Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Comic Book Talk
Reload this Page >

DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

Community
Search
Comic Book Talk The Place to talk about Comics

DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-15, 09:13 AM
  #26  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
rocket1312's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,218
Likes: 0
Received 978 Likes on 689 Posts
Re: DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

Originally Posted by kodave
Check out any of Dark Horse's Library Editions, like Fear Agent or Hellboy. Or their insanely sized Big Damn Sin City and The Colossal Conan books. The latter are manufacturing masterpieces.

On the Image side, there's just stuff like the recent Saga and Revival hardcover editions, but they're still very nicely done compared to some of Marvel and DC's oversized non-Omnibus offerings.
Those library editions are pretty nice, but I've never had the opportunity to really inspect the binding on one of them. I'll have to see if can get a good look at one next time I see one at the store. They do have significantly less content than the average Marvel omnibus, so I don't think they're a great comparison in that regard. They probably do compare favorably to the non-omnibus hardcovers.

The Sin City and Conan books are obviously much more comparable to an omnibus, but again, I've never been able to look closely at their construction. I will say that Sin City being mostly b/w will reduce cost. Also, that Conan book is more expensive than any Marvel Omnibus, so I would hope that it's of a high quality.
Old 05-14-15, 09:50 AM
  #27  
DVD Talk Hero
 
slop101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 43,908
Received 444 Likes on 311 Posts
Re: DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

At first, DC was doing their "Absolute" editions when Marvel first started trotting out their Omnibuses. The Absolutes don't have as many issues, but they contain much better paper, reproduction, binding, on an even bigger format - as far a physical book, the Absolutes are much nicer than Omnibuses. But yes, they don't collect as many issues, and certainly nothing that old - oldest being Watchmen and Sandman.

But then DC's always played second fiddle to Marvel when it comes to collected trade books.
Old 05-14-15, 02:28 PM
  #28  
DVD Talk Hero
 
PhantomStranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Phantom Zone
Posts: 27,511
Received 811 Likes on 685 Posts
Re: DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

The Absolute editions are nice, though I have to question some of their choices for that line.
Old 05-14-15, 02:41 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

Originally Posted by rocket1312
Those library editions are pretty nice, but I've never had the opportunity to really inspect the binding on one of them. I'll have to see if can get a good look at one next time I see one at the store. They do have significantly less content than the average Marvel omnibus, so I don't think they're a great comparison in that regard. They probably do compare favorably to the non-omnibus hardcovers.

The Sin City and Conan books are obviously much more comparable to an omnibus, but again, I've never been able to look closely at their construction. I will say that Sin City being mostly b/w will reduce cost. Also, that Conan book is more expensive than any Marvel Omnibus, so I would hope that it's of a high quality.
There's no one set size for Marvel Omnibuses. Young Avengers, Devil Dinosaur, Punisher Max by Aaron, The Death of Captain America - they're all pretty thin for Omnibuses. And then there's stuff like X-Statix and Simonson's Thor on the other end of the spectrum.

Yeah the Library Editions are on the lower end of the number of issues collected, but they have so many extras and the build quality/paper quality on them is so good that they are physically just as wide as many Marvel Omnibuses, and much wider than other similar issue counts in Marvel books. The first Fear Agent Library Edition is MSRP $50, the same as Young Avengers Omnibus. They may be more expensive per issue most of the time but you're buying a premium product that Dark Horse delivers on quality wise, where as Marvel may give you more issues but they're cutting costs and decreasing quality where ever they can. If it wasn't for buyer backlash at DC's first Omnibuses, I bet Marvel would go back to glued binding instead of sewn binding to save costs.

The Colossal Conan has an MSRP of $150. Thor by Simonson Omnibus had a $125 MSRP. 50 versus 40 issues. More expensive? Yes. But the book is also half an inch thicker, 3 inches taller, and half an inch wider.

It's not a perfect one to one comparison, but if that's what a smaller company like Dark Horse can do and come in at that price, then Marvel and DC can do better, no question about it. Dark Horse barely has 5% of the market. Marvel and DC collectively occupy 65-70% of the marketplace. And both have mega corporations backing them up.

I think it's a pretty fair comparison to say Marvel and DC should be doing better in the Omnibus/Oversized department.

