularly strong, and George Clooney is not exactly the most believable Batman, I still found the movie entertaining.

Anyone else out there feel this way or am I pretty much alone in this view?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-99, 11:24 AM   #2
Cartload
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Larryville, GA
Posts: 2,074
Well, after I saw Batman & Robin in the theater, my friend and I were really ticked off since we felt as though two hours of our lives had been robbed from us. However, the second time I saw it on HBO (there was nothing better on), I bsically treated it as though I were watching a comedy, and it wasn't that bad. Basically, just lower your expectations, and you might find just as I did that it is a funny movie because it is just so frickin' stupid. Kind of like Vegas Vacation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-99, 11:50 AM   #3
consoleman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 493
I did crack up quite a number of times while watching, which is surprising given it is a "Batman" movie. The first 3 were dark and serious with only occassional humorous moments, but nothing like this.

I don't know when or if they'll get around to making a 5th movie but they say Clooney is still the one to play Batman.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-99, 12:40 PM   #4
Al Infinitum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 377
Funniest comment, walking out of the theater:

"Even the music sucked."

Some random girl walking out in front of me said it. Had me laughing all the way home. This movie is pretty bad. Down there with Very Bad Things and Deep Blue Sea. Sadly, I payed to see all three in the theater. I have only myself to blame.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-99, 01:04 PM   #5
Apparition
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 478
Well, I agree that Batman & Robin pretty much sucked. My girlfriend hated it more than I did, though. At least it had a certain visual gloss to it, which is more than I can say for Superman 3 or 4. However, for an action film, it was surprisingly boring and George Clooney was pretty bad as Batman. I remember one scene in the film where he says "I'm Batman" and I was thinking "No you're not. Get the hell out of here!"

However, I wouldn't ever compare it to Deep Blue Sea, which I think was the best film to come out this summer (already preordered).

--Apparition
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-99, 01:44 PM   #6
DodgingCars
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: The L.A.
Posts: 18,120
Check this out. I got it from http://www.cinescape.com


Keanu Talks His
‘Batman 5’
Though the Batman movie franchise appears to have been put on the development back burner at Warner Bros.,interest remains high among
fans of the series. Now, out of the U.K. comes word of what Keanu Reeves would look
like see happen with the series should he be given the part... or in order for him to take it.

While talking to the TV Times movie magazine (via Empire magazine), The Matrix star was asked how he would approach the title role in a possible Batman 5. Reeves revealed, "It'll have to be dark, very sombre. Something that'll make people think twice about whether they're actually watching a Batman film or not...I want to see more about what makes [Batman] tick- Bruce is far more than just
your average wacko."

Reeves also explains who he would insist battle the caped crusader should he be allowed to wear the bat-suit, saying, "I would have to insist, and I mean most strenuously, that any Batman film I'm
involved in would have to have The Joker in it-absolutely. He's the archetypal bad guy, the Bat-nemesis. He's the dude with whom the Bat must battle- he's in the film, or I'm not! And Jack Nicholson has to do it again - definitely."

Okay, is there something in what Reeves is
suggesting? Maybe it’s just his wish list, but perhaps there’s something more. Reeves is
certainly high profile enough… though probably miscast, in the part. In addition, given the success of The Matrix at Warner Bros. and the studio’s desire to hang on to Reeves, one can’t help but wonder if Reeves statements were intended to elicit some interest from inside. On the other hand,
maybe he’s been asked and has put together a
scenario that would be impossible to put together to prevent having to take the role.

Maybe he was just kidding around. Time will tell.


Keanu as Batman? Woah!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-99, 02:02 PM   #7
consoleman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 493
Well, Keanu Reeves being the next Batman would be interesting. As for possibly being miscast - heck, when the first Batman movie was being made and I heard that Michael Keaton was cast, I was cracking up but Keaton did a great job.

