Release List Reviews Shop Join News DVD Giveaways Video Games Advertise
DVD Reviews | Theatrical Reviews | Adult DVD Reviews | Video Game Reviews | Price Search Buy Stuff Here
DVD Talk
DVD Reviews DVD Talk Headlines HD Reviews


Add to My Yahoo! - RSS 2.0 - RSS 2.0 - DVD Talk Podcast RSS -


Go Back   DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Reviews and Recommendations

DVD Reviews and Recommendations Read, Post and Request DVD Reviews.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-20-04, 08:50 AM   #1
psxfan2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Earth
Posts: 673
DVD Talk review of 'Rush In Rio'

I read Matthew Millheiser's DVD review of Rush In Rio at http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=9093 and...
would disagree on the audio portion of his review and thought the crowd noise should have been toned down more than a bit, Geddy's vocals are drowned out by the crowd almost to the point of distraction a big disapointment in what could have been a great rush video for this fan.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-04, 09:27 AM   #2
Hokeyboy
DVD Talk Legend
 
Hokeyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 15,513
Hi there.

I'd agree to a point. The 6-channel mix is definitely trigger happy with the crowd noise. I fiddled with my receiver's settings a tad to achieve a better delivery of the audio (listening to Rush live is a different aural delivery than listening to, say, Bad Boys 2, and adjustments should be made). Even with that, it's still a really good presentation of the show, if not just the music. Those Brazilians sure are into Rush, I tell you what...

The 2.0 channel is definitely superior if you want a fantastic representation of the music.
__________________
Some say God made them like that. Did God make dwarfs like that? Or retards? Or 2 headed twins? - wm lopez

i saw hangover, i just laughed a lot, so i believe hangover is comedy movie. - Ganesh Ujwal

But there's still HOKEYBLOG!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-04, 10:27 AM   #3
colossus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The lack of DTS was a bigger minus than the lack of an anamorphic transfer...

that said, this DVD really rocks!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-04, 04:19 PM   #4
psxfan2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Earth
Posts: 673
yeah the 2.0 is a better way to enjoy the disc, but than you ask yourself, why downgrade?
thanks.........
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-04, 10:14 AM   #5
deltufjp
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 13
I disliked the presentation every bit as much as the ridiculous audio mix. For a 20+ camera shoot they sure don't have much by way of interesting angles. The lighting is way too dark (I mean, they did know they were filming, right?), and the editing seems to have been done by someone with epilepsy.

The lack of an anamorphic transfer, at the end of 2003, is beyond comprehension. Shame for a band with such a consistent level of quality across media. Have a look at the new Peter Gabriel Growing Up Live DVD for an example of solid presentation.

That said, for fans, the CD audio mix is still worth having.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-04, 12:16 PM   #6
Rypro 525
DVD Talk Hero
 
Rypro 525's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: a frikin hellhole
Posts: 27,544
i read on thedigitalbits.com that an anamorphic transfer would have made the transfer look worse, not better then the current transfer, and that a dts track wouldn't fit.
__________________
Follow me: http://twitter.com/TheChewDefense
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 AM.

Rules - DVD Talk - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright 2011 DVDTalk.com All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.