I will say DC's Absolute line has always been solid and there can't be that many qualms there. I've only heard about reproduction issues in the V For Vendetta Absolute Edition. Otherwise you're getting exactly what you paid for - carefully selected stories in a well constructed very premium format, and they're priced accordingly. But those aren't there to fill the roll Omnibuses generally fill.
Old 05-14-15, 03:01 PM
  #30  
DVD Talk Hero
 
slop101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 43,908
Received 444 Likes on 311 Posts
Re: DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
The Absolute editions are nice, though I have to question some of their choices for that line.
They mostly seem to be based on art, as the pages are huge, more than the story. And since they are blown up huge, they need to bee newer stories that they have better, higher resolution scans of the originals, rather than stuff from the '70s or '80s where they might not have everything to form a complete run. DC's actual physical archiving is for shit, which is part of the reason why DC doesn't put out a lot of trade collections, as they're missing a lot of the original material.
Old 05-14-15, 03:57 PM
  #31  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
rocket1312's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,218
Likes: 0
Received 978 Likes on 689 Posts
Re: DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

Originally Posted by kodave
The first Fear Agent Library Edition is MSRP $50, the same as Young Avengers Omnibus. They may be more expensive per issue most of the time but you're buying a premium product that Dark Horse delivers on quality wise, where as Marvel may give you more issues but they're cutting costs and decreasing quality where ever they can.
That's all true, but the implication earlier was that Dark Horse (and other smaller publishers) were giving better value for the money. It seems to me they're about the same. With one book you get higher quality materials and with another you get more content per dollar.

The Colossal Conan has an MSRP of $150. Thor by Simonson Omnibus had a $125 MSRP. 50 versus 40 issues. More expensive? Yes. But the book is also half an inch thicker, 3 inches taller, and half an inch wider.
Again, Dark Horse charges more for a better product. I don't see how that reflects poorly on Marvel. If Dark Horse sold that same Conan book for equal or less than the Thor book, then I'd see cause for concern.

It's not a perfect one to one comparison, but if that's what a smaller company like Dark Horse can do and come in at that price, then Marvel and DC can do better, no question about it. Dark Horse barely has 5% of the market. Marvel and DC collectively occupy 65-70% of the marketplace. And both have mega corporations backing them up. I think it's a pretty fair comparison to say Marvel and DC should be doing better in the Omnibus/Oversized department.
That's not how the economics on books like these work. There's no such thing as a volume discount on manufacturing for books with print runs in the low thousands. All things being equal, a 1200 page omnibus that sells 1000 copies published by Dark Horse is going to cost the same amount of money as a 1200 page omnibus that sells 1000 copies published by Marvel. It doesn't matter if there's a huge corporation backing the publisher or not.
Old 05-14-15, 04:17 PM
  #32  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Formerly known as Groucho AND Bandoman/Death Moans, Iowa
Posts: 18,295
Received 372 Likes on 266 Posts
Re: DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

But DC and Marvel are likely to get an overall better rate from a printer due to the quantity of material they're sending a lot more material than a smaller company like Image or Dark Horse.
Old 05-14-15, 05:44 PM
  #33  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,804
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts
Re: DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

The Big Damn Sin City is such an incredibly produced book. It's massive and you can get one for easily $60 bucks. Dark Horse is making the big Two look bad in comparison.
Old 05-14-15, 10:31 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

Originally Posted by rocket1312
That's all true, but the implication earlier was that Dark Horse (and other smaller publishers) were giving better value for the money. It seems to me they're about the same. With one book you get higher quality materials and with another you get more content per dollar.



Again, Dark Horse charges more for a better product. I don't see how that reflects poorly on Marvel. If Dark Horse sold that same Conan book for equal or less than the Thor book, then I'd see cause for concern.



That's not how the economics on books like these work. There's no such thing as a volume discount on manufacturing for books with print runs in the low thousands. All things being equal, a 1200 page omnibus that sells 1000 copies published by Dark Horse is going to cost the same amount of money as a 1200 page omnibus that sells 1000 copies published by Marvel. It doesn't matter if there's a huge corporation backing the publisher or not.
A 20% increase in price for a smaller publisher isn't that far fetched. And in this particular example, Colossal Conan sold barely over 400 units to the direct market in the first month of release, while Simonson's Thor sold 4 times that amount. Simonson's Thor went through multiple printings before release based on pre-order sales alone. In fact over a year after release Simonson's Thor sold just about as many copies in the direct market as Colossal Conan did in its first month of release.

Marvel and Dark Horse are not moving or printing similar quantities of these books. And for a while Marvel was drastically overprinting many of their Omnibuses (and other books).