Now, getting Jack Nicholson back in the role of the Joker would be something to see. They would have to do something big with the story though being that they killed him off in the first film, but as in all stories from the comics, they just keep coming back.

Just keep your fingers crossed that something comes out of this, as it probably is with the case of Nicholas Cage possibly playing "Superman".
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-99, 10:05 PM   #8
Al Infinitum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 377
Keanu as Batman? "Miscast" would be something of an understatement. The only superhero I could see him playing would have to be one of the characters in Mystery Men. I also felt that Jack Nicholson was miscast as the Joker. Call me crazy, but if he could have gone "dark," Jim Carrey would have been perfect for the role. Of course, I don't think he was a star back then. Alas.

Deep Blue Sea, "best movie of the summer?" I'll tell you, that is one of the most interesting things about this forum; so many movie lovers in one place, so many different styles. At least tell me you thought it was good based on it's B-movie, MST3K appeal. I refuse to accept that anyone enjoyed it as a thriller. This movie is the result of a Conan O'Brien, "If They Mated," featuring Jurassic Park and Jaws; take the worst elements of each and you've got yourself a freak show.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-99, 11:24 PM   #9
3rainiac
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 95
Yes, this movie was "really that bad". Worst movie ever made.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-99, 04:37 AM   #10
Joseph B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 290
Whoa!

The Joker was not "killed off" in the original Batman. At least, not in a totally definite manner.

I remember reading that Nicholson had so much fun playing the character that he asked Burton to give him a way to reprise the role should he chose to do so. Burton did. If you notice, just before the scene when The Joker is seen dancing on the loose tiles on the roof, there is a closeup of one of the statues. The Jokers' coat is clearly seen draped on the statue. Yet, The Joker who later falls to his death is wearing the coat. The inference here of course is that The Joker changed places with a henchman who had been made up to look like him just before the "death scene".

Besides, in the actual comic The Joker has probabaly "died" at least three dozen times!

Joseph
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-99, 01:01 PM   #11
Cartload
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Larryville, GA
Posts: 2,074
When Clooney said, "Hi Frezze, I'm Batman." I wanted to scream out, "Oh, is that why you're wearing that ridiculous outfit?"
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-99, 04:23 PM   #12
buckee1
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
buckee1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Minding the precious things in the Local Shop
Posts: 4,107
The movie wasn't that bad. It suffered from amon other things way too many villians & batgit I mean Batgirl. Ahnold was way cool as Freeze.(actually conjured up a bit of Preminger in his campiness) I actually thought that Tommy Lee Jones as Two Face in Batman Forever contributed to making that a horrible film. That and Val kilmer. the Riddler was the only saving grace there as was Mr. Freeze here. I can't help but think that I'm forgetting a villian in Batman & Robin. Maybe your're right and it is that bad if I can't remember everybody!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-99, 04:23 PM   #13
buckee1
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
buckee1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Minding the precious things in the Local Shop
Posts: 4,107
The movie wasn't that bad. It suffered from among other things way too many villians & batgit I mean Batgirl. Ahnold was way cool as Freeze.(actually conjured up a bit of Preminger in his campiness) I actually thought that Tommy Lee Jones as Two Face in Batman Forever contributed to making that a horrible film. That and Val kilmer. the Riddler was the only saving grace there as was Mr. Freeze here. I can't help but think that I'm forgetting a villian in Batman & Robin. Maybe your're right and it is that bad if I can't remember everybody!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-99, 04:24 PM   #14
buckee1
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
buckee1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Minding the precious things in the Local Shop
Posts: 4,107
sorry about the double post!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-99, 02:54 AM   #15
Joe Ben
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 153
I thought batman and robin was horrible, I recommend the animated movie "Batman & Mr.Freeze: Subzero"
Actually I am a Batman fan, but I don't care for any of the live action movies, I love the animated series. "Batman Mask of the Phantasm" is not only the BEST Batman movie, but its also one of my favorite movies. lots of action and Bruce Wayne character is really devloped. and I love the music. does anyone know if either one of thes movies will be released on dvd anytime soon?
I also agree that Jack Nicholson was wrong for the joker, the joker needs to be dark and whacky.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-99, 08:44 PM   #16
JoeC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Bucks County, PA USA
Posts: 322
Yes, it was that bad.

'nuff said.

JoeC...who vows never to waste his time watching that one again
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-99, 11:40 PM   #17
Master J
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,447
Jack Nicholson not dark and wacky? Maybe you never saw the Shining...one of the greatest horror films in my opinion..Now that was a dark, scary, and maniacal role he played..

Master J
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-00, 05:24 PM   #18
Spiderbite
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Spiderbite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 9,605
this movie is worse than your most negative expectations. i can say that i was never truly bored more with an "action" movie.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-00, 05:31 PM   #19
Groucho
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 66,924
I personally would pay to see Reeves and Nicholson in a Batman movie...if Burton was brought back to direct.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-00, 05:34 PM   #20
sfsdfd
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: |-|@><0r L@n|)
Posts: 17,214
Batman 3 was bad because Val Kilmer can't act, Jim Carrey acted way too much, and the mad anger exhibited by Tommy Lee Jones got annoying after a while.

Batman 4 was horrid for two reasons: lame sets and frighteningly bad dialogue (marred further by bad line delivery... I think the actors knew they sounded stupid.)

The Day-Glo thugs in both Batman 3 and 4 need to get ditched.

As for Keanu: I can't picture Batman saying DUDE!

- David Stein
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-00, 07:26 PM   #21
bluemagic
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,609
Don't forget the two main words that caused Batman 3 and 4 to suck so much:

Joel Schumacher
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-00, 07:32 PM   #22
cyforce
Cool New Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 35
Yeap, JOEL, the guy that made STREET FIGHTER hahahahahah
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-00, 02:42 AM   #23
GlennS
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: NYC
Posts: 232
Short Answer: YES!!!

Long Answer: The first Batman was ok. Good for the Nicholson parts. Michael Keaton wasn't great but didn't suck. Kim Basinger sucked but didn't ruin it. The main thing was there was just enough story. Story(and character) overkill has sunk every subsequent Batman film since and the chickens really came home to roost on the last one. It appears that the studio decided that we needed characters in the movie to represent every demographic group available to see it. This formula equals a big mess with all targeted groups being unsatisfied. But at least 2 and 3 had good actors like Michelle Pfeiffer, Danny DeVito, Christopher Walken, Jim Carrey, and Tommy Lee Jones(whose role, at least onscreen, was severely underwritten because the decision was made to make it Carrey's movie). The last one finally suffered from overkill excess. With bad performances from the villains, all the demographic placements crowding even more than before, not to mention Alfred's illness, well, this was a recipe for complete and total failure. One of the worst movies I have ever seen. I went in hoping it would be a pleasant waste of time. It was more of a waste of time than I could have possibly imagined, and the farthest thing from pleasant. There were some truly horrendous performances from Schwarzenegger and Thurman, but the true culprit in this wretched cinematic crime is Joel Schumacher. Some have labelled Mr. Schumacher the Antichrist, but I think the Biblical connection is much simpler. He simply sold his soul to Satan for his success in the '80's and this movie was his payback. Satan still allows him to work but anyone who saw Flawless knows this man is never getting his soul back.

What th'? Did I black out or something? All I remember is someone mentioning something about Batman & Robin. I flew into a rage and came to just now. Did I write something?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-00, 02:51 PM   #24
monkey
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Kalamazoo, MI, USA
Posts: 1,550
"Batman and Robin": Is it really that bad?

Hell yes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-00, 10:45 PM   #25
bluedevil
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,638
There are very few movies that I just despise. This is one of them. I don't konw what Joel Shumacher wasa thinking.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 PM.

Rules - DVD Talk - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright 2011 DVDTalk.com All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.