Marvel also pumps out probably an Omnibus + per month on top of all of their hundreds of other trade collections. Dark Horse pretty much just had that one Colossal book, plus the occasional trade output. Again, Dark Horse only has 5% of the market. Marvel and DC are taking up anywhere from 30 to 40% each. You mean to tell me Marvel doesn't get any further discount from their printer for using them to continuously do business with? The sheer amount of business a company like Marvel would generate for a printer would lead one to believe they aren't paying the same prices a much smaller company like Dark Horse would have to pay.

Marvel did put out quality Omnibus builds and then one day decided to start cheaping out on them. These are big expensive books that likely don't have large profit margins, but it's not like the price of nicer paper skyrocketed overnight like a barrel of oil. Marvel figured out they could cut costs on production, charge the same amount OR MORE ($100 MSRP for 23 issues in the Punisher Max by Aaron Omnibus - an insane mark up per issue), which they've done, and pocket the difference. Meanwhile smaller companies that are a fraction of Marvel's size put out similar books in similar formats with more pleasing construction that are generally leaving people more pleased with their purchase. I think it's absolutely a fair criticism and comparison.

Marvel is free to keep doing what they're doing. They're a business. They want to make money. And as much as some collectors complain, business stays good for Marvel, for now. But I do think collectors are going to elect to start spending their money with smaller publishers like Dark Horse and Image more and more frequently.

Marvel couldn't even bother to put the issues in reading order for their Spider-Verse oversized hardcover that just came out. You have to consult the reading list and flip around in the book. That's a roughly 26 issue $75 MSRP book. Marvel didn't even put the correct title in the Edge of Spider-Verse TPB that came out. The title page says "Edge of Spider-Man." It's absurd. That's a 5 issue $16 MSRP trade. You can go buy a $15 MSRP 6 issue trade from Image where they'll at least get the title of the book correct.
Old 05-14-15, 11:07 PM
  #35  
DVD Talk Hero
 
slop101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 43,908
Received 444 Likes on 311 Posts
Re: DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

Originally Posted by kodave
And for a while Marvel was drastically overprinting many of their Omnibuses (and other books).
They were, and now they seem to be underprinting, as more than a few of the Omnibuses released within the last year have gone out of print and went up in price in the second hand market far quicker than other years.
Old 05-15-15, 09:24 AM
  #36  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
rocket1312's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,218
Likes: 0
Received 978 Likes on 689 Posts
Re: DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

I'm not going to get into the minutiae of the printing business, but I will say that even if Marvel is printing 5000 copies of a book and Dark Horse is printing 1000 copies of a similar book, both of those books would still probably be considered short run titles. In other words, they would still fall into the same pricing bracket. Also, the production of Marvel's oversized hardcovers is done at a different facility than their tpbs. While it's all under the RR Donnelly umbrella, my guess is that whatever deal they have for the oversized books would be more or less independent of the paperback side of their catalog and I would be surprised if Marvel could get a significantly better rate on the printing vs. a smaller publisher. We'd be talking about fractions of a cent per page. The profit margins on that sort of manufacturing are low enough that there's not a lot of wiggle room for discounts.

I'm not going to try and defend Marvel and their business practices overall. I'm also not trying to downplay the quality of the work from the other publishers. They put out some really nice books. I mostly purchase omnibuses of older material and while I would agree that Marvel have cut costs in certain areas, I don't consider their books (at least the ones I buy) to be of a significantly lower value than the competition provides. Then again, I don't really see the omnibuses as a prestige product in the way that those Dark Horse library editions or DC Absolutes are. I see them as a great way to get copious amounts of classic material (and don't overlook the extra work that goes into reprinting pre-1990's material) in an oversized format, with quality reproduction and in the case of books involving guys like Jeph York and Cory Sedlmeier, top-notch editorial as it relates to what and how things are collected.
Old 05-15-15, 10:03 AM
  #37  
DVD Talk Hero
 
slop101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 43,908
Received 444 Likes on 311 Posts
Re: DC-Why so few Omnibuses?

The main thing that I like about these collections are bang for the buck. Sure, they have a big sticker price, but when you break it down, they are the best deal going. When an omnibus comes out, it can be easily found for half it's cover price. They contain 30 to 40 issues, and that comes out to around $1.50 per issue. That is a freaking steal when you consider that floppies these days are $4, not to mention that the omnibuses are over-sized, have better paper, have no ads and are hardbacks. I know you're supposed to support the books you love by buying floppies, but it's the quality AND the value of these collections that stopped me from buying floppies 7 or 8 years ago.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.